Discussion:
UK 'chief rabbi' accuses Jeremy Corbyn of 'failure of leadership'
Add Reply
Grikbaseturd®™
2019-11-25 22:19:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day

Such a chutzpah already!

Don't they know the way home?

--------------------------> 'Israeel'
NEMO
2019-11-25 22:25:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:19:29 -0800, Grikbaseturd®™
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
A field day in Haifa, they should have.
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
LY318 ----------------------> TLV
Peeler
2019-11-25 22:46:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:25:13 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by NEMO
A field day in Haifa, they should have.
A field day I have, every day, slapping you around the place, pedophilic gay
Razovic! LOL
Post by NEMO
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
LY318 ----------------------> TLV
You->booby hatch (shortest way)!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Why do we still have outdated laws prohibiting paedophilia? Do you
seriously think that a 12-year old who spends 15 hours a day on Facebook
doesn't know what's going on?"
MID: <FnMUE.676068$***@usenetxs.com>
NEMO
2019-11-26 12:36:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NEMO
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:19:29 -0800, Grikbaseturd®™
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
A field day in Haifa, they should have.
Better shtill in 'Auschwitz'®™, a field day they should have!

How more jewish, Epshteen they could make?
Post by NEMO
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
LY318 ----------------------> TLV
WHOOS ------------------------->
Peeler
2019-11-26 12:53:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:36:31 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by NEMO
Better shtill in 'Auschwitz'®™, a field day they should have!
How more jewish, Epshteen they could make?
A field day we all have HERE beating the shit out of you, EVERY day, my
retarded serb punching bag! <BG>
Post by NEMO
Post by NEMO
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
LY318 ----------------------> TLV
WHOOS ------------------------->
YEAH! VERY "impressive" ...your idiocy, that is...
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-12-02 16:09:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peeler
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:36:31 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Better shtill in 'Auschwitz'®™, a field day they should have!
How more jewish, Epshteen they could make?
A field day we all have HERE beating the shit out of you, EVERY day, my
retarded serb punching bag! <BG>
The mangina is powerless against us.

Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.

http://ethicsalarms.com/2019/11/27/flashback-for-your-use-when-resistance-relatives-attack-at-thanksgiving-dinner/

Flashback: For Your Use When “Resistance” Relatives Attack At Thanksgiving
Dinner
NOVEMBER 27, 2019 / JACK MARSHALL


It all began here. How quickly we forget—or how quickly they hope we’ll
forget.

In two December 20, 2016 posts, “The Electoral College’s Day Of Reckoning I
and II,” Ethics Alarms covered the first attack on American democracy in
what came to called here the “2016 post-election Ethics Train Wreck.” This
has culminated in the current House Democrats’ impeachment fiasco. Make no
mistake: it is a single plot, one that I never suspected would have
continued this long, and caused as much damage to the nation as it has.

When your relatives start spouting talking points that they have neither
researched, thought critically about nor understand, consider reminding them
where it all started, and who has really been responsible for bringing the
United States of America to this sorry and thoroughly avoidable place. Most
of the villains of the coup attempts to come outed themselves here:
Democrats, the news media, academics, Hollywood, professionals, especially
lawyers. Most had outed themselves earlier, of course, but still had
plausible deniability. Not after this.

As you can see, they had decided, way back in 2016, right after the election
after thaye had wept, and cursed, and rended their garments, that because
they didn’t want Donald Trump to be President, they had a right to prevent
him from taking office, and if that failed, then to interfere with his right
to fulfill the duties of the office until they could come up with some way
remove him. This is where it began, and this is what has been going on ever
since.

Your resistance family members and friends have been been responsible
because they enabled this. Don’t let them get away with it.

The Electoral College’s Day Of Reckoning, Part I: Revelations
After all the protests, the petitioning, the grandstanding, the
misinformation and bad law and false history, after all the harassment and
intimidation aimed at getting state electors to violate their pledges, duty
and the trust of theirs state voters, all designed to keep Donald Trump from
attaining 270 electoral votes and thus forcing the Presidential election
into the House of Representatives for the first time since 1876, the results
were just another humiliation for the Democrats and Hillary Clinton. Donald
Trump was officially elected President of the United States, and it wasn’t
close.

Four Democratic electors in Washington, a state Clinton won, voted for
someone else, giving her just eight of the state’s 12 electoral votes. They
will be prosecuted, apparently, for breaking a Washington statute. Colin
Powell, a Republican, received three of the faithless elector votes and
Native American tribal leader Faith Spotted Eagle received one, apparently
because one elector decided that rather than vote for Senator Elizabeth
Warren, a real Native American was preferable. Single electors in both
Maine and Minnesota attempted to cast ballots for Bernie Sanders, but state
laws requiring electors to follow the statewide vote invalidated both
rebellious ballots. One Hawaii elector did vote for Sanders, an especially
outrageous betrayal of the vote since Hawaii went to Clinton even more
decisively than California. Never mind: this unknown, unvetted,
undistinguished citizen decided that no, he or she knew better. That’s the
model Democrats were promoting.

The one Republican elector, Texas’s Christopher Suprun, of Texas, who had
trumpeted his intention not to vote for Trump despite his state heavily
favoring the President Elect voted for Ohio Governor John Kasich as
promised, and another Texas elector defected to vote for Ron Paul. Thus the
almost six week Democratic push to use the Electoral College to pull victory
from the jaws of defeat had the net effect of increasing Trump’s Electoral
vote advantage over Clinton by three, with Hillary Clinton becoming the
candidate with most defecting electors in over 200 years.

George Will’s favorite phrase “condign justice” leaps to mind. First the
Wisconsin recount increases Trump’s vote total, and now this.

Three Ethics Observations on one of the most embarrassing spectacles in U.S.
election history:

1. Ironically, the Electoral College functioned exactly the way the Founders
intended it to, and rescued the nation from a regional candidate. Trump won
the nation, and Hillary was elected Queen of California. The country wanted
radical change, while the huddled socialists, crypto-Marxists, radical
college students, illegal immigration fans and nanny state addicts were
happy with things as they are.

California is a complete outlier, virtually a one-party state. As an
analysis by Investor’s Business Daily points out, between 2008 and 2016, the
number of Californians who registered as Democrats increased by 1.1
million, while the number of registered Republicans dropped by almost
400,000. Republicans in the state stayed away from the polling places
because they had nobody to vote for in many places. Two Democrats, and no
Republican, were on the ballot to replace Senator Barbara Boxer. Nor were
there Republicans on the ballots for House seats in nine of California’s
congressional districts. At the state level, six districts had no
Republicans running for the state senate, and 16 districts had no
Republicans running for state assembly seats:

Such Republicans as there were knew Clinton was going to win the state and
its 55 electoral votes, so there was little motivation to cast a
ballot.Clinton was getting all 55 votes, no matter what. Thus Trump received
11% fewer California votes than John McCain did in 2008, as the number of
registered Democrats in the state climbed by 13% since then. If California
had voted like every other Democratic state — where Clinton averaged 53.5%
wins — Clinton and Trump would have ended up in a virtual popular vote tie.
Laws requiring electors to follow the statewide vote invalidated both
efforts.

If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump won the
rest of the country by 1.4 million votes. The Founders installed a system
that favors a candidate with broad-based appeal over all the diverse regions
and cultures of a large nation, and that isn’t going to be easily dominated
by a large voting bloc that is atypical of the rest of the population—like
California in 2016.

2. Writer Daniel Brezenoff, the originator of the Change.Org Electoral
College Petition , appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show on Fox News to collect
his Andy Warhol Fifteen Minutes of Fame chip. He repeated his undemocratic
logic for overturning the election. Carlson accused Brezenoff of “resorting
to less democratic means, putting the decision in the hands of even fewer
people,” to which Brezenoff, who initially filed his petition using a fake
name, responded, “That’s right, to protect the Constitution from an unfit
President!”

The answer is smoking gun evidence of what was really afoot here. Brezenoff
thought Trump was unfit,just as I thought Trump was unfit, but the election
showed that millions of citizens felt differently. We can’t ethically,
logically, fairly, reasonably and Constitutionally come back after the
election and say that a handful of not-especially-qualified electors are
going to reverse the election result because our view is the right one.

We lost. The fact that we don’t like the result and are positive the winners
just don’t understand is not sufficient to justify what the Democrats and
progressives like Brezenoff were advocating.

3. It is disturbing and shocking—maybe I shouldn’t be shocked, but I am—
that no prominent Democratic leader publicly condemned the organized efforts
to turn electors faithless. This, as much as anything else, validates my
late decision that the Democrats were too corrupt and untrustworthy to get
my vote. Silence, as the legal maxim goes, implies consent, and the
petitioners, historical frauds, harassers and intimidators all did their
worst on behalf of the Democratic Party. Nothing but harm could come to the
party and its member progressives from such an arrogant, defiant and futile
scheme, and nothing but further division could have come from a success,
which basic civic literacy should have informed party leaders was
impossible. Nonetheless, they said nothing–Obama, Michelle, Pelosi, Reid,
Shumer, the Clintons, Jimmy Carter, Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, the President.
Nothing.

Was it cowardice, and the fear of tempting the rabid, angry Left from coming
after them, mouths foaming? Or was it that they were willing to benefit from
a Hail Mary pass, even one that destabilized the government and society?
Bernie Sanders was especially cynical, telling interviewers before yesterday
that he thought the Electoral College was beneficial, then calling for its
elimination after the voting was over.

The worst, of course, was Hillary Clinton. Had integrity meant anything to
her (we know it never has) she would have known that her unequivocal
condemnation of Donald Trump for suggesting that he might not “accept the
results” if he lost the election mandated a “Stop this nonsense now” message
to her traumatized and infantile supporters (see photo above). She couldn’t
mount the guts and principle to do it. A miniscule-to-the-vanishing-point
chance that somehow, through some combination of luck and cosmic
intervention, an elector uprising would give her the power she craves was
sufficient to inspire Hillary to even surpass the hypocrisy she had
displayed by joining in Jill Stein’s ridiculous recount efforts.

It was said of Hubert Humphrey that in his passion to attain the Presidency,
he proved himself unworthy of it. Hillary Clinton has made Hubert Humphrey
look wonderful in retrospect.

To be fair, so has Donald Trump.

The Electoral College’s Day Of Reckoning, Part II: Dunces, Heroes, Villains,
And Fools
The failure of the ugly Electoral College revolt scheme that ended
yesterday—let’s ignore the coming storm of frivolous lawsuits for now, all
right?—with the official, irreversible, like it or lump it victory of Donald
Trump over Hillary Clinton also settled some distinctions, some desirable,
some not.

Ethics Heroes: All of the Republican electors who resisted the harassment,
propaganda, intimidation and bad arguments and did their duty, avoiding a
crisis and foiling the attempts of Democrats to cheat, which is exactly what
the effort to flip the electoral vote was. The faithful electors get bonus
points for making so many Democrats and progressives look silly in the
process, a fate they richly deserved.
Come to think of it, it was predictable that Democratic appeals to electors
would persuade more Democratic electors than Republicans. Which leads us to…

Ethics Dunces: A bevy of Hollywood B-listers joined forces in an offensive
video that, like Brezenoff’s petition, misrepresented history and the
Constitution to gull star-struck electors into defying the public’s will and
its trust that their votes would be respected by electors. Led by Martin
Sheen, who has no credentials in government or political science but played
a wily President on TV, Debra Messing, James Cromwell, B.D. Wong, Noah Wyle,
Freda Payne (Quick: who is Freda Payne?), “Better Call Saul’s” Bob Odenkirk,
J. Smith Cameron (?), Michael Urie, Moby, superannuated M*A*S*H stars Mike
Farrell and Loretta Swit, Richard Schiff, Christine Lahti, Steven Pasquale,
Emily Tyra and Talia Balsam tell the electors that they will be following
the Founders’ intent by rejecting Donald Trump. This is flatly dishonest, as
they are attributing the contrarian position of Alexander Hamilton, who
detested popular democracy, to all the Founders, who rejected Hamilton’s
proposals on how the government should be elected and structured.
“What is evident is that Donald Trump lacks more than the qualifications to
be president. He lacks the necessary stability and clearly the respect for
the Constitution of our great nation,” say the celebrities. Obviously it is
NOT evident, since Trump’s voters won the day. The Federalist accurately
describes what was behind the video:

“The message is clear: the candidate for whom these celebrities spent months
shilling lost the Electoral College, the metric granted ultimate primacy by
Article Two of the Constitution. Now, as individuals with no substantial
political background, these celebrities have organized en masse to produce
content designed to “educate” our electors, chosen for their political
pedigree, on their electoral duty. The whole situation reeks of
condescension, dirisiveness, and social hubris. What these self-ordained
celebrities are demanding is nothing short of the very opposite of what they
claim to be purporting. They assert that they “stand with…all citizens of
the United States,” yet admittedly only if those citizens agree with their
political viewpoint. If said citizens disagree, then, unfortunately, these
celebrities decidedly do not stand with them. In fact, they would prefer
electors to actively oppose the wishes of these very citizens, so that the
candidate they personally believe to be the best suited has a second shot at
the presidency.”

That’s about the size of it, yes indeed.

Ethics Villain: Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig, who once
headed an ethics institute there, was advising electors through his group
Electors Trust, and last week said that as many as thirty Republican
electors were poised to refuse to vote for Mr. Trump. Well, he was close:
one more elector other than the one who announced his intention violated his
pledge. What was Lessig doing? It sure looked like he was lying to try to
persuade electors to flip. Lawyer. Professor. Ethicist.
Wow.

Prof. Lessig embarrassed his school, and he embarrassed his profession by
misusing his authority and position to try to meddle in a Presidential
election. He already made an ass of himself with his silly candidacy for
President last year, saying the he was running only to pass his “Citizen
Equality Act.” Then, he said, he would resign and turn the Presidency over
to his unnamed Vice President, who would then serve out the remainder of the
term. When this scheme received the reception it deserved—I still don’t know
how to spell a Bronx cheer— Lessig abandoned it, and said he would serve his
full term. Then he dropped out of the race. Ironically, Lessig’s signature
issue, removing big money from politics, was nicely refuted by Trump’s
election, which was achieved with his campaign spending about half what
Hillary Clinton spent.

Ethics Fools: The editors of the New York Times. Don’t they understand that
when their conduct allows no other interpretation but that they are biased
and partisan, they forfeit their influence and power to achieve the results
dictated by their bias? The paper never sounded a peep of dissent about the
Electoral College during the 2016 campaign, and if you really think that
today’s editorial about how it’s time to eliminate it would have appeared
had the positions of the parties been reversed, I have a breadfruit farm to
sell you.
Today’s Times even descended into obvious desperation. In a long piece
explaining why and how Trump prevailed despite losing the popular vote, it
published this:

One argument in favor of the Electoral College is that it doesn’t reward
regionalism: a candidate who wins with huge margins in one part of the
country. That’s because a winner-take-all system doesn’t reward any
additional votes beyond what’s necessary to win a state or a region. You get
all of Florida’s electoral votes, whether you win it by 537 or 537,000
votes.

A good example of how regionalism can drive a popular-electoral vote split
is the 1888 election. The Democrat, Grover Cleveland, won the popular vote
by nearly a point, but he lost the Electoral College by a margin similar to
Mrs. Clinton’s.

Why? He won the popular vote by dominating the Deep South, where white
supremacist Democrats had succeeded in disenfranchising Republican black
voters since the end of Reconstruction. Even progressives would consider
this a moral victory for the Electoral College.Mrs. Clinton’s big win in
California was, on paper, potentially enough to be “responsible” for the
electoral-popular vote split in the same way that the Deep South drove Mr.
Cleveland’s popular vote win in 1888.

But unlike the situation in 1888, Mrs. Clinton’s huge victory in California
(along with the District of Columbia and Hawaii, where Mrs. Clinton won by a
higher percentage than she did in California) was almost entirely canceled
out by Mr. Trump’s dominance of his base states — which we’ll call
Appalachafornia — from West Virginia to Wyoming. (“Appalachafornia” consists
of West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, Oklahoma, Kansas,
Nebraska, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota.) Mrs.
Clinton led in the rest of the country by the same two-point margin after
excluding Appalachafornia and California — and yet she still loses the
Electoral College vote by about the same margin.

Wait…WHAT? This is priceless deceit, and a textbook example of the Texas
Sharpshooter Fallacy so perfect that it should be used in that fallacy’s
definition. The Times really is arguing here that West Virginia, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Wyoming, Montana,
Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota are a single“region,” and the cultural
and demographic equivalent of a single state. If that group of states hadn’t
provided the numbers the Times needed to argue away California’s obvious
estrangement from the rest of the nation, it would have picked different
ones.

Suuure, West Virginia coal miners and Montana ranchers are nearly
indistinguishable! The same with North Dakota and Kansas: they both have
recently discovered huge oil reserves that have…wait, Kansas hasn’t, has it?

How can the Times insult its readers with such self-evident nonsense? How
can anyone trust a paper that would invent a fictional region to avoid
reality?

Ethics Fool, Dunce and Villain: Alexander Hamilton. It isn’t his fault,
exactly, that a previously obscure Federalist Paper he wrote in 1788 was
hijacked by dishonest proponents of a virtual coup who claimed that it
carried the authority of the Constitution itself, but #68, as David Hogberg
wrote in The American Spectator, is good for two things at this point:
“The first is as a demonstration of how very intelligent people can get
carried away with their ideas to the point of imbecility. The second is as
an inspiration for self-important show biz types to make fools of
themselves.”

The beginning of the paper proves the first proposition:

“The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of
President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent
degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Talents for low intrigue,
and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the
first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a
different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of
the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary
to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President
of the United States.”

This was ridiculous, even in 1788. Today, after 228 years of experience, it
reads like those “Back To The Future 2’s” version of 2015 looks. No system
could possible guarantee with “moral certainty” that the Presidency would
never be occupied by someone who is unqualified, and the system that
Hamilton lobbied for least of all. Look at how his independent electors, who
according to the 2016 Hamilton-lovers were qualified to substitute their
judgment for millions of equally astute voters who disagreed with them,
discharged their solemn duties yesterday.

Let’s see: three votes for a 75 year-old crackpot socialist who argued that
climate change was responsible for terrorism and who wanted to explode the
national debt beyond all survival, three votes for a 79-year-old retired
general who has said that he would not accept a nomination to be President,
a vote for John Kasich, a vote for 81-year-old Ron Paul, who believes the
U.S. should have sat out World War II and wants to legalize heroin, and best
of all, a vote for the eminently qualified Faith Spotted Eagle. This
illustrates beautifully what a full slate of electors free to vote their
fantasies, delusions and biases would produce: votes for Elmo, Honey Boo
Boo, Tim Tebow, Adam Sandler, Al Sharpton and Kanye West, with every
election being decided by the House of Representatives, which would have
made Hamilton happy, since he wanted a parliamentary system anyway.

I’m trying to think of the last presidential candidate Alexander Hamilton
would have believed was “a man endowed with the requisite qualifications.”
Not Hillary, obviously. Certainly not Trump. Definitely not Obama. It’s a
good topic for a Christmas dinner, if anyone at the table knows who
Alexander Hamilton was.
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2019-12-03 14:44:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:09:09 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
The mangina is powerless against us.
You two GBLTPQC+ guardian fairies are powerless against Humans.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.
Now who is going to read several hundred lines of shite that Jack
Marshall (whoever the fuck is) has plagiarised about his relatives?

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
--
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$***@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$***@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$***@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$***@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$***@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$***@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."
The Jews
2019-12-03 14:55:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Using one of his many inane aliases, the lazy, inbred,
pedophile, glue huffing Gordon Radovich
[***@tiscali.co.uk], continually beaten and humiliated
by Jews, Filipinos, Asians, Africans, and White people of
every stripe and denomination, returned for more degradation
and debasement at the hands of his physical, intellectual,
and moral superiors, when he typed the following plagiarized,
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:09:09 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.
Now who is going to read several hundred lines
LOL!!! LOL!!!

All that "reading" is too much for Gordon's glue-soaked brain to
handle! Hey Ejercito, don't you have anything with pictures for him?

ROFLMJAO








"Why do I keep getting scammed by Jews? Is it because they're so smart, or because I'm so stupid?"
-Gordon Radovich 2018

2019 Score Card for Gordon Radovich


# of jew ani zsuckled - 14,764
# of Jews holocausted to date - 0
# of subhumans deported to date - 0
# of people Gordon has "kicked off" of Usenet - 0
# of times Gordon has been humiliated on Usenet - [infinity]
# of years Gordon has hid from Barry - 12
# of years Gordon has hid from Chris Morton - 16+

"Straight? ME????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
-Gordon Radovich, Wed, 17 Jan 2018

"HUH ? O, shitscared of being, traced and 'holocausted'®™ that he set, up an untraceable Gmail account JUST, to email me!
"null.net account traceable ?
-Gordon, inanely babbling about a gmail account which he claimed he never got an email from, but somehow he knows about."
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Gordon, How did YOUR brain get so rattled?
"To/too/two (pick one) much sodomy and/or cocksucking!"
-Gordon Radovich
Peeler
2019-12-03 15:00:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:44:20 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Peeler
A field day we all have HERE beating the shit out of you, EVERY day, my
retarded serb punching bag! <BG>
The mangina is powerless against us.
You two GBLTPQC+ guardian fairies are powerless against Humans.
You are PROJECTING, yet again, you constantly bitch slapped subnormal
pedophilic gay dreckserb!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.
Now who is going to read several hundred lines of shite that Jack
Marshall (whoever the fuck is) has plagiarised about his relatives?
INTELLIGENT people read that smart guy's smart and original articles,
retarded perverted serb peasant!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-12-03 15:38:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:09:09 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
The mangina is powerless against us.
You two GBLTPQC+ guardian fairies are powerless against Humans.
Nithing, there is nothing fairy about us.
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.
Now who is going to read several hundred lines of shite that Jack
Marshall (whoever the fuck is) has plagiarised about his relatives?
Normal people would, for Jack Marshall is a world-renowned ethicist.


Michael
shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
2019-12-05 14:20:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 07:38:05 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 08:09:09 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
The mangina is powerless against us.
You two GBLTPQC+ guardian fairies are powerless against Humans.
Nithing, there is nothing fairy about us.
Needledick, there is EVERYTHING fairy about you two GBLTPQC+ fairies!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Now here is Jack Marshall explaining what to do when 'Resistance'
relatives attack during dinner.
Now who is going to read several hundred lines of shite that Jack
Marshall (whoever the fuck is) has plagiarised about his relatives?
Normal people would, for Jack Marshall is a world-renowned ethicist.
Only subnormal subpeople like you would, for Jack Marshall is a
world-despised plagiarist.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Michael
Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
--
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$***@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$***@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$***@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$***@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$***@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$***@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."
Peeler
2019-12-05 14:55:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 05 Dec 2019 06:20:41 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry'
Post by shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
Post by Michael Ejercito
Nithing, there is nothing fairy about us.
Needledick, there is EVERYTHING fairy about you two GBLTPQC+ fairies!
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN perversions onto all those that you feel
are superior to you and straight unlike you, you sexually crippled perv!
Post by shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
Post by Michael Ejercito
Normal people would, for Jack Marshall is a world-renowned ethicist.
Only subnormal subpeople like you would, for Jack Marshall is a
world-despised plagiarist.
Stop projecting your OWN situation onto all those that you feel are superior
to you and straight unlike you, you world-despised sexually crippled perv!
Post by shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
Post by Michael Ejercito
Michael
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
NEMO
2019-12-05 17:37:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:42:46 -0800 (PST), "fake vet La Jack G..."
<fluhs Grik skata>
It is fun make fun of the Sluggard.
It is wrote illiterate.
Peeler
2019-12-05 18:59:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:37:21 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by NEMO
Post by Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN perversions onto all those that you feel
are superior to you and straight unlike you, you sexually crippled perv!
Post by shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
Post by Michael Ejercito
Normal people would, for Jack Marshall is a world-renowned ethicist.
Only subnormal subpeople like you would, for Jack Marshall is a
world-despised plagiarist.
Stop projecting your OWN situation onto all those that you feel are superior
to you and straight unlike you, you world-despised sexually crippled perv!
Post by shick old yidoid Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jackobsohn')
Post by Michael Ejercito
Michael
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
It is fun make fun of the Sluggard.
It is wrote illiterate.
Are you the Sluggard, Retardovic? Of COURSE, you are! You must be the most
ridiculed, retarded, dumb bitch that was ever spotted on Usenet! Innit? LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
The Peeler
2019-11-25 22:43:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:19:29 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
Such a clinically insane asshole already. No, not Corbyn, YOU!
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
You->loony bin (shortest way)!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"That [referring to the term "consenting adults"] is just an outdated legal
construct. Are you telling me that a 13-year old who spends 15 hours a day
on Facebook is incapable of consent?"
MID: <Og0VE.1298131$***@usenetxs.com>
Loose Cannon
2019-11-25 22:49:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:19:29 -0800, Grikbaseturd®™
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
The Peeler
2019-11-25 23:03:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:49:27 -0500, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily
Post by Loose Cannon
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
Trying to spread them wide for your former serbian pimp again, Loose
Sphincter? Alas, the psycho dumped you for good! You have to make do with
Caroloony now, the insane gay nazoid nutter from Carolina! Hahahahahaaa!!!
--
Loose Sphincter about his passion:
" I love eating the Shit out of Poor Helpless Dumb Goran Razovic! LOL"
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-26 16:56:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NEMO
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:19:29 -0800, Grikbaseturd®™
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
"Sheenie Sheen" shoundsh about right, eh!
The Peeler
2019-11-26 17:46:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:56:56 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Loose Cannon
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
"Sheenie Sheen" shoundsh about right, eh!
Both of you sound right retarded! <BG>
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"That [referring to the term "consenting adults"] is just an outdated legal
construct. Are you telling me that a 13-year old who spends 15 hours a day
on Facebook is incapable of consent?"
MID: <Og0VE.1298131$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-11-30 17:01:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Peeler
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:56:56 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™, farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Loose Cannon
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
"Sheenie Sheen" shoundsh about right, eh!
Both of you sound right retarded! <BG>
Indeed the mangina and his fellow dreckvolk do.

Here is Chris's comment.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/atf-to-pay-employee-450000-over-harassment-by-a-supervisor-with-a-nazi-tattoo/#comment-4381205


Anybody remember the “Good Old Boys Roundup”, organized out of the Oklahoma
City BATF offices and run by a serving BATF agent?

Anybody remember the “n***er hunting licenses” and the “n***er check point”
at the Roundup?

Anybody remember the BATF agents who got pulled off of the ’90s Black church
burning investigation because they attended the Roundup?

Scratch a BATF[E] agent, find a Klansman.
Peeler
2019-11-30 18:47:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Loose Cannon
Do we pronounce our resident kike's name as "Sheen" or do we say
"Shine"?
"Sheenie Sheen" shoundsh about right, eh!
Both of you sound right retarded! <BG>
Indeed the mangina and his fellow dreckvolk do.
And not just occasionally ...but really ALWAYS!
John
2019-11-26 08:29:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®™ mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-
jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
Sounds like he is anti goy, hate speech!
The Peeler
2019-11-26 08:43:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:29:59 -0000 (UTC), John, another mentally challenged,
Post by John
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
Sounds like he is anti goy, hate speech!
Sounds like you are a troll-feeding senile asshole!
abelard
2019-11-26 09:13:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikbaseturd®™
And Jeremy Corbyn is accused of 'anti-semitically'®? mispronouncing
Jeffrey Epshteen's name as 'Epshtine' to make it sound 'more jewish!
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/20/global/jeremy-corbyn-mispronounces-
jeffrey-epsteins-name-and-critics-have-a-field-day
Such a chutzpah already!
Don't they know the way home?
--------------------------> 'Israeel'
Sounds like he is anti goy, hate speech!
agent cob is anti-british
like any socialist he is only concerned with promoting his
own marxist religion...

his antisemitism is just one part of his agenda



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7725137/Jeremy-Corbyn-wants-children-taught-injustice-British-Empire-school.html
Jeremy Corbyn wants children to be taught about the 'injustice' of the
British Empire in school as part of a new 'race and faith manifesto'
if Labour wins the General Election

The Labour leader plans to set up a new 'Emancipation Educational
Trust'

It would ensure the effects of colonialism are taught in the national
curriculum

Labour is being investigated for anti-Semitism by the equalities
watchdog
--
www.abelard.org
Loading...