Post by Grikboxxer®ÂPost by pensive hamsterPost by Grikboxxer®ÂIn message Grikboxxer®™ writes
Post by Grikboxxer®ÂIn message Grikboxer®™ writes
Post by Grikboxer®ÂPost by pensive hamsterYou are terribly confused, old bean. It's Leavers who have
embraced the concept wholeheartedly.
Sorry, old boy, but it's Remoaners who have embraced the concept of
fearmongering wholeheartedly and Leavers who have recognised it as
such. Brexiteers have never offered anything other than a (sometimes
guardedly) optimistic view of Britan's future.
You're simply stating the bleedin' obvious.
Apparently it's not bleedin' obvious to pensive hamster.
When offered the chance to change from what you have, those who vote for
the change will usually do so because they think it's a good idea - and
will say what they think is good about it. Those who vote against the
change will usually do so because they think it's a bad idea - and will
say what they think is bad about it.
And engage in fearmongering, as Remoaners have done.
So it's OK for those who want change to extoll the benefits, but it's
not OK for those who don't want change to caution about the
disadvantages?
It's certainly not OK for those who don't want change to
market/promote wholesale hysterical fearmongering.
Can you give an example of this alleged wholesale hysterical
fearmongering?
Haven't you been reading this newsgroup? Look at the frequent
doom 'n gloom posts from Mr Clayton and MM.
That's just lazy thinking on your part. Instead of making the
effort to address specific concerns raised by Mr Clayton and
MM (among others), you can just say they are engaging in
"wholesale hysterical fearmongering".
Of course, you are just preaching to the Brexitarian choir, to
whom it is bleedin' obvious that any concerns raised by
Remainers can be dismissed as wholesale hysterical
fearmongering.
Trying to have a discussion with a Brexiteer is like trying to
have a discussion with a Jehovah's Witness.
Post by Grikboxxer®ÂPost by pensive hamsterThe sort of thing I've heard, is that, post-Brexit, GDP might
grow by 6% less by 2030, than it would grow without Brexit.
I find it hard to see that as wholesale hysterical fearmongering.
The sort of thing I've heard is that we're heading for a depression,
beginning on 1st November. Not to mention food shortages,
Those things could happen, to some degree. Are you in a position
to assure us they won't? It seems only sensible to anticipate
possible problems, and have procedures in place to minimise
possible problems. That's not wholesale hysterical fearmongering.
Nigel Farage is the riots in the streets guy, not Mr Clayton and MM:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-warns-there-could-be-riots-if-brexit-is-blocked-a3388331.html
'Nigel Farage warns there could be riots if Brexit is blocked '
Post by Grikboxxer®Âand the Army called in to restore order.
Well, Boris did buy some water cannon.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/263973/UK-riots-92-per-cent-say-bring-in-the-Army
Aug 9, 2011
'UK riots: 92 per cent say bring in the Army
'THE majority of Britons believe the Army should be urgently
deployed to deal with the riots raging out of control across the
country.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14436499
15 August 2011
'Riots in London and around the country saw widespread looting
and buildings set alight.'
Post by Grikboxxer®ÂPost by pensive hamsterProject Mild Concern, I could accept. Or even, Project Boris
and Nigel are a Bit Dodgy, don't you think?
Well, no.