Noel
2005-03-20 13:30:08 UTC
JUDGE ENSOR IS AN ACCESSORY TO MURDER
Mr Charlton Harris was sentenced to 5 years in prison by
Judge James Goss as a result of false evidence given at his trial by
policemen. He always protested his innocence and that he was framed,
and after his release he embarked on steps to clear his name. He came
across my web site www.yorkshireripper.co.uk and when he studied it,
he became further incensed to see that the real Yorkshire Ripper was
allowed to remain free while a lunatic copycat killer, Peter Sutcliffe
was coaxed to confess to all the Ripper murders while he had been
locked up for a crime he didn't even commit. It was enough to tip him
over the edge to embark on a number of demonstrations to protest his
innocence. In pursuance of this he held up the traffic in Deansgate
Manchester for three days as he scaled scaffolding and protested his
innocence.
He was arrested after the three day demonstration and was facing
charges of disruption and public nuisance before judge Ensor and a
jury in Manchester Crown court the week ending 12 March 2005. After a
three day trial the jury failed to deliver a guilty verdict and he was
discharged a free man. The police failed to prove the charges they
leveled against him in a trial that had all the hall marks of a
vindictive and stage managed frame up.
Mr Harris was being legally assisted by his Mackenzie friend,
Londoner, Mr Patrick Cullinane who is an experienced case worker and
legal adviser. Mr Cullinane was only allowed to whisper to the
defendant and because of a raising of his voice at one stage he was
ordered to leave the court by the judge, leaving Mr Harris to flounder
without legal representation. The first two days of the trial were
taken up by police evidence and 23, yes twenty three, policemen had
full scope to tell all their evidence to the jury on behalf of the
prosecution. Mr Harris then called me to give my evidence as to the
authenticity of the claims about the Ripper still being at large. I
was sworn in and in the course of the next ten minutes I was stopped
at every statement I made by the judge and told to confine myself to
specific questions. My evidence was that I was the author of a book
which alleged that Peter Sutcliffe was a lunatic copycat killer who
was framed by corrupt policemen as the Ripper, while the real Ripper
is still a free man and living in Manchester at this time. I also
allege that there is a police cover up of the facts and that this is
supported by the media and the judiciary. I had a murder weapon in
the court which I acquired from the real Ripper and when I mentioned
it, I was quickly stopped and judge Ensor stifled my evidence as I
tried to tell the jury that Sutcliffe had been eliminated 12 times by
the police prior to his arrest because his blood group didn't match
the Ripper's.
I managed to say the bare bones of my allegations in the confusion and
the jury, which had a majority of women were clearly shocked by the
performance and the actions of judge Ensor in trying to silence me and
stifle the evidence. Harris claimed that the Ripper case had
influenced him in making his demonstration but Ensor claimed that the
Ripper case had nothing to do with the charges against Harris and in
his summing up he instructed the jury to ignore all my evidence.
Harris had the guts risk his liberty to go on a demonstration to
highlight the corruption of the judiciary. And so a mass murderer is
facilitated to remain free by judge Ensor, a man who should know
better.
Perhaps this episode will illustrate just why the system guarantees
murderers their freedom and also their apparent innocence when
innocent men and women are locked up for crimes they did not commit.
Judge Ensor is not alone unfit to be a judge of the courts but he is a
disgrace to them and to the Crown and to the people of Manchester who
pay his salary to dispense justice on their behalf. When serious
allegations such as mine are raised in his court it is his duty as a
judge and a respected leader in the community to ensure that those
allegations are brought to the attention of the proper authorities and
the very least he should have done was to order that a senior
policeman from an outside force attend and take my evidence in hand
and report back to him or otherwise he should have me arrested for
lying and perjury in his courtroom under oath.
Ensor, the legal man in blinkers, did neither because he was presiding
over a frame up of Harris by the police, all of whom led by Sergeant
Gavin had refused to take a copy of my allegations from me outside the
courtroom. They refused to do their duty when told that a murderer was
living in Manchester notwithstanding that two Ripper murders had taken
place there.
But while Ensor might be able to sleep at night without any qualms,
the jury had gotten the message and knowing that the Ripper was living
in their city they returned in confusion unable to reach a guilty
verdict as he had been directing them by blinkering them and he sent
them home for the night. When they resumed they were still in a state
of disagreement. Clearly the crown couldn't convince the jury that
Harris was guilty of a crime and he was freed.
Additionally Judge Ensor was in breach of Article 6 of the Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the
Council of Europe by not allowing Harris to present his witness
evidence in similar unrestricted manner as the witnesses against him
and also by leaving him to flounder without his chosen legal
representative, both of which would be grounds for an appeal had
Harris been convicted.
And so to sum up, Judge Ensor has now joined the elite club of bent
judges along with judge Kerry MacGill the former Bradford solicitor
who represented Sutcliffe at his trial and helped to secure leniency
for a lunatic copycat killer by offering him leniency in return for
more confessions to murders that he didn't commit. While these corrupt
judges bestride the court rooms of England the real Ripper is
guaranteed freedom and more murders have been and will be committed
because of their ineptitude and blinkered vision.
MacGill and Ensor are accessories to many murders because of their
failure to ensure that truth is not stifled in their courtrooms. They
are even greater criminals than street criminals because they are
educated and powerful in their access to the courts of the land and
thus their responsibility and guilt is greater.
for the evidence of the Ripper case see
http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/ripper.htm
Mr Charlton Harris was sentenced to 5 years in prison by
Judge James Goss as a result of false evidence given at his trial by
policemen. He always protested his innocence and that he was framed,
and after his release he embarked on steps to clear his name. He came
across my web site www.yorkshireripper.co.uk and when he studied it,
he became further incensed to see that the real Yorkshire Ripper was
allowed to remain free while a lunatic copycat killer, Peter Sutcliffe
was coaxed to confess to all the Ripper murders while he had been
locked up for a crime he didn't even commit. It was enough to tip him
over the edge to embark on a number of demonstrations to protest his
innocence. In pursuance of this he held up the traffic in Deansgate
Manchester for three days as he scaled scaffolding and protested his
innocence.
He was arrested after the three day demonstration and was facing
charges of disruption and public nuisance before judge Ensor and a
jury in Manchester Crown court the week ending 12 March 2005. After a
three day trial the jury failed to deliver a guilty verdict and he was
discharged a free man. The police failed to prove the charges they
leveled against him in a trial that had all the hall marks of a
vindictive and stage managed frame up.
Mr Harris was being legally assisted by his Mackenzie friend,
Londoner, Mr Patrick Cullinane who is an experienced case worker and
legal adviser. Mr Cullinane was only allowed to whisper to the
defendant and because of a raising of his voice at one stage he was
ordered to leave the court by the judge, leaving Mr Harris to flounder
without legal representation. The first two days of the trial were
taken up by police evidence and 23, yes twenty three, policemen had
full scope to tell all their evidence to the jury on behalf of the
prosecution. Mr Harris then called me to give my evidence as to the
authenticity of the claims about the Ripper still being at large. I
was sworn in and in the course of the next ten minutes I was stopped
at every statement I made by the judge and told to confine myself to
specific questions. My evidence was that I was the author of a book
which alleged that Peter Sutcliffe was a lunatic copycat killer who
was framed by corrupt policemen as the Ripper, while the real Ripper
is still a free man and living in Manchester at this time. I also
allege that there is a police cover up of the facts and that this is
supported by the media and the judiciary. I had a murder weapon in
the court which I acquired from the real Ripper and when I mentioned
it, I was quickly stopped and judge Ensor stifled my evidence as I
tried to tell the jury that Sutcliffe had been eliminated 12 times by
the police prior to his arrest because his blood group didn't match
the Ripper's.
I managed to say the bare bones of my allegations in the confusion and
the jury, which had a majority of women were clearly shocked by the
performance and the actions of judge Ensor in trying to silence me and
stifle the evidence. Harris claimed that the Ripper case had
influenced him in making his demonstration but Ensor claimed that the
Ripper case had nothing to do with the charges against Harris and in
his summing up he instructed the jury to ignore all my evidence.
Harris had the guts risk his liberty to go on a demonstration to
highlight the corruption of the judiciary. And so a mass murderer is
facilitated to remain free by judge Ensor, a man who should know
better.
Perhaps this episode will illustrate just why the system guarantees
murderers their freedom and also their apparent innocence when
innocent men and women are locked up for crimes they did not commit.
Judge Ensor is not alone unfit to be a judge of the courts but he is a
disgrace to them and to the Crown and to the people of Manchester who
pay his salary to dispense justice on their behalf. When serious
allegations such as mine are raised in his court it is his duty as a
judge and a respected leader in the community to ensure that those
allegations are brought to the attention of the proper authorities and
the very least he should have done was to order that a senior
policeman from an outside force attend and take my evidence in hand
and report back to him or otherwise he should have me arrested for
lying and perjury in his courtroom under oath.
Ensor, the legal man in blinkers, did neither because he was presiding
over a frame up of Harris by the police, all of whom led by Sergeant
Gavin had refused to take a copy of my allegations from me outside the
courtroom. They refused to do their duty when told that a murderer was
living in Manchester notwithstanding that two Ripper murders had taken
place there.
But while Ensor might be able to sleep at night without any qualms,
the jury had gotten the message and knowing that the Ripper was living
in their city they returned in confusion unable to reach a guilty
verdict as he had been directing them by blinkering them and he sent
them home for the night. When they resumed they were still in a state
of disagreement. Clearly the crown couldn't convince the jury that
Harris was guilty of a crime and he was freed.
Additionally Judge Ensor was in breach of Article 6 of the Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the
Council of Europe by not allowing Harris to present his witness
evidence in similar unrestricted manner as the witnesses against him
and also by leaving him to flounder without his chosen legal
representative, both of which would be grounds for an appeal had
Harris been convicted.
And so to sum up, Judge Ensor has now joined the elite club of bent
judges along with judge Kerry MacGill the former Bradford solicitor
who represented Sutcliffe at his trial and helped to secure leniency
for a lunatic copycat killer by offering him leniency in return for
more confessions to murders that he didn't commit. While these corrupt
judges bestride the court rooms of England the real Ripper is
guaranteed freedom and more murders have been and will be committed
because of their ineptitude and blinkered vision.
MacGill and Ensor are accessories to many murders because of their
failure to ensure that truth is not stifled in their courtrooms. They
are even greater criminals than street criminals because they are
educated and powerful in their access to the courts of the land and
thus their responsibility and guilt is greater.
for the evidence of the Ripper case see
http://www.yorkshireripper.co.uk/hyper/ripper.htm