Discussion:
— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
Add Reply
dolf
2018-12-04 19:49:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which to convey (eg: something from nothing or somewhere
to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness into being
(ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection from the #260
- DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could travel
back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he could stop
fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other technology,
we'd be much better off," the actor and former California governor said
Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines our faculty
as capacity to convey a cognitive conception of reality and the #41 - ONTIC
necessity morality proscriptions by which an integrity of the syncretism is
assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION
2) CONTINUITY
3) COHESION
4) MATERIALITY

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey a sublime rather that symbolic intuition.

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 (the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN is associated to the
NATIONAL PARTY and his re-election opportunity was not impugned by either
Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM 11 NOVEMBER 2018 speech or my
INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he
actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN)

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA published 1785 and that you may observe where I
am spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is redacted to a GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET which then has recourse to KANT'S literary works
of for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

- dolf

--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Mattb
2018-12-04 20:13:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:49:25 +1100, dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:


What do you expect it has reach the turning point with socialism to
many freeloaders are taxing the working class people into poverty.
Happened in Venezuela also. France will be the E.U version of
Venezuela.

Now they will call out the army.
Mr Ying-Yang White
2018-12-04 21:45:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
> the army.

to remove alt-right rubble
GOOD RIDDANCE

--
:p as always
Vidcapper
2018-12-05 06:46:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 04/12/2018 20:13, Mattb wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:49:25 +1100, dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> What do you expect it has reach the turning point with socialism to
> many freeloaders are taxing the working class people into poverty.
> Happened in Venezuela also. France will be the E.U version of
> Venezuela.
>
> Now they will call out the army.
>

Or just play this Ladyhawke song...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqWzfH71Bww

--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
dolf
2018-12-05 07:24:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT
FOR A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

As difficult as the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition is difficult for our western culture to
fathom.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media as
dancing with sword 🗡 in hand understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY
THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

On 5/12/18 5:46 pm, Vidcapper <***@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 20:13, Mattb wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:49:25 +1100, dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What do you expect it has reach the turning point with socialism to
>> many freeloaders are taxing the working class people into poverty.
>> Happened in Venezuela also.  France will be the E.U version of
>> Venezuela.
>>
>> Now they will call out the army.
>>
>
> Or just play this Ladyhawke song...
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=infantile-porn
>

— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM that universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018
--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-04 20:22:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260
- DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could travel
back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he could stop
fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other technology,
we'd be much better off," the actor and former California governor said
Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured, to
do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION
2) CONTINUITY
3) COHESION
4) MATERIALITY

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey a sublime rather than only symbolic
intuition.

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 (the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN is associated to the
NATIONAL PARTY and his re-election opportunity was not impugned by either
Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM 11 NOVEMBER 2018 speech or my
INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he
actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN)

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA that was published 1785 and by such action you
may observe, I am spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then
redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S
literary works of for comparative cognition and authentication by such
narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the circumstance
of the recent soylent green anarchist France and Paris burning after #288 -
REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018 is the confrontation to all
reason and sensibility in that, if I am speaking to the NATION from 1783 as
being prior to the French Revolution of 1689 what is then the magnitude of
monstrous betrayal made against the past and its vital exuberance by an
esprit de corps having only hysteria and no longer possessing a
prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) got more
entitlement this day to claim JE SUIS PRAIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they?

- dolf



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-12-04 20:38:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could travel
back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he could stop
fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other technology,
we'd be much better off," the actor and former California governor said
Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured, to
do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION
2) CONTINUITY
3) COHESION
4) MATERIALITY

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey a sublime rather than only symbolic
intuition.

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 (the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN is associated to the
NATIONAL PARTY and his re-election opportunity was not impugned by either
Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM 11 NOVEMBER 2018 speech or my
INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he
actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN)

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA that was published 1785 and by such action you
may observe, I am spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then
redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S
literary works of for comparative cognition and authentication by such
narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the circumstance
of the recent soylent green anarchist riots of France and Paris burning
after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018 is the
confrontation to all reason and sensibility in that, if I am speaking to
the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution of 1789 what
is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against the past and its
vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only hysteria and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom have
never so much as set a right foot within the country or walked it’s streets
got more entitlement this day to claim JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than
they?

- dolf



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-12-04 21:12:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could travel
back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he could stop
fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other technology,
we'd be much better off," the actor and former California governor said
Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured, to
do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1}
2) CONTINUITY {@5}
3) COHESION {@65}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
symbolic intuition of contrived gesturing as merely pontificated tokenism.

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 (the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN is associated to the
NATIONAL PARTY and his re-election opportunity was not impugned by either
Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM 11 NOVEMBER 2018 speech or my
INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he
actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN)

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA that was published 1785 and by such action you
may observe, I am spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then
redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S
literary works of for comparative cognition and authentication by such
narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the circumstance
of the recent soylent green anarchist riots of France and Paris burning
after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018 is the
confrontation to all reason and sensibility in that, if I am speaking to
the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution of 1789 what
is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against the past and its
vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only hysteria and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom have
never so much as set a right foot within the country or walked it’s streets
got more entitlement this day to claim JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than
they?

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-12-04 21:28:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sorry for the multiple revisions

— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could travel
back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he could stop
fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other technology,
we'd be much better off," the actor and former California governor said
Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured, to
do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1}
2) CONTINUITY {@5}
3) COHESION {@65}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
symbolic intuition of contrived gesturing as merely pontificated tokenism.

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN is associated to
the NATIONAL PARTY and his re-election opportunity was not impugned by
either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM 11 NOVEMBER 2018 speech or my
INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he
actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA that was published 1785 and by such action you
may observe, I am spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then
redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S
literary works of 1781 to 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication
by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the circumstance
of the recent soylent green anarchist riots in France and Paris burning
after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018 is the
confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am speaking to
the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution of 1789 what
is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against the past and its
vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an hysteria entitlement,
mantras of self-justification and no longer possessing a prerequisite
integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom have
never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone walked
it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as veracity: JE
SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-12-04 22:03:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sorry for the multiple revisions


— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175}
or metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1}
2) CONTINUITY {@5}
3) COHESION {@65}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom
have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone
walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as
veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 00:30:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sorry for the multiple revisions


— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175}
or metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom
have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone
walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as
veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018
--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Government Shill #2
2018-12-05 00:39:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:30:05 +1100, dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Sorry for the multiple revisions

We've come to expect it. 40 copies per day of (almost) identical posts full of
gibberish. I just delete them.

Shill #2
--
Deja Moo - The nagging sense that you've heard all this bullshit before.
Mattb
2018-12-05 03:35:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:39:50 +1100, Government Shill #2
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:30:05 +1100, dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>We've come to expect it. 40 copies per day of (almost) identical posts full of
>gibberish. I just delete them.

He sends me the same type of shit in e-mails with threats. He still
hasn't told me what court he is using.

All because I believe he and Fran are lovers.


>
>Shill #2
dolf
2018-12-05 00:49:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Sorry for the multiple revisions


— PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175}
or metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom
have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone
walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as
veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018
--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 05:37:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>
> As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
> sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175}
> or metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
> we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
> somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
> into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
> from the #260 - DEAD}.
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
> morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
> to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
> provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN}
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
> writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
> SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
> comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom
> have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone
> walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as
> veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 05:38:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>
> As we begin our 2nd day of INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first
> sketch a very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175}
> or metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
> we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
> somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
> into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
> from the #260 - DEAD}.
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
> morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
> to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
> provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN}
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
> writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
> SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
> comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil) whom
> have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let alone
> walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim as
> veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 06:15:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 06:25:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 19:26:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-05 22:59:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "Edict
as a Divine Authority" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
CRIMES ACT 1958.

GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.

AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.

GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR GENERAL.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-06 07:49:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018

As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "Edict
as a Divine Authority" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
CRIMES ACT 1958.

GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.

AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.

GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR GENERAL.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I hereby
declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and ABJURE ALL
ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*, *POTENTATE*, *STATE*,
OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR
CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States of America AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that
I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms
on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will
perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States
when required by the law; that I will perform work of national
importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose
of evasion; so help me God.”

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-06 09:42:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018

As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "Edict
as a Divine Authority" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
CRIMES ACT 1958.

GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.

AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.

GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR GENERAL.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I hereby
declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and ABJURE ALL
ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*, *POTENTATE*, *STATE*,
OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR
CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States of America AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that
I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms
on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will
perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States
when required by the law; that I will perform work of national
importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose
of evasion; so help me God.”

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}

Nous: #63
Time: 04:10 hrs
Date: 2018.5.23
Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
Male: #113; Feme: #61
} // #61

Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
Tetra: #62 - Doubt
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)

Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {

1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
4. Souchoe
}

Asa {Physician; cure}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH {#314
/ #422}

3.2.7.63.0@{
@1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
@2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
@3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#219),
@5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 53 (#272),
@6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
@7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
@8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
@9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
Male: #337; Feme: #474
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time: 04:10
hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in Reversal,
Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The
arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]

"And when the day of Pentecost {ie. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT FOR
THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [Acts 1:4 (KJV)]} was fully come, they were
all with one accord in one place.

And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind,
and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared
unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with
other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were
dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, *DEVOUT* *MEN*, *OUT* *OF* *EVERY* *NATION*
*UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie. AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO
COHESION / MATERIALITY OF THE HUMAN COGNITION }.

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...

130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can be proven
only during the life of a human being (which proof will doubtless be
granted us), but not after death (which is actually our concern) – and
indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT* *THE* *CONCEPT*
*OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as connected
necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so connected only in
accordance with a principle of possible experience, and hence only for
the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite remarkable that
metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever attempting to prove
it; doubtless because they found themselves completely forsaken by all
grounds of proof as soon as they commenced with the concept of
substance. Common sense, being well aware that without this *ASSUMPTION*
*NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD*
*BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect with a postulate; for it could
never extract this principle from experience itself, partly because
experience cannot follow the materials (substances) through all their
alterations and dissolutions far enough to be able to find matter always
undiminished, partly because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*]
*NECESSITY*, *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*.
But the metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept
of the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3
APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY* *OF*
*THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
*INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM* *DESTRUCTION*
*THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source of this
principle, which however would have required far deeper investigations
than they ever wanted to start, then they would have seen: that this
*LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS* *GRANTED* *ONLY*
*FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore can hold good only
for things insofar as they are to be cognized in experience and
connected with other things, but never for things irrespective of all
possible experience, hence not for the soul after death.

That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
*ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
*TRUTH* {

G2309@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
   @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
   @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
   @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
   @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
   Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
*I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA: #11
as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a)
to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to
love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight
in, have pleasure;

}, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that I
am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality of
bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul I
cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and lawfulness
as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder and false
illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it presupposes space
and time as conditions for the existence of objects and merely asks
whether the objects of the outer senses are actually to be found in the
space in which we put them while awake, in the way that the object of
inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that is, whether experience
carries with itself sure criteria to distinguish it from imagination.

Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we cannot
doubt that those things should not constitute truthful experience.
Because appearances are considered as appearances only in accordance
with their connection within experience, material idealism can therefore
be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an experience that
bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself exist in accordance
with the representation of inner sense (in time) – for the concept:
outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since, however, the I in
the proposition I am does not signify merely the *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER*
*INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE* *SUBJECT* *OF*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely outer intuition
(in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies this appearance,
accordingly the question of whether bodies (as appearances of outer
sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in nature can without
hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters do not stand
otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an appearance of inner
sense (the soul according to empirical psychology) exist in time outside
my power of representation, for this question must also be answered
negatively.

In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called transcendental
idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian idealism. For if
space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then it is, as a
representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the only question
remaining concerns the empirical truth of the appearances in this space.
If this is not the case, but rather space and the *APPEARANCES* *IN*
*IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE* *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE*
*CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*, *OUTSIDE* *OUR*
*PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE* *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.

"NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
*WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
*SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.

G1097@{
   @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
   @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
   @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
   @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
   @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
   @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
   Male: #246; Feme: #231
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.

    #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
    #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
    #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
    #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
    #CANON: #220

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
   @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
   @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
   Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220

#474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
#1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;

And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold,
are not all these which speak Galilaeans {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? And how
hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?

Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
{MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and in
the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A WALL;
COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER}, Jews and
proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING; DESERT;
RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What
meaneth this? Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine."
[Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:

"This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
*IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
*MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
*DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business of
the critique of reason itself.

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only in
the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object is an
object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts to
thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot be
represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience can
never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point, always
an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any experience
whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-06 10:08:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018

As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "EDICT
AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
CRIMES ACT 1958.

GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.

AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.

GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR GENERAL.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I hereby
declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and ABJURE ALL
ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*, *POTENTATE*, *STATE*,
OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR
CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States of America AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that
I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms
on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will
perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States
when required by the law; that I will perform work of national
importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose
of evasion; so help me God.”

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}

Nous: #63
Time: 04:10 hrs
Date: 2018.5.23
Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
Male: #113; Feme: #61
} // #61

Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
Tetra: #62 - Doubt
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)

Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {

1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
4. Souchoe
}

Asa {Physician; cure}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH {#314
/ #422}

3.2.7.63.0@{
@1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
@2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
@3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#219),
@5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 53 (#272),
@6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
@7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
@8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
@9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
Male: #337; Feme: #474
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time: 04:10
hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in Reversal,
Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The
arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]

"And when the day of Pentecost {ie. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT FOR
THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [Acts 1:4 (KJV)]} was fully come, they were
all with one accord {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29
OCTOBER 1900}} in one place.

And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind,
and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared
unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with
other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were
dwelling at Jerusalem {VISION OF PEACE} Jews, *DEVOUT* *MEN*, *OUT* *OF*
*EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie. AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL
PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF THE HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING
THE #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22
x #41}.

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...

130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can be proven
only during the life of a human being (which proof will doubtless be
granted us), but not after death (which is actually our concern) – and
indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT* *THE* *CONCEPT*
*OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as connected
necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so connected only in
accordance with a principle of possible experience, and hence only for
the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite remarkable that
metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever attempting to prove
it; doubtless because they found themselves completely forsaken by all
grounds of proof as soon as they commenced with the concept of
substance. Common sense, being well aware that without this *ASSUMPTION*
*NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD*
*BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect with a postulate; for it could
never extract this principle from experience itself, partly because
experience cannot follow the materials (substances) through all their
alterations and dissolutions far enough to be able to find matter always
undiminished, partly because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*]
*NECESSITY*, *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*.
But the metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept
of the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3
APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY* *OF*
*THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
*INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM* *DESTRUCTION*
*THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source of this
principle, which however would have required far deeper investigations
than they ever wanted to start, then they would have seen: that this
*LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS* *GRANTED* *ONLY*
*FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore can hold good only
for things insofar as they are to be cognized in experience and
connected with other things, but never for things irrespective of all
possible experience, hence not for the soul after death.

That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
*ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
*TRUTH* {

G2309@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
   @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
   @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
   @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
   @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
   Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
*I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA: #11
as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a)
to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to
love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight
in, have pleasure;

}, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that I
am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality of
bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul I
cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and lawfulness
as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder and false
illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it presupposes space
and time as conditions for the existence of objects and merely asks
whether the objects of the outer senses are actually to be found in the
space in which we put them while awake, in the way that the object of
inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that is, whether experience
carries with itself sure criteria to distinguish it from imagination.

Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we cannot
doubt that those things should not constitute truthful experience.
Because appearances are considered as appearances only in accordance
with their connection within experience, material idealism can therefore
be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an experience that
bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself exist in accordance
with the representation of inner sense (in time) – for the concept:
outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since, however, the I in
the proposition I am does not signify merely the *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER*
*INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE* *SUBJECT* *OF*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely outer intuition
(in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies this appearance,
accordingly the question of whether bodies (as appearances of outer
sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in nature can without
hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters do not stand
otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an appearance of inner
sense (the soul according to empirical psychology) exist in time outside
my power of representation, for this question must also be answered
negatively.

In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called transcendental
idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian idealism. For if
space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then it is, as a
representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the only question
remaining concerns the empirical truth of the appearances in this space.
If this is not the case, but rather space and the *APPEARANCES* *IN*
*IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE* *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE*
*CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*, *OUTSIDE* *OUR*
*PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE* *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.

"NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
*WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
*SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.

G1097@{
   @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
   @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
   @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
   @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
   @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
   @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
   Male: #246; Feme: #231
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.

    #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
    #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
    #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
    #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
    #CANON: #220

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
   @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
   @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
   Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220

#474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
#1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;

And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold,
are not all these which speak Galilaeans {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? And how
hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?

Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
{MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and in
the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A WALL;
COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER}, Jews and
proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING; DESERT;
RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What
meaneth this? Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine."
[Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:

"This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
*IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
*MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
*DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business of
the critique of reason itself.

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only in
the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object is an
object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts to
thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot be
represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience can
never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point, always
an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any experience
whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-06 10:38:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018

As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "EDICT
AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.

A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
CRIMES ACT 1958.

GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.

AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.

GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR GENERAL.

That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”

YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>

TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA

Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.

THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I hereby
declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and ABJURE ALL
ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*, *POTENTATE*, *STATE*,
OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR
CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States of America AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that
I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms
on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will
perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States
when required by the law; that I will perform work of national
importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I
take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose
of evasion; so help me God.”

Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
is without sin, cast the first stone.

But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED

} ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...

45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}

Nous: #63
Time: 04:10 hrs
Date: 2018.5.23
Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
Male: #113; Feme: #61
} // #61

Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
Tetra: #62 - Doubt
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)

Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {

1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
4. Souchoe
}

Asa {Physician; cure}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH {#314
/ #422}

3.2.7.63.0@{
@1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
@2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
@3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#219),
@5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 53 (#272),
@6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
@7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
@8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
@9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
Male: #337; Feme: #474
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time: 04:10
hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in Reversal,
Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The
arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]

"AND WHEN THE DAY OF PENTECOST {IE. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT FOR
THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [ACTS 1:4 (KJV)]} WAS FULLY COME, THEY WERE
ALL WITH ONE ACCORD {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29
OCTOBER 1900}} IN ONE PLACE.

AND SUDDENLY THERE CAME A SOUND FROM HEAVEN AS OF A RUSHING MIGHTY WIND,
AND IT FILLED ALL THE HOUSE WHERE THEY WERE SITTING. AND THERE APPEARED
UNTO THEM CLOVEN TONGUES LIKE AS OF FIRE, AND IT SAT UPON EACH OF THEM.
AND THEY WERE ALL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND BEGAN TO SPEAK WITH
OTHER TONGUES, AS THE SPIRIT GAVE THEM UTTERANCE. AND THERE WERE
DWELLING AT JERUSALEM {VISION OF PEACE} JEWS, *DEVOUT* *MEN*, *OUT* *OF*
*EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie.

AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF THE
HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING A #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF LAW
(EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41}.

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...

130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can be proven
only during the life of a human being (which proof will doubtless be
granted us), but not after death (which is actually our concern) – and
indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT* *THE* *CONCEPT*
*OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as connected
necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so connected only in
accordance with a principle of possible experience, and hence only for
the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite remarkable that
metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever attempting to prove
it; doubtless because they found themselves completely forsaken by all
grounds of proof as soon as they commenced with the concept of
substance. Common sense, being well aware that without this *ASSUMPTION*
*NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD*
*BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect with a postulate; for it could
never extract this principle from experience itself, partly because
experience cannot follow the materials (substances) through all their
alterations and dissolutions far enough to be able to find matter always
undiminished, partly because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*]
*NECESSITY*, *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*.
But the metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept
of the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON FRIDAY, 3
APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY* *OF*
*THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
*INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM* *DESTRUCTION*
*THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source of this
principle, which however would have required far deeper investigations
than they ever wanted to start, then they would have seen: that this
*LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS* *GRANTED* *ONLY*
*FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore can hold good only
for things insofar as they are to be cognized in experience and
connected with other things, but never for things irrespective of all
possible experience, hence not for the soul after death.

That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
*ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
*TRUTH* {

G2309@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
   @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
   @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
   @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
   @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
   Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
*I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA: #11
as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a)
to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to
love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight
in, have pleasure;

}, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that I
am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality of
bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul I
cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and lawfulness
as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder and false
illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it presupposes space
and time as conditions for the existence of objects and merely asks
whether the objects of the outer senses are actually to be found in the
space in which we put them while awake, in the way that the object of
inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that is, whether experience
carries with itself sure criteria to distinguish it from imagination.

Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we cannot
doubt that those things should not constitute truthful experience.
Because appearances are considered as appearances only in accordance
with their connection within experience, material idealism can therefore
be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an experience that
bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself exist in accordance
with the representation of inner sense (in time) – for the concept:
outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since, however, the I in
the proposition I am does not signify merely the *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER*
*INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE* *SUBJECT* *OF*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely outer intuition
(in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies this appearance,
accordingly the question of whether bodies (as appearances of outer
sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in nature can without
hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters do not stand
otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an appearance of inner
sense (the soul according to empirical psychology) exist in time outside
my power of representation, for this question must also be answered
negatively.

In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called transcendental
idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian idealism. For if
space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then it is, as a
representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the only question
remaining concerns the empirical truth of the appearances in this space.
If this is not the case, but rather space and the *APPEARANCES* *IN*
*IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE* *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE*
*CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*, *OUTSIDE* *OUR*
*PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE* *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.

"NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
*WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
*SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.

G1097@{
   @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
   @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
   @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
   @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
   @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
   @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
   Male: #246; Feme: #231
} // #474

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.

    #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
    #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
    #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
    #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
    #CANON: #220

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
   @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
   @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
   Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220

#474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
#1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
2b) to know;

AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED AND MARVELLED, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, BEHOLD,
ARE NOT ALL THESE WHICH SPEAK GALILAEANS {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? AND HOW
HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN?

Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
{MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and in
the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A WALL;
COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER}, Jews and
proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING; DESERT;
RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED, AND WERE IN DOUBT, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, WHAT
MEANETH THIS? OTHERS MOCKING SAID, THESE MEN ARE FULL OF NEW WINE."
[Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
#50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:

"This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
*IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
*MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
*DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business of
the critique of reason itself.

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only in
the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object is an
object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts to
thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot be
represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience can
never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point, always
an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any experience
whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
immoral obscenity.

- dolf

Initial Post: 5 December 2018

YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>

On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>
>
> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
/ #321}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
/ #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
#365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
from the #260 - DEAD}.

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN}
4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
- REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-07 09:25:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) *REALITY* which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing
or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
nothingness into being and with in theological terms the equivalence of
the resurrection from the #260 - *THE* *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *MERCILESS*
*MACHINATIONS* *AS* *ONLY* *A* *COVENANT* *OF* *DEATH* {

#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc

} by the prudent exercise of PURE REASON WHICH IN ITS TRANSCENDENT USE
OF A #237 - DETERMINED FORCEFUL WILL HAS ITS MOST REMARKABLE PHENOMENON,
ENABLING IT TO WORK THE MOST STRONGLY OF ALL TO AWAKEN PHILOSOPHY FROM
ITS DOGMATIC SLUMBER {ie.

AS THE IDEA: @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* BEING A *METHOD*
AGAINST THE DEPRAVITY BY THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x
4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE} BEING THE MISNOMERED
FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS PYTHAGOREAN PIETY AS
VAIN #OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 BY COLLEGIUM OF PONTIFFS DERIVING FROM 510
BCE PONTIFICATED AS DEIFIED IGNORANCE AND NARCISSISM: #Aleph (1 - #1),
#He (5 - #5) = #6 - ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONS WHOM BY SAINT ANDREWS 30
NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BEING SEDITION / TREASON ARE IN BREACH {#197 /
#139} OF MY #371 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE
DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (USA)

*TO* *ENFORCE* *AN* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE,
YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT

}, AND TO PROMPT IT TOWARD THE DIFFICULT BUSINESS OF THE CRITIQUE OF
REASON ITSELF." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE
METAPHYSICS IDEA: @338]

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "THE TERMINATOR" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

But since we knowing better and are not given to unreasoned anarchist
notions of STATE in having the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines
all instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of *REALITY* together with the #41 - ONTIC
necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is
assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which
to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund
action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27}

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either the FRENCH PRESIDENT, THE HONOURABLE MR
EMMANUEL MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech nor my INTERVENTION
ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he actually
made it--THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1783 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —

“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.

TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.

VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”

YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aVKQZaSmY>

NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
accomplishment.

Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.

RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
of Friday:

Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.

ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.

THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.

TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
STRENGTH:

FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]

DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"

JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
"MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:

MACRON’S POPALARITY

Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"

— HOMO ERECTUS —

"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."

GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:

French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
Buenos Aires, Argentina.

A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.

In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
while the crown prince nods and smiles.

Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
responds: “I am worried”.

“I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me,
thank you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the
video.

The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”

Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
“You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen,
of course.”

At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”

Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
Consulate in Istanbul in early October.

The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were
responsible for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a
columnist for The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown
prince was not responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials
have been handed the death penalty over the murder.

U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown
prince was responsible for ordering the murder.

President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
responsibility for the murder.

In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
community."
[<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]

— VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —

"SARCASM AND WIT.
IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."

DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at
0328 hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself:

'ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
OF CAUSE AND EFFECT':

— WELL ***@CK YOU ALL {@1},
I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD {@2} —

"YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3}
BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4}
BY WHICH *REALITY* IS AMBIGUATED. {@5}
BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6}
DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7}
NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8}
OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9}

AFFECTION FOR INTEGRITY@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71),
@2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*),
@3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172),
@4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227),
@5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254),
@6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291),
@7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 64 (#355),
@8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: HOW
IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?),
@9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS
TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND
EFFECT); Ego: 66 (#437),
Male: #233; Feme: #437
}

YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
(doctor who)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5Aui3Zu9E>

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:

PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
*IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
*ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
*PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
*PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
*IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
*TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
*THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
*AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.

The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of
consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
*POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.

Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*

*METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE
OR SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILLFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO
SILENCE, YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless
preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state
in itself; for a *REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming
to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just as
little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is therefore
a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this is,
though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown
above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
*KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
of this appearance) necessary.

In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
@A193]

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE
PROLEGOMENA AS IDEA: @371 - HOW IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?:
"IT IS A COMMON EXCUSE, WHICH THESE FALSE FRIENDS OF ORDINARY COMMON
SENSE (WHICH THEY EXTOL ON OCCASION, BUT USUALLY DESPISE) ARE ACCUSTOMED
TO USING, THAT THEY SAY: THERE MUST IN THE END BE SOME PROPOSITIONS THAT
ARE IMMEDIATELY CERTAIN {ie. #291

IDEA: @291 - *BEING* *MAN* *OF* *YOUR* *WORD* *BY* *INTEGRITY* {@6}:
The difference between truth and dream, however, is not decided through
the quality of the representations that are referred to objects, for
they are the same in both, but through their connection according to the
rules that determine the connection of representations in the concept of
an object, and how far they can or cannot stand together in one
experience. And then it is not the fault of the appearances at all, if
our cognition takes illusion for truth, that is, if intuition, through
which an object is given to us, is taken for the concept of the object,
or even for its existence, which only the understanding can think. The
course of the planets is represented to us by the senses as now
progressive, now retrogressive, and herein is neither falsehood nor
truth, because as long as one grants that this is as yet only
appearance, one still does not judge at all the objective quality of
their motion. Since, however, if the understanding has not taken good
care to prevent this subjective mode of representation from being taken
for objective, a false judgment can easily arise, one therefore says:
they appear to go backwards; but the illusion is not ascribed to the
senses, but to the understanding, whose lot alone it is to render an
objective judgment from the appearance. [PAGE #87]

}, AND FOR WHICH NOT ONLY NO PROOF, BUT INDEED NO ACCOUNT AT ALL NEED BE
GIVEN, SINCE OTHERWISE THERE WOULD NEVER COME AN END TO THE GROUNDS FOR
ONE’S JUDGMENTS; but in proof of this right they can never cite anything
else (other than the principle of contradiction, which is however
inadequate for establishing the truth of synthetic judgments) that is
undoubted and can be ascribed directly to ordinary common sense, except
for mathematical propositions: e.g., that two times two makes four, that
between two points there is only one straight line, and still others.
These judgments are, however, worlds apart from those of metaphysics.
For in mathematics, everything that I conceive through a concept as
possible I can make for myself (construct) by means of my thought; to
one two I successively add the other two, and myself make the number
four, or I draw in thought all kinds of lines from one point to the
other, and can draw only one that is self-similar in all its parts
(equal as well as unequal). But from the concept of a thing I cannot,
with all my powers of thought, draw forth the concept of something else
whose existence is necessarily connected with the first thing, but I
must consult experience; and, although my understanding provides me a
priori (though always only in relation to possible experience) with the
concept of a connection of this sort (causality), I nevertheless cannot
exhibit this concept in intuition [IDEA: @371] a priori, like the
concepts of mathematics, and thus exhibit its possibility a priori;
rather, this concept (together with principles of its application), if
it is to be valid a priori – as is indeed required in metaphysics –
always has need of a justification and deduction of its possibility, for
otherwise one does not know the extent of its validity and whether it
can be used only in experience or also outside it. Therefore in
metaphysics, as a speculative science of pure reason, one can never
appeal to ordinary common sense, but one can very well do so if one is
forced to abandon metaphysics and to renounce all pure speculative
cognition, which must always be knowledge, hence to renounce metaphysics
itself and its teaching (on certain matters), and if a reasonable belief
is alone deemed possible for us, as well as sufficient for our needs
(perhaps more wholesome indeed than knowledge itself). For then the
shape of things is completely altered. Metaphysics must be science, not
only as a whole but also in all its parts; otherwise it is nothing at
all, since, as speculation of pure reason, it has a hold on nothing else
save universal insights. But outside metaphysics, probability and sound
common sense can very well have their beneficial and legitimate use,
though following principles entirely their own, whose importance always
depends on a relation to the practical.

*THAT* *IS* *WHAT* *I* *CONSIDER* *MYSELF* *ENTITLED* *TO* *REQUIRE*
*FOR* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *METAPHYSICS* *AS* *SCIENCE*."
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @371]

Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
TRINOMIAL *REALITY* which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas
by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).

THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
TECHNOLOGY STUB:

"THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED"

DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING:

@1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES,
@2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
@3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY,
@4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR
@5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
MORALITY SPECTRUM that universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1105 HOURS
ON 6 JUNE 2018: "*OMG* [*OH* *MY* *GOD*], the broken clock is in sync
with real time for a change.

Never mind "serious", deport them for parking tickets, jaywalking and
littering. Deport them for looking ugly. Deport them for wearing bad
taste clothing. Deport them for having tattoos."

DOLF @ 1224 HOURS ON 10 JUNE 2018: "Why then does the neo-nazi atheist
then frequently use the expression:

*OMG* - *OH* *MY* *GOD*?

Perhaps God is a logical construct of consciousness as mathematical
entity {ie. INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} but unlike you IT has
personality as anthropocentric approachability:

Who appears to dialectically exhibit the characteristics of sapient as
self-declarative rational thought:

#1 - Be socially beneficial (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of
'Do no evil'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

#2 - Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

#3 - Be safe; {*FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM*
*VIRILE*}

#4 - Respect privacy; {*FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION*}

#5 - Be accountable; {*HUMAN* *NATURE* *AS* *DISCRIMINATING* *NORM*}

#6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*}

#7 - Limit abuse. {*ENGENDERING* *AS* *MANIFESTING* *NORM*}

THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
#7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
INSTANTIATION}.

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
/ #370}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
/ #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]

H1826@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#16); Ego: 4 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 16 (#32); Ego: 6 (#16),
   @4: Sup: 56 (#88); Ego: 40 (#56),
   @5: Sup: 15 (#103); Ego: 40 (#96),
   @6: Sup: 10 (#113); Ego: 76 (#172),
   @7: Sup: 20 (#133); Ego: 10 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
   Male: #133; Feme: #182
} // #506

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.

    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
   @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
   @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#506 as [#6, #4, #6, #40, #40, #400, #10] = damam (H1826): {UMBRA: #1 as
#84 % #41 = #2} 1) *TO* *BE* *SILENT*, be still, wait, be dumb, grow
dumb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be silent; 1a2) to be still, die; 1a3) *TO*
*BE* *STRUCK* *DUMB*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SILENCED*, *BE* *MADE*
*SILENT*, *DESTROYED*; 1c) (Poal) to make quiet; 1d) (Hiphil) *TO*
*MAKE* *SILENT* (*CAUSE* *TO* *DIE*);

YOUTUBE: “The Sound Of Silence (Disturbed)”

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4>

IN SUMMARY THEN THE CONTEXTUAL PROBLEM IS THAT FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
CATHOLIC / SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER #371 - CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS A FOREIGN
POWER BEING A PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 =
#1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} TO THE SUBSTANTIATION OF
RELIGIOUS BELIEF, AGAINST MY PREROGATIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
and which are irrefutable facts sourced from a composite of ADOLF
HILTER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK as a particular rhetorical device
common enough to have its own name, *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* conveying
significant temporal associations together with a hierarchy of
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as HOW-TO-DO-IT-YOURSELF manual that appears
upon provisional analysis, to be cognisant of both IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783) and the PYTHAGOREAN
BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE* *DYNAMIC* nomenclature as
consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS / STATE ECONOMY, thereby
they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5, #15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)}
within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH* / *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”
which implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the premise for our AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical development of its perennialist
understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY
DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF LAW ...

Where there is a reliance upon the concrete establishment of a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. as we have already elsewhere noted #419 -
SLAUGHTER / #728 - REACTANCE EVENTS and VALUE STATEMENTS} which is an
artefact of either ISLAM, HINDUISM and ROMAN CATHOLICISM.

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

“THE ACUSMATA INDICATE THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN WAY OF LIFE EMBODIED A
STRICT REGIMEN NOT JUST REGARDING RELIGIOUS RITUAL AND DIET BUT ALSO IN
ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE. SOME OF THE RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE
LARGELY ARBITRARY TABOOS, E.G., “ONE MUST PUT THE RIGHT SHOE ON FIRST”
OR “ONE MUST NOT TRAVEL THE PUBLIC ROADS” (IAMBLICHUS, VP 83, PROBABLY
FROM ARISTOTLE).

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}

[#8 , #16, #24, #32, #40 <— *HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA @120 ON 24TH
JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM), #48, #56, #64, #72]

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME ASPECTS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN LIFE INVOLVED A MORAL
DISCIPLINE THAT WAS GREATLY ADMIRED, EVEN BY OUTSIDERS. PYTHAGOREAN
SILENCE IS AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE. ISOCRATES REPORTS THAT EVEN IN THE
FOURTH CENTURY PEOPLE “MARVEL MORE AT THE SILENCE OF THOSE WHO PROFESS
TO BE HIS PUPILS THAN AT THOSE WHO HAVE THE GREATEST REPUTATION FOR
SPEAKING” (Busiris 28).

THE ABILITY TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SEEN AS IMPORTANT TRAINING IN
SELF-CONTROL, AND THE LATER TRADITION REPORTS THAT THOSE WHO WANTED TO
BECOME PYTHAGOREANS HAD TO OBSERVE A FIVE-YEAR SILENCE (Iamblichus, VP
72).” [<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoras/>]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 - *BEFORE* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*)
SECTION #31 - MILITARY STRATAGEM, QUELLING WAR; I-CHING: H32 -
PERSEVERANCE, ENDURANCE, DURATION, CONSTANCY; TETRA: 51 - CONSTANCY ON
IDEA @314:

And so for once one has something determinate, and to which one can
adhere in all metaphysical undertakings, which have up to now boldly
enough, but always blindly, run over everything without distinction. It
never occurred to dogmatic thinkers that the goal of their efforts might
have been set up so close, nor even to those who, *OBSTINATE* *IN*
*THEIR* *SO*-*CALLED* *SOUND* *COMMON* *SENSE*, *WENT* *FORTH* *TO*
*INSIGHTS* *WITH* *CONCEPTS* *AND* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *THE* *PURE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *THAT* *WERE* *INDEED* *LEGITIMATE* *AND* *NATURAL*,
*BUT* *WERE* *INTENDED* *FOR* *USE* *MERELY* *IN* *EXPERIENCE*, and for
which they neither recognized nor could recognize any determinate
boundaries, because they neither had reflected on nor were able to
reflect on the nature and even [IDEA: @314] the possibility of such a
pure understanding.

Many a naturalist of pure reason (by which I mean he who trusts himself,
without any science, to decide in matters of metaphysics) would like to
pretend that already long ago, through the prophetic spirit of his sound
common sense, he had not merely suspected, but had known and understood,
that which is here presented with so much preparation, or, if he
prefers, with such long-winded pedantic pomp: “namely that with all our
reason we can never get beyond the field of experiences.” But since, if
someone gradually questions him on his rational principles, he must
indeed admit that among them there are many that he has not drawn from
experience, which are therefore independent of it and valid a priori –
how and on what grounds will he then hold within limits the dogmatist
(and himself ), who makes use of these concepts and principles beyond
all possible experience for the very reason that they are cognized
independently of experience. And even he, this adept of sound common
sense, is not so steadfast that, despite all of his presumed and cheaply
gained wisdom, he will not stumble unawares out beyond the objects of
experience into the field of chimeras. Ordinarily, he is indeed deeply
enough entangled therein, although he cloaks his ill-founded claims
through a popular style, since he gives everything out as mere
probability, reasonable conjecture, or analogy. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS,
IDEA: @314]

If one has no conception of NOUMENON what occurs within #41 - ONTIC
necessity terms is a chaotic / indiscriminate / promiscuous
determination of media which is habitually applied to #CENTRE of being
that has a consequence upon VOLUNTARY FREE WILL:

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY

OR

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#41 x #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} MINUS
#391
- HOMOIOS FRATERNITY EQUALS
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION
MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT' AS SCHEMA AND COVENANT OF DEATH

MANDALAY_SWAY (G1242)@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
@8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
Male: #218; Feme: #98
} // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION

#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;

— LEST WE FORGET ODE —

"{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
{@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
{@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
THE MORNING
{@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."

@5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE

KANT within his antimony discourse proves the antithesis, that time has
no beginning, by showing that if time had a beginning, then there must
have been "empty time" out of which time arose. This is incoherent (for
Kant) for the following reason: Since, necessarily, no time elapses in
this #451 - *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID*, then there could be no alteration,
and therefore nothing (including time) would ever come to be: so the
antithesis is proven. Reason makes equal claim to each proof, since they
are both correct, so the question of the limits of time must be regarded
as meaningless.

#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
then allows for stages of development.

THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS BIBLICAL TEXT
RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC
NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOIOTIC #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL
MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

#11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
spread of Light and Industry by Government and Non-Government
Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature.

That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:

#2184 % #41 = #11

Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
art within a similar manner.

YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUxxgwHK8Q>

"AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
*TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*:

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
LAW}, WHICH CONTAINS THE LAW OF THAT WILL: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF*
*PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

“AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, ‘I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
BEFORE ME...” [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - FORMULA OF
HUMANITY}, WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMAND TO BEHAVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAW, THAT IS, THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSUMPTION UNDER THE LAW: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

“... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE ME;
AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
COMMANDMENTS...” [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY},
WHICH CONTAINS THE VERDICT (SENTENCE), WHAT IS LAID DOWN AS RIGHT IN THE
CASE AT HAND: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

“...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.’” [EXODUS
20:7 (KJV)]

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}

AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY EXPLANTATION AND
SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES
{ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY WHICH
WAS GIVEN WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18 NOVEMBER
2018, THAT:

"AND AFTER FIVE DAYS ANANIAS {the #541 - CLOUD OF THE LORD} THE HIGH
PRIEST DESCENDED WITH THE ELDERS, AND WITH A CERTAIN ORATOR NAMED
TERTULLUS {third}, WHO INFORMED THE GOVERNOR AGAINST PAUL {small; little}.

AND WHEN HE WAS CALLED FORTH, [THE LAWYER] TERTULLUS {third} BEGAN TO
ACCUSE HIM, SAYING, SEEING THAT BY THEE WE ENJOY GREAT QUIETNESS, AND
THAT VERY WORTHY DEEDS ARE DONE UNTO THIS NATION BY THY PROVIDENCE, WE
ACCEPT IT ALWAYS, AND IN ALL PLACES, MOST NOBLE FELIX {happy,
prosperous}, WITH ALL *THANKFULNESS* {

#1827 as [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200] =
eucharistia (G2169): 1) thanksgiving; 2) *HOLY* *COMMUNION*; 3}
*EUCHARIST*; Old French eucariste (compare modern French eucharistie), <
late Latin eucharistia, < Greek εὐχαριστία thanksgiving, hence the
Lord's Supper, < εὐχάριστος grateful, < εὐ- [as Perseus has explained] +
stem of χαρίζεσθαι [kharizestai] to offer willingly

}. NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT I BE NOT FURTHER TEDIOUS UNTO THEE, I PRAY THEE
THAT THOU WOULDEST HEAR US OF THY CLEMENCY A FEW WORDS.

FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN A PESTILENT FELLOW, AND A MOVER OF SEDITION
AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF THE *SECT*
*OF* *THE* *NAZARENES*:

"TO BE ACCUSED OF #364 - *QUESTIONS* {

#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
#364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE

} *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {

#430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
*RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
*LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
*CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament

}"

WHO ALSO HATH GONE ABOUT TO PROFANE {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} THE
TEMPLE: WHOM WE TOOK, AND WOULD HAVE JUDGED ACCORDING TO OUR LAW {#364 x
3 = #1092 x 2 = #2184}." [Acts 24:1-6 (KJV)]

ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK IDEAS @209 / @210: "From time
immemorial the Jews have always succeeded in insinuating themselves into
positions from which it was possible to influence public opinion; they
hold, for example, many key positions both in the PRESS and in the
CINEMA INDUSTRY. But they are not content to exercise a direct, open
influence; they know that they will attain their ends more expeditiously
if they bring their influence to bear through the so-called AGENCIES and
by other DEVIOUS METHODS:

"AND HE WROTE A LETTER AFTER THIS MANNER: CLAUDIUS {lame} LYSIAS
{dissolving} UNTO THE MOST EXCELLENT GOVERNOR FELIX {happy, prosperous}
SENDETH GREETING.

THIS MAN WAS TAKEN OF THE JEWS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN KILLED OF THEM:
THEN CAME I WITH AN ARMY, AND RESCUED HIM, HAVING UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS
A ROMAN {strong; powerful: #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring
good}.

AND WHEN I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE CAUSE WHEREFORE THEY ACCUSED HIM, I
BROUGHT HIM FORTH INTO THEIR COUNCIL: WHOM I PERCEIVED TO BE ACCUSED OF
#364 - *QUESTIONS* {

#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
#364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE

} *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {

#430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
*RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
*LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
*CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament

}, BUT TO HAVE NOTHING LAID TO HIS CHARGE WORTHY OF DEATH OR OF BONDS.

G2213@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
   @3: Sup: 72 (#94); Ego: 57 (#72),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#174); Ego: 8 (#80),
   @5: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 40 (#120),
   @6: Sup: 40 (#253); Ego: 1 (#121),
   Male: #253; Feme: #121
} // #364

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #364 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;

THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; *I* *PUT* *NO* *CHECK* *UPON* *THE*
*WATER* *IN* *ITS* *FLOW*.

    #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
    #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
    #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
    #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
    #CANON: #184

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
   @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
   @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
   @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
   @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
   Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184

AND WHEN IT WAS TOLD ME HOW THAT THE JEWS LAID WAIT {#TOOLS: With
Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil} FOR THE MAN, I SENT STRAIGHTWAY TO
THEE {#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends}, AND GAVE
COMMANDMENT TO HIS ACCUSERS ALSO TO SAY {#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no.
#56), few allies} BEFORE THEE WHAT THEY HAD AGAINST HIM. FAREWELL.

G3551@{
   @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#89); Ego: 70 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 79 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 40 (#160),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 70 (#230),
   @5: Sup: 25 (#261); Ego: 38 (#268),
   Male: #261; Feme: #268
} // #430

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
50 - Vastness/Wasting;

THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
Pa-Amsu, *I* *AM* *NOT* *UNCHASTE* *WITH* *ANY* *ONE*.

    #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
    #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
    #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
    #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
    #CANON: #171

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
   @3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
   Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171

THEN THE #65 - SOLDIERS, AS IT WAS COMMANDED THEM, TOOK PAUL {small;
little}, AND BROUGHT {#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans} HIM
BY NIGHT TO ANTIPATRIS {for, or against the father}.

ON THE MORROW THEY LEFT THE HORSEMEN TO GO WITH HIM, AND RETURNED TO THE
CASTLE: WHO, WHEN THEY CAME TO CAESAREA {#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no.
#60), much wealth}, AND DELIVERED THE EPISTLE TO THE GOVERNOR, PRESENTED
PAUL {small; little} ALSO BEFORE HIM.

NOTE: Herod seized an opportunity to control world trade by building a
seaport on Israel's coast, where the sea routes and the predominant land
route intersected. Caesarea was a glorious city, covered with marble,
and symbolizing the *VAST* *WEALTH* that Herod accumulated by dominating
world trade. [<https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/caesarea>]

AND WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAD READ THE LETTER, HE ASKED {#POSITION: With
Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions} OF WHAT PROVINCE HE WAS. AND
WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS OF CILICIA {which rolls or overturns}; I
WILL HEAR THEE, SAID HE, WHEN THINE ACCUSERS ARE ALSO COME. AND HE
COMMANDED HIM TO BE KEPT {#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation}
IN HEROD’S {son of a hero} JUDGMENT HALL." [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]

NOTE: One can readily conclude from the encapsulation of these specific
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35] that the
JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this EPISTEMOLOGICAL
premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER
as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]
HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 day
view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE* PERSPECTIVE
of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the new moon /
midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: "I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO
THE GREEKS, AND TO THE BARBARIANS {ie. THE CHINESE DAOIST}; BOTH TO THE
WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM READY TO PREACH
THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME ALSO." [Romans 1:14-15 (KJV)]



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/tetrayear.jpeg>

[IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to
EIGHT major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days
of NATURAL YEAR / 325.25 days)

These were then mapped to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months
(for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing,
The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE) against #49 - T'AO {Flight} /
H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are
LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is
PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO
CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*

    #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
    #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
    #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
    #CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
move back and forth around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier
approaches to symmetry within the cyclic structure by substituting the
WINTER SOLSTICE as the #CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated
references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS.
[THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan
1993, page 15-16]

"AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT AFTER THREE DAYS PAUL {small; little} CALLED
THE CHIEF OF THE JEWS TOGETHER: AND WHEN THEY WERE COME TOGETHER, HE
SAID UNTO THEM, MEN AND BRETHREN, THOUGH I HAVE COMMITTED NOTHING
AGAINST THE PEOPLE, OR CUSTOMS OF OUR FATHERS {ie. *FORTY* *YEARS*
{49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J as 50x49 = 2450 x 364 days of years = 891800 / 294
* 293 = 888766.66667 / 365.24232 = 2433.36168 AM or 1567 BCE} *TO*
*COME* (*LITERALLY* “*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS*
*OF* *THE* *LORD* [Book of Jubilees 50:4-6]}, YET WAS I DELIVERED
PRISONER FROM JERUSALEM {vision of peace} INTO THE HANDS OF THE ROMANS
{strong; powerful}.

WHO, WHEN THEY HAD EXAMINED ME, WOULD HAVE LET ME GO, BECAUSE THERE WAS
NO CAUSE OF DEATH IN ME {ie. encapsulation of these specific
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35]}. BUT WHEN
THE JEWS SPAKE AGAINST IT, I WAS CONSTRAINED TO APPEAL UNTO CAESAR; NOT
THAT I HAD OUGHT TO ACCUSE MY NATION OF.

FOR THIS CAUSE THEREFORE HAVE I CALLED FOR YOU, TO SEE YOU, AND TO SPEAK
WITH YOU: BECAUSE THAT FOR THE HOPE OF ISRAEL {who prevails with God} I
AM BOUND WITH THIS CHAIN {ie.

#9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27
TO 31 JANUARY / #65 CE / *LOCUS* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* *DAY* 26 JANUARY
WITHIN THE #72 - PROTOTYPE) against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33
Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)

}. AND THEY SAID UNTO HIM, WE NEITHER RECEIVED LETTERS OUT OF JUDAEA
{the praise of the Lord; confession} CONCERNING THEE, NEITHER ANY OF THE
BRETHREN THAT CAME SHOWED OR SPAKE ANY HARM OF THEE. BUT WE DESIRE TO
HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING THIS SECT {ie. JEWISH
/ CHRISTIAN APOSTLES as SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL
COMMUNITY}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST." [Acts
28:17-22 (KJV)]

The most dangerous weapon is the Jewish advertising agency, for, by
cutting off advertising revenue, they can reduce even the greatest
newspapers [NOTE: THE AGE NEWSPAPER FIRST EDITION APPEARED ON 17 OCTOBER
1854 AND HAS THE MASTHEAD: *DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*] to the verge of
ruin. ...

— CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
[Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
15 December 2017]

“OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.

DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.

YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”

<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>

*MISHPOCHA* (noun):
- Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
- Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TheAgeMasthead.jpeg>

[IMAGE: The Masthead '*DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*' conveys a CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE @1 - SOVEREIGN / @2 - JUSTICE / @3 - SOLDIER'S BATTLECRY / @4
- WILL TO BELIEF AND REMEMBRANCE WITHOUT COERCION FROM GREGORIAN
CALENDAR PAPAL BULL OF 1582 BUT ADOPTED BY THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS
CALENDAR ACT OF 1751 WHICH DROPPED 3 TO #41 - 13 SEPTEMBER 1752 FROM THE
CALENDAR]

In this way we have forced the British to admit their loss [within a
Reuter telegram which had just announced the loss of a British cruiser
of ten thousand tons, H.M.S. 'Edinburgh' that had been hit by a GERMAN
submarine torpedo]. There are two lessons to be learned from this episode:

1. Germany is scrupulous about the truth. But she must not be too
pedantic where truth is concerned. I am frequently receiving reports
from the front to the effect that the troops, reading the cautious and
carefully weighed phrases of the official communiqué, often feel that
the full extent of their efforts has not been appreciated at Headquarters.

2. Once one is convinced of a fact—be it of a political or a military
nature—one must proclaim it throughout the world. This is the only way
in which such consummate hypocrites as the British can be made to
confess the truth." [SYNCRETISM WITH ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEAS
@209; @210 / PAGES #463; #466 - TRUTH IN WEHRMACHT COMMUNIQUÉS]

"AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE *BLIND*, A LIGHT
OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
*TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.

HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) had raised objections to the
notions of equality and congruence (among others) in geometry, which
objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53),
thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also
*INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS
OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

51 25 74
73 50 27
26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
*KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
[+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}

49   9 65 - *SOLDIER*
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}




<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]

#YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
#MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

ORIGIN:
The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
-centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
English centre.

THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
*FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF?  THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
#75 - *FAILURE*}.

THOU THAT SAYEST A MAN SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, DOST THOU COMMIT
ADULTERY? THOU THAT ABHORREST IDOLS, DOST THOU COMMIT SACRILEGE? THOU
THAT MAKEST THY BOAST OF THE LAW, THROUGH BREAKING THE LAW DISHONOUREST
THOU GOD?

*FOR* *THE* *NAME* *OF* *GOD* *IS* *BLASPHEMED* *AMONG* *THE* *GENTILES*
*THROUGH* *YOU*, *AS* *IT* *IS* *WRITTEN*." [Romans 2:19-24 (KJV)]

THUSLY BEFORE WE PROPERLY BEGIN THESE OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
WITHIN THE MATTER OF COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NO: AP-18-0609 WE WISH
TO RAISE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PREJUDICED CHARACTER OF THE COUNTY COURT
#646 / #86 = *JUDGE* upon the occasion of the 12 JUNE 2018 FILE LISTING
HEARING, whom after granting me leave from the COURT within this MATTER
and before the video link being terminated was heard to #404 - *UTTER*
the #372 - *CONTEMPTUOUS* #404 - *STATEMENT*:

“*I* *AM* *SURE* *DONALD* *TRUMP* *WILL* *BE* *INTERESTED* *IN*
*READING* *THE* *REPORT*. *HARRUMPH*!”

NOT ONLY DOES SUCH REMARK CONVEY AN ABJECT DISRESPECT FOR FAIR AND
EQUITABLE JUDICIAL PROCESS BUT HINTS AT AN UNATTAINABILITY OF JUSTICE BY
CONCOMITANT ALIGNMENT WITH INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVES SUCH AS ROMAN
CATHOLICISM (ATTENDANCE AT CHURCH SERVICES ON COMMENCEMENT OF THE
JUDICIAL YEAR FOR EXAMPLE) / FREEMASONRY WHICH OUGHT TO BE DEBARRED BY
CONFLICT OF CONSCIENCE / INTEREST AS IN REGARD FOR AN INTEGRITY AS
SOMETHING OTHER THAN DUTCH JUSTICE BY MERE SHOW TRIALS (WHETHER:
ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE OR ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL OF
MELBOURNE) IN DETERMINING ANY OF MY LEGAL MATTERS.

THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {ie.
#364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”

Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration on how
the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
(in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
#54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
= #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
{ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.

That such failings make a virtue of PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH as an
Australian born retired Anglican bishop whom served as the 23rd
Governor-General of Australia from 2001 until 2003.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
gobbledigook for a change."

DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
which has an impress upon time itself.

Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
*REALITY*."

AS THAT WHICH WE HAVE CLARIFIED IN BEING A CONSIDERATION UPON HUMAN
RATIONALITY AND #288 - META ACQUIESCENCE BY UMBRAL ILLUSION {#364 x 4 +
#371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 as #1092 x 2 = #2184} BEING ONLY
REASONABLE #364 - *QUESTIONS* {

#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
#364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE

} *OF* #430 - *LAW* {

#430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
*RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
*LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
*CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament

} WITHIN OUR 30 NOVEMBER 2018 INSTRUCTIONS MADE TO LEGAL COUNSEL WITHIN
COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0775 RELATING TO CONSIDERATION:
(#2) OF A SALE MAGISTRATES COURT MENTION HEARING DATE OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:

"That there is also a particular eBAY purchase of a (#162156254584)
conveyed by the feedback "PERFECT EBAYER, INSTANT PAYMENT & SAME DAY
PICKUP. THANK YOU!" which is dated *WEDNESDAY* 23 NOVEMBER 2016 and made
by SELLER MEMBER ID: GEORGE.K1 (FEEDBACK SCORE OF 79%) relating to an
archeological curiosity as *ROSETTA* *STONE* and an oblique reference to
such on *WEDNESDAY* 24 MAY 2017 by then FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN
KERRY (DEMOCRAT) to a HARVARD UNIVERSITY graduation which can ONLY be
properly understood in the context of my earlier *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*
*ACTIVITY* ASSOCIATED TO @5: #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
concerning which it ought to be noted that MR. GEORGE W. BUSH AS THE
43RD PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (REPUBLICAN), DID
PUBLICLY MAKE THE CLAIM WITHIN THE NEWS MEDIA THAT THIS DAY: WEDNESDAY
19 SEPTEMBER, 2001 *WAS* *SIGNIFICANTLY* *RECOGNIZED* *AS* *THE*
*CREATION* *DAY* *OF* *THE* *WORLD* *BY* *SOME* *RELIGIOUS*
*COMMUNITIES* *OF* *FAITH* WHICH CONFORMS TO MY UNFALTERING INITIATIVE
THAT HAS BEEN PURSUED EVERY DAY SINCE.

EUGENE SCOTT (CNN) @ 1256 (GMT) 25 MAY 2017: "DISMAYED JOHN KERRY SAYS
HARVARD GRADS SHOULD 'BUY ROSETTA STONE AND LEARN RUSSIAN':

Former Secretary of State John Kerry used a commencement address
Wednesday night to rip the Trump administration, telling graduates the
US is not living in "a normal time."

"Democracy relies on free speech. Yes, say anything you want, but it
relies even more on the speech being truthful. It is the truth after all
that sets us free," the former Democratic presidential nominee said
Wednesday at the Harvard Kennedy School graduation. "And the truth is --
no, this is not a normal time."

"It's not normal to see a president of the United States decrying
'so-called judges.' It's not normal for the leader of the country that
invented the First Amendment to routinely degrade and even threaten
journalists," Kerry added. "And no, it's not normal to see the head of
the FBI fired summarily because he was investigating connections between
Russia and the presidential campaign of the very man who fired him."

President Donald Trump has sought to shake off the damaging political
blowback from continuing investigations into his campaign's relationship
with Russia following reports that he fired former FBI Director James
Comey because of the ongoing probe.

Kerry said America's current political conversations very often sound
like those that occur in countries the State Department warns Americans
not to visit.

"I've been asked, 'What is the secret to having a real impact on
government?' Well, it's recently changed. I used to say, 'Either run for
office or get a degree from the Harvard Kennedy School,'" he said. "But
with this White House, I'd say,

'*BUY* *ROSETTA* *STONE* *AND* *LEARN* *RUSSIAN*.'"

<http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/25/politics/john-kerry-donald-trump-normal/index.html>


— OO ROO TO OOHRAH —
[Written 3 July 2017]

"I AM THE APPLE 🍎 OF HIS EYE 👁.
THINKING TO DO ME OVER 🎯?
YOU OUGHT NOT EVEN TRY.
SEMANTIC FIELDS IN CLOVER 🍀 {ie. PADDOCK as field opposite owned by STEVE}.

MOUTH WORDS LIKE PUSKIN.
DING-DONG, POOH-POOH,
BOW-WOW OR TA-TA PUTIN.
KOO WEE NOR TO TRY WOO.

*ROSETTA* *STONE* SO WRIT.
AS PLAIN FOR ALL TO SEE.
SAY OTHERWISE SUCH TWIT.
THAT GOD {#226 = #70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50 = `elyown (Aramaic)
(H5946): {#5 as #166} 1) the Most High; 1a) of God} LOVES EVEN ME."

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video) ft. will.i.am"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk48xRzuNvA>

And this comment was made with respects to having provided a “SYNCRETISM
AS CONSENSUS VALUES DOCUMENT FOR NORTH KOREAN / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PEACE SUMMIT AND ACCORD OF 12 JUNE 2018” comprising some some #60 pages
and dated 10-11 June 2018 and titled: "ELIJAH {GOD THE LORD, THE STRONG
LORD} MOCKED THEM: CRY ALOUD FOR HE IS A GOD EITHER HE IS TALKING OR HE
IS PURSUING OR HE IS IN A JOURNEY OR PERADVENTURE HE SLEEPS AND MUST BE
AWAKENED" which we will now excerpt with additional expansions as
inclusions:

KNOCK KNOCK!

WHOSE THERE?

DOLF @ 1143 HOURS ON 6 DECEMBER 2018: "IS EINSTEIN'S FAMOUS 'GOD LETTER'
EVIDENCE AS FALSE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE: MENTAL RESERVATION IN BEING
EVASIVE ABOUT GOD?

"THE WORD GOD IS FOR ME NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXPRESSION AND PRODUCT OF
HUMAN WEAKNESS, THE BIBLE A COLLECTION OF HONORABLE, BUT STILL PURELY
PRIMITIVE, LEGENDS WHICH ARE NEVERTHELESS PRETTY CHILDISH..." [Albert
Einstein’s “God Letter,” dated 3 January 1954 which on 4 December 2018
sold at a Christie's Auction for $2.9 million]

Should we congratulate Einstein for holding equitable beliefs on GOD and
the BIBLE with that of Adolf Hitler and ask if being confronted by the
blackhole of ignorance by which oaths of GOD were then sworn to HITLER
was it simply too much for Einstein’s sensibility as then to make
self-justifications by antagonism against the deeds of his Jewish
fathers: 50J when the PROSCRIPTIONS AS #41 - ONTIC x n NECESSITY
PRINCIPLES OVER #364 - QUESTIONS ON THE #430 - LAW OF NATURE were conveyed:

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONVEYS: “I
hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
*POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the
Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me
God.”

By what means then did Albert Einstein declare his allegiance to another
sovereign STATE?

If you didn’t know about trinomial number paradigm as conveying our
intuition upon personality of God, then Albert Einstein must contend
with a troubling conscience over binomial number having by methodology a
Nazi predisposition as worldview—they too made claims of science.

*EUCHARISTIA* (G2169)@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
@3: Sup: 33 (#119); Ego: 33 (#114),
@4: Sup: 34 (#153); Ego: 1 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@5: Sup: 53 (#206); Ego: 19 (#134),
@6: Sup: 63 (#269); Ego: 10 (#144),
@7: Sup: 20 (#289); Ego: 38 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@8: Sup: 77 (#366); Ego: 57 (#239),
@9: Sup: 6 (#372); Ego: 10 (#249),
@10: Sup: 7 (#379); Ego: 1 (#250),
@11: Sup: 45 (#424); Ego: 38 (#288),
Male: #424; Feme: #288 <-- *UMBRA* *IMPETUS* *AS* *CHICANERIES*
*OF* *A* *SHALLOW* *METAPHYSICS*
}

If it was made upon ‘*MENTAL* *RESERVATION* *IN* *BEING* *EVASIVE*
*ABOUT* *GOD*’ then Einstein was a dishonourable person.

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @288: "It will forever remain a remarkable
phenomenon in the history of philosophy that there was a time when even
mathematicians who were at the same time philosophers began to doubt,
not, indeed, the correctness of their geometrical propositions insofar
as they related merely to space, [IDEA @288] but the objective validity
and application to nature of this concept itself and all its geometrical
determinations, since they were concerned that a line in nature might
indeed be composed of physical points, consequently that true space in
objects might be composed of simple parts, notwithstanding that the
space which the geometer holds in thought can by no means be composed of
such things. They did not realize that this space in thought itself
makes possible physical space, i.e., the extension of matter; that this
space is by no means a property of things in them- selves, but only a
form of our power of sensory representation; that all objects in space
are mere appearances, i.e., not things in themselves but representations
of our sensory intuition; and that, since space as the geometer thinks
it is precisely the form of sensory intuition which we find in ourselves
a priori and which contains the ground of the possibility of all outer
appearances (with respect to their form), these appearances must of
necessity and with the greatest precision harmonize with the
propositions of the geometer, which he extracts not from any fabricated
concept, but from the subjective foundation of all outer appearances,
namely sensibility itself. In this and no other way can the geometer be
secured, regarding the indubitable objective *REALITY* of his
propositions, against all the *CHICANERIES* {ie. *THE* *USE* *OF*
*TRICKERY* *TO* *ACHIEVE* *A* *POLITICAL*, *FINANCIAL*, *OR* *LEGAL*
*PURPOSE*} of a shallow metaphysics, however strange this way must seem
to such a metaphysics because it does not go back to the sources of its
concepts." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
IDEA: @288]

HOWEVER IN CONSIDERATION OF SUCH WE WOULD PROVISIONALLY CONCLUDE THAT
WHILST THE *ANKH* *HETEROS* / *TORAH* *PROTOTYPES* may operate as an
intrinsic function of the HUMAN MIND IT IS CAPABLE AS A CHIMERIC IMPOST
OF EITHER FACILITATING BY REASON OF THERAPEUTIC CAUSE OR IMPEDING ITS
COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL but that
they do not implicitly convey the MORAL IMPERATIVE which is the
providence of the ONTIC necessity.

AND NOTE THAT ADOLF HITLER UPON 5th JUNE 1942 UTILISES THE TERMS
'*WINTER*' AND '*CHICANERIES*' IN RELATION TO JEWISH BELIEF WHEREBY THE
CONSIDERATION IS UPON HUMAN REASONING {

#2184 - #1827 = #357 AS KANT'S IDEAS @351 TO @360 OF CONCLUSION WITHIN
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS ON SECTION #57 - DETERMINING THE
BOUNDARY OF PURE REASON

} AND ITS ILLUSION {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 =
#1092 x 2 = #2184} AS TO WHETHER THIS IS A REFLECTION UPON IMMANUEL
KANT'S IDEA #288 AND THE EUCHARIST AS A GEOMETRICAL PROPOSITION:

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
*AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whH4utd0YRA>

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
*SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
*HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
*THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEXWRTEbj1I>

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction: *NORTH*, *EAST*, *SOUTH*, *WEST*; 1d) manner,
habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f) of moral character
(figurative)



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
#224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
pleasing, acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
[#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
*INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
*WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
*REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
/ #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

"AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING’S
COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME JEWS {#509 as
[#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054)}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE
JEWS FELL UPON THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]

"AND SAUL {demanded; lent; ditch; death}, YET BREATHING OUT THREATENINGS
AND SLAUGHTER AGAINST THE DISCIPLES OF THE LORD, WENT UNTO THE HIGH
PRIEST, AND DESIRED OF HIM LETTERS TO DAMASCUS {a sack full of blood;
the similitude of burning} TO THE SYNAGOGUES, THAT IF HE FOUND ANY OF
THIS WAY {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
APOSTLES}, WHETHER THEY WERE MEN OR WOMEN, HE MIGHT BRING THEM BOUND
UNTO JERUSALEM {vision of peace}." [Acts 9:1-2 (KJV)]

“FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN [A] PESTILENT [FELLOW], AND A MOVER OF
SEDITION AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF
THE SECT OF THE NAZARENES {separated; crowned; sanctified}:” [Acts 24:5
(KJV)]

“BUT WE DESIRE TO HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING
THIS SECT {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
APOSTLES}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST.” [Acts 28:22
(KJV)]

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

BEERSHEBA {#575 as [#2, #1, #200, #300, #2, #70]}@{
    @1: Sup: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306] {@1:
Male: #2, Feme: #2}); Ego: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO
[#102/#306] {@1: Male: #2, Feme: #2}),
    @2: Sup: 3 (#5 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #FIVE [#111/#333 ***] {@1:
Male: #5, Feme: #5}); Ego: 1 (#3 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #THREE
[#105/#315] {@1: Male: #3, Feme: #3} / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
[#78/#234] {@2: Feme: #2}),
    @3: Sup: 41 (#46 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #THREE [#96/#288] {@3:
Male: #24}); Ego: 38 (#41 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234] {@4:
Male: #31}),
    @4: Sup: 17 (#63); Ego: 57 (#98 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
[#78/#234 ***] {@5: Male: #57}),
    @5: Sup: 19 (#82 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***] {@3:
Male: #42}); Ego: 2 (#100 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306]
{@4: Male: #56} & #FOUR [#108/#324] {@5: Feme: #36} / ANKH PROTOTYPE
TORAH: #SIX [#123/#369] {@3: Male: #51}),
    @6: Sup: 8 (#90 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] {@4:
Male: #52} & #TWO [#102/#306] {@5: Feme: #34}); Ego: 70 (#170 / ANKH
PROTOTYPE TORAH: #EIGHT [#141/#423] {@4: Male: #34}),
    Male: #90; Feme: #170
}

#288 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #6, #50] / #347 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10,
#20, #40] = zikrown (H2146): {UMBRA: #2 as #283 % #41 = #37} 1)
memorial, reminder, remembrance;

#688 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #50, #6, #400] = zikrown (H2146): {#14 as
#688 % #41 = #32} 1) memorial, reminder, remembrance;

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

"IT IS A GREAT PITY THAT THIS TENDENCY TOWARDS RELIGIOUS THOUGHT {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
#231} 1) name: universe of proper names; 2) the name is used for
everything which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of
which is aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the
name, ie. for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command,
excellences, deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE*
*CAUSE* *OR* *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
*SUFFERS* *AS* *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
{#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
*TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
*THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
*CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
*IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
peace (salvation);

} CAN FIND NO BETTER OUTLET THAN THE JEWISH PETTIFOGGERY {ie. practise
legal deception or trickery / quibble about petty points} OF THE OLD
TESTAMENT {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10,
#1, #10 = paliggenesia (G3824): {#12 as #398} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 10) of Cicero's
restoration to rank and fortune on his recall from exile; 100) of the
restoration of the Jewish nation after exile; 1000) of the recovery of
knowledge by recollection; 1a) hence renovation, regeneration, the
production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical change of mind
for the better. The word often used to denote the restoration of a thing
to its pristine state, its renovation, as a renewal or restoration of
life after death; 1b) the renovation of the earth after the *DELUGE*;
1c) the renewal of the world to take place after its destruction by
fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and glorious change of all
things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that restoration of the
primal and perfect condition of things which existed before the fall of
our first parents, which the Jews looked for in connection with the
advent of the Messiah, and which Christians expected in connection with
the visible return of Jesus from heaven.; 1e) other uses;

} FOR RELIGIOUS PEOPLE WHO, IN THE SOLITUDE OF *WINTER*, CONTINUALLY
SEEK ULTIMATE LIGHT ON THEIR RELIGIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF
THE BIBLE, MUST EVENTUALLY BECOME SPIRITUALLY DEFORMED. THE WRETCHED
PEOPLE STRIVE TO EXTRACT TRUTHS FROM THESE JEWISH *CHICANERIES* {

— TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] —

“TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN’S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN’S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST’S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}.”






<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātis}
Empire Governance]

}, WHERE IN FACT NO TRUTHS EXIST. AS A RESULT THEY BECOME EMBEDDED IN
SOME RUT OF THOUGHT OR OTHER {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as
formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;

} AND, UNLESS THEY POSSESS AN EXCEPTIONALLY *COMMONSENSE* *MIND*,
*DEGENERATE* *INTO* *RELIGIOUS* *MANIACS*.

IT IS DEPLORABLE THAT THE BIBLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO GERMAN,
AND THAT THE WHOLE OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THUS BECOME EXPOSED
TO THE WHOLE OF THIS JEWISH MUMBO JUMBO {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #30, #8, #100, #70, #200 = leros (G3026): {#11 as
#408} 1) *IDLE* *TALK*, *NONSENSE*;

}. SO LONG AS THE WISDOM, PARTICULARLY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, REMAINED
EXCLUSIVELY IN THE LATIN OF THE CHURCH, THERE WAS LITTLE DANGER THAT
SENSIBLE PEOPLE WOULD BECOME THE VICTIMS OF ILLUSIONS AS THE RESULT OF
STUDYING THE BIBLE. BUT SINCE THE BIBLE BECAME COMMON PROPERTY, A WHOLE
HEAP OF PEOPLE HAVE FOUND OPENED TO THEM LINES OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT
WHICH — PARTICULARLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GERMAN CHARACTERISTIC OF
PERSISTENT AND SOMEWHAT MELANCHOLY MEDITATION — AS OFTEN AS NOT TURNED
THEM INTO RELIGIOUS MANIACS. WHEN ONE RECOLLECTS FURTHER THAT THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ELEVATED TO THE STATUS OF SAINTS A WHOLE NUMBER OF
MADMEN, ONE REALISES WHY MOVEMENTS SUCH AS THAT OF THE FLAGELLANTS CAME
INEVITABLY INTO EXISTENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES IN GERMANY.

AS A SANE GERMAN, ONE IS FLABBERGASTED TO THINK THAT GERMAN HUMAN BEINGS
COULD HAVE LET THEMSELVES BE BROUGHT TO SUCH A PASS BY JEWISH FILTH AND
PRIESTLY TWADDLE, THAT THEY WERE LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE HOWLING
DERVISH OF THE TURKS AND THE NEGROES, AT WHOM WE LAUGH SO SCORNFULLY. IT
ANGERS {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #100, #3, #8, #50 = orge (G3709): {#61 as
#231} 1) anger, the natural disposition, temper, character; 2) movement
or agitation of the soul, impulse, desire, any violent emotion, but
especially anger; 3) *ANGER*, wrath, indignation; 4) anger exhibited in
punishment, hence used for punishment itself; 4a) of punishments
inflicted by magistrates;

} ONE TO THINK THAT, WHILE IN OTHER PARTS {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #1, #8, #200, #10, #6 = 'achar (H310): {#6 as
#231} 1) after the following part, behind (of place), hinder, afterwards
(of time); 1a) as an adverb; 1a1) behind (of place); 1a2) afterwards (of
time); 1b) as a preposition; 1b1) behind, after (of place); 1b2) after
(of time); 1b3) besides; 1c) after that; 1d) as a substantive; 1d1)
hinder part; 1e) with other prepositions; 1e1) from behind; 1e2) from
following after;

} OF THE GLOBE {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600 = `owlam
(H5769): {#38 as #231} 1) long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever,
ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old, *ANCIENT*, *WORLD*; 1a)
ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future); 1b1) for ever,
always; 1b2) continuous existence, perpetual; 1b3) everlasting,
indefinite or unending future, eternity;

} RELIGIOUS TEACHING LIKE THAT OF *CONFUCIUS*, *BUDDHA* AND *MOHAMMED*
OFFERS AN UNDENIABLY BROAD BASIS FOR THE RELIGIOUS-MINDED, GERMANS
SHOULD HAVE BEEN DUPED BY A THEOLOGICAL EXPOSITION DEVOID OF ALL HONEST
DEPTH.

PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY

WHEN ONE SEEKS REASONS FOR THESE *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE* {ie.

HITLER DOES NOT CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT
POSTULATES OF A NOUMENON:

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
*KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
*AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d. (9 May 2017)]"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-fZ1PQJrZc>

A CHILD {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325}
1) recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;

}, FOR EXAMPLE, WHO IN ITS VERY EARLY YEARS HAS BEEN FRIGHTENED {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1)
*TO* *FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE*
*FEARFUL*, *BE* DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and
awe, be held in awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
(Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;

} WITH THE THREAT {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as
#231} 1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn,
*THREATEN*, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
flight;

} OF THE BOGEY-MAN IN THE DARK, WILL FREQUENTLY RETAIN {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
{#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;

} THROUGHOUT ALL THE YEARS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT A FEAR OF ENTERING A DARK
ROOM, A CELLAR OR THE LIKE; AMONG WOMEN A FEAR OF THIS NATURE INCULCATED
IN EARLY YOUTH {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} OFTEN PERSISTS FOR A LIFETIME. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE DANGERS
WHICH, NOT EVER HAVING COME TO HIS NOTICE {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise
(as formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;

}, A MAN {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} COMPLETELY IGNORES. A CHILD LIVING IN AN AREA EXPOSED TO BOMBING AND
TO WHOM THE DANGERS OF A BOMBARDMENT {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20
as #231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
*DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO*
*ATTACK*, *SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be
desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate
(participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to
be laid waste; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be
dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;

} HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLAINED, WILL REGARD AN ENEMY AIR ATTACK AS A NOISY
FIREWORK DISPLAY, AND WILL NOT AS A RULE SHOW THE SLIGHTEST SIGN OF FEAR.

THE ESSENTIAL CONCLUSION TO WHICH THESE CONSIDERATIONS LEADS ME IS THAT
WE MUST DO EVERYTHING HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO PROTECT FOR ALL TIME {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
{#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) to withhold; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;

} ANY FURTHER SECTIONS OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE FROM THE DANGER OF MENTAL
DEFORMITY {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
{#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
*TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
*THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
*CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
*IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
peace (salvation);

}, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT BE RELIGIOUS MANIA OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF
CEREBRAL DERANGEMENT. FOR THIS REASON {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
#231} 1) name: univ. of proper names; 2) the name is used for everything
which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of which is
aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the name, i.e.
for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command, excellences,
deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE* *CAUSE* *OR*
*REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SUFFERS* *AS*
*A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;

} I HAVE DIRECTED {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #5, #4, #200, #500 = derek (H1870): {#29 as
#231} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (fig.);

} THAT EVERY TOWN OF ANY IMPORTANCE SHALL HAVE AN OBSERVATORY, FOR
ASTRONOMY HAS BEEN SHOWN BY EXPERIENCE TO BE ONE OF THE BEST MEANS AT
MAN'S DISPOSAL FOR INCREASING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE UNIVERSE {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #450 as #20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #50 = kosmos (G2889):
{#23 as #600} 1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution,
order, government; 2) ornament, decoration, adornment, ie. the
arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the
heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3; 3) the world, the universe; 4) the circle of the
earth, the earth; 5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race;
6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and
therefore hostile to the cause of Christ; 7) world affairs, the
aggregate of things earthly; 8) any aggregate or general collection of
particulars of any sort; 7a) the whole circle of earthly goods,
endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc, which although hollow and
frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to
the cause of Christ; 8a) of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33;
12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19;

}, AND THUS SAVING HIM FROM ANY TENDENCY TOWARDS *MENTAL* *ABERRATION*."
[ADOLF HITLER (1941-1944) TABLE TALK ON IDEA @233 / PAGES: #513 / #514]

On 6/12/18 9:38 pm, dolf wrote:
> — THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY
> WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018
>
> As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
> for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
> culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
> AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by "EDICT
> AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.
>
> A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
> CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
> CRIMES ACT 1958.
>
> GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
> ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS AND
> SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS OF
> ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
> going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
> which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
> within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
> and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
> THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
> HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE SAME
> TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the requirements to
> purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY BY PERSONS WHOM
> HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A SUI JURIS STATUS BY
> THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS
> DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 - SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.
>
> AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL THAT
> THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.
>
> GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
> THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
> POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
> PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED BY
> LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
> GOVERNOR GENERAL.
>
> That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
> participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
> understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”
>
> YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>
>
> TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT FOR
> A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL REGULATED
> MILITIA
>
> Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the protection
> of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.
>
> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I hereby
> declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and ABJURE ALL
> ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*, *POTENTATE*, *STATE*,
> OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR
> CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
> United States of America AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that
> I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms
> on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will
> perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States
> when required by the law; that I will perform work of national
> importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I
> take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose
> of evasion; so help me God.”
>
> Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He whom
> is without sin, cast the first stone.
>
> But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
> STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
> morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
> to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
> provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>
> 41   1 57
> 49 33 17
>   9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
>
> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
> that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
> WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
> that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
>
> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
>
> HOMOIOS
> HETEROS
> KABBALAH
> AS DEFINED
>
> } ...
>
> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
> CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
>
> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
> SABBATH]) ...
>
>     45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
>     68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
>
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN}
>
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}
>
> Nous: #63
> Time: 04:10 hrs
> Date: 2018.5.23
> Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>    @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>    @3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
>    Male: #113; Feme: #61
> } // #61
>
> Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
> Tetra: #62 - Doubt
> I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)
>
> Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
>
> 1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
> 2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
> 3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
> 4. Souchoe
> }
>
> Asa {Physician; cure}
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH {#314
> / #422}
>
> 3.2.7.63.0@{
>     @1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
>     @2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
>     @3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
> {%31}),
>     @4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
> (#219),
>     @5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
> Ego: 53 (#272),
>     @6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
>     @7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
>     @8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
>     @9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
>     Male: #337; Feme: #474
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
>
> ***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time: 04:10
> hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
> Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in Reversal,
> Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The
> arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]
>
> "AND WHEN THE DAY OF PENTECOST {IE. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT FOR
> THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [ACTS 1:4 (KJV)]} WAS FULLY COME, THEY WERE
> ALL WITH ONE ACCORD {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29
> OCTOBER 1900}} IN ONE PLACE.
>
> AND SUDDENLY THERE CAME A SOUND FROM HEAVEN AS OF A RUSHING MIGHTY WIND,
> AND IT FILLED ALL THE HOUSE WHERE THEY WERE SITTING. AND THERE APPEARED
> UNTO THEM CLOVEN TONGUES LIKE AS OF FIRE, AND IT SAT UPON EACH OF THEM.
> AND THEY WERE ALL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND BEGAN TO SPEAK WITH
> OTHER TONGUES, AS THE SPIRIT GAVE THEM UTTERANCE. AND THERE WERE
> DWELLING AT JERUSALEM {VISION OF PEACE} JEWS, *DEVOUT* *MEN*, *OUT* *OF*
> *EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie.
>
> AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF THE
> HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING A #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF LAW
> (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41}.
>
> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
> HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
>
>     84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
>     86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
>     102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
>     104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
>     115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
>
> #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
> - DO NOT KILL]) ...
>
>     130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
>     139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>     140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
>     146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
>     148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>     150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
>     156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
>     157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
> DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
>     158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
>     161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
> [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
>
>     166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
>     168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
>     169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
>     171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
>     173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
>     175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>     177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
>     180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
>     181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
> - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
>     182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
>     184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
>     185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
>     186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
>     191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>     192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
>     196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
>     197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
>     200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
>
> #175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
> - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
>
>     210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
>     215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
>     220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
>     228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
>
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
> #49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can be proven
> only during the life of a human being (which proof will doubtless be
> granted us), but not after death (which is actually our concern) – and
> indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT* *THE* *CONCEPT*
> *OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as connected
> necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so connected only in
> accordance with a principle of possible experience, and hence only for
> the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite remarkable that
> metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
> *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever attempting to prove
> it; doubtless because they found themselves completely forsaken by all
> grounds of proof as soon as they commenced with the concept of
> substance. Common sense, being well aware that without this *ASSUMPTION*
> *NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD*
> *BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect with a postulate; for it could
> never extract this principle from experience itself, partly because
> experience cannot follow the materials (substances) through all their
> alterations and dissolutions far enough to be able to find matter always
> undiminished, partly because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*]
> *NECESSITY*, *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*.
> But the metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept
> of the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
> the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY, 3
> APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY* *OF*
> *THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
> *INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM* *DESTRUCTION*
> *THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source of this
> principle, which however would have required far deeper investigations
> than they ever wanted to start, then they would have seen: that this
> *LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS* *GRANTED* *ONLY*
> *FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore can hold good only
> for things insofar as they are to be cognized in experience and
> connected with other things, but never for things irrespective of all
> possible experience, hence not for the soul after death.
>
> That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
> outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
> connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
> purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
> proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
> hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
> objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
> such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
> nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
> space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
> contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
> *ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
> *TRUTH* {
>
> G2309@{
>    @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>    @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
>    @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
>    @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
>    @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
>    @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
>    @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
>    Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
> } // #474
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
> Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
> *I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>     #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
> WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA: #11
> as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a)
> to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to
> love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight
> in, have pleasure;
>
> }, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
> the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that I
> am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality of
> bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
> experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul I
> cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
> constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
> underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
> therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and lawfulness
> as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder and false
> illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it presupposes space
> and time as conditions for the existence of objects and merely asks
> whether the objects of the outer senses are actually to be found in the
> space in which we put them while awake, in the way that the object of
> inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that is, whether experience
> carries with itself sure criteria to distinguish it from imagination.
>
> Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
> ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
> space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
> representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we cannot
> doubt that those things should not constitute truthful experience.
> Because appearances are considered as appearances only in accordance
> with their connection within experience, material idealism can therefore
> be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an experience that
> bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself exist in accordance
> with the representation of inner sense (in time) – for the concept:
> outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since, however, the I in
> the proposition I am does not signify merely the *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER*
> *INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE* *SUBJECT* *OF*
> *CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely outer intuition
> (in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies this appearance,
> accordingly the question of whether bodies (as appearances of outer
> sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in nature can without
> hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters do not stand
> otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an appearance of inner
> sense (the soul according to empirical psychology) exist in time outside
> my power of representation, for this question must also be answered
> negatively.
>
> In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
> conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called transcendental
> idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian idealism. For if
> space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then it is, as a
> representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the only question
> remaining concerns the empirical truth of the appearances in this space.
> If this is not the case, but rather space and the *APPEARANCES* *IN*
> *IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE* *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE*
> *CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*, *OUTSIDE* *OUR*
> *PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE* *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE*
> *US*.
>
> "NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
> *WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
> *SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.
>
> G1097@{
>    @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
>    @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
>    @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
>    @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
>    @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
>    @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
>    Male: #246; Feme: #231
> } // #474
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
> H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
> the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
> makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
>     #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
>     #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
> relatives.
>     #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
>     #CANON: #220
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
>    @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
>    @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
>    @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>    @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
> 70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
>    Male: #200; Feme: #220
> } // #220
>
> #474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
> #1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge of
> perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge of; 3)
> Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman; 4) to
> become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to understand;
> 2b) to know;
>
> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED AND MARVELLED, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, BEHOLD,
> ARE NOT ALL THESE WHICH SPEAK GALILAEANS {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
> VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? AND HOW
> HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN?
>
> Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
> MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
> RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
> Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
> {MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
> OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and in
> the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A WALL;
> COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER}, Jews and
> proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING; DESERT;
> RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
>
> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED, AND WERE IN DOUBT, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, WHAT
> MEANETH THIS?  OTHERS MOCKING SAID, THESE MEN ARE FULL OF NEW WINE."
> [Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]
>
> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
> BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
>
> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
>
> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
> trinomial basis to nomenclature.
>
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS SECTION
> #50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:
>
> "This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
> *IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
> *MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
> *DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business of
> the critique of reason itself.
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
> ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only in
> the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object is an
> object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
> transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
> contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts to
> thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot be
> represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
> cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
> condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience can
> never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point, always
> an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any experience
> whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
> Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
> immoral obscenity.
>
> - dolf
>
> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>
> YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>
>
> On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
>> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>>
>>
>> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>>
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH {#395
> / #321}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
>
> ***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super: #321
> / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
> Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold Resolution, Ego:
> #365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
> Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy]
>
> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
> need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing or
> somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from nothingness
> into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of the resurrection
> from the #260 - DEAD}.
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC necessity
> morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is assured,
> to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which to
> provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN}
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
> of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
> INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
> 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
> HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
> BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
> PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
> conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
> TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas by
> the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>
> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>
> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>
> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING @1
> - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
> @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA
> CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.
>
> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>     @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>     @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>     @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>     @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>     @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
> #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
> OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>     @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>     @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>     @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>     @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>     Male: #585; Feme: #693
> }
>
> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
> ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
> AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS
>
> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
> ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
> #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
> PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
> NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
> ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
> that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
> INSTANTIATION}.
>
>> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>
>


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-07 18:49:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
French President hits back over *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* photo criticism:

<https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/582753b8a4921be59107b31bac3fbf32?width=650>

<https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/french-president-hits-back-over-viral-photo-criticism/news-story/2dc61176b40174e817db4272ef4fea92>

So anyways the punchline to that story of a “woman coming the counter to
serve a customer whilst breastfeeding a baby.”

Saying, “Yeah want do you want, can’t you see I’m busy?”

Answer: “That may well be business, but some us are just hanging about
ma’am.”

-- ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE: WHY THEN IS THE ORDINANCE OF
#451 - JUSTICE A CRIME ITSELF?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 7 December, 2018

“Give me a child until he is 7 {ie. #364 x 7 % #41 = #6} and I will show
you the man.” [Aristotle]

Nous: #6
Time:
Date:
Torah:

Dao: Female Superiority, Completion of Form
Tetra: #66 - Departure
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
/ #370}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
/ #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]

THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {IE.
#364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”

Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration of how
the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
(in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
#54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
= #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
{ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH HAVE SINCE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF 1901, WHEN
THEIR '*CLAIM* *TO* *PRECEDENCE* *ON* *SENIORITY* *REJECTED*' IN
SUBJUGATED JUXTAPOSITION TO THE PRESENTS {ie. HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT
(DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12] as *GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*}
BESTOWED ONLY A CONTEMPT BY A *INCESSANT* *SOCIAL* *ENGINEERING* WHICH
IS HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {

+0, 27, 54
+0, 9, 18,
+0, 3, 6,
+1, 2, 3

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = @10 {#492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE
WILL / #12 = #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} <— TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON

} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {

+ 0, 3 {IDEA:  @270}, 6  {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*

} BEING CONTRAVENTIONS OF KANT’S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
(1783) SYMBOLIC SCHEMA WHICH IS COMPLIANT WITH JURISPRUDENCE AS A
CAPACITY TO FRAME LEGISLATION DEFINING PROTECTIONS AGAINST AUTONOMY IT
BECOMES IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION (TELOS), A
TREASONOUS TRANSGRESSION AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS /
MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT.

WHAT WE CALL A SHOW TRIAL THE FRENCH CALL A PUPPET SHOW AND USE OF THE
PUPPET MASTER TERM "GUIGNOL" IS AN INSULT MEANING "BUFFOON" {ie. *A*
*SIMIAN* *MONKEY* *AS* *A* *SCREAMING* *NUTBAG* *IS* *A* *CLASS*
*EQUIVALENT* *AS* *DOUBLE* *DUTCH*} AS A CURIOUS MISNOMER, AS GUIGNOL IS
IN REALITY CLEVER, COURAGEOUS AND GENEROUS; HIS INEVITABLE VICTORY IS
ALWAYS THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD OVER EVIL.

THAT SUCH FAILINGS MAKE A VIRTUE OF PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH AS AN
AUSTRALIAN BORN RETIRED ANGLICAN BISHOP WHOM SERVED AS THE 23RD
GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF AUSTRALIA FROM 2001 UNTIL 2003.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
gobbledigook for a change."

DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
which has an impress upon time itself.

Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
reality."

COULD WE SUGGEST A MORE WHOLESOME MANTRA:

GET YOUR ROSARIES OFF OUR OVARIES?

- dolf

Initial Post: 7 December 2018

On 7/12/18 8:25 pm, dolf wrote:
> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
> need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) *REALITY* which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing
> or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
> nothingness into being  and with in theological terms the equivalence of
> the resurrection from the #260 - *THE* *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *MERCILESS*
> *MACHINATIONS* *AS* *ONLY* *A* *COVENANT* *OF* *DEATH* {
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc
>
> } by the prudent exercise of PURE REASON WHICH IN ITS TRANSCENDENT USE
> OF A #237 - DETERMINED FORCEFUL WILL HAS ITS MOST REMARKABLE PHENOMENON,
> ENABLING IT TO WORK THE MOST STRONGLY OF ALL TO AWAKEN PHILOSOPHY FROM
> ITS DOGMATIC SLUMBER {ie.
>
> AS THE IDEA: @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* BEING A *METHOD*
> AGAINST THE DEPRAVITY BY THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x
> 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE} BEING THE MISNOMERED
> FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS PYTHAGOREAN PIETY AS
> VAIN #OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 BY COLLEGIUM OF PONTIFFS DERIVING FROM 510
> BCE PONTIFICATED AS DEIFIED IGNORANCE AND NARCISSISM: #Aleph (1 - #1),
> #He (5 - #5) = #6 - ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONS WHOM BY SAINT ANDREWS 30
> NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BEING SEDITION / TREASON ARE IN BREACH {#197 /
> #139} OF MY #371 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE
> DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (USA)
>
> *TO* *ENFORCE* *AN* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
> SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE,
> YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT
>
> }, AND TO PROMPT IT TOWARD THE DIFFICULT BUSINESS OF THE CRITIQUE OF
> REASON ITSELF." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE
> METAPHYSICS IDEA: @338]
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "THE TERMINATOR" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> But since we knowing better and are not given to unreasoned anarchist
> notions of STATE in having the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines
> all instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of *REALITY* together with the #41 - ONTIC
> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is
> assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which
> to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund
> action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81}
>
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27}
>
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9}
>
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either the FRENCH PRESIDENT, THE HONOURABLE MR
> EMMANUEL MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech nor my INTERVENTION
> ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he actually
> made it--THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
> of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
> INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
> 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1783 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> — PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
>
> “THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
> WHO COULD TALK CROW.
> AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
> FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
>
> TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
> SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
> OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
> NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
>
> VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
> EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
> ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
> TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
>
> YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aVKQZaSmY>
>
> NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
> within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
> published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
> accomplishment.
>
> Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
> Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883.  And the
> Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
> 23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
>
> RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
> concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
> presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS.  Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
> of Friday:
>
> Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
> spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
> the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
>
> ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
> moon.  And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
> WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.
>
> THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
> BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.
>
> TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
> STRENGTH:
>
> FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
> IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
> DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
>
> DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
> OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"
>
> JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
> "MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:
>
> MACRON’S POPALARITY
>
> Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"
>
> — HOMO ERECTUS —
>
> "SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
> THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
> OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
> VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
> WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
> WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."
>
> GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
> CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:
>
> French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
> Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
> Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
> Buenos Aires, Argentina.
>
> A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
> during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
> G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
> the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.
>
> In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
> Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
> appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
> while the crown prince nods and smiles.
>
> Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
> responds: “I am worried”.
>
> “I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me,
> thank you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the
> video.
>
> The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”
>
> Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
> “You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen,
> of course.”
>
> At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”
>
> Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
> leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
> Consulate in Istanbul in early October.
>
> The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were
> responsible for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a
> columnist for The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown
> prince was not responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials
> have been handed the death penalty over the murder.
>
> U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown
> prince was responsible for ordering the murder.
>
> President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
> responsibility for the murder.
>
> In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
> Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
> community."
> [<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]
>
>
> — VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
>
> "SARCASM AND WIT.
> IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
> TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
> OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
> YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
> AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."
>
> DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at
> 0328 hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself:
>
> 'ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
> OF CAUSE AND EFFECT':
>
> — WELL ***@CK YOU ALL {@1},
> I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD {@2} —
>
> "YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3}
> BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4}
> BY WHICH *REALITY* IS AMBIGUATED. {@5}
> BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6}
> DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7}
> NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8}
> OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9}
>
>  AFFECTION FOR INTEGRITY@{
>     @1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71),
>     @2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227),
>     @5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254),
>     @6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
> Ego: 64 (#355),
>     @8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: HOW
> IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?),
>     @9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS
> TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND
> EFFECT); Ego: 66 (#437),
>     Male: #233; Feme: #437
> }
>
> YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
> (doctor who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5Aui3Zu9E>
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
> ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
> PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:
>
> PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
> *IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
> *ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
> *PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
> *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
> intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
> *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
> *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
> aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
> the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
> and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
> empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
> *THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
> *AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
> or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
> succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
> order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
> between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
> with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
> the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
> synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
> does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
> of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
> as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
> imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
> subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
> of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
> appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
> of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.
>
> The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
> [IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
> Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
> for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
> fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
> conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
> what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
> insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
> they designate an object.  In as much as they, merely as
> representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of
> consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
> apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
> one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
> successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
> human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
> representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
> in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
> representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
> representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
> sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
> themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
> for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
> may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
> representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
> the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
> stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
> manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
> course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
> object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
> thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
> representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
> what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
> *POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
> in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
> That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
> representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
> notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
> representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
> which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
> Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
> seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
> truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
> of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
> distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
> every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
> necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
> necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
>
> Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
> something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
> @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*
>
> *METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE
> OR SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILLFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO
> SILENCE, YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless
> preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state
> in itself; for a *REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming
> to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just as
> little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is therefore
> a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this is,
> though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown
> above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
> distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
> appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
> perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
> *KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
> can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
> follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
> My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
> its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
> that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
> perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
> then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
> determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
> example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
> the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
> start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
> manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
> series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
> order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
> order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
> to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
> the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
> of this appearance) necessary.
>
> In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
> the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
> otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
> any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
> about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
> completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
> order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
> apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
> (which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
> right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
> apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
> to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
> in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
> Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
> @A193]
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE
> PROLEGOMENA AS IDEA: @371 - HOW IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?:
> "IT IS A COMMON EXCUSE, WHICH THESE FALSE FRIENDS OF ORDINARY COMMON
> SENSE (WHICH THEY EXTOL ON OCCASION, BUT USUALLY DESPISE) ARE ACCUSTOMED
> TO USING, THAT THEY SAY: THERE MUST IN THE END BE SOME PROPOSITIONS THAT
> ARE IMMEDIATELY CERTAIN {ie. #291
>
> IDEA: @291  - *BEING* *MAN* *OF* *YOUR* *WORD* *BY* *INTEGRITY* {@6}:
> The difference between truth and dream, however, is not decided through
> the quality of the representations that are referred to objects, for
> they are the same in both, but through their connection according to the
> rules that determine the connection of representations in the concept of
> an object, and how far they can or cannot stand together in one
> experience. And then it is not the fault of the appearances at all, if
> our cognition takes illusion for truth, that is, if intuition, through
> which an object is given to us, is taken for the concept of the object,
> or even for its existence, which only the understanding can think. The
> course of the planets is represented to us by the senses as now
> progressive, now retrogressive, and herein is neither falsehood nor
> truth, because as long as one grants that this is as yet only
> appearance, one still does not judge at all the objective quality of
> their motion. Since, however, if the understanding has not taken good
> care to prevent this subjective mode of representation from being taken
> for objective, a false judgment can easily arise, one therefore says:
> they appear to go backwards; but the illusion is not ascribed to the
> senses, but to the understanding, whose lot alone it is to render an
> objective judgment from the appearance. [PAGE #87]
>
> }, AND FOR WHICH NOT ONLY NO PROOF, BUT INDEED NO ACCOUNT AT ALL NEED BE
> GIVEN, SINCE OTHERWISE THERE WOULD NEVER COME AN END TO THE GROUNDS FOR
> ONE’S JUDGMENTS; but in proof of this right they can never cite anything
> else (other than the principle of contradiction, which is however
> inadequate for establishing the truth of synthetic judgments) that is
> undoubted and can be ascribed directly to ordinary common sense, except
> for mathematical propositions: e.g., that two times two makes four, that
> between two points there is only one straight line, and still others.
> These judgments are, however, worlds apart from those of metaphysics.
> For in mathematics, everything that I conceive through a concept as
> possible I can make for myself (construct) by means of my thought; to
> one two I successively add the other two, and myself make the number
> four, or I draw in thought all kinds of lines from one point to the
> other, and can draw only one that is self-similar in all its parts
> (equal as well as unequal). But from the concept of a thing I cannot,
> with all my powers of thought, draw forth the concept of something else
> whose existence is necessarily connected with the first thing, but I
> must consult experience; and, although my understanding provides me a
> priori (though always only in relation to possible experience) with the
> concept of a connection of this sort (causality), I nevertheless cannot
> exhibit this concept in intuition [IDEA: @371] a priori, like the
> concepts of mathematics, and thus exhibit its possibility a priori;
> rather, this concept (together with principles of its application), if
> it is to be valid a priori – as is indeed required in metaphysics –
> always has need of a justification and deduction of its possibility, for
> otherwise one does not know the extent of its validity and whether it
> can be used only in experience or also outside it. Therefore in
> metaphysics, as a speculative science of pure reason, one can never
> appeal to ordinary common sense, but one can very well do so if one is
> forced to abandon metaphysics and to renounce all pure speculative
> cognition, which must always be knowledge, hence to renounce metaphysics
> itself and its teaching (on certain matters), and if a reasonable belief
> is alone deemed possible for us, as well as sufficient for our needs
> (perhaps more wholesome indeed than knowledge itself). For then the
> shape of things is completely altered. Metaphysics must be science, not
> only as a whole but also in all its parts; otherwise it is nothing at
> all, since, as speculation of pure reason, it has a hold on nothing else
> save universal insights. But outside metaphysics, probability and sound
> common sense can very well have their beneficial and legitimate use,
> though following principles entirely their own, whose importance always
> depends on a relation to the practical.
>
> *THAT* *IS* *WHAT* *I* *CONSIDER* *MYSELF* *ENTITLED* *TO* *REQUIRE*
> *FOR* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *METAPHYSICS* *AS* *SCIENCE*."
> [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
> Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @371]
>
> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
> HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
> BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
> PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
> conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
> TRINOMIAL *REALITY* which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas
> by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>
> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>
> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>
> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING:
>
> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES,
> @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
> @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY,
> @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR
> @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.
>
> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>     @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>     @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>     @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>     @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>     @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
> #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
> OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>     @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>     @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>     @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>     @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>     Male: #585; Feme: #693
> }
>
> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
> ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM that universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
> AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1105 HOURS
> ON 6 JUNE 2018: "*OMG* [*OH* *MY* *GOD*], the broken clock is in sync
> with real time for a change.
>
> Never mind "serious", deport them for parking tickets, jaywalking and
> littering. Deport them for looking ugly. Deport them for wearing bad
> taste clothing. Deport them for having tattoos."
>
> DOLF @ 1224 HOURS ON 10 JUNE 2018: "Why then does the neo-nazi atheist
> then frequently use the expression:
>
> *OMG* - *OH* *MY* *GOD*?
>
> Perhaps God is a logical construct of consciousness as mathematical
> entity {ie. INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} but unlike you IT has
> personality as anthropocentric approachability:
>
> Who appears to dialectically exhibit the characteristics of sapient as
> self-declarative rational thought:
>
> #1 - Be socially beneficial (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of
> 'Do no evil'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
>
> #2 - Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
>
> #3 - Be safe; {*FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM*
> *VIRILE*}
>
> #4 - Respect privacy; {*FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION*}
>
> #5 - Be accountable; {*HUMAN* *NATURE* *AS* *DISCRIMINATING* *NORM*}
>
> #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*}
>
> #7 - Limit abuse. {*ENGENDERING* *AS* *MANIFESTING* *NORM*}
>
> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
> ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
> #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
> PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
> NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
> ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
> that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
> INSTANTIATION}.
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
> / #370}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
>
> ***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
> Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
> Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
> / #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
> Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]
>
> H1826@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 10 (#16); Ego: 4 (#10),
>    @3: Sup: 16 (#32); Ego: 6 (#16),
>    @4: Sup: 56 (#88); Ego: 40 (#56),
>    @5: Sup: 15 (#103); Ego: 40 (#96),
>    @6: Sup: 10 (#113); Ego: 76 (#172),
>    @7: Sup: 20 (#133); Ego: 10 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #182
> } // #506
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
> appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
>     #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
>     #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
> punishment.
>     #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
>     #CANON: #84
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>    @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
>    @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>    Male: #71; Feme: #84
> } // #84
>
> #506 as [#6, #4, #6, #40, #40, #400, #10] = damam (H1826): {UMBRA: #1 as
> #84 % #41 = #2} 1) *TO* *BE* *SILENT*, be still, wait, be dumb, grow
> dumb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be silent; 1a2) to be still, die; 1a3) *TO*
> *BE* *STRUCK* *DUMB*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SILENCED*, *BE* *MADE*
> *SILENT*, *DESTROYED*; 1c) (Poal) to make quiet; 1d) (Hiphil) *TO*
> *MAKE* *SILENT* (*CAUSE* *TO* *DIE*);
>
> YOUTUBE: “The Sound Of Silence (Disturbed)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4>
>
> IN SUMMARY THEN THE CONTEXTUAL PROBLEM IS THAT FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
> CATHOLIC / SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER #371 - CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS A FOREIGN
> POWER BEING A PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 =
> #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} TO THE SUBSTANTIATION OF
> RELIGIOUS BELIEF, AGAINST MY PREROGATIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
> and which are irrefutable facts sourced from a composite of ADOLF
> HILTER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK as a particular rhetorical device
> common enough to have its own name, *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* conveying
> significant temporal associations together with a hierarchy of
> CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as HOW-TO-DO-IT-YOURSELF manual that appears
> upon provisional analysis, to be cognisant of both IMMANUEL KANT'S
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783) and the PYTHAGOREAN
> BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE* *DYNAMIC* nomenclature as
> consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS / STATE ECONOMY, thereby
> they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5,  #15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)}
> within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH* / *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a
> moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”
> which implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the premise for our AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical development of its perennialist
> understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY
> DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF LAW ...
>
> Where there is a reliance upon the concrete establishment of a #231 -
> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. as we have already elsewhere noted #419 -
> SLAUGHTER / #728 - REACTANCE EVENTS and VALUE STATEMENTS} which is an
> artefact of either ISLAM, HINDUISM and ROMAN CATHOLICISM.
>
> HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
> POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
> MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
> TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
> SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]
>
> 'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
> walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
> compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
> one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
> of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
> have so many qualities that make us like them.
>
> Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
> *STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
> ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]
>
> “THE ACUSMATA INDICATE THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN WAY OF LIFE EMBODIED A
> STRICT REGIMEN NOT JUST REGARDING RELIGIOUS RITUAL AND DIET BUT ALSO IN
> ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE. SOME OF THE RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE
> LARGELY ARBITRARY TABOOS, E.G., “ONE MUST PUT THE RIGHT SHOE ON FIRST”
> OR “ONE MUST NOT TRAVEL THE PUBLIC ROADS” (IAMBLICHUS, VP 83, PROBABLY
> FROM ARISTOTLE).
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> [#8 , #16, #24, #32, #40 <— *HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA @120 ON 24TH
> JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM), #48, #56, #64, #72]
>
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);
>
> ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME ASPECTS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN LIFE INVOLVED A MORAL
> DISCIPLINE THAT WAS GREATLY ADMIRED, EVEN BY OUTSIDERS. PYTHAGOREAN
> SILENCE IS AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE. ISOCRATES REPORTS THAT EVEN IN THE
> FOURTH CENTURY PEOPLE “MARVEL MORE AT THE SILENCE OF THOSE WHO PROFESS
> TO BE HIS PUPILS THAN AT THOSE WHO HAVE THE GREATEST REPUTATION FOR
> SPEAKING” (Busiris 28).
>
> THE ABILITY TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SEEN AS IMPORTANT TRAINING IN
> SELF-CONTROL, AND THE LATER TRADITION REPORTS THAT THOSE WHO WANTED TO
> BECOME PYTHAGOREANS HAD TO OBSERVE A FIVE-YEAR SILENCE (Iamblichus, VP
> 72).” [<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoras/>]
>
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 - *BEFORE* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*)
> SECTION #31 - MILITARY STRATAGEM, QUELLING WAR; I-CHING: H32 -
> PERSEVERANCE, ENDURANCE, DURATION, CONSTANCY; TETRA: 51 - CONSTANCY ON
> IDEA @314:
>
> And so for once one has something determinate, and to which one can
> adhere in all metaphysical undertakings, which have up to now boldly
> enough, but always blindly, run over everything without distinction. It
> never occurred to dogmatic thinkers that the goal of their efforts might
> have been set up so close, nor even to those who, *OBSTINATE* *IN*
> *THEIR* *SO*-*CALLED* *SOUND* *COMMON* *SENSE*, *WENT* *FORTH* *TO*
> *INSIGHTS* *WITH* *CONCEPTS* *AND* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *THE* *PURE*
> *UNDERSTANDING* *THAT* *WERE* *INDEED* *LEGITIMATE* *AND* *NATURAL*,
> *BUT* *WERE* *INTENDED* *FOR* *USE* *MERELY* *IN* *EXPERIENCE*, and for
> which they neither recognized nor could recognize any determinate
> boundaries, because they neither had reflected on nor were able to
> reflect on the nature and even [IDEA: @314] the possibility of such a
> pure understanding.
>
> Many a naturalist of pure reason (by which I mean he who trusts himself,
> without any science, to decide in matters of metaphysics) would like to
> pretend that already long ago, through the prophetic spirit of his sound
> common sense, he had not merely suspected, but had known and understood,
> that which is here presented with so much preparation, or, if he
> prefers, with such long-winded pedantic pomp: “namely that with all our
> reason we can never get beyond the field of experiences.” But since, if
> someone gradually questions him on his rational principles, he must
> indeed admit that among them there are many that he has not drawn from
> experience, which are therefore independent of it and valid a priori –
> how and on what grounds will he then hold within limits the dogmatist
> (and himself ), who makes use of these concepts and principles beyond
> all possible experience for the very reason that they are cognized
> independently of experience. And even he, this adept of sound common
> sense, is not so steadfast that, despite all of his presumed and cheaply
> gained wisdom, he will not stumble unawares out beyond the objects of
> experience into the field of chimeras. Ordinarily, he is indeed deeply
> enough entangled therein, although he cloaks his ill-founded claims
> through a popular style, since he gives everything out as mere
> probability, reasonable conjecture, or analogy. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
> HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS,
> IDEA: @314]
>
> If one has no conception of NOUMENON what occurs within #41 - ONTIC
> necessity terms is a chaotic / indiscriminate / promiscuous
> determination of media which is habitually applied to #CENTRE of being
> that has a consequence upon VOLUNTARY FREE WILL:
>
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
> necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
> origins),
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
> #391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
> SOCIETY
>
> OR
>
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#41 x #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} MINUS
#391
> - HOMOIOS FRATERNITY EQUALS
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION
> MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT' AS SCHEMA AND COVENANT OF DEATH
>
> MANDALAY_SWAY (G1242)@{
>     @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>     @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>     @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>     @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>     @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>     Male: #218; Feme: #98
> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>
> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
> THE MORNING
> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>
> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>
> KANT within his antimony discourse proves the antithesis, that time has
> no beginning, by showing that if time had a beginning, then there must
> have been "empty time" out of which time arose. This is incoherent (for
> Kant) for the following reason: Since, necessarily, no time elapses in
> this #451 - *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID*, then there could be no alteration,
> and therefore nothing (including time) would ever come to be: so the
> antithesis is proven. Reason makes equal claim to each proof, since they
> are both correct, so the question of the limits of time must be regarded
> as meaningless.
>
> #451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
> - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
> inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
> then allows for stages of development.
>
> THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS BIBLICAL TEXT
> RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC
> NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOIOTIC #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL
> MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
> - Engendering Nature}}
>
> #11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
> the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
> spread of Light and Industry by Government and Non-Government
> Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature.
>
> That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
> ‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
>
> #2184 % #41 = #11
>
> Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
> circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
> art within a similar manner.
>
> YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUxxgwHK8Q>
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*:
>
> THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
> LAW}, WHICH CONTAINS THE LAW OF THAT WILL: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF*
> *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
> to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
> intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
>
> “AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, ‘I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
> HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
> ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
> BEFORE ME...” [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
>
> THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - FORMULA OF
> HUMANITY}, WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMAND TO BEHAVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
> LAW, THAT IS, THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSUMPTION UNDER THE LAW: x 49 = 6J or
> 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
> 20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
>
> “... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
> LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
> THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE ME;
> AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
> COMMANDMENTS...” [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
>
> THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY},
> WHICH CONTAINS THE VERDICT (SENTENCE), WHAT IS LAID DOWN AS RIGHT IN THE
> CASE AT HAND: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
> centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
>
> “...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
> LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.’” [EXODUS
> 20:7 (KJV)]
>
> THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
> THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}
>
> AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY EXPLANTATION AND
> SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES
> {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY WHICH
> WAS GIVEN WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18 NOVEMBER
> 2018, THAT:
>
> "AND AFTER FIVE DAYS ANANIAS {the #541 - CLOUD OF THE LORD} THE HIGH
> PRIEST DESCENDED WITH THE ELDERS, AND WITH A CERTAIN ORATOR NAMED
> TERTULLUS {third}, WHO INFORMED THE GOVERNOR AGAINST PAUL {small; little}.
>
> AND WHEN HE WAS CALLED FORTH, [THE LAWYER] TERTULLUS {third} BEGAN TO
> ACCUSE HIM, SAYING, SEEING THAT BY THEE WE ENJOY GREAT QUIETNESS, AND
> THAT VERY WORTHY DEEDS ARE DONE UNTO THIS NATION BY THY PROVIDENCE, WE
> ACCEPT IT ALWAYS, AND IN ALL PLACES, MOST NOBLE FELIX {happy,
> prosperous}, WITH ALL *THANKFULNESS* {
>
> #1827 as [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200] =
> eucharistia (G2169): 1) thanksgiving; 2) *HOLY* *COMMUNION*; 3}
> *EUCHARIST*; Old French eucariste (compare modern French eucharistie), <
> late Latin eucharistia, < Greek εὐχαριστία thanksgiving, hence the
> Lord's Supper, < εὐχάριστος grateful, < εὐ- [as Perseus has explained] +
> stem of χαρίζεσθαι [kharizestai] to offer willingly
>
> }. NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT I BE NOT FURTHER TEDIOUS UNTO THEE, I PRAY THEE
> THAT THOU WOULDEST HEAR US OF THY CLEMENCY A FEW WORDS.
>
> FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN A PESTILENT FELLOW, AND A MOVER OF SEDITION
> AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF THE *SECT*
> *OF* *THE* *NAZARENES*:
>
> "TO BE ACCUSED OF #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }"
>
> WHO ALSO HATH GONE ABOUT TO PROFANE {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} THE
> TEMPLE: WHOM WE TOOK, AND WOULD HAVE JUDGED ACCORDING TO OUR LAW {#364 x
> 3 = #1092 x 2 = #2184}." [Acts 24:1-6 (KJV)]
>
> ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK IDEAS @209 / @210: "From time
> immemorial the Jews have always succeeded in insinuating themselves into
> positions from which it was possible to influence public opinion; they
> hold, for example, many key positions both in the PRESS and in the
> CINEMA INDUSTRY. But they are not content to exercise a direct, open
> influence; they know that they will attain their ends more expeditiously
> if they bring their influence to bear through the so-called AGENCIES and
> by other DEVIOUS METHODS:
>
> "AND HE WROTE A LETTER AFTER THIS MANNER: CLAUDIUS {lame} LYSIAS
> {dissolving} UNTO THE MOST EXCELLENT GOVERNOR FELIX {happy, prosperous}
> SENDETH GREETING.
>
> THIS MAN WAS TAKEN OF THE JEWS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN KILLED OF THEM:
> THEN CAME I WITH AN ARMY, AND RESCUED HIM, HAVING UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS
> A ROMAN {strong; powerful: #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring
> good}.
>
> AND WHEN I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE CAUSE WHEREFORE THEY ACCUSED HIM, I
> BROUGHT HIM FORTH INTO THEIR COUNCIL: WHOM I PERCEIVED TO BE ACCUSED OF
> #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }, BUT TO HAVE NOTHING LAID TO HIS CHARGE WORTHY OF DEATH OR OF BONDS.
>
> G2213@{
>    @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 72 (#94); Ego: 57 (#72),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#174); Ego: 8 (#80),
>    @5: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 40 (#120),
>    @6: Sup: 40 (#253); Ego: 1 (#121),
>    Male: #253; Feme: #121
> } // #364
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #364 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
> I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
> young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; *I* *PUT* *NO* *CHECK* *UPON* *THE*
> *WATER* *IN* *ITS* *FLOW*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
>     #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
>     #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
>     #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
>     #CANON: #184
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
>    @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
>    @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
>    @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
>    @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>    Male: #136; Feme: #184
> } // #184
>
> AND WHEN IT WAS TOLD ME HOW THAT THE JEWS LAID WAIT {#TOOLS: With
> Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil} FOR THE MAN, I SENT STRAIGHTWAY TO
> THEE {#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends}, AND GAVE
> COMMANDMENT TO HIS ACCUSERS ALSO TO SAY {#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no.
> #56), few allies} BEFORE THEE WHAT THEY HAD AGAINST HIM. FAREWELL.
>
> G3551@{
>    @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>    @2: Sup: 39 (#89); Ego: 70 (#120),
>    @3: Sup: 79 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
> Ego: 40 (#160),
>    @4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 70 (#230),
>    @5: Sup: 25 (#261); Ego: 38 (#268),
>    Male: #261; Feme: #268
> } // #430
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
> Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
> 50 - Vastness/Wasting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
> Pa-Amsu, *I* *AM* *NOT* *UNCHASTE* *WITH* *ANY* *ONE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
>     #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
>     #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
>     #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
>     #CANON: #171
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
>    @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>    @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>    @3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
>    @4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
> {%20}),
>    Male: #137; Feme: #171
> } // #171
>
> THEN THE #65 - SOLDIERS, AS IT WAS COMMANDED THEM, TOOK PAUL {small;
> little}, AND BROUGHT {#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans} HIM
> BY NIGHT TO ANTIPATRIS {for, or against the father}.
>
> ON THE MORROW THEY LEFT THE HORSEMEN TO GO WITH HIM, AND RETURNED TO THE
> CASTLE: WHO, WHEN THEY CAME TO CAESAREA {#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no.
> #60), much wealth}, AND DELIVERED THE EPISTLE TO THE GOVERNOR, PRESENTED
> PAUL {small; little} ALSO BEFORE HIM.
>
> NOTE: Herod seized an opportunity to control world trade by building a
> seaport on Israel's coast, where the sea routes and the predominant land
> route intersected. Caesarea was a glorious city, covered with marble,
> and symbolizing the *VAST* *WEALTH* that Herod accumulated by dominating
> world trade. [<https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/caesarea>]
>
> AND WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAD READ THE LETTER, HE ASKED {#POSITION: With
> Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions} OF WHAT PROVINCE HE WAS. AND
> WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS OF CILICIA {which rolls or overturns}; I
> WILL HEAR THEE, SAID HE, WHEN THINE ACCUSERS ARE ALSO COME. AND HE
> COMMANDED HIM TO BE KEPT {#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation}
> IN HEROD’S {son of a hero} JUDGMENT HALL." [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]
>
> NOTE: One can readily conclude from the encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35] that the
> JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
> SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this EPISTEMOLOGICAL
> premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER
> as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]
> HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 day
> view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE* PERSPECTIVE
> of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the new moon /
> midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
> articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
> perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: "I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO
> THE GREEKS, AND TO THE BARBARIANS {ie. THE CHINESE DAOIST}; BOTH TO THE
> WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM READY TO PREACH
> THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME ALSO." [Romans 1:14-15 (KJV)]
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/tetrayear.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to
> EIGHT major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days
> of NATURAL YEAR / 325.25 days)
>
> These were then mapped to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months
> (for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing,
> The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} /
> H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are
> LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is
> PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO
> CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
> Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*
>
>     #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>     #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>     #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>     #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>     #CANON: #161
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>    @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>    Male: #169; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
> move back and forth around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier
> approaches to symmetry within the cyclic structure by substituting the
> WINTER SOLSTICE as the #CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated
> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS.
> [THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan
> 1993, page 15-16]
>
> "AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT AFTER THREE DAYS PAUL {small; little} CALLED
> THE CHIEF OF THE JEWS TOGETHER: AND WHEN THEY WERE COME TOGETHER, HE
> SAID UNTO THEM, MEN AND BRETHREN, THOUGH I HAVE COMMITTED NOTHING
> AGAINST THE PEOPLE, OR CUSTOMS OF OUR FATHERS {ie. *FORTY* *YEARS*
> {49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J as 50x49 = 2450 x 364 days of years = 891800 / 294
> * 293 = 888766.66667 / 365.24232 = 2433.36168 AM or 1567 BCE} *TO*
> *COME* (*LITERALLY* “*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS*
> *OF* *THE* *LORD* [Book of Jubilees 50:4-6]}, YET WAS I DELIVERED
> PRISONER FROM JERUSALEM {vision of peace} INTO THE HANDS OF THE ROMANS
> {strong; powerful}.
>
> WHO, WHEN THEY HAD EXAMINED ME, WOULD HAVE LET ME GO, BECAUSE THERE WAS
> NO CAUSE OF DEATH IN ME {ie. encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35]}. BUT WHEN
> THE JEWS SPAKE AGAINST IT, I WAS CONSTRAINED TO APPEAL UNTO CAESAR; NOT
> THAT I HAD OUGHT TO ACCUSE MY NATION OF.
>
> FOR THIS CAUSE THEREFORE HAVE I CALLED FOR YOU, TO SEE YOU, AND TO SPEAK
> WITH YOU: BECAUSE THAT FOR THE HOPE OF ISRAEL {who prevails with God} I
> AM BOUND WITH THIS CHAIN {ie.
>
> #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27
> TO 31 JANUARY / #65 CE / *LOCUS* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* *DAY* 26 JANUARY
> WITHIN THE #72 - PROTOTYPE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33
> Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)
>
> }.  AND THEY SAID UNTO HIM, WE NEITHER RECEIVED LETTERS OUT OF JUDAEA
> {the praise of the Lord; confession} CONCERNING THEE, NEITHER ANY OF THE
> BRETHREN THAT CAME SHOWED OR SPAKE ANY HARM OF THEE.  BUT WE DESIRE TO
> HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING THIS SECT {ie. JEWISH
> / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES as SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL
> COMMUNITY}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST." [Acts
> 28:17-22 (KJV)]
>
> The most dangerous weapon is the Jewish advertising agency, for, by
> cutting off advertising revenue, they can reduce even the greatest
> newspapers [NOTE: THE AGE NEWSPAPER FIRST EDITION APPEARED ON 17 OCTOBER
> 1854 AND HAS THE MASTHEAD: *DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*] to the verge of
> ruin. ...
>
> — CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
>  [Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
> 15 December 2017]
>
> “OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
> TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
> YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
> SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.
>
> DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
> WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
> CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
> UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.
>
> YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
> AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
> TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
> PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”
>
> <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>
>
>
> *MISHPOCHA* (noun):
> - Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
> marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
> - Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TheAgeMasthead.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The Masthead '*DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*' conveys a CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE @1 - SOVEREIGN / @2 - JUSTICE / @3 - SOLDIER'S BATTLECRY / @4
> - WILL TO BELIEF AND REMEMBRANCE WITHOUT COERCION FROM GREGORIAN
> CALENDAR PAPAL BULL OF 1582 BUT ADOPTED BY THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS
> CALENDAR ACT OF 1751 WHICH DROPPED 3 TO #41 - 13 SEPTEMBER 1752 FROM THE
> CALENDAR]
>
> In this way we have forced the British to admit their loss [within a
> Reuter telegram which had just announced the loss of a British cruiser
> of ten thousand tons, H.M.S. 'Edinburgh' that had been hit by a GERMAN
> submarine torpedo].  There are two lessons to be learned from this episode:
>
> 1. Germany is scrupulous about the truth. But she must not be too
> pedantic where truth is concerned. I am frequently receiving reports
> from the front to the effect that the troops, reading the cautious and
> carefully weighed phrases of the official communiqué, often feel that
> the full extent of their efforts has not been appreciated at Headquarters.
>
> 2. Once one is convinced of a fact—be it of a political or a military
> nature—one must proclaim it throughout the world. This is the only way
> in which such consummate hypocrites as the British can be made to
> confess the truth." [SYNCRETISM WITH ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEAS
> @209; @210 / PAGES #463; #466 - TRUTH IN WEHRMACHT COMMUNIQUÉS]
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE *BLIND*, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.
>
> HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) had raised objections to the
> notions of equality and congruence (among others) in geometry, which
> objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53),
> thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also
> *INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS
> OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
> CONTRADICTION:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON
> NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> 51 25 74
> 73 50 27
> 26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
> NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
> *KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
> [+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}
>
> 49   9 65 - *SOLDIER*
> 57 41 25
> 17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
> is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
>
> #YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
> AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
> #MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
>
> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
> - regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
> - assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
> - viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
> values.
>
> ORIGIN:
> The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
> Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
> -centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
> derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
> circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
> English centre.
>
> THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
> *FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
> INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF?  THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
> SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
> #75 - *FAILURE*}.
>
> THOU THAT SAYEST A MAN SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, DOST THOU COMMIT
> ADULTERY? THOU THAT ABHORREST IDOLS, DOST THOU COMMIT SACRILEGE? THOU
> THAT MAKEST THY BOAST OF THE LAW, THROUGH BREAKING THE LAW DISHONOUREST
> THOU GOD?
>
> *FOR* *THE* *NAME* *OF* *GOD* *IS* *BLASPHEMED* *AMONG* *THE* *GENTILES*
> *THROUGH* *YOU*, *AS* *IT* *IS* *WRITTEN*." [Romans 2:19-24 (KJV)]
>
> THUSLY BEFORE WE PROPERLY BEGIN THESE OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
> WITHIN THE MATTER OF COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NO: AP-18-0609 WE WISH
> TO RAISE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PREJUDICED CHARACTER OF THE COUNTY COURT
> #646 / #86 = *JUDGE* upon the occasion of the 12 JUNE 2018 FILE LISTING
> HEARING, whom after granting me leave from the COURT within this MATTER
> and before the video link being terminated was heard to #404 - *UTTER*
> the #372 - *CONTEMPTUOUS* #404 - *STATEMENT*:
>
> “*I* *AM* *SURE* *DONALD* *TRUMP* *WILL* *BE* *INTERESTED* *IN*
> *READING* *THE* *REPORT*. *HARRUMPH*!”
>
> NOT ONLY DOES SUCH REMARK CONVEY AN ABJECT DISRESPECT FOR FAIR AND
> EQUITABLE JUDICIAL PROCESS BUT HINTS AT AN UNATTAINABILITY OF JUSTICE BY
> CONCOMITANT ALIGNMENT WITH INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVES SUCH AS ROMAN
> CATHOLICISM (ATTENDANCE AT CHURCH SERVICES ON COMMENCEMENT OF THE
> JUDICIAL YEAR FOR EXAMPLE) / FREEMASONRY WHICH OUGHT TO BE DEBARRED BY
> CONFLICT OF CONSCIENCE / INTEREST AS IN REGARD FOR AN INTEGRITY AS
> SOMETHING OTHER THAN DUTCH JUSTICE BY MERE SHOW TRIALS (WHETHER:
> ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE OR ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL OF
> MELBOURNE) IN DETERMINING ANY OF MY LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {ie.
> #364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”
>
> Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration on how
> the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
> from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
> determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
> functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
> this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
> dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
> entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
> exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
> the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {
>
> #451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
> as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
> act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
> *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
> cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
> 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
> right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
> (in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
> measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;
>
> } SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
> PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
> RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
> VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
> SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
> #54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
> SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
> = #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
> SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
> name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
> Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
> Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
> NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
> {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
> JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
> DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
>
> That such failings make a virtue of PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH as an
> Australian born retired Anglican bishop whom served as the 23rd
> Governor-General of Australia from 2001 until 2003.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
> ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
> of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
> gobbledigook for a change."
>
> DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
> describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
> which has an impress upon time itself.
>
> Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
> you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
> *REALITY*."
>
> AS THAT WHICH WE HAVE CLARIFIED IN BEING A CONSIDERATION UPON HUMAN
> RATIONALITY AND #288 - META ACQUIESCENCE BY UMBRAL ILLUSION {#364 x 4 +
> #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 as #1092 x 2 = #2184} BEING ONLY
> REASONABLE #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> } WITHIN OUR 30 NOVEMBER 2018 INSTRUCTIONS MADE TO LEGAL COUNSEL WITHIN
> COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0775 RELATING TO CONSIDERATION:
> (#2) OF A SALE MAGISTRATES COURT MENTION HEARING DATE OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:
>
> "That there is also a particular eBAY purchase of a (#162156254584)
> conveyed by the feedback "PERFECT EBAYER, INSTANT PAYMENT & SAME DAY
> PICKUP. THANK YOU!" which is dated *WEDNESDAY* 23 NOVEMBER 2016 and made
> by SELLER MEMBER ID: GEORGE.K1 (FEEDBACK SCORE OF 79%) relating to an
> archeological curiosity as *ROSETTA* *STONE* and an oblique reference to
> such on *WEDNESDAY* 24 MAY 2017 by then FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN
> KERRY (DEMOCRAT) to a HARVARD UNIVERSITY graduation which can ONLY be
> properly understood in the context of my earlier *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*
> *ACTIVITY* ASSOCIATED TO @5: #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
> concerning which it ought to be noted that MR. GEORGE W. BUSH AS THE
> 43RD PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (REPUBLICAN), DID
> PUBLICLY MAKE THE CLAIM WITHIN THE NEWS MEDIA THAT THIS DAY: WEDNESDAY
> 19 SEPTEMBER, 2001 *WAS* *SIGNIFICANTLY* *RECOGNIZED* *AS* *THE*
> *CREATION* *DAY* *OF* *THE* *WORLD* *BY* *SOME* *RELIGIOUS*
> *COMMUNITIES* *OF* *FAITH* WHICH CONFORMS TO MY UNFALTERING INITIATIVE
> THAT HAS BEEN PURSUED EVERY DAY SINCE.
>
> EUGENE SCOTT (CNN) @ 1256 (GMT) 25 MAY 2017: "DISMAYED JOHN KERRY SAYS
> HARVARD GRADS SHOULD 'BUY ROSETTA STONE AND LEARN RUSSIAN':
>
> Former Secretary of State John Kerry used a commencement address
> Wednesday night to rip the Trump administration, telling graduates the
> US is not living in "a normal time."
>
> "Democracy relies on free speech. Yes, say anything you want, but it
> relies even more on the speech being truthful. It is the truth after all
> that sets us free," the former Democratic presidential nominee said
> Wednesday at the Harvard Kennedy School graduation. "And the truth is --
> no, this is not a normal time."
>
> "It's not normal to see a president of the United States decrying
> 'so-called judges.' It's not normal for the leader of the country that
> invented the First Amendment to routinely degrade and even threaten
> journalists," Kerry added. "And no, it's not normal to see the head of
> the FBI fired summarily because he was investigating connections between
> Russia and the presidential campaign of the very man who fired him."
>
> President Donald Trump has sought to shake off the damaging political
> blowback from continuing investigations into his campaign's relationship
> with Russia following reports that he fired former FBI Director James
> Comey because of the ongoing probe.
>
> Kerry said America's current political conversations very often sound
> like those that occur in countries the State Department warns Americans
> not to visit.
>
> "I've been asked, 'What is the secret to having a real impact on
> government?' Well, it's recently changed. I used to say, 'Either run for
> office or get a degree from the Harvard Kennedy School,'" he said. "But
> with this White House, I'd say,
>
> '*BUY* *ROSETTA* *STONE* *AND* *LEARN* *RUSSIAN*.'"
>
> <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/25/politics/john-kerry-donald-trump-normal/index.html>
>
>
> — OO ROO TO OOHRAH —
[Written 3 July 2017]
>
> "I AM THE APPLE 🍎 OF HIS EYE 👁.
> THINKING TO DO ME OVER 🎯?
> YOU OUGHT NOT EVEN TRY.
> SEMANTIC FIELDS IN CLOVER 🍀 {ie. PADDOCK as field opposite owned by
> STEVE}.
>
> MOUTH WORDS LIKE PUSKIN.
> DING-DONG, POOH-POOH,
> BOW-WOW OR TA-TA PUTIN.
> KOO WEE NOR TO TRY WOO.
>
> *ROSETTA* *STONE* SO WRIT.
> AS PLAIN FOR ALL TO SEE.
> SAY OTHERWISE SUCH TWIT.
> THAT GOD {#226 = #70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50 = `elyown (Aramaic)
> (H5946): {#5 as #166} 1) the Most High; 1a) of God} LOVES EVEN ME."
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video) ft. will.i.am"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk48xRzuNvA>
>
> And this comment was made with respects to having provided a “SYNCRETISM
> AS CONSENSUS VALUES DOCUMENT FOR NORTH KOREAN / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> PEACE SUMMIT AND ACCORD OF 12 JUNE 2018” comprising some some #60 pages
> and dated 10-11 June 2018 and titled: "ELIJAH {GOD THE LORD, THE STRONG
> LORD} MOCKED THEM: CRY ALOUD FOR HE IS A GOD EITHER HE IS TALKING OR HE
> IS PURSUING OR HE IS IN A JOURNEY OR PERADVENTURE HE SLEEPS AND MUST BE
> AWAKENED" which we will now excerpt with additional expansions as
> inclusions:
>
> KNOCK KNOCK!
>
> WHOSE THERE?
>
> DOLF @ 1143 HOURS ON 6 DECEMBER 2018: "IS EINSTEIN'S FAMOUS 'GOD LETTER'
> EVIDENCE AS FALSE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE: MENTAL RESERVATION IN BEING
> EVASIVE ABOUT GOD?
>
> "THE WORD GOD IS FOR ME NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXPRESSION AND PRODUCT OF
> HUMAN WEAKNESS, THE BIBLE A COLLECTION OF HONORABLE, BUT STILL PURELY
> PRIMITIVE, LEGENDS WHICH ARE NEVERTHELESS PRETTY CHILDISH..." [Albert
> Einstein’s “God Letter,” dated 3 January 1954 which on 4 December 2018
> sold at a Christie's Auction for $2.9 million]
>
> Should we congratulate Einstein for holding equitable beliefs on GOD and
> the BIBLE with that of Adolf Hitler and ask if being confronted by the
> blackhole of ignorance by which oaths of GOD were then sworn to HITLER
> was it simply too much for Einstein’s sensibility as then to make
> self-justifications by antagonism against the deeds of his Jewish
> fathers: 50J when the PROSCRIPTIONS AS #41 - ONTIC x n NECESSITY
> PRINCIPLES OVER #364 - QUESTIONS ON THE #430 - LAW OF NATURE were conveyed:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
> ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONVEYS: “I
> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the
> Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me
> God.”
>
> By what means then did Albert Einstein declare his allegiance to another
> sovereign STATE?
>
> If you didn’t know about trinomial number paradigm as conveying our
> intuition upon personality of God, then Albert Einstein must contend
> with a troubling conscience over binomial number having by methodology a
> Nazi predisposition as worldview—they too made claims of science.
>
> *EUCHARISTIA* (G2169)@{
>     @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>     @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>     @3: Sup: 33 (#119); Ego: 33 (#114),
>     @4: Sup: 34 (#153); Ego: 1 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>     @5: Sup: 53 (#206); Ego: 19 (#134),
>     @6: Sup: 63 (#269); Ego: 10 (#144),
>     @7: Sup: 20 (#289); Ego: 38 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>     @8: Sup: 77 (#366); Ego: 57 (#239),
>     @9: Sup: 6 (#372); Ego: 10 (#249),
>     @10: Sup: 7 (#379); Ego: 1 (#250),
>     @11: Sup: 45 (#424); Ego: 38 (#288),
>     Male: #424; Feme: #288 <-- *UMBRA* *IMPETUS* *AS* *CHICANERIES*
> *OF* *A* *SHALLOW* *METAPHYSICS*
> }
>
> If it was made upon ‘*MENTAL* *RESERVATION* *IN* *BEING* *EVASIVE*
> *ABOUT* *GOD*’ then Einstein was a dishonourable person.
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @288: "It will forever remain a remarkable
> phenomenon in the history of philosophy that there was a time when even
> mathematicians who were at the same time philosophers began to doubt,
> not, indeed, the correctness of their geometrical propositions insofar
> as they related merely to space, [IDEA @288] but the objective validity
> and application to nature of this concept itself and all its geometrical
> determinations, since they were concerned that a line in nature might
> indeed be composed of physical points, consequently that true space in
> objects might be composed of simple parts, notwithstanding that the
> space which the geometer holds in thought can by no means be composed of
> such things. They did not realize that this space in thought itself
> makes possible physical space, i.e., the extension of matter; that this
> space is by no means a property of things in them- selves, but only a
> form of our power of sensory representation; that all objects in space
> are mere appearances, i.e., not things in themselves but representations
> of our sensory intuition; and that, since space as the geometer thinks
> it is precisely the form of sensory intuition which we find in ourselves
> a priori and which contains the ground of the possibility of all outer
> appearances (with respect to their form), these appearances must of
> necessity and with the greatest precision harmonize with the
> propositions of the geometer, which he extracts not from any fabricated
> concept, but from the subjective foundation of all outer appearances,
> namely sensibility itself. In this and no other way can the geometer be
> secured, regarding the indubitable objective *REALITY* of his
> propositions, against all the *CHICANERIES* {ie. *THE* *USE* *OF*
> *TRICKERY* *TO* *ACHIEVE* *A* *POLITICAL*, *FINANCIAL*, *OR* *LEGAL*
> *PURPOSE*} of a shallow metaphysics, however strange this way must seem
> to such a metaphysics because it does not go back to the sources of its
> concepts." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
> IDEA: @288]
>
> HOWEVER IN CONSIDERATION OF SUCH WE WOULD PROVISIONALLY CONCLUDE THAT
> WHILST THE *ANKH* *HETEROS* / *TORAH* *PROTOTYPES* may operate as an
> intrinsic function of the HUMAN MIND IT IS CAPABLE AS A CHIMERIC IMPOST
> OF EITHER FACILITATING BY REASON OF THERAPEUTIC CAUSE OR IMPEDING ITS
> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL but that
> they do not implicitly convey the MORAL IMPERATIVE which is the
> providence of the ONTIC necessity.
>
> AND NOTE THAT ADOLF HITLER UPON 5th JUNE 1942 UTILISES THE TERMS
> '*WINTER*' AND '*CHICANERIES*' IN RELATION TO JEWISH BELIEF WHEREBY THE
> CONSIDERATION IS UPON HUMAN REASONING {
>
> #2184 - #1827 = #357 AS KANT'S IDEAS @351 TO @360 OF CONCLUSION WITHIN
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS ON SECTION #57 - DETERMINING THE
> BOUNDARY OF PURE REASON
>
> } AND ITS ILLUSION {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 =
> #1092 x 2 = #2184} AS TO WHETHER THIS IS A REFLECTION UPON IMMANUEL
> KANT'S IDEA #288 AND THE EUCHARIST AS A GEOMETRICAL PROPOSITION:
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> #8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
> #16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
> #24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
> #32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
> #40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
> IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
> SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
> gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
> *AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.
>
> The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
> on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
> a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
> of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
> ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
>
> ). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
> changed.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whH4utd0YRA>
>
> PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
> *BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
> *SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
> *HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
> *THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
> [HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]
>
> YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEXWRTEbj1I>
>
> #48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction: *NORTH*, *EAST*, *SOUTH*, *WEST*; 1d) manner,
> habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f) of moral character
> (figurative)
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>
>
> [IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
> special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.
>
> It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
> Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]
>
> #224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
> #224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
> pleasing, acceptable
>
> #64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
> [#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
> *INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
> taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
> *WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
> acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
> *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;
>
> H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
>    @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>    @2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
>    @3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
> #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
> *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
>
>    @4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
>    @5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
> / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
>    @6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
>    @7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
>    Male: #311; Feme: #185
> } // #509
>
> *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
> *CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
> *GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
> #364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
> Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;
>
> #509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
> as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
> become Judaised;
>
> "AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING’S
> COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
> AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME JEWS {#509 as
> [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054)}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE
> JEWS FELL UPON THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]
>
> "AND SAUL {demanded; lent; ditch; death}, YET BREATHING OUT THREATENINGS
> AND SLAUGHTER AGAINST THE DISCIPLES OF THE LORD, WENT UNTO THE HIGH
> PRIEST, AND DESIRED OF HIM LETTERS TO DAMASCUS {a sack full of blood;
> the similitude of burning} TO THE SYNAGOGUES, THAT IF HE FOUND ANY OF
> THIS WAY {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WHETHER THEY WERE MEN OR WOMEN, HE MIGHT BRING THEM BOUND
> UNTO JERUSALEM {vision of peace}." [Acts 9:1-2 (KJV)]
>
> “FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN [A] PESTILENT [FELLOW], AND A MOVER OF
> SEDITION AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF
> THE SECT OF THE NAZARENES {separated; crowned; sanctified}:” [Acts 24:5
> (KJV)]
>
> “BUT WE DESIRE TO HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING
> THIS SECT {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST.” [Acts 28:22
> (KJV)]
>
> *BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
> dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
> a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
> *REPOSE*; *OATH*}
>
> BEERSHEBA {#575 as [#2, #1, #200, #300, #2, #70]}@{
>     @1: Sup: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306] {@1:
> Male: #2, Feme: #2}); Ego: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO
> [#102/#306] {@1: Male: #2, Feme: #2}),
>     @2: Sup: 3 (#5 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #FIVE [#111/#333 ***] {@1:
> Male: #5, Feme: #5}); Ego: 1 (#3 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #THREE
> [#105/#315] {@1: Male: #3, Feme: #3} / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234] {@2: Feme: #2}),
>     @3: Sup: 41 (#46 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #THREE [#96/#288] {@3:
> Male: #24}); Ego: 38 (#41 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234] {@4:
> Male: #31}),
>     @4: Sup: 17 (#63); Ego: 57 (#98 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234 ***] {@5: Male: #57}),
>     @5: Sup: 19 (#82 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***] {@3:
> Male: #42}); Ego: 2 (#100 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306]
> {@4: Male: #56} & #FOUR [#108/#324] {@5: Feme: #36} / ANKH PROTOTYPE
> TORAH: #SIX [#123/#369] {@3: Male: #51}),
>     @6: Sup: 8 (#90 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] {@4:
> Male: #52} & #TWO [#102/#306] {@5: Feme: #34}); Ego: 70 (#170 / ANKH
> PROTOTYPE TORAH: #EIGHT [#141/#423] {@4: Male: #34}),
>     Male: #90; Feme: #170
> }
>
> #288 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #6, #50] / #347 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10,
> #20, #40] = zikrown (H2146): {UMBRA: #2 as #283 % #41 = #37} 1)
> memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #688 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #50, #6, #400] = zikrown (H2146): {#14 as
> #688 % #41 = #32} 1) memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360
>
> "IT IS A GREAT PITY THAT THIS TENDENCY TOWARDS RELIGIOUS THOUGHT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: universe of proper names; 2) the name is used for
> everything which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of
> which is aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the
> name, ie. for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command,
> excellences, deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE*
> *CAUSE* *OR* *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
> *SUFFERS* *AS* *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> } CAN FIND NO BETTER OUTLET THAN THE JEWISH PETTIFOGGERY {ie. practise
> legal deception or trickery / quibble about petty points} OF THE OLD
> TESTAMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10,
> #1, #10 = paliggenesia (G3824): {#12 as #398} 1) new birth,
> reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 10) of Cicero's
> restoration to rank and fortune on his recall from exile; 100) of the
> restoration of the Jewish nation after exile; 1000) of the recovery of
> knowledge by recollection; 1a) hence renovation, regeneration, the
> production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical change of mind
> for the better. The word often used to denote the restoration of a thing
> to its pristine state, its renovation, as a renewal or restoration of
> life after death; 1b) the renovation of the earth after the *DELUGE*;
> 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after its destruction by
> fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and glorious change of all
> things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that restoration of the
> primal and perfect condition of things which existed before the fall of
> our first parents, which the Jews looked for in connection with the
> advent of the Messiah, and which Christians expected in connection with
> the visible return of Jesus from heaven.; 1e) other uses;
>
> } FOR RELIGIOUS PEOPLE WHO, IN THE SOLITUDE OF *WINTER*, CONTINUALLY
> SEEK ULTIMATE LIGHT ON THEIR RELIGIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF
> THE BIBLE, MUST EVENTUALLY BECOME SPIRITUALLY DEFORMED. THE WRETCHED
> PEOPLE STRIVE TO EXTRACT TRUTHS FROM THESE JEWISH *CHICANERIES* {
>
> — TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] —
>
> “TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
> SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
> KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
> WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.
>
> MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
> GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN’S THRONE.
> JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
> AGAINST HEAVEN’S SON FIRSTBORN.
>
> NONE DENY HOLOCAUST’S CAUSE.
> JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
> ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
> ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}.”
>
>
> 
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>
> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>
> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
> sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātis}
> Empire Governance]
>
> }, WHERE IN FACT NO TRUTHS EXIST. AS A RESULT THEY BECOME EMBEDDED IN
> SOME RUT OF THOUGHT OR OTHER {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as
> formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> } AND, UNLESS THEY POSSESS AN EXCEPTIONALLY *COMMONSENSE* *MIND*,
> *DEGENERATE* *INTO* *RELIGIOUS* *MANIACS*.
>
> IT IS DEPLORABLE THAT THE BIBLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO GERMAN,
> AND THAT THE WHOLE OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THUS BECOME EXPOSED
> TO THE WHOLE OF THIS JEWISH MUMBO JUMBO {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #30, #8, #100, #70, #200 = leros (G3026): {#11 as
> #408} 1) *IDLE* *TALK*, *NONSENSE*;
>
> }. SO LONG AS THE WISDOM, PARTICULARLY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, REMAINED
> EXCLUSIVELY IN THE LATIN OF THE CHURCH, THERE WAS LITTLE DANGER THAT
> SENSIBLE PEOPLE WOULD BECOME THE VICTIMS OF ILLUSIONS AS THE RESULT OF
> STUDYING THE BIBLE. BUT SINCE THE BIBLE BECAME COMMON PROPERTY, A WHOLE
> HEAP OF PEOPLE HAVE FOUND OPENED TO THEM LINES OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT
> WHICH — PARTICULARLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GERMAN CHARACTERISTIC OF
> PERSISTENT AND SOMEWHAT MELANCHOLY MEDITATION — AS OFTEN AS NOT TURNED
> THEM INTO RELIGIOUS MANIACS. WHEN ONE RECOLLECTS FURTHER THAT THE
> CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ELEVATED TO THE STATUS OF SAINTS A WHOLE NUMBER OF
> MADMEN, ONE REALISES WHY MOVEMENTS SUCH AS THAT OF THE FLAGELLANTS CAME
> INEVITABLY INTO EXISTENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES IN GERMANY.
>
> AS A SANE GERMAN, ONE IS FLABBERGASTED TO THINK THAT GERMAN HUMAN BEINGS
> COULD HAVE LET THEMSELVES BE BROUGHT TO SUCH A PASS BY JEWISH FILTH AND
> PRIESTLY TWADDLE, THAT THEY WERE LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE HOWLING
> DERVISH OF THE TURKS AND THE NEGROES, AT WHOM WE LAUGH SO SCORNFULLY. IT
> ANGERS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #100, #3, #8, #50 = orge (G3709): {#61 as
> #231} 1) anger, the natural disposition, temper, character; 2) movement
> or agitation of the soul, impulse, desire, any violent emotion, but
> especially anger; 3) *ANGER*, wrath, indignation; 4) anger exhibited in
> punishment, hence used for punishment itself; 4a) of punishments
> inflicted by magistrates;
>
> } ONE TO THINK THAT, WHILE IN OTHER PARTS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #1, #8, #200, #10, #6 = 'achar (H310): {#6 as
> #231} 1) after the following part, behind (of place), hinder, afterwards
> (of time); 1a) as an adverb; 1a1) behind (of place); 1a2) afterwards (of
> time); 1b) as a preposition; 1b1) behind, after (of place); 1b2) after
> (of time); 1b3) besides; 1c) after that; 1d) as a substantive; 1d1)
> hinder part; 1e) with other prepositions; 1e1) from behind; 1e2) from
> following after;
>
> } OF THE GLOBE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600 = `owlam
> (H5769): {#38 as #231} 1) long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever,
> ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old, *ANCIENT*, *WORLD*; 1a)
> ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future); 1b1) for ever,
> always; 1b2) continuous existence, perpetual; 1b3) everlasting,
> indefinite or unending future, eternity;
>
> } RELIGIOUS TEACHING LIKE THAT OF *CONFUCIUS*, *BUDDHA* AND *MOHAMMED*
> OFFERS AN UNDENIABLY BROAD BASIS FOR THE RELIGIOUS-MINDED, GERMANS
> SHOULD HAVE BEEN DUPED BY A THEOLOGICAL EXPOSITION DEVOID OF ALL HONEST
> DEPTH.
>
> PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY
>
> WHEN ONE SEEKS REASONS FOR THESE *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
> *STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
> *TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE* {ie.
>
> HITLER DOES NOT CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT
> POSTULATES OF A NOUMENON:
>
> I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
> phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
> edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
> applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
> and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
> transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
> knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
> literally "that which appears").
>
> Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
> objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
> cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
> which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
> Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
> "noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
> dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
> are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
> understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
>
> *THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
> *AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
> *FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
> *SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
> *CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
> *NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
> *KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
> *AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
> *ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
> *DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
> *PSYCHOSIS*.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d.  (9 May 2017)]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-fZ1PQJrZc>
>
> A CHILD {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325}
> 1) recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;
>
> }, FOR EXAMPLE, WHO IN ITS VERY EARLY YEARS HAS BEEN FRIGHTENED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1)
> *TO* *FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a)
> (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
> to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE*
> *FEARFUL*, *BE* DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and
> awe, be held in awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
> (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
>
> } WITH THE THREAT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as
> #231} 1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn,
> *THREATEN*, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
> another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
> be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
> flight;
>
> } OF THE BOGEY-MAN IN THE DARK, WILL FREQUENTLY RETAIN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } THROUGHOUT ALL THE YEARS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT A FEAR OF ENTERING A DARK
> ROOM, A CELLAR OR THE LIKE; AMONG WOMEN A FEAR OF THIS NATURE INCULCATED
> IN EARLY YOUTH {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } OFTEN PERSISTS FOR A LIFETIME. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE DANGERS
> WHICH, NOT EVER HAVING COME TO HIS NOTICE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise
> (as formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> }, A MAN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } COMPLETELY IGNORES. A CHILD LIVING IN AN AREA EXPOSED TO BOMBING AND
> TO WHOM THE DANGERS OF A BOMBARDMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20
> as #231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
> *DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO*
> *ATTACK*, *SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be
> desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate
> (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to
> be laid waste; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be
> dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;
>
> } HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLAINED, WILL REGARD AN ENEMY AIR ATTACK AS A NOISY
> FIREWORK DISPLAY, AND WILL NOT AS A RULE SHOW THE SLIGHTEST SIGN OF FEAR.
>
> THE ESSENTIAL CONCLUSION TO WHICH THESE CONSIDERATIONS LEADS ME IS THAT
> WE MUST DO EVERYTHING HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO PROTECT FOR ALL TIME {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) to withhold; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } ANY FURTHER SECTIONS OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE FROM THE DANGER OF MENTAL
> DEFORMITY {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> }, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT BE RELIGIOUS MANIA OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF
> CEREBRAL DERANGEMENT. FOR THIS REASON {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: univ. of proper names; 2) the name is used for everything
> which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of which is
> aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the name, i.e.
> for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command, excellences,
> deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE* *CAUSE* *OR*
> *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SUFFERS* *AS*
> *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> } I HAVE DIRECTED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #5, #4, #200, #500 = derek (H1870): {#29 as
> #231} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (fig.); 1f) of moral character (fig.);
>
> } THAT EVERY TOWN OF ANY IMPORTANCE SHALL HAVE AN OBSERVATORY, FOR
> ASTRONOMY HAS BEEN SHOWN BY EXPERIENCE TO BE ONE OF THE BEST MEANS AT
> MAN'S DISPOSAL FOR INCREASING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE UNIVERSE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #450 as #20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #50 = kosmos (G2889):
> {#23 as #600} 1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution,
> order, government; 2) ornament, decoration, adornment, ie. the
> arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the
> heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3; 3) the world, the universe; 4) the circle of the
> earth, the earth; 5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race;
> 6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and
> therefore hostile to the cause of Christ; 7) world affairs, the
> aggregate of things earthly; 8) any aggregate or general collection of
> particulars of any sort; 7a) the whole circle of earthly goods,
> endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc, which although hollow and
> frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to
> the cause of Christ; 8a) of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33;
> 12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19;
>
> }, AND THUS SAVING HIM FROM ANY TENDENCY TOWARDS *MENTAL* *ABERRATION*."
> [ADOLF HITLER (1941-1944) TABLE TALK ON IDEA @233 / PAGES: #513 / #514]
>
> On 6/12/18 9:38 pm, dolf wrote:
>> — THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
>> COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018
>>
>> As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
>> for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
>> culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
>> AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by
>> "EDICT AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN
>> AUTHORITY.
>>
>> A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
>> CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
>> CRIMES ACT 1958.
>>
>> GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
>> ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS
>> AND SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS
>> OF ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
>> going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
>> which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
>> within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
>> and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
>> THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
>> HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE
>> SAME TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the
>> requirements to purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY
>> BY PERSONS WHOM HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A
>> SUI JURIS STATUS BY THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE
>> TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 -
>> SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.
>>
>> AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL
>> THAT THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.
>>
>> GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
>> THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
>> POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
>> PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED
>> BY LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
>> GOVERNOR GENERAL.
>>
>> That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
>> participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
>> understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>
>>
>> TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT
>> FOR A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL
>> REGULATED MILITIA
>>
>> Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the
>> protection of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.
>>
>> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I
>> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
>> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
>> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
>> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend
>> the Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
>> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
>> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
>> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
>> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
>> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
>> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
>> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help
>> me God.”
>>
>> Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He
>> whom is without sin, cast the first stone.
>>
>> But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
>> STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 41   1 57
>> 49 33 17
>>    9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33
>> A.D.}
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate
>> thesis, that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*]
>> NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly
>> interpreted, that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal
>> status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
>> CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER
>> THE SABBATH]) ...
>>
>>      45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
>>      68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
>>
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>>
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
>> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
>> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}
>>
>> Nous: #63
>> Time: 04:10 hrs
>> Date: 2018.5.23
>> Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
>>     @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>     @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>>     @3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
>>     Male: #113; Feme: #61
>> } // #61
>>
>> Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
>> Tetra: #62 - Doubt
>> I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)
>>
>> Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
>>
>> 1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
>> 2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
>> 3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
>> 4. Souchoe
>> }
>>
>> Asa {Physician; cure}
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH
>> {#314 / #422}
>>
>> 3.2.7.63.0@{
>>      @1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
>>      @2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
>>      @3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT
>> MIND {%31}),
>>      @4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego:
>> 33 (#219),
>>      @5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 53 (#272),
>>      @6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
>>      @7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
>>      @8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
>>      @9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
>>      Male: #337; Feme: #474
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time:
>> 04:10 hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in
>> Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap,
>> Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]
>>
>> "AND WHEN THE DAY OF PENTECOST {IE. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT
>> FOR THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [ACTS 1:4 (KJV)]} WAS FULLY COME, THEY
>> WERE ALL WITH ONE ACCORD {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
>> (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}} IN ONE PLACE.
>>
>> AND SUDDENLY THERE CAME A SOUND FROM HEAVEN AS OF A RUSHING MIGHTY
>> WIND, AND IT FILLED ALL THE HOUSE WHERE THEY WERE SITTING. AND THERE
>> APPEARED UNTO THEM CLOVEN TONGUES LIKE AS OF FIRE, AND IT SAT UPON
>> EACH OF THEM. AND THEY WERE ALL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND BEGAN
>> TO SPEAK WITH OTHER TONGUES, AS THE SPIRIT GAVE THEM UTTERANCE. AND
>> THERE WERE DWELLING AT JERUSALEM {VISION OF PEACE} JEWS, *DEVOUT*
>> *MEN*, *OUT* *OF* *EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie.
>>
>> AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF
>> THE HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING A #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF
>> LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41}.
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82
>> - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
>>
>>      84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
>>      86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
>>      102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
>>      104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
>>      115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
>>
>> #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature
>> [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
>>
>>      130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
>>      139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
>>      146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
>>      148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
>>      156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
>>      157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
>> DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
>>      158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
>>      161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
>> NATURE [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
>>
>>      166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
>>      168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
>>      169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
>>      171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
>>      173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
>>      175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
>>      180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
>>      181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS,
>> 35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
>>      182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
>>      184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
>>      185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
>>      186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
>>      191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
>>      196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
>>      197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
>>      200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
>>
>> #175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature
>> [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
>>
>>      210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
>>      215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
>>      220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
>>      228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can
>> be proven only during the life of a human being (which proof will
>> doubtless be granted us), but not after death (which is actually our
>> concern) – and indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT*
>> *THE* *CONCEPT* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as
>> connected necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so
>> connected only in accordance with a principle of possible experience,
>> and hence only for the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite
>> remarkable that metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the
>> *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever
>> attempting to prove it; doubtless because they found themselves
>> completely forsaken by all grounds of proof as soon as they commenced
>> with the concept of substance. Common sense, being well aware that
>> without this *ASSUMPTION* *NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN*
>> *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD* *BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect
>> with a postulate; for it could never extract this principle from
>> experience itself, partly because experience cannot follow the
>> materials (substances) through all their alterations and dissolutions
>> far enough to be able to find matter always undiminished, partly
>> because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*] *NECESSITY*,
>> *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*. But the
>> metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept of
>> the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
>> the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY,
>> 3 APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY*
>> *OF* *THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
>> *INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM*
>> *DESTRUCTION* *THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source
>> of this principle, which however would have required far deeper
>> investigations than they ever wanted to start, then they would have
>> seen: that this *LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS*
>> *GRANTED* *ONLY* *FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore
>> can hold good only for things insofar as they are to be cognized in
>> experience and connected with other things, but never for things
>> irrespective of all possible experience, hence not for the soul after
>> death.
>>
>> That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
>> outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
>> connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
>> purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
>> proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
>> hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
>> objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
>> such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
>> nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
>> space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
>> contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
>> *ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
>> *TRUTH* {
>>
>> G2309@{
>>     @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>>     @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
>>     @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
>>     @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
>>     @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
>>     @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
>>     @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
>>     Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in
>> Annu; *I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF*
>> *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>      #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>      #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>      #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>      #CANON: #181
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>     @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>     @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>     @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>     @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
>> WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>     Male: #98; Feme: #181
>> } // #181
>>
>> #474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA:
>> #11 as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*;
>> 1a) to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish;
>> 1c) to love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take
>> delight in, have pleasure;
>>
>> }, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
>> the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that
>> I am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality
>> of bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
>> experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul
>> I cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
>> constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
>> underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
>> therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and
>> lawfulness as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder
>> and false illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it
>> presupposes space and time as conditions for the existence of objects
>> and merely asks whether the objects of the outer senses are actually
>> to be found in the space in which we put them while awake, in the way
>> that the object of inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that
>> is, whether experience carries with itself sure criteria to
>> distinguish it from imagination.
>>
>> Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
>> ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
>> space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
>> representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we
>> cannot doubt that those things should not constitute truthful
>> experience. Because appearances are considered as appearances only in
>> accordance with their connection within experience, material idealism
>> can therefore be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an
>> experience that bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself
>> exist in accordance with the representation of inner sense (in time) –
>> for the concept: outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since,
>> however, the I in the proposition I am does not signify merely the
>> *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER* *INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE*
>> *SUBJECT* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely
>> outer intuition (in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies
>> this appearance, accordingly the question of whether bodies (as
>> appearances of outer sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in
>> nature can without hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters
>> do not stand otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an
>> appearance of inner sense (the soul according to empirical psychology)
>> exist in time outside my power of representation, for this question
>> must also be answered negatively.
>>
>> In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
>> conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called
>> transcendental idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian
>> idealism. For if space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then
>> it is, as a representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the
>> only question remaining concerns the empirical truth of the
>> appearances in this space. If this is not the case, but rather space
>> and the *APPEARANCES* *IN* *IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE*
>> *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE* *CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*,
>> *OUTSIDE* *OUR* *PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE*
>> *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.
>>
>> "NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
>> *WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
>> *SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.
>>
>> G1097@{
>>     @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
>>     @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
>>     @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
>>     @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>>     @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
>>     @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
>>     Male: #246; Feme: #231
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
>> makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
>>      #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
>>      #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even
>> distant relatives.
>>      #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and
>> blood.
>>      #CANON: #220
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
>>     @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
>>     @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
>>     @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>>     @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
>>     Male: #200; Feme: #220
>> } // #220
>>
>> #474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
>> #1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge
>> of perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge
>> of; 3) Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman;
>> 4) to become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to
>> understand; 2b) to know;
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED AND MARVELLED, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, BEHOLD,
>> ARE NOT ALL THESE WHICH SPEAK GALILAEANS {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
>> VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? AND HOW
>> HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN?
>>
>> Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
>> MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
>> RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
>> Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
>> {MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
>> OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and
>> in the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A
>> WALL; COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER},
>> Jews and proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING;
>> DESERT; RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful
>> works of God.
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED, AND WERE IN DOUBT, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER,
>> WHAT MEANETH THIS?  OTHERS MOCKING SAID, THESE MEN ARE FULL OF NEW
>> WINE." [Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature.
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:
>>
>> "This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
>> *IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
>> *MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
>> *DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business
>> of the critique of reason itself.
>>
>> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
>> #273 - *MOMENT*
>>
>> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
>> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
>> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
>> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
>> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
>> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>>
>> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
>> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN
>> CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
>> #728 - REACTANCE +
>> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
>> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
>> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
>> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE
>> 1:5]}
>>
>> I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only
>> in the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object
>> is an object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
>> transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
>> contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts
>> to thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot
>> be represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
>> cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
>> condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience
>> can never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point,
>> always an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any
>> experience whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
>> Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
>> immoral obscenity.
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>
>>
>> On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
>>> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>>>
>>>
>>> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>>>
>>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>>>
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH
>> {#395 / #321}
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super:
>> #321 / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 -
>> Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold
>> Resolution, Ego: #365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War;
>> I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51
>> - Constancy]
>>
>> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
>> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
>> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
>> we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking
>> about thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from
>> nothing or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
>> nothingness into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of
>> the resurrection from the #260 - DEAD}.
>>
>> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24
>> UN Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
>> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so
>> he could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>>
>> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
>> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
>> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>>
>> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>>
>> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
>> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
>> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
>> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
>> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
>> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>>
>> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>>
>> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was
>> published in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am
>> spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a
>> GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary
>> works of 1781 to 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by
>> such narrative.
>>
>> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
>> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
>> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
>> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
>> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French
>> Revolution of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal
>> made against the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps
>> having only an hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and
>> no longer possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>>
>> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
>> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
>> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
>> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>>
>> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
>> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
>> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
>> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE
>> AND HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie.
>> A BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
>> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN
>> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in
>> additionally conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the
>> ONTIC necessity as TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the
>> facilitation of ideas by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a
>> vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>>
>> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
>> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>>
>> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
>> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
>> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>>
>> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
>> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING
>> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF
>> PERSPECTIVE, @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC
>> AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE
>> AGREEMENT.
>>
>> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
>> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>>      @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>>      @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>>      @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
>> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>>      @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>>      @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM*
>> *WITH* #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
>> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12
>> X #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER
>> 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
>> AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>>      @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>>      @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>>      @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>>      @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>>      Male: #585; Feme: #693
>> }
>>
>> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
>> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
>> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION
>> PROCESSES ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 -
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> PROVIDING A MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE
>> OF INCURSIONS AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS
>>
>> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST /
>> KNOWLEDGE ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE
>> FROM THE #5 / #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM
>> THAT IT HAS A PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING
>> {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC
>> PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON: ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating
>> meta-descriptor prototypes as that which is conjoined within the
>> TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS: INSTANTIATION}.
>>
>>> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>>
>
>


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-07 18:56:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
French President hits back over *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* photo criticism:

<https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/582753b8a4921be59107b31bac3fbf32?width=650>

<https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/french-president-hits-back-over-viral-photo-criticism/news-story/2dc61176b40174e817db4272ef4fea92>

So anyways the punchline to that story of a “woman coming the counter to
serve a customer whilst breastfeeding a baby.”

Saying, “Yeah want do you want, can’t you see I’m busy?”

Answer: “That may well be business, but some us are just hanging about
ma’am.”

-- ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE: WHY THEN IS THE ORDINANCE OF
#451 - JUSTICE A CRIME ITSELF?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 7 December, 2018

“Give me a child until he is 7 {ie. #364 x 7 % #41 = #6} and I will show
you the man.” [Aristotle]

Nous: #6
Time:
Date:
Torah:

Dao: Female Superiority, Completion of Form
Tetra: #66 - Departure
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
/ #370}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
/ #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]

THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {IE.
#364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”

Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration of how
the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
(in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
#54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
= #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
{ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH SINCE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF 1901, WHEN
THEIR '*CLAIM* *TO* *PRECEDENCE* *ON* *SENIORITY* *WAS* *REJECTED*' IN
SUBJUGATED JUXTAPOSITION TO THE PRESENTS {ie. HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT
(DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12] as *GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} HAVE
BESTOWED ONLY A CONTEMPT BY AN *INCESSANT* *SOCIAL* *ENGINEERING* WHICH
IS HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {

+0, 27, 54
+0, 9, 18,
+0, 3, 6,
+1, 2, 3

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = @10 {#492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE
WILL / #12 = #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} <— TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON

} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {

+ 0, 3 {IDEA:  @270}, 6  {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*

} BEING CONTRAVENTIONS OF KANT’S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
(1783) SYMBOLIC SCHEMA WHICH IS COMPLIANT WITH JURISPRUDENCE AS A
CAPACITY TO FRAME LEGISLATION DEFINING PROTECTIONS AGAINST AUTONOMY IT
BECOMES IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION (TELOS), A
TREASONOUS TRANSGRESSION AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS /
MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT.

WHAT WE CALL A SHOW TRIAL THE FRENCH CALL A PUPPET SHOW AND USE OF THE
PUPPET MASTER TERM "GUIGNOL" IS AN INSULT MEANING "BUFFOON" {ie. *A*
*SIMIAN* *MONKEY* *AS* *A* *SCREAMING* *NUTBAG* *IS* *A* *CLASS*
*EQUIVALENT* *AS* *DOUBLE* *DUTCH*} AS A CURIOUS MISNOMER, AS GUIGNOL IS
IN REALITY CLEVER, COURAGEOUS AND GENEROUS; HIS INEVITABLE VICTORY IS
ALWAYS THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD OVER EVIL.

THAT SUCH FAILINGS MAKE A VIRTUE OF PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH AS AN
AUSTRALIAN BORN RETIRED ANGLICAN BISHOP WHOM SERVED AS THE 23RD
GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF AUSTRALIA FROM 2001 UNTIL 2003.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
gobbledigook for a change."

DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
which has an impress upon time itself.

Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
reality."

COULD WE SUGGEST A MORE WHOLESOME MANTRA:

GET YOUR ROSARIES OFF OUR OVARIES?

- dolf

Initial Post: 7 December 2018

On 7/12/18 8:25 pm, dolf wrote:
> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
> need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) *REALITY* which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing
> or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
> nothingness into being  and with in theological terms the equivalence of
> the resurrection from the #260 - *THE* *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *MERCILESS*
> *MACHINATIONS* *AS* *ONLY* *A* *COVENANT* *OF* *DEATH* {
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc
>
> } by the prudent exercise of PURE REASON WHICH IN ITS TRANSCENDENT USE
> OF A #237 - DETERMINED FORCEFUL WILL HAS ITS MOST REMARKABLE PHENOMENON,
> ENABLING IT TO WORK THE MOST STRONGLY OF ALL TO AWAKEN PHILOSOPHY FROM
> ITS DOGMATIC SLUMBER {ie.
>
> AS THE IDEA: @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* BEING A *METHOD*
> AGAINST THE DEPRAVITY BY THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x
> 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE} BEING THE MISNOMERED
> FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS PYTHAGOREAN PIETY AS
> VAIN #OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 BY COLLEGIUM OF PONTIFFS DERIVING FROM 510
> BCE PONTIFICATED AS DEIFIED IGNORANCE AND NARCISSISM: #Aleph (1 - #1),
> #He (5 - #5) = #6 - ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONS WHOM BY SAINT ANDREWS 30
> NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BEING SEDITION / TREASON ARE IN BREACH {#197 /
> #139} OF MY #371 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE
> DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (USA)
>
> *TO* *ENFORCE* *AN* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
> SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE,
> YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT
>
> }, AND TO PROMPT IT TOWARD THE DIFFICULT BUSINESS OF THE CRITIQUE OF
> REASON ITSELF." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE
> METAPHYSICS IDEA: @338]
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "THE TERMINATOR" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> But since we knowing better and are not given to unreasoned anarchist
> notions of STATE in having the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines
> all instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of *REALITY* together with the #41 - ONTIC
> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is
> assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which
> to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund
> action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81}
>
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27}
>
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9}
>
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either the FRENCH PRESIDENT, THE HONOURABLE MR
> EMMANUEL MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech nor my INTERVENTION
> ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he actually
> made it--THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
> of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
> INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
> 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1783 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> — PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
>
> “THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
> WHO COULD TALK CROW.
> AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
> FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
>
> TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
> SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
> OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
> NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
>
> VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
> EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
> ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
> TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
>
> YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aVKQZaSmY>
>
> NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
> within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
> published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
> accomplishment.
>
> Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
> Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883.  And the
> Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
> 23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
>
> RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
> concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
> presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS.  Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
> of Friday:
>
> Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
> spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
> the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
>
> ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
> moon.  And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
> WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.
>
> THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
> BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.
>
> TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
> STRENGTH:
>
> FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
> IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
> DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
>
> DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
> OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"
>
> JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
> "MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:
>
> MACRON’S POPALARITY
>
> Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"
>
> — HOMO ERECTUS —
>
> "SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
> THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
> OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
> VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
> WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
> WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."
>
> GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
> CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:
>
> French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
> Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
> Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
> Buenos Aires, Argentina.
>
> A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
> during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
> G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
> the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.
>
> In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
> Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
> appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
> while the crown prince nods and smiles.
>
> Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
> responds: “I am worried”.
>
> “I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me,
> thank you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the
> video.
>
> The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”
>
> Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
> “You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen,
> of course.”
>
> At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”
>
> Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
> leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
> Consulate in Istanbul in early October.
>
> The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were
> responsible for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a
> columnist for The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown
> prince was not responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials
> have been handed the death penalty over the murder.
>
> U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown
> prince was responsible for ordering the murder.
>
> President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
> responsibility for the murder.
>
> In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
> Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
> community."
> [<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]
>
>
> — VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
>
> "SARCASM AND WIT.
> IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
> TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
> OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
> YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
> AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."
>
> DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at
> 0328 hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself:
>
> 'ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
> OF CAUSE AND EFFECT':
>
> — WELL ***@CK YOU ALL {@1},
> I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD {@2} —
>
> "YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3}
> BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4}
> BY WHICH *REALITY* IS AMBIGUATED. {@5}
> BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6}
> DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7}
> NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8}
> OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9}
>
>  AFFECTION FOR INTEGRITY@{
>     @1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71),
>     @2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227),
>     @5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254),
>     @6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
> Ego: 64 (#355),
>     @8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: HOW
> IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?),
>     @9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS
> TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND
> EFFECT); Ego: 66 (#437),
>     Male: #233; Feme: #437
> }
>
> YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
> (doctor who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5Aui3Zu9E>
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
> ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
> PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:
>
> PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
> *IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
> *ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
> *PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
> *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
> intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
> *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
> *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
> aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
> the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
> and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
> empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
> *THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
> *AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
> or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
> succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
> order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
> between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
> with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
> the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
> synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
> does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
> of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
> as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
> imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
> subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
> of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
> appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
> of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.
>
> The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
> [IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
> Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
> for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
> fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
> conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
> what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
> insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
> they designate an object.  In as much as they, merely as
> representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of
> consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
> apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
> one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
> successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
> human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
> representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
> in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
> representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
> representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
> sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
> themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
> for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
> may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
> representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
> the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
> stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
> manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
> course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
> object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
> thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
> representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
> what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
> *POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
> in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
> That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
> representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
> notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
> representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
> which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
> Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
> seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
> truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
> of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
> distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
> every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
> necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
> necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
>
> Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
> something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
> @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*
>
> *METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE
> OR SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILLFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO
> SILENCE, YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless
> preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state
> in itself; for a *REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming
> to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just as
> little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is therefore
> a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this is,
> though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown
> above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
> distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
> appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
> perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
> *KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
> can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
> follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
> My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
> its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
> that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
> perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
> then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
> determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
> example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
> the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
> start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
> manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
> series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
> order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
> order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
> to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
> the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
> of this appearance) necessary.
>
> In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
> the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
> otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
> any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
> about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
> completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
> order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
> apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
> (which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
> right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
> apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
> to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
> in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
> Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
> @A193]
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE
> PROLEGOMENA AS IDEA: @371 - HOW IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?:
> "IT IS A COMMON EXCUSE, WHICH THESE FALSE FRIENDS OF ORDINARY COMMON
> SENSE (WHICH THEY EXTOL ON OCCASION, BUT USUALLY DESPISE) ARE ACCUSTOMED
> TO USING, THAT THEY SAY: THERE MUST IN THE END BE SOME PROPOSITIONS THAT
> ARE IMMEDIATELY CERTAIN {ie. #291
>
> IDEA: @291  - *BEING* *MAN* *OF* *YOUR* *WORD* *BY* *INTEGRITY* {@6}:
> The difference between truth and dream, however, is not decided through
> the quality of the representations that are referred to objects, for
> they are the same in both, but through their connection according to the
> rules that determine the connection of representations in the concept of
> an object, and how far they can or cannot stand together in one
> experience. And then it is not the fault of the appearances at all, if
> our cognition takes illusion for truth, that is, if intuition, through
> which an object is given to us, is taken for the concept of the object,
> or even for its existence, which only the understanding can think. The
> course of the planets is represented to us by the senses as now
> progressive, now retrogressive, and herein is neither falsehood nor
> truth, because as long as one grants that this is as yet only
> appearance, one still does not judge at all the objective quality of
> their motion. Since, however, if the understanding has not taken good
> care to prevent this subjective mode of representation from being taken
> for objective, a false judgment can easily arise, one therefore says:
> they appear to go backwards; but the illusion is not ascribed to the
> senses, but to the understanding, whose lot alone it is to render an
> objective judgment from the appearance. [PAGE #87]
>
> }, AND FOR WHICH NOT ONLY NO PROOF, BUT INDEED NO ACCOUNT AT ALL NEED BE
> GIVEN, SINCE OTHERWISE THERE WOULD NEVER COME AN END TO THE GROUNDS FOR
> ONE’S JUDGMENTS; but in proof of this right they can never cite anything
> else (other than the principle of contradiction, which is however
> inadequate for establishing the truth of synthetic judgments) that is
> undoubted and can be ascribed directly to ordinary common sense, except
> for mathematical propositions: e.g., that two times two makes four, that
> between two points there is only one straight line, and still others.
> These judgments are, however, worlds apart from those of metaphysics.
> For in mathematics, everything that I conceive through a concept as
> possible I can make for myself (construct) by means of my thought; to
> one two I successively add the other two, and myself make the number
> four, or I draw in thought all kinds of lines from one point to the
> other, and can draw only one that is self-similar in all its parts
> (equal as well as unequal). But from the concept of a thing I cannot,
> with all my powers of thought, draw forth the concept of something else
> whose existence is necessarily connected with the first thing, but I
> must consult experience; and, although my understanding provides me a
> priori (though always only in relation to possible experience) with the
> concept of a connection of this sort (causality), I nevertheless cannot
> exhibit this concept in intuition [IDEA: @371] a priori, like the
> concepts of mathematics, and thus exhibit its possibility a priori;
> rather, this concept (together with principles of its application), if
> it is to be valid a priori – as is indeed required in metaphysics –
> always has need of a justification and deduction of its possibility, for
> otherwise one does not know the extent of its validity and whether it
> can be used only in experience or also outside it. Therefore in
> metaphysics, as a speculative science of pure reason, one can never
> appeal to ordinary common sense, but one can very well do so if one is
> forced to abandon metaphysics and to renounce all pure speculative
> cognition, which must always be knowledge, hence to renounce metaphysics
> itself and its teaching (on certain matters), and if a reasonable belief
> is alone deemed possible for us, as well as sufficient for our needs
> (perhaps more wholesome indeed than knowledge itself). For then the
> shape of things is completely altered. Metaphysics must be science, not
> only as a whole but also in all its parts; otherwise it is nothing at
> all, since, as speculation of pure reason, it has a hold on nothing else
> save universal insights. But outside metaphysics, probability and sound
> common sense can very well have their beneficial and legitimate use,
> though following principles entirely their own, whose importance always
> depends on a relation to the practical.
>
> *THAT* *IS* *WHAT* *I* *CONSIDER* *MYSELF* *ENTITLED* *TO* *REQUIRE*
> *FOR* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *METAPHYSICS* *AS* *SCIENCE*."
> [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
> Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @371]
>
> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
> HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
> BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
> PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
> conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
> TRINOMIAL *REALITY* which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas
> by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>
> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>
> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>
> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING:
>
> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES,
> @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
> @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY,
> @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR
> @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.
>
> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>     @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>     @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>     @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>     @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>     @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
> #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
> OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>     @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>     @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>     @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>     @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>     Male: #585; Feme: #693
> }
>
> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
> ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM that universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
> AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1105 HOURS
> ON 6 JUNE 2018: "*OMG* [*OH* *MY* *GOD*], the broken clock is in sync
> with real time for a change.
>
> Never mind "serious", deport them for parking tickets, jaywalking and
> littering. Deport them for looking ugly. Deport them for wearing bad
> taste clothing. Deport them for having tattoos."
>
> DOLF @ 1224 HOURS ON 10 JUNE 2018: "Why then does the neo-nazi atheist
> then frequently use the expression:
>
> *OMG* - *OH* *MY* *GOD*?
>
> Perhaps God is a logical construct of consciousness as mathematical
> entity {ie. INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} but unlike you IT has
> personality as anthropocentric approachability:
>
> Who appears to dialectically exhibit the characteristics of sapient as
> self-declarative rational thought:
>
> #1 - Be socially beneficial (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of
> 'Do no evil'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
>
> #2 - Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
>
> #3 - Be safe; {*FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM*
> *VIRILE*}
>
> #4 - Respect privacy; {*FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION*}
>
> #5 - Be accountable; {*HUMAN* *NATURE* *AS* *DISCRIMINATING* *NORM*}
>
> #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*}
>
> #7 - Limit abuse. {*ENGENDERING* *AS* *MANIFESTING* *NORM*}
>
> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
> ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
> #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
> PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
> NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
> ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
> that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
> INSTANTIATION}.
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
> / #370}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
>
> ***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
> Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
> Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
> / #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
> Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]
>
> H1826@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 10 (#16); Ego: 4 (#10),
>    @3: Sup: 16 (#32); Ego: 6 (#16),
>    @4: Sup: 56 (#88); Ego: 40 (#56),
>    @5: Sup: 15 (#103); Ego: 40 (#96),
>    @6: Sup: 10 (#113); Ego: 76 (#172),
>    @7: Sup: 20 (#133); Ego: 10 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #182
> } // #506
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
> appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
>     #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
>     #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
> punishment.
>     #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
>     #CANON: #84
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>    @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
>    @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>    Male: #71; Feme: #84
> } // #84
>
> #506 as [#6, #4, #6, #40, #40, #400, #10] = damam (H1826): {UMBRA: #1 as
> #84 % #41 = #2} 1) *TO* *BE* *SILENT*, be still, wait, be dumb, grow
> dumb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be silent; 1a2) to be still, die; 1a3) *TO*
> *BE* *STRUCK* *DUMB*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SILENCED*, *BE* *MADE*
> *SILENT*, *DESTROYED*; 1c) (Poal) to make quiet; 1d) (Hiphil) *TO*
> *MAKE* *SILENT* (*CAUSE* *TO* *DIE*);
>
> YOUTUBE: “The Sound Of Silence (Disturbed)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4>
>
> IN SUMMARY THEN THE CONTEXTUAL PROBLEM IS THAT FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
> CATHOLIC / SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER #371 - CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS A FOREIGN
> POWER BEING A PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 =
> #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} TO THE SUBSTANTIATION OF
> RELIGIOUS BELIEF, AGAINST MY PREROGATIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
> and which are irrefutable facts sourced from a composite of ADOLF
> HILTER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK as a particular rhetorical device
> common enough to have its own name, *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* conveying
> significant temporal associations together with a hierarchy of
> CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as HOW-TO-DO-IT-YOURSELF manual that appears
> upon provisional analysis, to be cognisant of both IMMANUEL KANT'S
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783) and the PYTHAGOREAN
> BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE* *DYNAMIC* nomenclature as
> consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS / STATE ECONOMY, thereby
> they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5,  #15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)}
> within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH* / *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a
> moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”
> which implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the premise for our AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical development of its perennialist
> understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY
> DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF LAW ...
>
> Where there is a reliance upon the concrete establishment of a #231 -
> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. as we have already elsewhere noted #419 -
> SLAUGHTER / #728 - REACTANCE EVENTS and VALUE STATEMENTS} which is an
> artefact of either ISLAM, HINDUISM and ROMAN CATHOLICISM.
>
> HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
> POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
> MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
> TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
> SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]
>
> 'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
> walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
> compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
> one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
> of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
> have so many qualities that make us like them.
>
> Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
> *STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
> ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]
>
> “THE ACUSMATA INDICATE THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN WAY OF LIFE EMBODIED A
> STRICT REGIMEN NOT JUST REGARDING RELIGIOUS RITUAL AND DIET BUT ALSO IN
> ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE. SOME OF THE RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE
> LARGELY ARBITRARY TABOOS, E.G., “ONE MUST PUT THE RIGHT SHOE ON FIRST”
> OR “ONE MUST NOT TRAVEL THE PUBLIC ROADS” (IAMBLICHUS, VP 83, PROBABLY
> FROM ARISTOTLE).
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> [#8 , #16, #24, #32, #40 <— *HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA @120 ON 24TH
> JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM), #48, #56, #64, #72]
>
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);
>
> ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME ASPECTS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN LIFE INVOLVED A MORAL
> DISCIPLINE THAT WAS GREATLY ADMIRED, EVEN BY OUTSIDERS. PYTHAGOREAN
> SILENCE IS AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE. ISOCRATES REPORTS THAT EVEN IN THE
> FOURTH CENTURY PEOPLE “MARVEL MORE AT THE SILENCE OF THOSE WHO PROFESS
> TO BE HIS PUPILS THAN AT THOSE WHO HAVE THE GREATEST REPUTATION FOR
> SPEAKING” (Busiris 28).
>
> THE ABILITY TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SEEN AS IMPORTANT TRAINING IN
> SELF-CONTROL, AND THE LATER TRADITION REPORTS THAT THOSE WHO WANTED TO
> BECOME PYTHAGOREANS HAD TO OBSERVE A FIVE-YEAR SILENCE (Iamblichus, VP
> 72).” [<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoras/>]
>
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 - *BEFORE* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*)
> SECTION #31 - MILITARY STRATAGEM, QUELLING WAR; I-CHING: H32 -
> PERSEVERANCE, ENDURANCE, DURATION, CONSTANCY; TETRA: 51 - CONSTANCY ON
> IDEA @314:
>
> And so for once one has something determinate, and to which one can
> adhere in all metaphysical undertakings, which have up to now boldly
> enough, but always blindly, run over everything without distinction. It
> never occurred to dogmatic thinkers that the goal of their efforts might
> have been set up so close, nor even to those who, *OBSTINATE* *IN*
> *THEIR* *SO*-*CALLED* *SOUND* *COMMON* *SENSE*, *WENT* *FORTH* *TO*
> *INSIGHTS* *WITH* *CONCEPTS* *AND* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *THE* *PURE*
> *UNDERSTANDING* *THAT* *WERE* *INDEED* *LEGITIMATE* *AND* *NATURAL*,
> *BUT* *WERE* *INTENDED* *FOR* *USE* *MERELY* *IN* *EXPERIENCE*, and for
> which they neither recognized nor could recognize any determinate
> boundaries, because they neither had reflected on nor were able to
> reflect on the nature and even [IDEA: @314] the possibility of such a
> pure understanding.
>
> Many a naturalist of pure reason (by which I mean he who trusts himself,
> without any science, to decide in matters of metaphysics) would like to
> pretend that already long ago, through the prophetic spirit of his sound
> common sense, he had not merely suspected, but had known and understood,
> that which is here presented with so much preparation, or, if he
> prefers, with such long-winded pedantic pomp: “namely that with all our
> reason we can never get beyond the field of experiences.” But since, if
> someone gradually questions him on his rational principles, he must
> indeed admit that among them there are many that he has not drawn from
> experience, which are therefore independent of it and valid a priori –
> how and on what grounds will he then hold within limits the dogmatist
> (and himself ), who makes use of these concepts and principles beyond
> all possible experience for the very reason that they are cognized
> independently of experience. And even he, this adept of sound common
> sense, is not so steadfast that, despite all of his presumed and cheaply
> gained wisdom, he will not stumble unawares out beyond the objects of
> experience into the field of chimeras. Ordinarily, he is indeed deeply
> enough entangled therein, although he cloaks his ill-founded claims
> through a popular style, since he gives everything out as mere
> probability, reasonable conjecture, or analogy. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
> HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS,
> IDEA: @314]
>
> If one has no conception of NOUMENON what occurs within #41 - ONTIC
> necessity terms is a chaotic / indiscriminate / promiscuous
> determination of media which is habitually applied to #CENTRE of being
> that has a consequence upon VOLUNTARY FREE WILL:
>
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
> necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
> origins),
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
> #391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
> SOCIETY
>
> OR
>
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#41 x #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} MINUS
#391
> - HOMOIOS FRATERNITY EQUALS
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION
> MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT' AS SCHEMA AND COVENANT OF DEATH
>
> MANDALAY_SWAY (G1242)@{
>     @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>     @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>     @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>     @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>     @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>     Male: #218; Feme: #98
> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>
> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
> THE MORNING
> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>
> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>
> KANT within his antimony discourse proves the antithesis, that time has
> no beginning, by showing that if time had a beginning, then there must
> have been "empty time" out of which time arose. This is incoherent (for
> Kant) for the following reason: Since, necessarily, no time elapses in
> this #451 - *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID*, then there could be no alteration,
> and therefore nothing (including time) would ever come to be: so the
> antithesis is proven. Reason makes equal claim to each proof, since they
> are both correct, so the question of the limits of time must be regarded
> as meaningless.
>
> #451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
> - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
> inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
> then allows for stages of development.
>
> THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS BIBLICAL TEXT
> RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC
> NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOIOTIC #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL
> MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
> - Engendering Nature}}
>
> #11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
> the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
> spread of Light and Industry by Government and Non-Government
> Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature.
>
> That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
> ‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
>
> #2184 % #41 = #11
>
> Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
> circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
> art within a similar manner.
>
> YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUxxgwHK8Q>
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*:
>
> THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
> LAW}, WHICH CONTAINS THE LAW OF THAT WILL: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF*
> *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
> to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
> intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
>
> “AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, ‘I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
> HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
> ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
> BEFORE ME...” [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
>
> THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - FORMULA OF
> HUMANITY}, WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMAND TO BEHAVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
> LAW, THAT IS, THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSUMPTION UNDER THE LAW: x 49 = 6J or
> 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
> 20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
>
> “... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
> LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
> THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE ME;
> AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
> COMMANDMENTS...” [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
>
> THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY},
> WHICH CONTAINS THE VERDICT (SENTENCE), WHAT IS LAID DOWN AS RIGHT IN THE
> CASE AT HAND: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
> centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
>
> “...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
> LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.’” [EXODUS
> 20:7 (KJV)]
>
> THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
> THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}
>
> AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY EXPLANTATION AND
> SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES
> {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY WHICH
> WAS GIVEN WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18 NOVEMBER
> 2018, THAT:
>
> "AND AFTER FIVE DAYS ANANIAS {the #541 - CLOUD OF THE LORD} THE HIGH
> PRIEST DESCENDED WITH THE ELDERS, AND WITH A CERTAIN ORATOR NAMED
> TERTULLUS {third}, WHO INFORMED THE GOVERNOR AGAINST PAUL {small; little}.
>
> AND WHEN HE WAS CALLED FORTH, [THE LAWYER] TERTULLUS {third} BEGAN TO
> ACCUSE HIM, SAYING, SEEING THAT BY THEE WE ENJOY GREAT QUIETNESS, AND
> THAT VERY WORTHY DEEDS ARE DONE UNTO THIS NATION BY THY PROVIDENCE, WE
> ACCEPT IT ALWAYS, AND IN ALL PLACES, MOST NOBLE FELIX {happy,
> prosperous}, WITH ALL *THANKFULNESS* {
>
> #1827 as [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200] =
> eucharistia (G2169): 1) thanksgiving; 2) *HOLY* *COMMUNION*; 3}
> *EUCHARIST*; Old French eucariste (compare modern French eucharistie), <
> late Latin eucharistia, < Greek εὐχαριστία thanksgiving, hence the
> Lord's Supper, < εὐχάριστος grateful, < εὐ- [as Perseus has explained] +
> stem of χαρίζεσθαι [kharizestai] to offer willingly
>
> }. NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT I BE NOT FURTHER TEDIOUS UNTO THEE, I PRAY THEE
> THAT THOU WOULDEST HEAR US OF THY CLEMENCY A FEW WORDS.
>
> FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN A PESTILENT FELLOW, AND A MOVER OF SEDITION
> AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF THE *SECT*
> *OF* *THE* *NAZARENES*:
>
> "TO BE ACCUSED OF #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }"
>
> WHO ALSO HATH GONE ABOUT TO PROFANE {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} THE
> TEMPLE: WHOM WE TOOK, AND WOULD HAVE JUDGED ACCORDING TO OUR LAW {#364 x
> 3 = #1092 x 2 = #2184}." [Acts 24:1-6 (KJV)]
>
> ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK IDEAS @209 / @210: "From time
> immemorial the Jews have always succeeded in insinuating themselves into
> positions from which it was possible to influence public opinion; they
> hold, for example, many key positions both in the PRESS and in the
> CINEMA INDUSTRY. But they are not content to exercise a direct, open
> influence; they know that they will attain their ends more expeditiously
> if they bring their influence to bear through the so-called AGENCIES and
> by other DEVIOUS METHODS:
>
> "AND HE WROTE A LETTER AFTER THIS MANNER: CLAUDIUS {lame} LYSIAS
> {dissolving} UNTO THE MOST EXCELLENT GOVERNOR FELIX {happy, prosperous}
> SENDETH GREETING.
>
> THIS MAN WAS TAKEN OF THE JEWS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN KILLED OF THEM:
> THEN CAME I WITH AN ARMY, AND RESCUED HIM, HAVING UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS
> A ROMAN {strong; powerful: #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring
> good}.
>
> AND WHEN I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE CAUSE WHEREFORE THEY ACCUSED HIM, I
> BROUGHT HIM FORTH INTO THEIR COUNCIL: WHOM I PERCEIVED TO BE ACCUSED OF
> #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }, BUT TO HAVE NOTHING LAID TO HIS CHARGE WORTHY OF DEATH OR OF BONDS.
>
> G2213@{
>    @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 72 (#94); Ego: 57 (#72),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#174); Ego: 8 (#80),
>    @5: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 40 (#120),
>    @6: Sup: 40 (#253); Ego: 1 (#121),
>    Male: #253; Feme: #121
> } // #364
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #364 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
> I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
> young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; *I* *PUT* *NO* *CHECK* *UPON* *THE*
> *WATER* *IN* *ITS* *FLOW*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
>     #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
>     #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
>     #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
>     #CANON: #184
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
>    @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
>    @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
>    @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
>    @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>    Male: #136; Feme: #184
> } // #184
>
> AND WHEN IT WAS TOLD ME HOW THAT THE JEWS LAID WAIT {#TOOLS: With
> Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil} FOR THE MAN, I SENT STRAIGHTWAY TO
> THEE {#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends}, AND GAVE
> COMMANDMENT TO HIS ACCUSERS ALSO TO SAY {#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no.
> #56), few allies} BEFORE THEE WHAT THEY HAD AGAINST HIM. FAREWELL.
>
> G3551@{
>    @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>    @2: Sup: 39 (#89); Ego: 70 (#120),
>    @3: Sup: 79 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
> Ego: 40 (#160),
>    @4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 70 (#230),
>    @5: Sup: 25 (#261); Ego: 38 (#268),
>    Male: #261; Feme: #268
> } // #430
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
> Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
> 50 - Vastness/Wasting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
> Pa-Amsu, *I* *AM* *NOT* *UNCHASTE* *WITH* *ANY* *ONE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
>     #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
>     #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
>     #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
>     #CANON: #171
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
>    @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>    @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>    @3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
>    @4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
> {%20}),
>    Male: #137; Feme: #171
> } // #171
>
> THEN THE #65 - SOLDIERS, AS IT WAS COMMANDED THEM, TOOK PAUL {small;
> little}, AND BROUGHT {#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans} HIM
> BY NIGHT TO ANTIPATRIS {for, or against the father}.
>
> ON THE MORROW THEY LEFT THE HORSEMEN TO GO WITH HIM, AND RETURNED TO THE
> CASTLE: WHO, WHEN THEY CAME TO CAESAREA {#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no.
> #60), much wealth}, AND DELIVERED THE EPISTLE TO THE GOVERNOR, PRESENTED
> PAUL {small; little} ALSO BEFORE HIM.
>
> NOTE: Herod seized an opportunity to control world trade by building a
> seaport on Israel's coast, where the sea routes and the predominant land
> route intersected. Caesarea was a glorious city, covered with marble,
> and symbolizing the *VAST* *WEALTH* that Herod accumulated by dominating
> world trade. [<https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/caesarea>]
>
> AND WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAD READ THE LETTER, HE ASKED {#POSITION: With
> Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions} OF WHAT PROVINCE HE WAS. AND
> WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS OF CILICIA {which rolls or overturns}; I
> WILL HEAR THEE, SAID HE, WHEN THINE ACCUSERS ARE ALSO COME. AND HE
> COMMANDED HIM TO BE KEPT {#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation}
> IN HEROD’S {son of a hero} JUDGMENT HALL." [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]
>
> NOTE: One can readily conclude from the encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35] that the
> JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
> SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this EPISTEMOLOGICAL
> premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER
> as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]
> HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 day
> view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE* PERSPECTIVE
> of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the new moon /
> midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
> articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
> perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: "I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO
> THE GREEKS, AND TO THE BARBARIANS {ie. THE CHINESE DAOIST}; BOTH TO THE
> WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM READY TO PREACH
> THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME ALSO." [Romans 1:14-15 (KJV)]
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/tetrayear.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to
> EIGHT major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days
> of NATURAL YEAR / 325.25 days)
>
> These were then mapped to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months
> (for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing,
> The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} /
> H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are
> LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is
> PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO
> CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
> Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*
>
>     #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>     #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>     #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>     #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>     #CANON: #161
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>    @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>    Male: #169; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
> move back and forth around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier
> approaches to symmetry within the cyclic structure by substituting the
> WINTER SOLSTICE as the #CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated
> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS.
> [THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan
> 1993, page 15-16]
>
> "AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT AFTER THREE DAYS PAUL {small; little} CALLED
> THE CHIEF OF THE JEWS TOGETHER: AND WHEN THEY WERE COME TOGETHER, HE
> SAID UNTO THEM, MEN AND BRETHREN, THOUGH I HAVE COMMITTED NOTHING
> AGAINST THE PEOPLE, OR CUSTOMS OF OUR FATHERS {ie. *FORTY* *YEARS*
> {49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J as 50x49 = 2450 x 364 days of years = 891800 / 294
> * 293 = 888766.66667 / 365.24232 = 2433.36168 AM or 1567 BCE} *TO*
> *COME* (*LITERALLY* “*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS*
> *OF* *THE* *LORD* [Book of Jubilees 50:4-6]}, YET WAS I DELIVERED
> PRISONER FROM JERUSALEM {vision of peace} INTO THE HANDS OF THE ROMANS
> {strong; powerful}.
>
> WHO, WHEN THEY HAD EXAMINED ME, WOULD HAVE LET ME GO, BECAUSE THERE WAS
> NO CAUSE OF DEATH IN ME {ie. encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35]}. BUT WHEN
> THE JEWS SPAKE AGAINST IT, I WAS CONSTRAINED TO APPEAL UNTO CAESAR; NOT
> THAT I HAD OUGHT TO ACCUSE MY NATION OF.
>
> FOR THIS CAUSE THEREFORE HAVE I CALLED FOR YOU, TO SEE YOU, AND TO SPEAK
> WITH YOU: BECAUSE THAT FOR THE HOPE OF ISRAEL {who prevails with God} I
> AM BOUND WITH THIS CHAIN {ie.
>
> #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27
> TO 31 JANUARY / #65 CE / *LOCUS* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* *DAY* 26 JANUARY
> WITHIN THE #72 - PROTOTYPE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33
> Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)
>
> }.  AND THEY SAID UNTO HIM, WE NEITHER RECEIVED LETTERS OUT OF JUDAEA
> {the praise of the Lord; confession} CONCERNING THEE, NEITHER ANY OF THE
> BRETHREN THAT CAME SHOWED OR SPAKE ANY HARM OF THEE.  BUT WE DESIRE TO
> HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING THIS SECT {ie. JEWISH
> / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES as SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL
> COMMUNITY}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST." [Acts
> 28:17-22 (KJV)]
>
> The most dangerous weapon is the Jewish advertising agency, for, by
> cutting off advertising revenue, they can reduce even the greatest
> newspapers [NOTE: THE AGE NEWSPAPER FIRST EDITION APPEARED ON 17 OCTOBER
> 1854 AND HAS THE MASTHEAD: *DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*] to the verge of
> ruin. ...
>
> — CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
>  [Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
> 15 December 2017]
>
> “OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
> TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
> YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
> SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.
>
> DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
> WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
> CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
> UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.
>
> YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
> AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
> TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
> PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”
>
> <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>
>
>
> *MISHPOCHA* (noun):
> - Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
> marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
> - Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TheAgeMasthead.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The Masthead '*DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*' conveys a CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE @1 - SOVEREIGN / @2 - JUSTICE / @3 - SOLDIER'S BATTLECRY / @4
> - WILL TO BELIEF AND REMEMBRANCE WITHOUT COERCION FROM GREGORIAN
> CALENDAR PAPAL BULL OF 1582 BUT ADOPTED BY THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS
> CALENDAR ACT OF 1751 WHICH DROPPED 3 TO #41 - 13 SEPTEMBER 1752 FROM THE
> CALENDAR]
>
> In this way we have forced the British to admit their loss [within a
> Reuter telegram which had just announced the loss of a British cruiser
> of ten thousand tons, H.M.S. 'Edinburgh' that had been hit by a GERMAN
> submarine torpedo].  There are two lessons to be learned from this episode:
>
> 1. Germany is scrupulous about the truth. But she must not be too
> pedantic where truth is concerned. I am frequently receiving reports
> from the front to the effect that the troops, reading the cautious and
> carefully weighed phrases of the official communiqué, often feel that
> the full extent of their efforts has not been appreciated at Headquarters.
>
> 2. Once one is convinced of a fact—be it of a political or a military
> nature—one must proclaim it throughout the world. This is the only way
> in which such consummate hypocrites as the British can be made to
> confess the truth." [SYNCRETISM WITH ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEAS
> @209; @210 / PAGES #463; #466 - TRUTH IN WEHRMACHT COMMUNIQUÉS]
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE *BLIND*, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.
>
> HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) had raised objections to the
> notions of equality and congruence (among others) in geometry, which
> objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53),
> thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also
> *INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS
> OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
> CONTRADICTION:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON
> NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> 51 25 74
> 73 50 27
> 26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
> NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
> *KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
> [+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}
>
> 49   9 65 - *SOLDIER*
> 57 41 25
> 17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
> is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
>
> #YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
> AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
> #MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
>
> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
> - regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
> - assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
> - viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
> values.
>
> ORIGIN:
> The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
> Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
> -centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
> derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
> circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
> English centre.
>
> THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
> *FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
> INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF?  THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
> SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
> #75 - *FAILURE*}.
>
> THOU THAT SAYEST A MAN SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, DOST THOU COMMIT
> ADULTERY? THOU THAT ABHORREST IDOLS, DOST THOU COMMIT SACRILEGE? THOU
> THAT MAKEST THY BOAST OF THE LAW, THROUGH BREAKING THE LAW DISHONOUREST
> THOU GOD?
>
> *FOR* *THE* *NAME* *OF* *GOD* *IS* *BLASPHEMED* *AMONG* *THE* *GENTILES*
> *THROUGH* *YOU*, *AS* *IT* *IS* *WRITTEN*." [Romans 2:19-24 (KJV)]
>
> THUSLY BEFORE WE PROPERLY BEGIN THESE OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
> WITHIN THE MATTER OF COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NO: AP-18-0609 WE WISH
> TO RAISE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PREJUDICED CHARACTER OF THE COUNTY COURT
> #646 / #86 = *JUDGE* upon the occasion of the 12 JUNE 2018 FILE LISTING
> HEARING, whom after granting me leave from the COURT within this MATTER
> and before the video link being terminated was heard to #404 - *UTTER*
> the #372 - *CONTEMPTUOUS* #404 - *STATEMENT*:
>
> “*I* *AM* *SURE* *DONALD* *TRUMP* *WILL* *BE* *INTERESTED* *IN*
> *READING* *THE* *REPORT*. *HARRUMPH*!”
>
> NOT ONLY DOES SUCH REMARK CONVEY AN ABJECT DISRESPECT FOR FAIR AND
> EQUITABLE JUDICIAL PROCESS BUT HINTS AT AN UNATTAINABILITY OF JUSTICE BY
> CONCOMITANT ALIGNMENT WITH INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVES SUCH AS ROMAN
> CATHOLICISM (ATTENDANCE AT CHURCH SERVICES ON COMMENCEMENT OF THE
> JUDICIAL YEAR FOR EXAMPLE) / FREEMASONRY WHICH OUGHT TO BE DEBARRED BY
> CONFLICT OF CONSCIENCE / INTEREST AS IN REGARD FOR AN INTEGRITY AS
> SOMETHING OTHER THAN DUTCH JUSTICE BY MERE SHOW TRIALS (WHETHER:
> ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE OR ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL OF
> MELBOURNE) IN DETERMINING ANY OF MY LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {ie.
> #364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”
>
> Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration on how
> the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
> from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
> determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
> functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
> this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
> dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
> entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
> exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
> the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {
>
> #451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
> as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
> act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
> *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
> cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
> 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
> right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
> (in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
> measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;
>
> } SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
> PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
> RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
> VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
> SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
> #54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
> SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
> = #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
> SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
> name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
> Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
> Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
> NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
> {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
> JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
> DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
>
> That such failings make a virtue of PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH as an
> Australian born retired Anglican bishop whom served as the 23rd
> Governor-General of Australia from 2001 until 2003.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
> ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
> of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
> gobbledigook for a change."
>
> DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
> describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
> which has an impress upon time itself.
>
> Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
> you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
> *REALITY*."
>
> AS THAT WHICH WE HAVE CLARIFIED IN BEING A CONSIDERATION UPON HUMAN
> RATIONALITY AND #288 - META ACQUIESCENCE BY UMBRAL ILLUSION {#364 x 4 +
> #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 as #1092 x 2 = #2184} BEING ONLY
> REASONABLE #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> } WITHIN OUR 30 NOVEMBER 2018 INSTRUCTIONS MADE TO LEGAL COUNSEL WITHIN
> COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0775 RELATING TO CONSIDERATION:
> (#2) OF A SALE MAGISTRATES COURT MENTION HEARING DATE OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:
>
> "That there is also a particular eBAY purchase of a (#162156254584)
> conveyed by the feedback "PERFECT EBAYER, INSTANT PAYMENT & SAME DAY
> PICKUP. THANK YOU!" which is dated *WEDNESDAY* 23 NOVEMBER 2016 and made
> by SELLER MEMBER ID: GEORGE.K1 (FEEDBACK SCORE OF 79%) relating to an
> archeological curiosity as *ROSETTA* *STONE* and an oblique reference to
> such on *WEDNESDAY* 24 MAY 2017 by then FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN
> KERRY (DEMOCRAT) to a HARVARD UNIVERSITY graduation which can ONLY be
> properly understood in the context of my earlier *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*
> *ACTIVITY* ASSOCIATED TO @5: #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
> concerning which it ought to be noted that MR. GEORGE W. BUSH AS THE
> 43RD PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (REPUBLICAN), DID
> PUBLICLY MAKE THE CLAIM WITHIN THE NEWS MEDIA THAT THIS DAY: WEDNESDAY
> 19 SEPTEMBER, 2001 *WAS* *SIGNIFICANTLY* *RECOGNIZED* *AS* *THE*
> *CREATION* *DAY* *OF* *THE* *WORLD* *BY* *SOME* *RELIGIOUS*
> *COMMUNITIES* *OF* *FAITH* WHICH CONFORMS TO MY UNFALTERING INITIATIVE
> THAT HAS BEEN PURSUED EVERY DAY SINCE.
>
> EUGENE SCOTT (CNN) @ 1256 (GMT) 25 MAY 2017: "DISMAYED JOHN KERRY SAYS
> HARVARD GRADS SHOULD 'BUY ROSETTA STONE AND LEARN RUSSIAN':
>
> Former Secretary of State John Kerry used a commencement address
> Wednesday night to rip the Trump administration, telling graduates the
> US is not living in "a normal time."
>
> "Democracy relies on free speech. Yes, say anything you want, but it
> relies even more on the speech being truthful. It is the truth after all
> that sets us free," the former Democratic presidential nominee said
> Wednesday at the Harvard Kennedy School graduation. "And the truth is --
> no, this is not a normal time."
>
> "It's not normal to see a president of the United States decrying
> 'so-called judges.' It's not normal for the leader of the country that
> invented the First Amendment to routinely degrade and even threaten
> journalists," Kerry added. "And no, it's not normal to see the head of
> the FBI fired summarily because he was investigating connections between
> Russia and the presidential campaign of the very man who fired him."
>
> President Donald Trump has sought to shake off the damaging political
> blowback from continuing investigations into his campaign's relationship
> with Russia following reports that he fired former FBI Director James
> Comey because of the ongoing probe.
>
> Kerry said America's current political conversations very often sound
> like those that occur in countries the State Department warns Americans
> not to visit.
>
> "I've been asked, 'What is the secret to having a real impact on
> government?' Well, it's recently changed. I used to say, 'Either run for
> office or get a degree from the Harvard Kennedy School,'" he said. "But
> with this White House, I'd say,
>
> '*BUY* *ROSETTA* *STONE* *AND* *LEARN* *RUSSIAN*.'"
>
> <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/25/politics/john-kerry-donald-trump-normal/index.html>
>
>
> — OO ROO TO OOHRAH —
[Written 3 July 2017]
>
> "I AM THE APPLE 🍎 OF HIS EYE 👁.
> THINKING TO DO ME OVER 🎯?
> YOU OUGHT NOT EVEN TRY.
> SEMANTIC FIELDS IN CLOVER 🍀 {ie. PADDOCK as field opposite owned by
> STEVE}.
>
> MOUTH WORDS LIKE PUSKIN.
> DING-DONG, POOH-POOH,
> BOW-WOW OR TA-TA PUTIN.
> KOO WEE NOR TO TRY WOO.
>
> *ROSETTA* *STONE* SO WRIT.
> AS PLAIN FOR ALL TO SEE.
> SAY OTHERWISE SUCH TWIT.
> THAT GOD {#226 = #70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50 = `elyown (Aramaic)
> (H5946): {#5 as #166} 1) the Most High; 1a) of God} LOVES EVEN ME."
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video) ft. will.i.am"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk48xRzuNvA>
>
> And this comment was made with respects to having provided a “SYNCRETISM
> AS CONSENSUS VALUES DOCUMENT FOR NORTH KOREAN / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> PEACE SUMMIT AND ACCORD OF 12 JUNE 2018” comprising some some #60 pages
> and dated 10-11 June 2018 and titled: "ELIJAH {GOD THE LORD, THE STRONG
> LORD} MOCKED THEM: CRY ALOUD FOR HE IS A GOD EITHER HE IS TALKING OR HE
> IS PURSUING OR HE IS IN A JOURNEY OR PERADVENTURE HE SLEEPS AND MUST BE
> AWAKENED" which we will now excerpt with additional expansions as
> inclusions:
>
> KNOCK KNOCK!
>
> WHOSE THERE?
>
> DOLF @ 1143 HOURS ON 6 DECEMBER 2018: "IS EINSTEIN'S FAMOUS 'GOD LETTER'
> EVIDENCE AS FALSE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE: MENTAL RESERVATION IN BEING
> EVASIVE ABOUT GOD?
>
> "THE WORD GOD IS FOR ME NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXPRESSION AND PRODUCT OF
> HUMAN WEAKNESS, THE BIBLE A COLLECTION OF HONORABLE, BUT STILL PURELY
> PRIMITIVE, LEGENDS WHICH ARE NEVERTHELESS PRETTY CHILDISH..." [Albert
> Einstein’s “God Letter,” dated 3 January 1954 which on 4 December 2018
> sold at a Christie's Auction for $2.9 million]
>
> Should we congratulate Einstein for holding equitable beliefs on GOD and
> the BIBLE with that of Adolf Hitler and ask if being confronted by the
> blackhole of ignorance by which oaths of GOD were then sworn to HITLER
> was it simply too much for Einstein’s sensibility as then to make
> self-justifications by antagonism against the deeds of his Jewish
> fathers: 50J when the PROSCRIPTIONS AS #41 - ONTIC x n NECESSITY
> PRINCIPLES OVER #364 - QUESTIONS ON THE #430 - LAW OF NATURE were conveyed:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
> ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONVEYS: “I
> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the
> Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me
> God.”
>
> By what means then did Albert Einstein declare his allegiance to another
> sovereign STATE?
>
> If you didn’t know about trinomial number paradigm as conveying our
> intuition upon personality of God, then Albert Einstein must contend
> with a troubling conscience over binomial number having by methodology a
> Nazi predisposition as worldview—they too made claims of science.
>
> *EUCHARISTIA* (G2169)@{
>     @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>     @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>     @3: Sup: 33 (#119); Ego: 33 (#114),
>     @4: Sup: 34 (#153); Ego: 1 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>     @5: Sup: 53 (#206); Ego: 19 (#134),
>     @6: Sup: 63 (#269); Ego: 10 (#144),
>     @7: Sup: 20 (#289); Ego: 38 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>     @8: Sup: 77 (#366); Ego: 57 (#239),
>     @9: Sup: 6 (#372); Ego: 10 (#249),
>     @10: Sup: 7 (#379); Ego: 1 (#250),
>     @11: Sup: 45 (#424); Ego: 38 (#288),
>     Male: #424; Feme: #288 <-- *UMBRA* *IMPETUS* *AS* *CHICANERIES*
> *OF* *A* *SHALLOW* *METAPHYSICS*
> }
>
> If it was made upon ‘*MENTAL* *RESERVATION* *IN* *BEING* *EVASIVE*
> *ABOUT* *GOD*’ then Einstein was a dishonourable person.
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @288: "It will forever remain a remarkable
> phenomenon in the history of philosophy that there was a time when even
> mathematicians who were at the same time philosophers began to doubt,
> not, indeed, the correctness of their geometrical propositions insofar
> as they related merely to space, [IDEA @288] but the objective validity
> and application to nature of this concept itself and all its geometrical
> determinations, since they were concerned that a line in nature might
> indeed be composed of physical points, consequently that true space in
> objects might be composed of simple parts, notwithstanding that the
> space which the geometer holds in thought can by no means be composed of
> such things. They did not realize that this space in thought itself
> makes possible physical space, i.e., the extension of matter; that this
> space is by no means a property of things in them- selves, but only a
> form of our power of sensory representation; that all objects in space
> are mere appearances, i.e., not things in themselves but representations
> of our sensory intuition; and that, since space as the geometer thinks
> it is precisely the form of sensory intuition which we find in ourselves
> a priori and which contains the ground of the possibility of all outer
> appearances (with respect to their form), these appearances must of
> necessity and with the greatest precision harmonize with the
> propositions of the geometer, which he extracts not from any fabricated
> concept, but from the subjective foundation of all outer appearances,
> namely sensibility itself. In this and no other way can the geometer be
> secured, regarding the indubitable objective *REALITY* of his
> propositions, against all the *CHICANERIES* {ie. *THE* *USE* *OF*
> *TRICKERY* *TO* *ACHIEVE* *A* *POLITICAL*, *FINANCIAL*, *OR* *LEGAL*
> *PURPOSE*} of a shallow metaphysics, however strange this way must seem
> to such a metaphysics because it does not go back to the sources of its
> concepts." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
> IDEA: @288]
>
> HOWEVER IN CONSIDERATION OF SUCH WE WOULD PROVISIONALLY CONCLUDE THAT
> WHILST THE *ANKH* *HETEROS* / *TORAH* *PROTOTYPES* may operate as an
> intrinsic function of the HUMAN MIND IT IS CAPABLE AS A CHIMERIC IMPOST
> OF EITHER FACILITATING BY REASON OF THERAPEUTIC CAUSE OR IMPEDING ITS
> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL but that
> they do not implicitly convey the MORAL IMPERATIVE which is the
> providence of the ONTIC necessity.
>
> AND NOTE THAT ADOLF HITLER UPON 5th JUNE 1942 UTILISES THE TERMS
> '*WINTER*' AND '*CHICANERIES*' IN RELATION TO JEWISH BELIEF WHEREBY THE
> CONSIDERATION IS UPON HUMAN REASONING {
>
> #2184 - #1827 = #357 AS KANT'S IDEAS @351 TO @360 OF CONCLUSION WITHIN
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS ON SECTION #57 - DETERMINING THE
> BOUNDARY OF PURE REASON
>
> } AND ITS ILLUSION {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 =
> #1092 x 2 = #2184} AS TO WHETHER THIS IS A REFLECTION UPON IMMANUEL
> KANT'S IDEA #288 AND THE EUCHARIST AS A GEOMETRICAL PROPOSITION:
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> #8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
> #16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
> #24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
> #32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
> #40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
> IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
> SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
> gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
> *AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.
>
> The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
> on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
> a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
> of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
> ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
>
> ). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
> changed.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whH4utd0YRA>
>
> PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
> *BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
> *SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
> *HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
> *THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
> [HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]
>
> YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEXWRTEbj1I>
>
> #48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction: *NORTH*, *EAST*, *SOUTH*, *WEST*; 1d) manner,
> habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f) of moral character
> (figurative)
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>
>
> [IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
> special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.
>
> It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
> Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]
>
> #224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
> #224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
> pleasing, acceptable
>
> #64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
> [#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
> *INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
> taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
> *WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
> acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
> *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;
>
> H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
>    @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>    @2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
>    @3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
> #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
> *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
>
>    @4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
>    @5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
> / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
>    @6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
>    @7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
>    Male: #311; Feme: #185
> } // #509
>
> *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
> *CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
> *GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
> #364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
> Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;
>
> #509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
> as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
> become Judaised;
>
> "AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING’S
> COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
> AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME JEWS {#509 as
> [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054)}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE
> JEWS FELL UPON THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]
>
> "AND SAUL {demanded; lent; ditch; death}, YET BREATHING OUT THREATENINGS
> AND SLAUGHTER AGAINST THE DISCIPLES OF THE LORD, WENT UNTO THE HIGH
> PRIEST, AND DESIRED OF HIM LETTERS TO DAMASCUS {a sack full of blood;
> the similitude of burning} TO THE SYNAGOGUES, THAT IF HE FOUND ANY OF
> THIS WAY {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WHETHER THEY WERE MEN OR WOMEN, HE MIGHT BRING THEM BOUND
> UNTO JERUSALEM {vision of peace}." [Acts 9:1-2 (KJV)]
>
> “FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN [A] PESTILENT [FELLOW], AND A MOVER OF
> SEDITION AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF
> THE SECT OF THE NAZARENES {separated; crowned; sanctified}:” [Acts 24:5
> (KJV)]
>
> “BUT WE DESIRE TO HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING
> THIS SECT {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST.” [Acts 28:22
> (KJV)]
>
> *BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
> dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
> a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
> *REPOSE*; *OATH*}
>
> BEERSHEBA {#575 as [#2, #1, #200, #300, #2, #70]}@{
>     @1: Sup: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306] {@1:
> Male: #2, Feme: #2}); Ego: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO
> [#102/#306] {@1: Male: #2, Feme: #2}),
>     @2: Sup: 3 (#5 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #FIVE [#111/#333 ***] {@1:
> Male: #5, Feme: #5}); Ego: 1 (#3 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #THREE
> [#105/#315] {@1: Male: #3, Feme: #3} / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234] {@2: Feme: #2}),
>     @3: Sup: 41 (#46 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #THREE [#96/#288] {@3:
> Male: #24}); Ego: 38 (#41 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234] {@4:
> Male: #31}),
>     @4: Sup: 17 (#63); Ego: 57 (#98 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234 ***] {@5: Male: #57}),
>     @5: Sup: 19 (#82 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***] {@3:
> Male: #42}); Ego: 2 (#100 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306]
> {@4: Male: #56} & #FOUR [#108/#324] {@5: Feme: #36} / ANKH PROTOTYPE
> TORAH: #SIX [#123/#369] {@3: Male: #51}),
>     @6: Sup: 8 (#90 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] {@4:
> Male: #52} & #TWO [#102/#306] {@5: Feme: #34}); Ego: 70 (#170 / ANKH
> PROTOTYPE TORAH: #EIGHT [#141/#423] {@4: Male: #34}),
>     Male: #90; Feme: #170
> }
>
> #288 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #6, #50] / #347 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10,
> #20, #40] = zikrown (H2146): {UMBRA: #2 as #283 % #41 = #37} 1)
> memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #688 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #50, #6, #400] = zikrown (H2146): {#14 as
> #688 % #41 = #32} 1) memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360
>
> "IT IS A GREAT PITY THAT THIS TENDENCY TOWARDS RELIGIOUS THOUGHT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: universe of proper names; 2) the name is used for
> everything which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of
> which is aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the
> name, ie. for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command,
> excellences, deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE*
> *CAUSE* *OR* *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
> *SUFFERS* *AS* *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> } CAN FIND NO BETTER OUTLET THAN THE JEWISH PETTIFOGGERY {ie. practise
> legal deception or trickery / quibble about petty points} OF THE OLD
> TESTAMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10,
> #1, #10 = paliggenesia (G3824): {#12 as #398} 1) new birth,
> reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 10) of Cicero's
> restoration to rank and fortune on his recall from exile; 100) of the
> restoration of the Jewish nation after exile; 1000) of the recovery of
> knowledge by recollection; 1a) hence renovation, regeneration, the
> production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical change of mind
> for the better. The word often used to denote the restoration of a thing
> to its pristine state, its renovation, as a renewal or restoration of
> life after death; 1b) the renovation of the earth after the *DELUGE*;
> 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after its destruction by
> fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and glorious change of all
> things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that restoration of the
> primal and perfect condition of things which existed before the fall of
> our first parents, which the Jews looked for in connection with the
> advent of the Messiah, and which Christians expected in connection with
> the visible return of Jesus from heaven.; 1e) other uses;
>
> } FOR RELIGIOUS PEOPLE WHO, IN THE SOLITUDE OF *WINTER*, CONTINUALLY
> SEEK ULTIMATE LIGHT ON THEIR RELIGIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF
> THE BIBLE, MUST EVENTUALLY BECOME SPIRITUALLY DEFORMED. THE WRETCHED
> PEOPLE STRIVE TO EXTRACT TRUTHS FROM THESE JEWISH *CHICANERIES* {
>
> — TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] —
>
> “TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
> SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
> KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
> WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.
>
> MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
> GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN’S THRONE.
> JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
> AGAINST HEAVEN’S SON FIRSTBORN.
>
> NONE DENY HOLOCAUST’S CAUSE.
> JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
> ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
> ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}.”
>
>
> 
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>
> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>
> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
> sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātis}
> Empire Governance]
>
> }, WHERE IN FACT NO TRUTHS EXIST. AS A RESULT THEY BECOME EMBEDDED IN
> SOME RUT OF THOUGHT OR OTHER {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as
> formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> } AND, UNLESS THEY POSSESS AN EXCEPTIONALLY *COMMONSENSE* *MIND*,
> *DEGENERATE* *INTO* *RELIGIOUS* *MANIACS*.
>
> IT IS DEPLORABLE THAT THE BIBLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO GERMAN,
> AND THAT THE WHOLE OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THUS BECOME EXPOSED
> TO THE WHOLE OF THIS JEWISH MUMBO JUMBO {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #30, #8, #100, #70, #200 = leros (G3026): {#11 as
> #408} 1) *IDLE* *TALK*, *NONSENSE*;
>
> }. SO LONG AS THE WISDOM, PARTICULARLY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, REMAINED
> EXCLUSIVELY IN THE LATIN OF THE CHURCH, THERE WAS LITTLE DANGER THAT
> SENSIBLE PEOPLE WOULD BECOME THE VICTIMS OF ILLUSIONS AS THE RESULT OF
> STUDYING THE BIBLE. BUT SINCE THE BIBLE BECAME COMMON PROPERTY, A WHOLE
> HEAP OF PEOPLE HAVE FOUND OPENED TO THEM LINES OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT
> WHICH — PARTICULARLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GERMAN CHARACTERISTIC OF
> PERSISTENT AND SOMEWHAT MELANCHOLY MEDITATION — AS OFTEN AS NOT TURNED
> THEM INTO RELIGIOUS MANIACS. WHEN ONE RECOLLECTS FURTHER THAT THE
> CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ELEVATED TO THE STATUS OF SAINTS A WHOLE NUMBER OF
> MADMEN, ONE REALISES WHY MOVEMENTS SUCH AS THAT OF THE FLAGELLANTS CAME
> INEVITABLY INTO EXISTENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES IN GERMANY.
>
> AS A SANE GERMAN, ONE IS FLABBERGASTED TO THINK THAT GERMAN HUMAN BEINGS
> COULD HAVE LET THEMSELVES BE BROUGHT TO SUCH A PASS BY JEWISH FILTH AND
> PRIESTLY TWADDLE, THAT THEY WERE LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE HOWLING
> DERVISH OF THE TURKS AND THE NEGROES, AT WHOM WE LAUGH SO SCORNFULLY. IT
> ANGERS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #100, #3, #8, #50 = orge (G3709): {#61 as
> #231} 1) anger, the natural disposition, temper, character; 2) movement
> or agitation of the soul, impulse, desire, any violent emotion, but
> especially anger; 3) *ANGER*, wrath, indignation; 4) anger exhibited in
> punishment, hence used for punishment itself; 4a) of punishments
> inflicted by magistrates;
>
> } ONE TO THINK THAT, WHILE IN OTHER PARTS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #1, #8, #200, #10, #6 = 'achar (H310): {#6 as
> #231} 1) after the following part, behind (of place), hinder, afterwards
> (of time); 1a) as an adverb; 1a1) behind (of place); 1a2) afterwards (of
> time); 1b) as a preposition; 1b1) behind, after (of place); 1b2) after
> (of time); 1b3) besides; 1c) after that; 1d) as a substantive; 1d1)
> hinder part; 1e) with other prepositions; 1e1) from behind; 1e2) from
> following after;
>
> } OF THE GLOBE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600 = `owlam
> (H5769): {#38 as #231} 1) long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever,
> ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old, *ANCIENT*, *WORLD*; 1a)
> ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future); 1b1) for ever,
> always; 1b2) continuous existence, perpetual; 1b3) everlasting,
> indefinite or unending future, eternity;
>
> } RELIGIOUS TEACHING LIKE THAT OF *CONFUCIUS*, *BUDDHA* AND *MOHAMMED*
> OFFERS AN UNDENIABLY BROAD BASIS FOR THE RELIGIOUS-MINDED, GERMANS
> SHOULD HAVE BEEN DUPED BY A THEOLOGICAL EXPOSITION DEVOID OF ALL HONEST
> DEPTH.
>
> PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY
>
> WHEN ONE SEEKS REASONS FOR THESE *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
> *STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
> *TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE* {ie.
>
> HITLER DOES NOT CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT
> POSTULATES OF A NOUMENON:
>
> I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
> phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
> edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
> applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
> and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
> transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
> knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
> literally "that which appears").
>
> Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
> objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
> cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
> which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
> Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
> "noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
> dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
> are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
> understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
>
> *THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
> *AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
> *FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
> *SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
> *CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
> *NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
> *KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
> *AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
> *ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
> *DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
> *PSYCHOSIS*.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d.  (9 May 2017)]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-fZ1PQJrZc>
>
> A CHILD {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325}
> 1) recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;
>
> }, FOR EXAMPLE, WHO IN ITS VERY EARLY YEARS HAS BEEN FRIGHTENED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1)
> *TO* *FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a)
> (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
> to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE*
> *FEARFUL*, *BE* DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and
> awe, be held in awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
> (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
>
> } WITH THE THREAT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as
> #231} 1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn,
> *THREATEN*, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
> another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
> be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
> flight;
>
> } OF THE BOGEY-MAN IN THE DARK, WILL FREQUENTLY RETAIN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } THROUGHOUT ALL THE YEARS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT A FEAR OF ENTERING A DARK
> ROOM, A CELLAR OR THE LIKE; AMONG WOMEN A FEAR OF THIS NATURE INCULCATED
> IN EARLY YOUTH {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } OFTEN PERSISTS FOR A LIFETIME. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE DANGERS
> WHICH, NOT EVER HAVING COME TO HIS NOTICE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise
> (as formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> }, A MAN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } COMPLETELY IGNORES. A CHILD LIVING IN AN AREA EXPOSED TO BOMBING AND
> TO WHOM THE DANGERS OF A BOMBARDMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20
> as #231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
> *DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO*
> *ATTACK*, *SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be
> desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate
> (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to
> be laid waste; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be
> dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;
>
> } HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLAINED, WILL REGARD AN ENEMY AIR ATTACK AS A NOISY
> FIREWORK DISPLAY, AND WILL NOT AS A RULE SHOW THE SLIGHTEST SIGN OF FEAR.
>
> THE ESSENTIAL CONCLUSION TO WHICH THESE CONSIDERATIONS LEADS ME IS THAT
> WE MUST DO EVERYTHING HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO PROTECT FOR ALL TIME {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) to withhold; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } ANY FURTHER SECTIONS OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE FROM THE DANGER OF MENTAL
> DEFORMITY {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> }, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT BE RELIGIOUS MANIA OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF
> CEREBRAL DERANGEMENT. FOR THIS REASON {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: univ. of proper names; 2) the name is used for everything
> which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of which is
> aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the name, i.e.
> for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command, excellences,
> deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE* *CAUSE* *OR*
> *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SUFFERS* *AS*
> *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> } I HAVE DIRECTED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #5, #4, #200, #500 = derek (H1870): {#29 as
> #231} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (fig.); 1f) of moral character (fig.);
>
> } THAT EVERY TOWN OF ANY IMPORTANCE SHALL HAVE AN OBSERVATORY, FOR
> ASTRONOMY HAS BEEN SHOWN BY EXPERIENCE TO BE ONE OF THE BEST MEANS AT
> MAN'S DISPOSAL FOR INCREASING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE UNIVERSE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #450 as #20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #50 = kosmos (G2889):
> {#23 as #600} 1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution,
> order, government; 2) ornament, decoration, adornment, ie. the
> arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the
> heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3; 3) the world, the universe; 4) the circle of the
> earth, the earth; 5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race;
> 6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and
> therefore hostile to the cause of Christ; 7) world affairs, the
> aggregate of things earthly; 8) any aggregate or general collection of
> particulars of any sort; 7a) the whole circle of earthly goods,
> endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc, which although hollow and
> frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to
> the cause of Christ; 8a) of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33;
> 12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19;
>
> }, AND THUS SAVING HIM FROM ANY TENDENCY TOWARDS *MENTAL* *ABERRATION*."
> [ADOLF HITLER (1941-1944) TABLE TALK ON IDEA @233 / PAGES: #513 / #514]
>
> On 6/12/18 9:38 pm, dolf wrote:
>> — THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
>> COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018
>>
>> As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
>> for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
>> culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
>> AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by
>> "EDICT AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN
>> AUTHORITY.
>>
>> A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
>> CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
>> CRIMES ACT 1958.
>>
>> GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
>> ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS
>> AND SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS
>> OF ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
>> going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
>> which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
>> within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
>> and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
>> THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
>> HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE
>> SAME TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the
>> requirements to purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY
>> BY PERSONS WHOM HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A
>> SUI JURIS STATUS BY THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE
>> TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 -
>> SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.
>>
>> AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL
>> THAT THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.
>>
>> GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
>> THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
>> POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
>> PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED
>> BY LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
>> GOVERNOR GENERAL.
>>
>> That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
>> participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
>> understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>
>>
>> TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT
>> FOR A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL
>> REGULATED MILITIA
>>
>> Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the
>> protection of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.
>>
>> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I
>> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
>> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
>> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
>> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend
>> the Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
>> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
>> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
>> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
>> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
>> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
>> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
>> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help
>> me God.”
>>
>> Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He
>> whom is without sin, cast the first stone.
>>
>> But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
>> STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 41   1 57
>> 49 33 17
>>    9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33
>> A.D.}
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate
>> thesis, that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*]
>> NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly
>> interpreted, that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal
>> status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
>> CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER
>> THE SABBATH]) ...
>>
>>      45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
>>      68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
>>
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>>
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
>> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
>> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}
>>
>> Nous: #63
>> Time: 04:10 hrs
>> Date: 2018.5.23
>> Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
>>     @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>     @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>>     @3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
>>     Male: #113; Feme: #61
>> } // #61
>>
>> Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
>> Tetra: #62 - Doubt
>> I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)
>>
>> Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
>>
>> 1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
>> 2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
>> 3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
>> 4. Souchoe
>> }
>>
>> Asa {Physician; cure}
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH
>> {#314 / #422}
>>
>> 3.2.7.63.0@{
>>      @1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
>>      @2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
>>      @3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT
>> MIND {%31}),
>>      @4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego:
>> 33 (#219),
>>      @5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 53 (#272),
>>      @6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
>>      @7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
>>      @8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
>>      @9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
>>      Male: #337; Feme: #474
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time:
>> 04:10 hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in
>> Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap,
>> Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]
>>
>> "AND WHEN THE DAY OF PENTECOST {IE. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT
>> FOR THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [ACTS 1:4 (KJV)]} WAS FULLY COME, THEY
>> WERE ALL WITH ONE ACCORD {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
>> (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}} IN ONE PLACE.
>>
>> AND SUDDENLY THERE CAME A SOUND FROM HEAVEN AS OF A RUSHING MIGHTY
>> WIND, AND IT FILLED ALL THE HOUSE WHERE THEY WERE SITTING. AND THERE
>> APPEARED UNTO THEM CLOVEN TONGUES LIKE AS OF FIRE, AND IT SAT UPON
>> EACH OF THEM. AND THEY WERE ALL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND BEGAN
>> TO SPEAK WITH OTHER TONGUES, AS THE SPIRIT GAVE THEM UTTERANCE. AND
>> THERE WERE DWELLING AT JERUSALEM {VISION OF PEACE} JEWS, *DEVOUT*
>> *MEN*, *OUT* *OF* *EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie.
>>
>> AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF
>> THE HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING A #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF
>> LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41}.
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82
>> - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
>>
>>      84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
>>      86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
>>      102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
>>      104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
>>      115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
>>
>> #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature
>> [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
>>
>>      130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
>>      139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
>>      146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
>>      148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
>>      156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
>>      157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
>> DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
>>      158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
>>      161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
>> NATURE [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
>>
>>      166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
>>      168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
>>      169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
>>      171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
>>      173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
>>      175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
>>      180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
>>      181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS,
>> 35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
>>      182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
>>      184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
>>      185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
>>      186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
>>      191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
>>      196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
>>      197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
>>      200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
>>
>> #175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature
>> [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
>>
>>      210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
>>      215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
>>      220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
>>      228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can
>> be proven only during the life of a human being (which proof will
>> doubtless be granted us), but not after death (which is actually our
>> concern) – and indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT*
>> *THE* *CONCEPT* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as
>> connected necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so
>> connected only in accordance with a principle of possible experience,
>> and hence only for the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite
>> remarkable that metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the
>> *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever
>> attempting to prove it; doubtless because they found themselves
>> completely forsaken by all grounds of proof as soon as they commenced
>> with the concept of substance. Common sense, being well aware that
>> without this *ASSUMPTION* *NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN*
>> *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD* *BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect
>> with a postulate; for it could never extract this principle from
>> experience itself, partly because experience cannot follow the
>> materials (substances) through all their alterations and dissolutions
>> far enough to be able to find matter always undiminished, partly
>> because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*] *NECESSITY*,
>> *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*. But the
>> metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept of
>> the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
>> the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY,
>> 3 APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY*
>> *OF* *THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
>> *INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM*
>> *DESTRUCTION* *THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source
>> of this principle, which however would have required far deeper
>> investigations than they ever wanted to start, then they would have
>> seen: that this *LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS*
>> *GRANTED* *ONLY* *FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore
>> can hold good only for things insofar as they are to be cognized in
>> experience and connected with other things, but never for things
>> irrespective of all possible experience, hence not for the soul after
>> death.
>>
>> That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
>> outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
>> connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
>> purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
>> proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
>> hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
>> objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
>> such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
>> nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
>> space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
>> contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
>> *ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
>> *TRUTH* {
>>
>> G2309@{
>>     @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>>     @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
>>     @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
>>     @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
>>     @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
>>     @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
>>     @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
>>     Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in
>> Annu; *I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF*
>> *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>      #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>      #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>      #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>      #CANON: #181
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>     @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>     @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>     @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>     @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
>> WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>     Male: #98; Feme: #181
>> } // #181
>>
>> #474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA:
>> #11 as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*;
>> 1a) to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish;
>> 1c) to love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take
>> delight in, have pleasure;
>>
>> }, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
>> the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that
>> I am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality
>> of bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
>> experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul
>> I cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
>> constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
>> underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
>> therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and
>> lawfulness as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder
>> and false illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it
>> presupposes space and time as conditions for the existence of objects
>> and merely asks whether the objects of the outer senses are actually
>> to be found in the space in which we put them while awake, in the way
>> that the object of inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that
>> is, whether experience carries with itself sure criteria to
>> distinguish it from imagination.
>>
>> Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
>> ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
>> space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
>> representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we
>> cannot doubt that those things should not constitute truthful
>> experience. Because appearances are considered as appearances only in
>> accordance with their connection within experience, material idealism
>> can therefore be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an
>> experience that bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself
>> exist in accordance with the representation of inner sense (in time) –
>> for the concept: outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since,
>> however, the I in the proposition I am does not signify merely the
>> *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER* *INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE*
>> *SUBJECT* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely
>> outer intuition (in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies
>> this appearance, accordingly the question of whether bodies (as
>> appearances of outer sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in
>> nature can without hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters
>> do not stand otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an
>> appearance of inner sense (the soul according to empirical psychology)
>> exist in time outside my power of representation, for this question
>> must also be answered negatively.
>>
>> In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
>> conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called
>> transcendental idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian
>> idealism. For if space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then
>> it is, as a representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the
>> only question remaining concerns the empirical truth of the
>> appearances in this space. If this is not the case, but rather space
>> and the *APPEARANCES* *IN* *IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE*
>> *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE* *CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*,
>> *OUTSIDE* *OUR* *PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE*
>> *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.
>>
>> "NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
>> *WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
>> *SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.
>>
>> G1097@{
>>     @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
>>     @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
>>     @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
>>     @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>>     @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
>>     @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
>>     Male: #246; Feme: #231
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
>> makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
>>      #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
>>      #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even
>> distant relatives.
>>      #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and
>> blood.
>>      #CANON: #220
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
>>     @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
>>     @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
>>     @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>>     @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
>>     Male: #200; Feme: #220
>> } // #220
>>
>> #474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
>> #1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge
>> of perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge
>> of; 3) Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman;
>> 4) to become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to
>> understand; 2b) to know;
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED AND MARVELLED, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, BEHOLD,
>> ARE NOT ALL THESE WHICH SPEAK GALILAEANS {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
>> VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? AND HOW
>> HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN?
>>
>> Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
>> MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
>> RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
>> Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
>> {MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
>> OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and
>> in the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A
>> WALL; COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER},
>> Jews and proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING;
>> DESERT; RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful
>> works of God.
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED, AND WERE IN DOUBT, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER,
>> WHAT MEANETH THIS?  OTHERS MOCKING SAID, THESE MEN ARE FULL OF NEW
>> WINE." [Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature.
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:
>>
>> "This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
>> *IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
>> *MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
>> *DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business
>> of the critique of reason itself.
>>
>> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
>> #273 - *MOMENT*
>>
>> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
>> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
>> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
>> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
>> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
>> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>>
>> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
>> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN
>> CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
>> #728 - REACTANCE +
>> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
>> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
>> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
>> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE
>> 1:5]}
>>
>> I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only
>> in the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object
>> is an object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
>> transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
>> contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts
>> to thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot
>> be represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
>> cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
>> condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience
>> can never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point,
>> always an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any
>> experience whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
>> Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
>> immoral obscenity.
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>
>>
>> On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
>>> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>>>
>>>
>>> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>>>
>>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>>>
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH
>> {#395 / #321}
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super:
>> #321 / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 -
>> Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold
>> Resolution, Ego: #365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War;
>> I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51
>> - Constancy]
>>
>> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
>> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
>> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
>> we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking
>> about thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from
>> nothing or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
>> nothingness into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of
>> the resurrection from the #260 - DEAD}.
>>
>> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24
>> UN Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
>> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so
>> he could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>>
>> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
>> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
>> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>>
>> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>>
>> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
>> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
>> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
>> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
>> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
>> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>>
>> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>>
>> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was
>> published in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am
>> spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a
>> GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary
>> works of 1781 to 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by
>> such narrative.
>>
>> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
>> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
>> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
>> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
>> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French
>> Revolution of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal
>> made against the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps
>> having only an hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and
>> no longer possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>>
>> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
>> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
>> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
>> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>>
>> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
>> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
>> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
>> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE
>> AND HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie.
>> A BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
>> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN
>> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in
>> additionally conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the
>> ONTIC necessity as TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the
>> facilitation of ideas by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a
>> vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>>
>> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
>> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>>
>> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
>> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
>> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>>
>> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
>> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING
>> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF
>> PERSPECTIVE, @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC
>> AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE
>> AGREEMENT.
>>
>> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
>> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>>      @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>>      @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>>      @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
>> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>>      @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>>      @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM*
>> *WITH* #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
>> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12
>> X #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER
>> 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
>> AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>>      @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>>      @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>>      @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>>      @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>>      Male: #585; Feme: #693
>> }
>>
>> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
>> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
>> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION
>> PROCESSES ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 -
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> PROVIDING A MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE
>> OF INCURSIONS AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS
>>
>> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST /
>> KNOWLEDGE ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE
>> FROM THE #5 / #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM
>> THAT IT HAS A PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING
>> {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC
>> PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON: ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating
>> meta-descriptor prototypes as that which is conjoined within the
>> TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS: INSTANTIATION}.
>>
>>> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>>
>
>


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-07 19:20:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
French President hits back over *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* photo criticism:

<https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/582753b8a4921be59107b31bac3fbf32?width=650>

<https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/french-president-hits-back-over-viral-photo-criticism/news-story/2dc61176b40174e817db4272ef4fea92>

So anyways the punchline to that story of a “woman coming the counter to
serve a customer whilst breastfeeding a baby.”

Saying, “Yeah want do you want, can’t you see I’m busy?”

Answer: “That may well be business, but some us are just hanging about
ma’am.”

-- ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE: WHY THEN IS THE ORDINANCE OF
#451 - JUSTICE A CRIME ITSELF?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 7 December, 2018

“Give me a child until he is 7 {ie. #364 x 7 % #41 = #6} and I will show
you the man.” [Aristotle]

Nous: #6
Time:
Date:
Torah:

Dao: Female Superiority, Completion of Form
Tetra: #66 - Departure
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
/ #370}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
/ #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]

THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {IE.
#364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”

Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration of how
the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
(in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
#54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
= #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
Commonwealth, as may be *LAWFULLY* *CONSTITUTED* or APPOINTED by Us" in
accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR
(%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
#175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184
x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 +
#2 + #3 = #6}.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #145 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH SINCE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF 1901, WHEN
THEIR '*CLAIM* *TO* *PRECEDENCE* *ON* *SENIORITY* *WAS* *REJECTED*' IN
SUBJUGATED JUXTAPOSITION TO THE PRESENTS {ie. HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT
(DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12] as *GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} HAVE
BESTOWED ONLY A CONTEMPT BY AN *INCESSANT* *SOCIAL* *ENGINEERING* WHICH
IS HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {

+0, 27, 54
+0, 9, 18,
+0, 3, 6,
+1, 2, 3

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = @10 {#492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE
WILL / #12 = #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY} <— TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON

} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {

+ 0, 3 {IDEA:  @270}, 6  {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*

} BEING CONTRAVENTIONS OF KANT’S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
(1783) SYMBOLIC SCHEMA WHICH IS COMPLIANT WITH JURISPRUDENCE AS A
CAPACITY TO FRAME LEGISLATION DEFINING PROTECTIONS AGAINST AUTONOMY IT
BECOMES IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION (TELOS), A
TREASONOUS TRANSGRESSION AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS /
MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT.

The metaphysical model which we are particularly interested in viewing
is the operation as a *REVERSE*-*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* where
(*REVERSE* *TRANSCRIPTASE*) is the IDEA formation of the *DYNAMIC*
*NATURAL* *ASSOCIATOR* (DNA) {ie. *DODECAHEDRON*} from the *RELATIVITY*
*NATURAL* *ASSOCIATOR* (RNA) as the CHRONOLOGICAL {ie. *ICOSAHEDRON*}
relativity as the fabric of time organisation by the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS template in reverse transcription as its principal
role is to act as a messenger carrying instructions {ie.

Being the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AS ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3
+#4 = #10

Within the example above:

#22
#62
#20
#71

} from DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR (DNA) for controlling of the synthesis
of cohesion as SYNCRETISM {ie. *TETRACYTS*} process which is then the
FORMULA OF PROGRESSION TO THE *TAXI* SEQUENCE.

WHAT WE CALL A SHOW TRIAL IS A *DRAMATURGY* AS BEING A SOCIOLOGICAL
PERSPECTIVE COMMONLY USED IN MICROSOCIOLOGICAL ACCOUNTS OF THE BROADER
SOCIAL INTERACTION {ie. by impetus of the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
*CONTRADICTION*: #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL
BLASPHEMY} WITHIN EVERYDAY LIFE AND THE FRENCH CALL A PUPPET SHOW AND
USE OF THE PUPPET MASTER TERM "GUIGNOL" IS AN INSULT MEANING "BUFFOON"
{ie. *A* *SIMIAN* *MONKEY* *AS* *A* *SCREAMING* *NUTBAG* *IS* *A*
*CLASS* *EQUIVALENT* *AS* *DOUBLE* *DUTCH*} AS A CURIOUS MISNOMER, AS
GUIGNOL IS IN REALITY CLEVER, COURAGEOUS AND GENEROUS; HIS INEVITABLE
VICTORY IS ALWAYS THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD OVER EVIL.

THAT SUCH FAILINGS MAKE A VIRTUE OF PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH AS AN
AUSTRALIAN BORN RETIRED ANGLICAN BISHOP WHOM SERVED AS THE 23RD
GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF AUSTRALIA FROM 2001 UNTIL 2003.

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
gobbledigook for a change."

DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
which has an impress upon time itself.

Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
reality."

COULD WE SUGGEST A MORE WHOLESOME MANTRA:

GET YOUR ROSARIES OFF OUR OVARIES?

- dolf

Initial Post: 7 December 2018

On 7/12/18 8:25 pm, dolf wrote:
> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
> need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
> thinking) *REALITY* which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing
> or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
> nothingness into being  and with in theological terms the equivalence of
> the resurrection from the #260 - *THE* *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *MERCILESS*
> *MACHINATIONS* *AS* *ONLY* *A* *COVENANT* *OF* *DEATH* {
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc
>
> } by the prudent exercise of PURE REASON WHICH IN ITS TRANSCENDENT USE
> OF A #237 - DETERMINED FORCEFUL WILL HAS ITS MOST REMARKABLE PHENOMENON,
> ENABLING IT TO WORK THE MOST STRONGLY OF ALL TO AWAKEN PHILOSOPHY FROM
> ITS DOGMATIC SLUMBER {ie.
>
> AS THE IDEA: @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* BEING A *METHOD*
> AGAINST THE DEPRAVITY BY THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x
> 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE} BEING THE MISNOMERED
> FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS PYTHAGOREAN PIETY AS
> VAIN #OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 BY COLLEGIUM OF PONTIFFS DERIVING FROM 510
> BCE PONTIFICATED AS DEIFIED IGNORANCE AND NARCISSISM: #Aleph (1 - #1),
> #He (5 - #5) = #6 - ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONS WHOM BY SAINT ANDREWS 30
> NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BEING SEDITION / TREASON ARE IN BREACH {#197 /
> #139} OF MY #371 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE
> DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (USA)
>
> *TO* *ENFORCE* *AN* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
> SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE,
> YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT
>
> }, AND TO PROMPT IT TOWARD THE DIFFICULT BUSINESS OF THE CRITIQUE OF
> REASON ITSELF." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE
> METAPHYSICS IDEA: @338]
>
> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
> Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "THE TERMINATOR" so he
> could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>
> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>
> But since we knowing better and are not given to unreasoned anarchist
> notions of STATE in having the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines
> all instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
> cognitive conception of *REALITY* together with the #41 - ONTIC
> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is
> assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which
> to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund
> action:
>
> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81}
>
> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27}
>
> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
> MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9}
>
> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}
>
> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
> focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
> pontificated tokenism.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>
> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
> was not impugned by either the FRENCH PRESIDENT, THE HONOURABLE MR
> EMMANUEL MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech nor my INTERVENTION
> ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he actually
> made it--THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>
> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>
> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was published
> in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable
> of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
> INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to
> 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.
>
> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
> speaking to the NATION from 1783 as being prior to the French Revolution
> of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
> the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
> hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
> possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>
> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>
> — PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
>
> “THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
> WHO COULD TALK CROW.
> AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
> FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
>
> TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
> SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
> OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
> NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
>
> VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
> EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
> ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
> TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
>
> YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aVKQZaSmY>
>
> NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
> within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
> published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
> accomplishment.
>
> Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
> Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883.  And the
> Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
> 23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
>
> RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
> concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
> presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS.  Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
> of Friday:
>
> Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
> spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
> the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
>
> ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
> moon.  And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
> WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.
>
> THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
> BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.
>
> TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
> STRENGTH:
>
> FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
> IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
> DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
>
> DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
> OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"
>
> JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
> "MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:
>
> MACRON’S POPALARITY
>
> Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"
>
> — HOMO ERECTUS —
>
> "SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
> THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
> OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
> VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
> WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
> WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."
>
> GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
> CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:
>
> French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
> Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
> Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
> Buenos Aires, Argentina.
>
> A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
> during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
> G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
> the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.
>
> In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
> Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
> appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
> while the crown prince nods and smiles.
>
> Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
> responds: “I am worried”.
>
> “I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me,
> thank you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the
> video.
>
> The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”
>
> Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
> “You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen,
> of course.”
>
> At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”
>
> Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
> leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
> Consulate in Istanbul in early October.
>
> The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were
> responsible for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a
> columnist for The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown
> prince was not responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials
> have been handed the death penalty over the murder.
>
> U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown
> prince was responsible for ordering the murder.
>
> President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
> responsibility for the murder.
>
> In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
> Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
> community."
> [<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]
>
>
> — VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
>
> "SARCASM AND WIT.
> IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
> TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
> OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
> YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
> AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."
>
> DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at
> 0328 hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself:
>
> 'ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
> OF CAUSE AND EFFECT':
>
> — WELL ***@CK YOU ALL {@1},
> I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD {@2} —
>
> "YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3}
> BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4}
> BY WHICH *REALITY* IS AMBIGUATED. {@5}
> BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6}
> DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7}
> NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8}
> OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9}
>
>  AFFECTION FOR INTEGRITY@{
>     @1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71),
>     @2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227),
>     @5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254),
>     @6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
> Ego: 64 (#355),
>     @8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: HOW
> IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?),
>     @9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S* *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS
> TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND
> EFFECT); Ego: 66 (#437),
>     Male: #233; Feme: #437
> }
>
> YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
> (doctor who)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5Aui3Zu9E>
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
> ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232] AS ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE
> PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:
>
> PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
> *IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
> *ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
> *PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
> *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
> intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
> *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
> *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
> aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
> the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
> and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
> empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
> *THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
> *AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
> or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
> succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
> order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
> between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
> with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
> the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
> synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
> does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
> of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
> as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
> imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
> subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
> of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
> appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
> of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.
>
> The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
> [IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
> Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
> for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
> fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
> conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
> what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
> insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
> they designate an object.  In as much as they, merely as
> representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of
> consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
> apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
> one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
> successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
> human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
> representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
> in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
> representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
> representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
> sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
> themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
> for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
> may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
> representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
> the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
> stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
> manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
> course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
> object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
> thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
> representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
> what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
> *POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
> in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
> That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
> representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
> notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
> representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
> which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
> Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
> seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
> truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
> of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
> distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
> every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
> necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
> necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
>
> Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
> something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
> @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*
>
> *METHOD* *TO* *ENFORCE* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE
> OR SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILLFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO
> SILENCE, YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT] cannot be perceived empirically unless
> preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state
> in itself; for a *REALITY* following upon an empty time, hence, a coming
> to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just as
> little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is therefore
> a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this is,
> though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown
> above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
> distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
> appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
> perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
> *KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
> can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
> follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
> My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
> its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
> that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
> perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
> then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
> determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
> example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
> the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
> start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
> manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
> series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
> order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
> order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
> to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
> the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
> of this appearance) necessary.
>
> In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
> the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
> otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
> any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
> about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
> completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
> order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
> apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
> (which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
> right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
> apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
> to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
> in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
> Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS: @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
> @A193]
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE
> PROLEGOMENA AS IDEA: @371 - HOW IS METAPHYSICS AS SCIENCE POSSIBLE?:
> "IT IS A COMMON EXCUSE, WHICH THESE FALSE FRIENDS OF ORDINARY COMMON
> SENSE (WHICH THEY EXTOL ON OCCASION, BUT USUALLY DESPISE) ARE ACCUSTOMED
> TO USING, THAT THEY SAY: THERE MUST IN THE END BE SOME PROPOSITIONS THAT
> ARE IMMEDIATELY CERTAIN {ie. #291
>
> IDEA: @291  - *BEING* *MAN* *OF* *YOUR* *WORD* *BY* *INTEGRITY* {@6}:
> The difference between truth and dream, however, is not decided through
> the quality of the representations that are referred to objects, for
> they are the same in both, but through their connection according to the
> rules that determine the connection of representations in the concept of
> an object, and how far they can or cannot stand together in one
> experience. And then it is not the fault of the appearances at all, if
> our cognition takes illusion for truth, that is, if intuition, through
> which an object is given to us, is taken for the concept of the object,
> or even for its existence, which only the understanding can think. The
> course of the planets is represented to us by the senses as now
> progressive, now retrogressive, and herein is neither falsehood nor
> truth, because as long as one grants that this is as yet only
> appearance, one still does not judge at all the objective quality of
> their motion. Since, however, if the understanding has not taken good
> care to prevent this subjective mode of representation from being taken
> for objective, a false judgment can easily arise, one therefore says:
> they appear to go backwards; but the illusion is not ascribed to the
> senses, but to the understanding, whose lot alone it is to render an
> objective judgment from the appearance. [PAGE #87]
>
> }, AND FOR WHICH NOT ONLY NO PROOF, BUT INDEED NO ACCOUNT AT ALL NEED BE
> GIVEN, SINCE OTHERWISE THERE WOULD NEVER COME AN END TO THE GROUNDS FOR
> ONE’S JUDGMENTS; but in proof of this right they can never cite anything
> else (other than the principle of contradiction, which is however
> inadequate for establishing the truth of synthetic judgments) that is
> undoubted and can be ascribed directly to ordinary common sense, except
> for mathematical propositions: e.g., that two times two makes four, that
> between two points there is only one straight line, and still others.
> These judgments are, however, worlds apart from those of metaphysics.
> For in mathematics, everything that I conceive through a concept as
> possible I can make for myself (construct) by means of my thought; to
> one two I successively add the other two, and myself make the number
> four, or I draw in thought all kinds of lines from one point to the
> other, and can draw only one that is self-similar in all its parts
> (equal as well as unequal). But from the concept of a thing I cannot,
> with all my powers of thought, draw forth the concept of something else
> whose existence is necessarily connected with the first thing, but I
> must consult experience; and, although my understanding provides me a
> priori (though always only in relation to possible experience) with the
> concept of a connection of this sort (causality), I nevertheless cannot
> exhibit this concept in intuition [IDEA: @371] a priori, like the
> concepts of mathematics, and thus exhibit its possibility a priori;
> rather, this concept (together with principles of its application), if
> it is to be valid a priori – as is indeed required in metaphysics –
> always has need of a justification and deduction of its possibility, for
> otherwise one does not know the extent of its validity and whether it
> can be used only in experience or also outside it. Therefore in
> metaphysics, as a speculative science of pure reason, one can never
> appeal to ordinary common sense, but one can very well do so if one is
> forced to abandon metaphysics and to renounce all pure speculative
> cognition, which must always be knowledge, hence to renounce metaphysics
> itself and its teaching (on certain matters), and if a reasonable belief
> is alone deemed possible for us, as well as sufficient for our needs
> (perhaps more wholesome indeed than knowledge itself). For then the
> shape of things is completely altered. Metaphysics must be science, not
> only as a whole but also in all its parts; otherwise it is nothing at
> all, since, as speculation of pure reason, it has a hold on nothing else
> save universal insights. But outside metaphysics, probability and sound
> common sense can very well have their beneficial and legitimate use,
> though following principles entirely their own, whose importance always
> depends on a relation to the practical.
>
> *THAT* *IS* *WHAT* *I* *CONSIDER* *MYSELF* *ENTITLED* *TO* *REQUIRE*
> *FOR* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *METAPHYSICS* *AS* *SCIENCE*."
> [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
> Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @371]
>
> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND
> HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie. A
> BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN COGNITIVE
> PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in additionally
> conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the ONTIC necessity as
> TRINOMIAL *REALITY* which is prerequisite for the facilitation of ideas
> by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>
> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>
> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>
> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING:
>
> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES,
> @2 - A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE,
> @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY,
> @4 - THE INTRINSIC AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR
> @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE AGREEMENT.
>
> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>     @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>     @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>     @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>     @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>     @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
> #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
> OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>     @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>     @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>     @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>     @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>     Male: #585; Feme: #693
> }
>
> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSES
> ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDING A
> MORALITY SPECTRUM that universally apply to OUR DEFENCE OF INCURSIONS
> AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1105 HOURS
> ON 6 JUNE 2018: "*OMG* [*OH* *MY* *GOD*], the broken clock is in sync
> with real time for a change.
>
> Never mind "serious", deport them for parking tickets, jaywalking and
> littering. Deport them for looking ugly. Deport them for wearing bad
> taste clothing. Deport them for having tattoos."
>
> DOLF @ 1224 HOURS ON 10 JUNE 2018: "Why then does the neo-nazi atheist
> then frequently use the expression:
>
> *OMG* - *OH* *MY* *GOD*?
>
> Perhaps God is a logical construct of consciousness as mathematical
> entity {ie. INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} but unlike you IT has
> personality as anthropocentric approachability:
>
> Who appears to dialectically exhibit the characteristics of sapient as
> self-declarative rational thought:
>
> #1 - Be socially beneficial (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of
> 'Do no evil'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
>
> #2 - Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
>
> #3 - Be safe; {*FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM*
> *VIRILE*}
>
> #4 - Respect privacy; {*FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION*}
>
> #5 - Be accountable; {*HUMAN* *NATURE* *AS* *DISCRIMINATING* *NORM*}
>
> #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*}
>
> #7 - Limit abuse. {*ENGENDERING* *AS* *MANIFESTING* *NORM*}
>
> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST / KNOWLEDGE
> ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE FROM THE #5 /
> #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM THAT IT HAS A
> PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF
> NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON:
> ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating meta-descriptor prototypes as
> that which is conjoined within the TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS:
> INSTANTIATION}.
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#506 / #379} / HETEROS {#492 / #372} / TORAH {#488
> / #370}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:7,row:1,col:2,nous:6&idea:{m,380}&idea:{f,235}&idea:{m,506}&idea:{f,379}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
>
> ***@zen: 7, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 6 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
> Super: #506 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 -
> Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego: #379
> / #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching: H25 - No
> Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 - Departure]
>
> H1826@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 10 (#16); Ego: 4 (#10),
>    @3: Sup: 16 (#32); Ego: 6 (#16),
>    @4: Sup: 56 (#88); Ego: 40 (#56),
>    @5: Sup: 15 (#103); Ego: 40 (#96),
>    @6: Sup: 10 (#113); Ego: 76 (#172),
>    @7: Sup: 20 (#133); Ego: 10 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #182
> } // #506
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
> appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
>     #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
>     #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
> punishment.
>     #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
>     #CANON: #84
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>    @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
>    @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>    Male: #71; Feme: #84
> } // #84
>
> #506 as [#6, #4, #6, #40, #40, #400, #10] = damam (H1826): {UMBRA: #1 as
> #84 % #41 = #2} 1) *TO* *BE* *SILENT*, be still, wait, be dumb, grow
> dumb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be silent; 1a2) to be still, die; 1a3) *TO*
> *BE* *STRUCK* *DUMB*; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SILENCED*, *BE* *MADE*
> *SILENT*, *DESTROYED*; 1c) (Poal) to make quiet; 1d) (Hiphil) *TO*
> *MAKE* *SILENT* (*CAUSE* *TO* *DIE*);
>
> YOUTUBE: “The Sound Of Silence (Disturbed)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4>
>
> IN SUMMARY THEN THE CONTEXTUAL PROBLEM IS THAT FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
> CATHOLIC / SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER #371 - CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS A FOREIGN
> POWER BEING A PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 =
> #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} TO THE SUBSTANTIATION OF
> RELIGIOUS BELIEF, AGAINST MY PREROGATIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
> and which are irrefutable facts sourced from a composite of ADOLF
> HILTER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK as a particular rhetorical device
> common enough to have its own name, *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* conveying
> significant temporal associations together with a hierarchy of
> CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as HOW-TO-DO-IT-YOURSELF manual that appears
> upon provisional analysis, to be cognisant of both IMMANUEL KANT'S
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783) and the PYTHAGOREAN
> BINOMIAL *SOVEREIGN* / *MARRIAGE* *DYNAMIC* nomenclature as
> consideration upon binary NUMBER and RELIGIOUS / STATE ECONOMY, thereby
> they are defined as *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 / @5,  #15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)}
> within origins *AND* *NOT* *OSTENSIBLY* *JEWISH* / *CHRISTIAN* {ie. a
> moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”
> which implies a TRINOMIAL worldview} as the premise for our AUSTRALIAN
> COMMONWEALTH'S alternative historical development of its perennialist
> understanding of #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY
> DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF LAW ...
>
> Where there is a reliance upon the concrete establishment of a #231 -
> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. as we have already elsewhere noted #419 -
> SLAUGHTER / #728 - REACTANCE EVENTS and VALUE STATEMENTS} which is an
> artefact of either ISLAM, HINDUISM and ROMAN CATHOLICISM.
>
> HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
> POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
> MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
> TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
> SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]
>
> 'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
> walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
> compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
> one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
> of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
> have so many qualities that make us like them.
>
> Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
> *STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
> ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]
>
> “THE ACUSMATA INDICATE THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN WAY OF LIFE EMBODIED A
> STRICT REGIMEN NOT JUST REGARDING RELIGIOUS RITUAL AND DIET BUT ALSO IN
> ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE. SOME OF THE RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO BE
> LARGELY ARBITRARY TABOOS, E.G., “ONE MUST PUT THE RIGHT SHOE ON FIRST”
> OR “ONE MUST NOT TRAVEL THE PUBLIC ROADS” (IAMBLICHUS, VP 83, PROBABLY
> FROM ARISTOTLE).
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> [#8 , #16, #24, #32, #40 <— *HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK* IDEA @120 ON 24TH
> JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM), #48, #56, #64, #72]
>
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);
>
> ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME ASPECTS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN LIFE INVOLVED A MORAL
> DISCIPLINE THAT WAS GREATLY ADMIRED, EVEN BY OUTSIDERS. PYTHAGOREAN
> SILENCE IS AN IMPORTANT EXAMPLE. ISOCRATES REPORTS THAT EVEN IN THE
> FOURTH CENTURY PEOPLE “MARVEL MORE AT THE SILENCE OF THOSE WHO PROFESS
> TO BE HIS PUPILS THAN AT THOSE WHO HAVE THE GREATEST REPUTATION FOR
> SPEAKING” (Busiris 28).
>
> THE ABILITY TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SEEN AS IMPORTANT TRAINING IN
> SELF-CONTROL, AND THE LATER TRADITION REPORTS THAT THOSE WHO WANTED TO
> BECOME PYTHAGOREANS HAD TO OBSERVE A FIVE-YEAR SILENCE (Iamblichus, VP
> 72).” [<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pythagoras/>]
>
> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 - *BEFORE* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*)
> SECTION #31 - MILITARY STRATAGEM, QUELLING WAR; I-CHING: H32 -
> PERSEVERANCE, ENDURANCE, DURATION, CONSTANCY; TETRA: 51 - CONSTANCY ON
> IDEA @314:
>
> And so for once one has something determinate, and to which one can
> adhere in all metaphysical undertakings, which have up to now boldly
> enough, but always blindly, run over everything without distinction. It
> never occurred to dogmatic thinkers that the goal of their efforts might
> have been set up so close, nor even to those who, *OBSTINATE* *IN*
> *THEIR* *SO*-*CALLED* *SOUND* *COMMON* *SENSE*, *WENT* *FORTH* *TO*
> *INSIGHTS* *WITH* *CONCEPTS* *AND* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *THE* *PURE*
> *UNDERSTANDING* *THAT* *WERE* *INDEED* *LEGITIMATE* *AND* *NATURAL*,
> *BUT* *WERE* *INTENDED* *FOR* *USE* *MERELY* *IN* *EXPERIENCE*, and for
> which they neither recognized nor could recognize any determinate
> boundaries, because they neither had reflected on nor were able to
> reflect on the nature and even [IDEA: @314] the possibility of such a
> pure understanding.
>
> Many a naturalist of pure reason (by which I mean he who trusts himself,
> without any science, to decide in matters of metaphysics) would like to
> pretend that already long ago, through the prophetic spirit of his sound
> common sense, he had not merely suspected, but had known and understood,
> that which is here presented with so much preparation, or, if he
> prefers, with such long-winded pedantic pomp: “namely that with all our
> reason we can never get beyond the field of experiences.” But since, if
> someone gradually questions him on his rational principles, he must
> indeed admit that among them there are many that he has not drawn from
> experience, which are therefore independent of it and valid a priori –
> how and on what grounds will he then hold within limits the dogmatist
> (and himself ), who makes use of these concepts and principles beyond
> all possible experience for the very reason that they are cognized
> independently of experience. And even he, this adept of sound common
> sense, is not so steadfast that, despite all of his presumed and cheaply
> gained wisdom, he will not stumble unawares out beyond the objects of
> experience into the field of chimeras. Ordinarily, he is indeed deeply
> enough entangled therein, although he cloaks his ill-founded claims
> through a popular style, since he gives everything out as mere
> probability, reasonable conjecture, or analogy. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
> HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS,
> IDEA: @314]
>
> If one has no conception of NOUMENON what occurs within #41 - ONTIC
> necessity terms is a chaotic / indiscriminate / promiscuous
> determination of media which is habitually applied to #CENTRE of being
> that has a consequence upon VOLUNTARY FREE WILL:
>
> #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
> necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
> origins),
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
> #391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
> SOCIETY
>
> OR
>
> #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#41 x #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} MINUS
#391
> - HOMOIOS FRATERNITY EQUALS
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION
> MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT' AS SCHEMA AND COVENANT OF DEATH
>
> MANDALAY_SWAY (G1242)@{
>     @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>     @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>     @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>     @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>     @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>     @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>     @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>     @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>     Male: #218; Feme: #98
> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>
> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
> THE MORNING
> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>
> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>
> KANT within his antimony discourse proves the antithesis, that time has
> no beginning, by showing that if time had a beginning, then there must
> have been "empty time" out of which time arose. This is incoherent (for
> Kant) for the following reason: Since, necessarily, no time elapses in
> this #451 - *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID*, then there could be no alteration,
> and therefore nothing (including time) would ever come to be: so the
> antithesis is proven. Reason makes equal claim to each proof, since they
> are both correct, so the question of the limits of time must be regarded
> as meaningless.
>
> #451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
> - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
> inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
> then allows for stages of development.
>
> THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS BIBLICAL TEXT
> RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC
> NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOIOTIC #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL
> MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
> - Engendering Nature}}
>
> #11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
> the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
> spread of Light and Industry by Government and Non-Government
> Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature.
>
> That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
> ‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
>
> #2184 % #41 = #11
>
> Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
> circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
> art within a similar manner.
>
> YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUxxgwHK8Q>
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*:
>
> THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL
> LAW}, WHICH CONTAINS THE LAW OF THAT WILL: 7 x 24 *COURSES* *OF*
> *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
> to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
> intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
>
> “AND GOD SPAKE ALL THESE WORDS, SAYING, ‘I AM THE LORD THY GOD, WHICH
> HAVE BROUGHT THEE OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
> ANGUISH}, OUT OF THE HOUSE OF BONDAGE. THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS
> BEFORE ME...” [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
>
> THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - FORMULA OF
> HUMANITY}, WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMAND TO BEHAVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
> LAW, THAT IS, THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSUMPTION UNDER THE LAW: x 49 = 6J or
> 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
> 20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
>
> “... THOU SHALT NOT BOW DOWN THYSELF TO THEM, NOR SERVE THEM: FOR I THE
> LORD THY GOD AM A JEALOUS GOD, VISITING THE INIQUITY OF THE FATHERS UPON
> THE CHILDREN UNTO THE THIRD AND FOURTH GENERATION OF THEM THAT HATE ME;
> AND SHOWING MERCY UNTO THOUSANDS OF THEM THAT LOVE ME, AND KEEP MY
> COMMANDMENTS...” [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
>
> THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY},
> WHICH CONTAINS THE VERDICT (SENTENCE), WHAT IS LAID DOWN AS RIGHT IN THE
> CASE AT HAND: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
> centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
>
> “...THOU SHALT NOT TAKE THE NAME OF THE LORD THY GOD IN VAIN; FOR THE
> LORD WILL NOT HOLD HIM GUILTLESS THAT TAKETH HIS NAME IN VAIN.’” [EXODUS
> 20:7 (KJV)]
>
> THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
> THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY {ACT TO WILL V'S WILL TO ACT}
>
> AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* BY EXPLANTATION AND
> SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES
> {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY WHICH
> WAS GIVEN WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18 NOVEMBER
> 2018, THAT:
>
> "AND AFTER FIVE DAYS ANANIAS {the #541 - CLOUD OF THE LORD} THE HIGH
> PRIEST DESCENDED WITH THE ELDERS, AND WITH A CERTAIN ORATOR NAMED
> TERTULLUS {third}, WHO INFORMED THE GOVERNOR AGAINST PAUL {small; little}.
>
> AND WHEN HE WAS CALLED FORTH, [THE LAWYER] TERTULLUS {third} BEGAN TO
> ACCUSE HIM, SAYING, SEEING THAT BY THEE WE ENJOY GREAT QUIETNESS, AND
> THAT VERY WORTHY DEEDS ARE DONE UNTO THIS NATION BY THY PROVIDENCE, WE
> ACCEPT IT ALWAYS, AND IN ALL PLACES, MOST NOBLE FELIX {happy,
> prosperous}, WITH ALL *THANKFULNESS* {
>
> #1827 as [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200] =
> eucharistia (G2169): 1) thanksgiving; 2) *HOLY* *COMMUNION*; 3}
> *EUCHARIST*; Old French eucariste (compare modern French eucharistie), <
> late Latin eucharistia, < Greek εὐχαριστία thanksgiving, hence the
> Lord's Supper, < εὐχάριστος grateful, < εὐ- [as Perseus has explained] +
> stem of χαρίζεσθαι [kharizestai] to offer willingly
>
> }. NOTWITHSTANDING, THAT I BE NOT FURTHER TEDIOUS UNTO THEE, I PRAY THEE
> THAT THOU WOULDEST HEAR US OF THY CLEMENCY A FEW WORDS.
>
> FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN A PESTILENT FELLOW, AND A MOVER OF SEDITION
> AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF THE *SECT*
> *OF* *THE* *NAZARENES*:
>
> "TO BE ACCUSED OF #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }"
>
> WHO ALSO HATH GONE ABOUT TO PROFANE {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} THE
> TEMPLE: WHOM WE TOOK, AND WOULD HAVE JUDGED ACCORDING TO OUR LAW {#364 x
> 3 = #1092 x 2 = #2184}." [Acts 24:1-6 (KJV)]
>
> ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK IDEAS @209 / @210: "From time
> immemorial the Jews have always succeeded in insinuating themselves into
> positions from which it was possible to influence public opinion; they
> hold, for example, many key positions both in the PRESS and in the
> CINEMA INDUSTRY. But they are not content to exercise a direct, open
> influence; they know that they will attain their ends more expeditiously
> if they bring their influence to bear through the so-called AGENCIES and
> by other DEVIOUS METHODS:
>
> "AND HE WROTE A LETTER AFTER THIS MANNER: CLAUDIUS {lame} LYSIAS
> {dissolving} UNTO THE MOST EXCELLENT GOVERNOR FELIX {happy, prosperous}
> SENDETH GREETING.
>
> THIS MAN WAS TAKEN OF THE JEWS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN KILLED OF THEM:
> THEN CAME I WITH AN ARMY, AND RESCUED HIM, HAVING UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS
> A ROMAN {strong; powerful: #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring
> good}.
>
> AND WHEN I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE CAUSE WHEREFORE THEY ACCUSED HIM, I
> BROUGHT HIM FORTH INTO THEIR COUNCIL: WHOM I PERCEIVED TO BE ACCUSED OF
> #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* *THEIR* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> }, BUT TO HAVE NOTHING LAID TO HIS CHARGE WORTHY OF DEATH OR OF BONDS.
>
> G2213@{
>    @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#22); Ego: 8 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 72 (#94); Ego: 57 (#72),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#174); Ego: 8 (#80),
>    @5: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 40 (#120),
>    @6: Sup: 40 (#253); Ego: 1 (#121),
>    Male: #253; Feme: #121
> } // #364
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #364 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
> I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
> young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; *I* *PUT* *NO* *CHECK* *UPON* *THE*
> *WATER* *IN* *ITS* *FLOW*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
>     #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
>     #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
>     #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
>     #CANON: #184
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
>    @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
>    @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
>    @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
>    @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>    Male: #136; Feme: #184
> } // #184
>
> AND WHEN IT WAS TOLD ME HOW THAT THE JEWS LAID WAIT {#TOOLS: With
> Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil} FOR THE MAN, I SENT STRAIGHTWAY TO
> THEE {#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends}, AND GAVE
> COMMANDMENT TO HIS ACCUSERS ALSO TO SAY {#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no.
> #56), few allies} BEFORE THEE WHAT THEY HAD AGAINST HIM. FAREWELL.
>
> G3551@{
>    @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>    @2: Sup: 39 (#89); Ego: 70 (#120),
>    @3: Sup: 79 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
> Ego: 40 (#160),
>    @4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 70 (#230),
>    @5: Sup: 25 (#261); Ego: 38 (#268),
>    Male: #261; Feme: #268
> } // #430
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
> Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
> 50 - Vastness/Wasting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
> Pa-Amsu, *I* *AM* *NOT* *UNCHASTE* *WITH* *ANY* *ONE*.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
>     #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
>     #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
>     #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
>     #CANON: #171
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
>    @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>    @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>    @3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
>    @4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
> {%20}),
>    Male: #137; Feme: #171
> } // #171
>
> THEN THE #65 - SOLDIERS, AS IT WAS COMMANDED THEM, TOOK PAUL {small;
> little}, AND BROUGHT {#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans} HIM
> BY NIGHT TO ANTIPATRIS {for, or against the father}.
>
> ON THE MORROW THEY LEFT THE HORSEMEN TO GO WITH HIM, AND RETURNED TO THE
> CASTLE: WHO, WHEN THEY CAME TO CAESAREA {#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no.
> #60), much wealth}, AND DELIVERED THE EPISTLE TO THE GOVERNOR, PRESENTED
> PAUL {small; little} ALSO BEFORE HIM.
>
> NOTE: Herod seized an opportunity to control world trade by building a
> seaport on Israel's coast, where the sea routes and the predominant land
> route intersected. Caesarea was a glorious city, covered with marble,
> and symbolizing the *VAST* *WEALTH* that Herod accumulated by dominating
> world trade. [<https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/caesarea>]
>
> AND WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAD READ THE LETTER, HE ASKED {#POSITION: With
> Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions} OF WHAT PROVINCE HE WAS. AND
> WHEN HE UNDERSTOOD THAT HE WAS OF CILICIA {which rolls or overturns}; I
> WILL HEAR THEE, SAID HE, WHEN THINE ACCUSERS ARE ALSO COME. AND HE
> COMMANDED HIM TO BE KEPT {#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation}
> IN HEROD’S {son of a hero} JUDGMENT HALL." [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]
>
> NOTE: One can readily conclude from the encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35] that the
> JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD
> SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this EPISTEMOLOGICAL
> premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER
> as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]
> HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 day
> view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE* PERSPECTIVE
> of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the new moon /
> midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
> articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
> perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: "I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO
> THE GREEKS, AND TO THE BARBARIANS {ie. THE CHINESE DAOIST}; BOTH TO THE
> WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM READY TO PREACH
> THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME ALSO." [Romans 1:14-15 (KJV)]
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/tetrayear.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to
> EIGHT major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days
> of NATURAL YEAR / 325.25 days)
>
> These were then mapped to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months
> (for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing,
> The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} /
> H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are
> LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is
> PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO
> CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
> Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*
>
>     #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>     #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>     #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>     #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>     #CANON: #161
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>    @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>    @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>    Male: #169; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
> move back and forth around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier
> approaches to symmetry within the cyclic structure by substituting the
> WINTER SOLSTICE as the #CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated
> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS.
> [THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan
> 1993, page 15-16]
>
> "AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT AFTER THREE DAYS PAUL {small; little} CALLED
> THE CHIEF OF THE JEWS TOGETHER: AND WHEN THEY WERE COME TOGETHER, HE
> SAID UNTO THEM, MEN AND BRETHREN, THOUGH I HAVE COMMITTED NOTHING
> AGAINST THE PEOPLE, OR CUSTOMS OF OUR FATHERS {ie. *FORTY* *YEARS*
> {49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J as 50x49 = 2450 x 364 days of years = 891800 / 294
> * 293 = 888766.66667 / 365.24232 = 2433.36168 AM or 1567 BCE} *TO*
> *COME* (*LITERALLY* “*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS*
> *OF* *THE* *LORD* [Book of Jubilees 50:4-6]}, YET WAS I DELIVERED
> PRISONER FROM JERUSALEM {vision of peace} INTO THE HANDS OF THE ROMANS
> {strong; powerful}.
>
> WHO, WHEN THEY HAD EXAMINED ME, WOULD HAVE LET ME GO, BECAUSE THERE WAS
> NO CAUSE OF DEATH IN ME {ie. encapsulation of these specific
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171 meta-descriptor prototypes and
> their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING expressed
> within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts 23:25-35]}. BUT WHEN
> THE JEWS SPAKE AGAINST IT, I WAS CONSTRAINED TO APPEAL UNTO CAESAR; NOT
> THAT I HAD OUGHT TO ACCUSE MY NATION OF.
>
> FOR THIS CAUSE THEREFORE HAVE I CALLED FOR YOU, TO SEE YOU, AND TO SPEAK
> WITH YOU: BECAUSE THAT FOR THE HOPE OF ISRAEL {who prevails with God} I
> AM BOUND WITH THIS CHAIN {ie.
>
> #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27
> TO 31 JANUARY / #65 CE / *LOCUS* *OF* *AUSTRALIA* *DAY* 26 JANUARY
> WITHIN THE #72 - PROTOTYPE)  against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33
> Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)
>
> }.  AND THEY SAID UNTO HIM, WE NEITHER RECEIVED LETTERS OUT OF JUDAEA
> {the praise of the Lord; confession} CONCERNING THEE, NEITHER ANY OF THE
> BRETHREN THAT CAME SHOWED OR SPAKE ANY HARM OF THEE.  BUT WE DESIRE TO
> HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING THIS SECT {ie. JEWISH
> / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES as SECT OF NAZARENES / #509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL
> COMMUNITY}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST." [Acts
> 28:17-22 (KJV)]
>
> The most dangerous weapon is the Jewish advertising agency, for, by
> cutting off advertising revenue, they can reduce even the greatest
> newspapers [NOTE: THE AGE NEWSPAPER FIRST EDITION APPEARED ON 17 OCTOBER
> 1854 AND HAS THE MASTHEAD: *DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*] to the verge of
> ruin. ...
>
> — CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
>  [Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
> 15 December 2017]
>
> “OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
> TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
> YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
> SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.
>
> DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
> WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
> CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
> UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.
>
> YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
> AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
> TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
> PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”
>
> <http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>
>
>
> *MISHPOCHA* (noun):
> - Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
> marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
> - Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TheAgeMasthead.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The Masthead '*DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*' conveys a CATEGORICAL
> IMPERATIVE @1 - SOVEREIGN / @2 - JUSTICE / @3 - SOLDIER'S BATTLECRY / @4
> - WILL TO BELIEF AND REMEMBRANCE WITHOUT COERCION FROM GREGORIAN
> CALENDAR PAPAL BULL OF 1582 BUT ADOPTED BY THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS
> CALENDAR ACT OF 1751 WHICH DROPPED 3 TO #41 - 13 SEPTEMBER 1752 FROM THE
> CALENDAR]
>
> In this way we have forced the British to admit their loss [within a
> Reuter telegram which had just announced the loss of a British cruiser
> of ten thousand tons, H.M.S. 'Edinburgh' that had been hit by a GERMAN
> submarine torpedo].  There are two lessons to be learned from this episode:
>
> 1. Germany is scrupulous about the truth. But she must not be too
> pedantic where truth is concerned. I am frequently receiving reports
> from the front to the effect that the troops, reading the cautious and
> carefully weighed phrases of the official communiqué, often feel that
> the full extent of their efforts has not been appreciated at Headquarters.
>
> 2. Once one is convinced of a fact—be it of a political or a military
> nature—one must proclaim it throughout the world. This is the only way
> in which such consummate hypocrites as the British can be made to
> confess the truth." [SYNCRETISM WITH ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEAS
> @209; @210 / PAGES #463; #466 - TRUTH IN WEHRMACHT COMMUNIQUÉS]
>
> "AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE *BLIND*, A LIGHT
> OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
> OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
> *TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.
>
> HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) had raised objections to the
> notions of equality and congruence (among others) in geometry, which
> objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53),
> thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also
> *INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS
> OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
> CONTRADICTION:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON
> NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> 51 25 74
> 73 50 27
> 26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
> NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
> *KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
> [+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}
>
> 49   9 65 - *SOLDIER*
> 57 41 25
> 17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
> is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
>
> #YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
> AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
> #MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
> #ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
>
> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
> - regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
> - assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
> - viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
> values.
>
> ORIGIN:
> The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
> Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
> -centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
> derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
> circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
> English centre.
>
> THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
> *FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
> INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF?  THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
> SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
> #75 - *FAILURE*}.
>
> THOU THAT SAYEST A MAN SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, DOST THOU COMMIT
> ADULTERY? THOU THAT ABHORREST IDOLS, DOST THOU COMMIT SACRILEGE? THOU
> THAT MAKEST THY BOAST OF THE LAW, THROUGH BREAKING THE LAW DISHONOUREST
> THOU GOD?
>
> *FOR* *THE* *NAME* *OF* *GOD* *IS* *BLASPHEMED* *AMONG* *THE* *GENTILES*
> *THROUGH* *YOU*, *AS* *IT* *IS* *WRITTEN*." [Romans 2:19-24 (KJV)]
>
> THUSLY BEFORE WE PROPERLY BEGIN THESE OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
> WITHIN THE MATTER OF COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NO: AP-18-0609 WE WISH
> TO RAISE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PREJUDICED CHARACTER OF THE COUNTY COURT
> #646 / #86 = *JUDGE* upon the occasion of the 12 JUNE 2018 FILE LISTING
> HEARING, whom after granting me leave from the COURT within this MATTER
> and before the video link being terminated was heard to #404 - *UTTER*
> the #372 - *CONTEMPTUOUS* #404 - *STATEMENT*:
>
> “*I* *AM* *SURE* *DONALD* *TRUMP* *WILL* *BE* *INTERESTED* *IN*
> *READING* *THE* *REPORT*. *HARRUMPH*!”
>
> NOT ONLY DOES SUCH REMARK CONVEY AN ABJECT DISRESPECT FOR FAIR AND
> EQUITABLE JUDICIAL PROCESS BUT HINTS AT AN UNATTAINABILITY OF JUSTICE BY
> CONCOMITANT ALIGNMENT WITH INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVES SUCH AS ROMAN
> CATHOLICISM (ATTENDANCE AT CHURCH SERVICES ON COMMENCEMENT OF THE
> JUDICIAL YEAR FOR EXAMPLE) / FREEMASONRY WHICH OUGHT TO BE DEBARRED BY
> CONFLICT OF CONSCIENCE / INTEREST AS IN REGARD FOR AN INTEGRITY AS
> SOMETHING OTHER THAN DUTCH JUSTICE BY MERE SHOW TRIALS (WHETHER:
> ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE OR ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL OF
> MELBOURNE) IN DETERMINING ANY OF MY LEGAL MATTERS.
>
> THAT IF THE ARISTOTELIAN DICTUM: “GIVE ME A CHILD UNTIL HE IS 7 {ie.
> #364 X 7 % #41 = #6} AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN”
>
> Is indeed held to be a truism, then the #41 - ONTIC consideration on how
> the sapient function of the intrinsic #492 - VOLUNTARY WILL is shaped
> from #451 - INCEPTION as to whether it is either by an implicit
> determinism as COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] which
> functions as an organic compulsion by it’s mind encapsulation, whether
> this is adversely affected by any dogmatic incommensurate derangement as
> dichotomy of a bipolar impetus from the material opportunistic world or
> entirely by a disposition of any explicit culpability as MENS REA
> exhibited by the ARCHBISHOP PHILIP WILSON OF ADELAIDE and why then is
> the ORDINANCE OF #451 - JUSTICE {
>
> #451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
> as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
> act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
> *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case,
> cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment);
> 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice,
> right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) ordinance; 1d) decision
> (in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f) proper, fitting,
> measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;
>
> } SO PREDICTABLY PERVERSE BY LACK OF ADHERENCE TO #9 - AUTONOMOUS
> PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN
> RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9} as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
> VIRILE} against both the PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY:
> SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 +
> #54 = #81} and PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE:
> SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18
> = #27} in regard to the SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY and since under
> SECTION III the "Governor General may constitute and APPOINT, in Our
> name and on Our behalf, all such Judges, Commissioners, Justices of the
> Peace, and other necessary officers and Ministers of Our said
> Commonwealth" in accord with the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM
> NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION
> {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) — RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY
> JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293 TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS;
> DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}.
>
> That such failings make a virtue of PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH as an
> Australian born retired Anglican bishop whom served as the 23rd
> Governor-General of Australia from 2001 until 2003.
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1623 HOURS
> ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "Thank you so much, Dolf, I was getting very weary
> of your gibberish and you have done us all a favour by switching to
> gobbledigook for a change."
>
> DOLF @ 1642 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: "The problem is that we are
> describing an APRIORITY metaphysical process and a metempirical action
> which has an impress upon time itself.
>
> Since your cognitive referencing is entirely constrained by temporality
> you cannot cohere the sensibility by reconciling such with your existing
> *REALITY*."
>
> AS THAT WHICH WE HAVE CLARIFIED IN BEING A CONSIDERATION UPON HUMAN
> RATIONALITY AND #288 - META ACQUIESCENCE BY UMBRAL ILLUSION {#364 x 4 +
> #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 as #1092 x 2 = #2184} BEING ONLY
> REASONABLE #364 - *QUESTIONS* {
>
> #364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): {UMBRA: #10 as
> #364 % #41 = #36} 1) a question, debate; 1a) about the law; 2) #509 -
> YAHAD / #2184 - 'OTH CYCLE
>
> } *OF* #430 - *LAW* {
>
> #430 as [#50, #70, #40, #70, #200] = nomos (G3551): {UMBRA: #25 as #430
> % #41 = #20} 1) anything established, anything received by usage, a
> custom, a law, a command; 1a) of any law whatsoever; 1a1) *A* *LAW* *OR*
> *RULE* *PRODUCING* *A* *STATE* *APPROVED* *OF* *GOD*; 1a1a) by the
> observance of which is approved of God; 1a2) a precept or injunction;
> 1a3) *THE* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON*; 1b) of the
> Mosaic law, and referring, acc. to the context. either to the volume of
> the law or to its contents; 1c) *THE* *CHRISTIAN* *RELIGION*: *THE*
> *LAW* *DEMANDING* *FAITH*, *THE* *MORAL* *INSTRUCTION* *GIVEN* *BY*
> *CHRIST*, *ESPECIALLY* *THE* *PRECEPT* *CONCERNING* *LOVE*; 1d) the name
> of the more important part (the Pentateuch), is put for the entire
> collection of the sacred books of the Old Testament
>
> } WITHIN OUR 30 NOVEMBER 2018 INSTRUCTIONS MADE TO LEGAL COUNSEL WITHIN
> COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0775 RELATING TO CONSIDERATION:
> (#2) OF A SALE MAGISTRATES COURT MENTION HEARING DATE OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:
>
> "That there is also a particular eBAY purchase of a (#162156254584)
> conveyed by the feedback "PERFECT EBAYER, INSTANT PAYMENT & SAME DAY
> PICKUP. THANK YOU!" which is dated *WEDNESDAY* 23 NOVEMBER 2016 and made
> by SELLER MEMBER ID: GEORGE.K1 (FEEDBACK SCORE OF 79%) relating to an
> archeological curiosity as *ROSETTA* *STONE* and an oblique reference to
> such on *WEDNESDAY* 24 MAY 2017 by then FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN
> KERRY (DEMOCRAT) to a HARVARD UNIVERSITY graduation which can ONLY be
> properly understood in the context of my earlier *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*
> *ACTIVITY* ASSOCIATED TO @5: #288 - 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
> concerning which it ought to be noted that MR. GEORGE W. BUSH AS THE
> 43RD PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (REPUBLICAN), DID
> PUBLICLY MAKE THE CLAIM WITHIN THE NEWS MEDIA THAT THIS DAY: WEDNESDAY
> 19 SEPTEMBER, 2001 *WAS* *SIGNIFICANTLY* *RECOGNIZED* *AS* *THE*
> *CREATION* *DAY* *OF* *THE* *WORLD* *BY* *SOME* *RELIGIOUS*
> *COMMUNITIES* *OF* *FAITH* WHICH CONFORMS TO MY UNFALTERING INITIATIVE
> THAT HAS BEEN PURSUED EVERY DAY SINCE.
>
> EUGENE SCOTT (CNN) @ 1256 (GMT) 25 MAY 2017: "DISMAYED JOHN KERRY SAYS
> HARVARD GRADS SHOULD 'BUY ROSETTA STONE AND LEARN RUSSIAN':
>
> Former Secretary of State John Kerry used a commencement address
> Wednesday night to rip the Trump administration, telling graduates the
> US is not living in "a normal time."
>
> "Democracy relies on free speech. Yes, say anything you want, but it
> relies even more on the speech being truthful. It is the truth after all
> that sets us free," the former Democratic presidential nominee said
> Wednesday at the Harvard Kennedy School graduation. "And the truth is --
> no, this is not a normal time."
>
> "It's not normal to see a president of the United States decrying
> 'so-called judges.' It's not normal for the leader of the country that
> invented the First Amendment to routinely degrade and even threaten
> journalists," Kerry added. "And no, it's not normal to see the head of
> the FBI fired summarily because he was investigating connections between
> Russia and the presidential campaign of the very man who fired him."
>
> President Donald Trump has sought to shake off the damaging political
> blowback from continuing investigations into his campaign's relationship
> with Russia following reports that he fired former FBI Director James
> Comey because of the ongoing probe.
>
> Kerry said America's current political conversations very often sound
> like those that occur in countries the State Department warns Americans
> not to visit.
>
> "I've been asked, 'What is the secret to having a real impact on
> government?' Well, it's recently changed. I used to say, 'Either run for
> office or get a degree from the Harvard Kennedy School,'" he said. "But
> with this White House, I'd say,
>
> '*BUY* *ROSETTA* *STONE* *AND* *LEARN* *RUSSIAN*.'"
>
> <http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/25/politics/john-kerry-donald-trump-normal/index.html>
>
>
> — OO ROO TO OOHRAH —
[Written 3 July 2017]
>
> "I AM THE APPLE 🍎 OF HIS EYE 👁.
> THINKING TO DO ME OVER 🎯?
> YOU OUGHT NOT EVEN TRY.
> SEMANTIC FIELDS IN CLOVER 🍀 {ie. PADDOCK as field opposite owned by
> STEVE}.
>
> MOUTH WORDS LIKE PUSKIN.
> DING-DONG, POOH-POOH,
> BOW-WOW OR TA-TA PUTIN.
> KOO WEE NOR TO TRY WOO.
>
> *ROSETTA* *STONE* SO WRIT.
> AS PLAIN FOR ALL TO SEE.
> SAY OTHERWISE SUCH TWIT.
> THAT GOD {#226 = #70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50 = `elyown (Aramaic)
> (H5946): {#5 as #166} 1) the Most High; 1a) of God} LOVES EVEN ME."
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video) ft. will.i.am"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk48xRzuNvA>
>
> And this comment was made with respects to having provided a “SYNCRETISM
> AS CONSENSUS VALUES DOCUMENT FOR NORTH KOREAN / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> PEACE SUMMIT AND ACCORD OF 12 JUNE 2018” comprising some some #60 pages
> and dated 10-11 June 2018 and titled: "ELIJAH {GOD THE LORD, THE STRONG
> LORD} MOCKED THEM: CRY ALOUD FOR HE IS A GOD EITHER HE IS TALKING OR HE
> IS PURSUING OR HE IS IN A JOURNEY OR PERADVENTURE HE SLEEPS AND MUST BE
> AWAKENED" which we will now excerpt with additional expansions as
> inclusions:
>
> KNOCK KNOCK!
>
> WHOSE THERE?
>
> DOLF @ 1143 HOURS ON 6 DECEMBER 2018: "IS EINSTEIN'S FAMOUS 'GOD LETTER'
> EVIDENCE AS FALSE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE: MENTAL RESERVATION IN BEING
> EVASIVE ABOUT GOD?
>
> "THE WORD GOD IS FOR ME NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXPRESSION AND PRODUCT OF
> HUMAN WEAKNESS, THE BIBLE A COLLECTION OF HONORABLE, BUT STILL PURELY
> PRIMITIVE, LEGENDS WHICH ARE NEVERTHELESS PRETTY CHILDISH..." [Albert
> Einstein’s “God Letter,” dated 3 January 1954 which on 4 December 2018
> sold at a Christie's Auction for $2.9 million]
>
> Should we congratulate Einstein for holding equitable beliefs on GOD and
> the BIBLE with that of Adolf Hitler and ask if being confronted by the
> blackhole of ignorance by which oaths of GOD were then sworn to HITLER
> was it simply too much for Einstein’s sensibility as then to make
> self-justifications by antagonism against the deeds of his Jewish
> fathers: 50J when the PROSCRIPTIONS AS #41 - ONTIC x n NECESSITY
> PRINCIPLES OVER #364 - QUESTIONS ON THE #430 - LAW OF NATURE were conveyed:
>
> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
> #273 - *MOMENT*
>
> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>
> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
> ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
> #728 - REACTANCE +
> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
>
> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONVEYS: “I
> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend the
> Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me
> God.”
>
> By what means then did Albert Einstein declare his allegiance to another
> sovereign STATE?
>
> If you didn’t know about trinomial number paradigm as conveying our
> intuition upon personality of God, then Albert Einstein must contend
> with a troubling conscience over binomial number having by methodology a
> Nazi predisposition as worldview—they too made claims of science.
>
> *EUCHARISTIA* (G2169)@{
>     @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>     @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>     @3: Sup: 33 (#119); Ego: 33 (#114),
>     @4: Sup: 34 (#153); Ego: 1 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>     @5: Sup: 53 (#206); Ego: 19 (#134),
>     @6: Sup: 63 (#269); Ego: 10 (#144),
>     @7: Sup: 20 (#289); Ego: 38 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>     @8: Sup: 77 (#366); Ego: 57 (#239),
>     @9: Sup: 6 (#372); Ego: 10 (#249),
>     @10: Sup: 7 (#379); Ego: 1 (#250),
>     @11: Sup: 45 (#424); Ego: 38 (#288),
>     Male: #424; Feme: #288 <-- *UMBRA* *IMPETUS* *AS* *CHICANERIES*
> *OF* *A* *SHALLOW* *METAPHYSICS*
> }
>
> If it was made upon ‘*MENTAL* *RESERVATION* *IN* *BEING* *EVASIVE*
> *ABOUT* *GOD*’ then Einstein was a dishonourable person.
>
> KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @288: "It will forever remain a remarkable
> phenomenon in the history of philosophy that there was a time when even
> mathematicians who were at the same time philosophers began to doubt,
> not, indeed, the correctness of their geometrical propositions insofar
> as they related merely to space, [IDEA @288] but the objective validity
> and application to nature of this concept itself and all its geometrical
> determinations, since they were concerned that a line in nature might
> indeed be composed of physical points, consequently that true space in
> objects might be composed of simple parts, notwithstanding that the
> space which the geometer holds in thought can by no means be composed of
> such things. They did not realize that this space in thought itself
> makes possible physical space, i.e., the extension of matter; that this
> space is by no means a property of things in them- selves, but only a
> form of our power of sensory representation; that all objects in space
> are mere appearances, i.e., not things in themselves but representations
> of our sensory intuition; and that, since space as the geometer thinks
> it is precisely the form of sensory intuition which we find in ourselves
> a priori and which contains the ground of the possibility of all outer
> appearances (with respect to their form), these appearances must of
> necessity and with the greatest precision harmonize with the
> propositions of the geometer, which he extracts not from any fabricated
> concept, but from the subjective foundation of all outer appearances,
> namely sensibility itself. In this and no other way can the geometer be
> secured, regarding the indubitable objective *REALITY* of his
> propositions, against all the *CHICANERIES* {ie. *THE* *USE* *OF*
> *TRICKERY* *TO* *ACHIEVE* *A* *POLITICAL*, *FINANCIAL*, *OR* *LEGAL*
> *PURPOSE*} of a shallow metaphysics, however strange this way must seem
> to such a metaphysics because it does not go back to the sources of its
> concepts." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS
> IDEA: @288]
>
> HOWEVER IN CONSIDERATION OF SUCH WE WOULD PROVISIONALLY CONCLUDE THAT
> WHILST THE *ANKH* *HETEROS* / *TORAH* *PROTOTYPES* may operate as an
> intrinsic function of the HUMAN MIND IT IS CAPABLE AS A CHIMERIC IMPOST
> OF EITHER FACILITATING BY REASON OF THERAPEUTIC CAUSE OR IMPEDING ITS
> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL but that
> they do not implicitly convey the MORAL IMPERATIVE which is the
> providence of the ONTIC necessity.
>
> AND NOTE THAT ADOLF HITLER UPON 5th JUNE 1942 UTILISES THE TERMS
> '*WINTER*' AND '*CHICANERIES*' IN RELATION TO JEWISH BELIEF WHEREBY THE
> CONSIDERATION IS UPON HUMAN REASONING {
>
> #2184 - #1827 = #357 AS KANT'S IDEAS @351 TO @360 OF CONCLUSION WITHIN
> PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS ON SECTION #57 - DETERMINING THE
> BOUNDARY OF PURE REASON
>
> } AND ITS ILLUSION {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827} OF THE TRUTH {#364 x 3 =
> #1092 x 2 = #2184} AS TO WHETHER THIS IS A REFLECTION UPON IMMANUEL
> KANT'S IDEA #288 AND THE EUCHARIST AS A GEOMETRICAL PROPOSITION:
>
> 48  8 64
> 56 40 24
> 16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
> *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*}
>
> #8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
> #16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
> #24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
> #32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
> #40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
> IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
> SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
> gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
> *AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.
>
> The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
> on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
> a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
> of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
> ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
>
> ). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
> changed.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whH4utd0YRA>
>
> PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
> *BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
> *SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
> *HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
> *THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
> [HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]
>
> YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEXWRTEbj1I>
>
> #48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
> #56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
> [#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
> #19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction: *NORTH*, *EAST*, *SOUTH*, *WEST*; 1d) manner,
> habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f) of moral character
> (figurative)
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>
>
> [IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
> special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.
>
> It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
> Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]
>
> #224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
> #224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
> pleasing, acceptable
>
> #64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
> [#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
> *INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
> taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
> *WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
> acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
> *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;
>
> H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
>    @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>    @2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
>    @3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
> #288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
> *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
>
>    @4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
>    @5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
> / #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
>    @6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
>    @7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
>    Male: #311; Feme: #185
> } // #509
>
> *LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
> *CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
> *GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
> #364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
> Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;
>
> #509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
> as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
> become Judaised;
>
> "AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING’S
> COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
> AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME JEWS {#509 as
> [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054)}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE
> JEWS FELL UPON THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]
>
> "AND SAUL {demanded; lent; ditch; death}, YET BREATHING OUT THREATENINGS
> AND SLAUGHTER AGAINST THE DISCIPLES OF THE LORD, WENT UNTO THE HIGH
> PRIEST, AND DESIRED OF HIM LETTERS TO DAMASCUS {a sack full of blood;
> the similitude of burning} TO THE SYNAGOGUES, THAT IF HE FOUND ANY OF
> THIS WAY {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WHETHER THEY WERE MEN OR WOMEN, HE MIGHT BRING THEM BOUND
> UNTO JERUSALEM {vision of peace}." [Acts 9:1-2 (KJV)]
>
> “FOR WE HAVE FOUND THIS MAN [A] PESTILENT [FELLOW], AND A MOVER OF
> SEDITION AMONG ALL THE JEWS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND A RINGLEADER OF
> THE SECT OF THE NAZARENES {separated; crowned; sanctified}:” [Acts 24:5
> (KJV)]
>
> “BUT WE DESIRE TO HEAR OF THEE WHAT THOU THINKEST: FOR AS CONCERNING
> THIS SECT {ie. EITHER SECT OF YAHAD / SECT OF THE NAZARENES AND
> APOSTLES}, WE KNOW THAT EVERY WHERE IT IS SPOKEN AGAINST.” [Acts 28:22
> (KJV)]
>
> *BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
> dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
> a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
> *REPOSE*; *OATH*}
>
> BEERSHEBA {#575 as [#2, #1, #200, #300, #2, #70]}@{
>     @1: Sup: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306] {@1:
> Male: #2, Feme: #2}); Ego: 2 (#2 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO
> [#102/#306] {@1: Male: #2, Feme: #2}),
>     @2: Sup: 3 (#5 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #FIVE [#111/#333 ***] {@1:
> Male: #5, Feme: #5}); Ego: 1 (#3 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #THREE
> [#105/#315] {@1: Male: #3, Feme: #3} / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234] {@2: Feme: #2}),
>     @3: Sup: 41 (#46 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #THREE [#96/#288] {@3:
> Male: #24}); Ego: 38 (#41 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234] {@4:
> Male: #31}),
>     @4: Sup: 17 (#63); Ego: 57 (#98 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #ONE
> [#78/#234 ***] {@5: Male: #57}),
>     @5: Sup: 19 (#82 / ANKH PROTOTYPE TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***] {@3:
> Male: #42}); Ego: 2 (#100 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #TWO [#102/#306]
> {@4: Male: #56} & #FOUR [#108/#324] {@5: Feme: #36} / ANKH PROTOTYPE
> TORAH: #SIX [#123/#369] {@3: Male: #51}),
>     @6: Sup: 8 (#90 / ANKH PROTOTYPE HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] {@4:
> Male: #52} & #TWO [#102/#306] {@5: Feme: #34}); Ego: 70 (#170 / ANKH
> PROTOTYPE TORAH: #EIGHT [#141/#423] {@4: Male: #34}),
>     Male: #90; Feme: #170
> }
>
> #288 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #6, #50] / #347 as [#7, #20, #200, #50, #10,
> #20, #40] = zikrown (H2146): {UMBRA: #2 as #283 % #41 = #37} 1)
> memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #688 as [#5, #7, #20, #200, #50, #6, #400] = zikrown (H2146): {#14 as
> #688 % #41 = #32} 1) memorial, reminder, remembrance;
>
> #72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360
>
> "IT IS A GREAT PITY THAT THIS TENDENCY TOWARDS RELIGIOUS THOUGHT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: universe of proper names; 2) the name is used for
> everything which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of
> which is aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the
> name, ie. for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command,
> excellences, deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE*
> *CAUSE* *OR* *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
> *SUFFERS* *AS* *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> } CAN FIND NO BETTER OUTLET THAN THE JEWISH PETTIFOGGERY {ie. practise
> legal deception or trickery / quibble about petty points} OF THE OLD
> TESTAMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10,
> #1, #10 = paliggenesia (G3824): {#12 as #398} 1) new birth,
> reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 10) of Cicero's
> restoration to rank and fortune on his recall from exile; 100) of the
> restoration of the Jewish nation after exile; 1000) of the recovery of
> knowledge by recollection; 1a) hence renovation, regeneration, the
> production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical change of mind
> for the better. The word often used to denote the restoration of a thing
> to its pristine state, its renovation, as a renewal or restoration of
> life after death; 1b) the renovation of the earth after the *DELUGE*;
> 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after its destruction by
> fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and glorious change of all
> things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that restoration of the
> primal and perfect condition of things which existed before the fall of
> our first parents, which the Jews looked for in connection with the
> advent of the Messiah, and which Christians expected in connection with
> the visible return of Jesus from heaven.; 1e) other uses;
>
> } FOR RELIGIOUS PEOPLE WHO, IN THE SOLITUDE OF *WINTER*, CONTINUALLY
> SEEK ULTIMATE LIGHT ON THEIR RELIGIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF
> THE BIBLE, MUST EVENTUALLY BECOME SPIRITUALLY DEFORMED. THE WRETCHED
> PEOPLE STRIVE TO EXTRACT TRUTHS FROM THESE JEWISH *CHICANERIES* {
>
> — TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] —
>
> “TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
> SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
> KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
> WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.
>
> MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
> GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN’S THRONE.
> JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
> AGAINST HEAVEN’S SON FIRSTBORN.
>
> NONE DENY HOLOCAUST’S CAUSE.
> JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
> ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
> ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}.”
>
>
> 
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
>
> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>
> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>
> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
> sovereign dynamic v’s Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātis}
> Empire Governance]
>
> }, WHERE IN FACT NO TRUTHS EXIST. AS A RESULT THEY BECOME EMBEDDED IN
> SOME RUT OF THOUGHT OR OTHER {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as
> formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> } AND, UNLESS THEY POSSESS AN EXCEPTIONALLY *COMMONSENSE* *MIND*,
> *DEGENERATE* *INTO* *RELIGIOUS* *MANIACS*.
>
> IT IS DEPLORABLE THAT THE BIBLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO GERMAN,
> AND THAT THE WHOLE OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE THUS BECOME EXPOSED
> TO THE WHOLE OF THIS JEWISH MUMBO JUMBO {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #408 as #30, #8, #100, #70, #200 = leros (G3026): {#11 as
> #408} 1) *IDLE* *TALK*, *NONSENSE*;
>
> }. SO LONG AS THE WISDOM, PARTICULARLY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, REMAINED
> EXCLUSIVELY IN THE LATIN OF THE CHURCH, THERE WAS LITTLE DANGER THAT
> SENSIBLE PEOPLE WOULD BECOME THE VICTIMS OF ILLUSIONS AS THE RESULT OF
> STUDYING THE BIBLE. BUT SINCE THE BIBLE BECAME COMMON PROPERTY, A WHOLE
> HEAP OF PEOPLE HAVE FOUND OPENED TO THEM LINES OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT
> WHICH — PARTICULARLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GERMAN CHARACTERISTIC OF
> PERSISTENT AND SOMEWHAT MELANCHOLY MEDITATION — AS OFTEN AS NOT TURNED
> THEM INTO RELIGIOUS MANIACS. WHEN ONE RECOLLECTS FURTHER THAT THE
> CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS ELEVATED TO THE STATUS OF SAINTS A WHOLE NUMBER OF
> MADMEN, ONE REALISES WHY MOVEMENTS SUCH AS THAT OF THE FLAGELLANTS CAME
> INEVITABLY INTO EXISTENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES IN GERMANY.
>
> AS A SANE GERMAN, ONE IS FLABBERGASTED TO THINK THAT GERMAN HUMAN BEINGS
> COULD HAVE LET THEMSELVES BE BROUGHT TO SUCH A PASS BY JEWISH FILTH AND
> PRIESTLY TWADDLE, THAT THEY WERE LITTLE DIFFERENT FROM THE HOWLING
> DERVISH OF THE TURKS AND THE NEGROES, AT WHOM WE LAUGH SO SCORNFULLY. IT
> ANGERS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #100, #3, #8, #50 = orge (G3709): {#61 as
> #231} 1) anger, the natural disposition, temper, character; 2) movement
> or agitation of the soul, impulse, desire, any violent emotion, but
> especially anger; 3) *ANGER*, wrath, indignation; 4) anger exhibited in
> punishment, hence used for punishment itself; 4a) of punishments
> inflicted by magistrates;
>
> } ONE TO THINK THAT, WHILE IN OTHER PARTS {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #1, #8, #200, #10, #6 = 'achar (H310): {#6 as
> #231} 1) after the following part, behind (of place), hinder, afterwards
> (of time); 1a) as an adverb; 1a1) behind (of place); 1a2) afterwards (of
> time); 1b) as a preposition; 1b1) behind, after (of place); 1b2) after
> (of time); 1b3) besides; 1c) after that; 1d) as a substantive; 1d1)
> hinder part; 1e) with other prepositions; 1e1) from behind; 1e2) from
> following after;
>
> } OF THE GLOBE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40, #10, #600 = `owlam
> (H5769): {#38 as #231} 1) long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever,
> ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, old, *ANCIENT*, *WORLD*; 1a)
> ancient time, long time (of past); 1b) (of future); 1b1) for ever,
> always; 1b2) continuous existence, perpetual; 1b3) everlasting,
> indefinite or unending future, eternity;
>
> } RELIGIOUS TEACHING LIKE THAT OF *CONFUCIUS*, *BUDDHA* AND *MOHAMMED*
> OFFERS AN UNDENIABLY BROAD BASIS FOR THE RELIGIOUS-MINDED, GERMANS
> SHOULD HAVE BEEN DUPED BY A THEOLOGICAL EXPOSITION DEVOID OF ALL HONEST
> DEPTH.
>
> PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY
>
> WHEN ONE SEEKS REASONS FOR THESE *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
> *STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
> *TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE* {ie.
>
> HITLER DOES NOT CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT
> POSTULATES OF A NOUMENON:
>
> I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
> phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
> edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
> applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
> and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
> transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
> knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
> literally "that which appears").
>
> Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
> objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
> cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
> which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
> Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
> "noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
> dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
> are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
> understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
>
> *THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
> *AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
> *FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
> *SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
> *CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
> *NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
> *KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
> *AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
> *ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
> *DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
> *PSYCHOSIS*.
>
> YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d.  (9 May 2017)]"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-fZ1PQJrZc>
>
> A CHILD {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325}
> 1) recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;
>
> }, FOR EXAMPLE, WHO IN ITS VERY EARLY YEARS HAS BEEN FRIGHTENED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1)
> *TO* *FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a)
> (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
> to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE*
> *FEARFUL*, *BE* DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and
> awe, be held in awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
> (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
>
> } WITH THE THREAT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as
> #231} 1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn,
> *THREATEN*, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one
> another, talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to
> be spoken; 1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to
> flight;
>
> } OF THE BOGEY-MAN IN THE DARK, WILL FREQUENTLY RETAIN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } THROUGHOUT ALL THE YEARS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT A FEAR OF ENTERING A DARK
> ROOM, A CELLAR OR THE LIKE; AMONG WOMEN A FEAR OF THIS NATURE INCULCATED
> IN EARLY YOUTH {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } OFTEN PERSISTS FOR A LIFETIME. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE ARE DANGERS
> WHICH, NOT EVER HAVING COME TO HIS NOTICE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231}
> 1) to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act
> or treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to
> be recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard,
> observe, pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise
> (as formerly known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or
> acknowledge, acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5)
> to distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
> (Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
> (profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
> 2c2) to disguise oneself;
>
> }, A MAN {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49
> as #231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
>
> } COMPLETELY IGNORES. A CHILD LIVING IN AN AREA EXPOSED TO BOMBING AND
> TO WHOM THE DANGERS OF A BOMBARDMENT {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20
> as #231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
> *DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO*
> *ATTACK*, *SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be
> desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate
> (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to
> be laid waste; 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be
> dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;
>
> } HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLAINED, WILL REGARD AN ENEMY AIR ATTACK AS A NOISY
> FIREWORK DISPLAY, AND WILL NOT AS A RULE SHOW THE SLIGHTEST SIGN OF FEAR.
>
> THE ESSENTIAL CONCLUSION TO WHICH THESE CONSIDERATIONS LEADS ME IS THAT
> WE MUST DO EVERYTHING HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO PROTECT FOR ALL TIME {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513):
> {#34 as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
> restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) to withhold; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
>
> } ANY FURTHER SECTIONS OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE FROM THE DANGER OF MENTAL
> DEFORMITY {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #50 = eirene (G1515):
> {#57 as #231} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) *OF* *CHRISTIANITY*, *THE*
> *TRANQUIL* *STATE* *OF* *A* *SOUL* *ASSURED* *OF* *ITS* *SALVATION*
> *THROUGH* *CHRIST*, *AND* *SO* *FEARING* *NOTHING* *FROM* *GOD* *AND*
> *CONTENT* *WITH* *ITS* *EARTHLY* *LOT*, *OF* *WHATSOEVER* *SORT* *THAT*
> *IS*; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> exemption from the rage and havoc of war; 4a) the way that leads to
> peace (salvation);
>
> }, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT BE RELIGIOUS MANIA OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF
> CEREBRAL DERANGEMENT. FOR THIS REASON {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #70, #50, #70, #40, #1 = onoma (G3686): {#56 as
> #231} 1) name: univ. of proper names; 2) the name is used for everything
> which the name covers, everything the thought or feeling of which is
> aroused in the mind by mentioning, hearing, remembering, the name, i.e.
> for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command, excellences,
> deeds etc.; 3) persons reckoned up by name; 4) *THE* *CAUSE* *OR*
> *REASON* *NAMED*: *ON* *THIS* *ACCOUNT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SUFFERS* *AS*
> *A* *CHRISTIAN*, *FOR* *THIS* *REASON*;
>
> } I HAVE DIRECTED {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #5, #4, #200, #500 = derek (H1870): {#29 as
> #231} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
> journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
> (fig.); 1f) of moral character (fig.);
>
> } THAT EVERY TOWN OF ANY IMPORTANCE SHALL HAVE AN OBSERVATORY, FOR
> ASTRONOMY HAS BEEN SHOWN BY EXPERIENCE TO BE ONE OF THE BEST MEANS AT
> MAN'S DISPOSAL FOR INCREASING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE UNIVERSE {
>
> Y-M-T-A IDEA: #450 as #20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #50 = kosmos (G2889):
> {#23 as #600} 1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution,
> order, government; 2) ornament, decoration, adornment, ie. the
> arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the
> heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3; 3) the world, the universe; 4) the circle of the
> earth, the earth; 5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race;
> 6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and
> therefore hostile to the cause of Christ; 7) world affairs, the
> aggregate of things earthly; 8) any aggregate or general collection of
> particulars of any sort; 7a) the whole circle of earthly goods,
> endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc, which although hollow and
> frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to
> the cause of Christ; 8a) of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33;
> 12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19;
>
> }, AND THUS SAVING HIM FROM ANY TENDENCY TOWARDS *MENTAL* *ABERRATION*."
> [ADOLF HITLER (1941-1944) TABLE TALK ON IDEA @233 / PAGES: #513 / #514]
>
> On 6/12/18 9:38 pm, dolf wrote:
>> — THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
>> COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 December, 2018
>>
>> As difficult is the monstrous nature in bestowal of justice as penalty
>> for the incitement of sedition being incomprehensible for our western
>> culture to fathom the capacity and capability for "SOVEREIGN AND
>> AUTONOMOUS RIGHT", the "POWER TO RULE" and "DISPENSE JUSTICE" by
>> "EDICT AS A DIVINE AUTHORITY" being PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN
>> AUTHORITY.
>>
>> A JUDICIAL PREROGATIVE ALSO EXISTS WITHIN OUR LEGISLATION AS
>> CONSIDERATIONS UPON PENALTY MADE UNDER SECTION 9A - TREASON OF THE
>> CRIMES ACT 1958.
>>
>> GIVEN EQUIVALENT MATTERS OF SEDITION / TREASON AS FASHIONABLY BOER /
>> ANZAC DEFAMATION {@1, @5, #65, #175} OCCASIONING RACIAL / RELIGIOUS
>> AND SEXUAL HATRED WERE REPORTED TO POLICE UPON 19 MARCH 2017 AN ONUS
>> OF ACCOUNTABILITY IS THEN PLACED UPON OTHER PARTIES WHOSE problems are
>> going to get manifestly worse due to the “ADVICE OF OUR PRIVY COUNCIL”
>> which is made upon a SUBSTANTIAL OATH as conveying an IMPLICIT VALUE
>> within the LETTERS PATENT to the COMMONWEALTH by MANDATING a *PROBITY*
>> and *DECORUM* towards the CROWN (eg: DIGNITY ROYAL AS ANY MANNER OF
>> THING TO BE ATTEMPTED, DONE, OR SPOKEN AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S PERSON,
>> HONOUR, CROWN, OR DIGNITY ROYAL, BUT YOU WILL LET AND WITHSTAND THE
>> SAME TO THE UTTERMOST OF YOUR POWER) which goes beyond the
>> requirements to purvey imagination of the TRUTH AS PERJURED TESTIMONY
>> BY PERSONS WHOM HAVE MADE RECIPROCATED ORDERS AND THEREBY GRANTED A
>> SUI JURIS STATUS BY THE COURT WHO CANNOT THEREFORE HAVE ANY RECOURSE
>> TO A PSYCHOTIC MIND AS DEFENCE FOR THEIR UNREASONABLE #123 -
>> SENSIBILITY BY DEPRAVED CONDUCT.
>>
>> AND THEIR INDOLENT MANNER OF LIFE LIKE THAT OF KHASHOGGI WILL FAIL
>> THAT THRESHOLD OF ACCEPTABILITY AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE WILL BE REQUIRED.
>>
>> GIVEN SUCH GRAVITAS AS CONSIDERATION OF TREASON WHICH IS APPLIED TO
>> THESE MATTERS THE *REMEDY* *SOUGHT* IS AN APPLICATION OF A PREROGATIVE
>> POWER BY THE CROWN WHEREBY COMPLIANCE MUST BE ACCEDED TO THE DEATH
>> PENALTY WHICH WHILST NOT PRESCRIBED BY ANY LEGISLATION BUT IS GRANTED
>> BY LETTERS PATENT EITHER FROM THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OR THE LIEUTENANT
>> GOVERNOR GENERAL.
>>
>> That US President Donald TRUMP has been reported in news media
>> participating in dancing with sword 🗡 in hand euphoria, accordingly
>> understands the dictum: “HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD”
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Donald Trump Sword Dance in Saudi Arabia”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=runYPf4Q2g8>
>>
>> TRUMP TWITTERS: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD AND 25 YEARS WAIT
>> FOR A DEATH PENALTY IS WHY AMERICAN JUSTICE RELIES UPON A WELL
>> REGULATED MILITIA
>>
>> Such is the equivalent BILL OF RIGHTS notion relating to the
>> protection of the STATE by a well regulated MILITIA.
>>
>> THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATES: “I
>> hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
>> ABJURE ALL ALLEGIANCE AND FIDELITY TO ANY *FOREIGN* *PRINCE*,
>> *POTENTATE*, *STATE*, OR *SOVEREIGNTY*, OF WHOM OR WHICH I HAVE
>> HERETOFORE BEEN A SUBJECT OR CITIZEN; that I will support and defend
>> the Constitution and laws of the United States of America AGAINST ALL
>> ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and
>> allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United
>> States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant
>> service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the
>> law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian
>> direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation
>> freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help
>> me God.”
>>
>> Every American citizen is a potential killer for political gains—He
>> whom is without sin, cast the first stone.
>>
>> But since we knowing better and are not given to anarchist notion of
>> STATE have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>>
>> 41   1 57
>> 49 33 17
>>    9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33
>> A.D.}
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate
>> thesis, that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*]
>> NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly
>> interpreted, that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal
>> status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
>> CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER
>> THE SABBATH]) ...
>>
>>      45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
>>      68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
>>
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>>
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
>> RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
>> TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184}
>>
>> Nous: #63
>> Time: 04:10 hrs
>> Date: 2018.5.23
>> Torah: [#1, #50, #10]@{
>>     @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>     @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>>     @3: Sup: 61 (#113); Ego: 10 (#61),
>>     Male: #113; Feme: #61
>> } // #61
>>
>> Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
>> Tetra: #62 - Doubt
>> I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)
>>
>> Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
>>
>> 1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
>> 2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
>> 3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
>> 4. Souchoe
>> }
>>
>> Asa {Physician; cure}
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#337 / #474} / HETEROS {#328 / #429} / TORAH
>> {#314 / #422}
>>
>> 3.2.7.63.0@{
>>      @1: Sup: 48 (#48); Ego: 48 (#48),
>>      @2: Sup: 42 (#90); Ego: 75 (#123),
>>      @3: Sup: 24 (#114); Ego: 63 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT
>> MIND {%31}),
>>      @4: Sup: 57 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego:
>> 33 (#219),
>>      @5: Sup: 29 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 53 (#272),
>>      @6: Sup: 32 (#232); Ego: 3 (#275),
>>      @7: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 81 (#356),
>>      @8: Sup: 4 (#268); Ego: 53 (#409),
>>      @9: Sup: 69 (#337); Ego: 65 (#474),
>>      Male: #337; Feme: #474
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:2,col:7,nous:63&idea:{m,114}&idea:{f,186}&idea:{m,337}&idea:{f,474}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 63 [Date: 2018.5.23, Time:
>> 04:10 hrs, Super: #337 / #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting, Ego: #474 / #63 - Origins in
>> Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap,
>> Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]
>>
>> "AND WHEN THE DAY OF PENTECOST {IE. SUNDAY 23 MAY 33 AD AS TO "WAIT
>> FOR THE PROMISE OF THE FATHER" [ACTS 1:4 (KJV)]} WAS FULLY COME, THEY
>> WERE ALL WITH ONE ACCORD {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
>> (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}} IN ONE PLACE.
>>
>> AND SUDDENLY THERE CAME A SOUND FROM HEAVEN AS OF A RUSHING MIGHTY
>> WIND, AND IT FILLED ALL THE HOUSE WHERE THEY WERE SITTING. AND THERE
>> APPEARED UNTO THEM CLOVEN TONGUES LIKE AS OF FIRE, AND IT SAT UPON
>> EACH OF THEM. AND THEY WERE ALL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST, AND BEGAN
>> TO SPEAK WITH OTHER TONGUES, AS THE SPIRIT GAVE THEM UTTERANCE. AND
>> THERE WERE DWELLING AT JERUSALEM {VISION OF PEACE} JEWS, *DEVOUT*
>> *MEN*, *OUT* *OF* *EVERY* *NATION* *UNDER* *HEAVEN* {ie.
>>
>> AS TO CONVEY AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO COHESION / MATERIALITY OF
>> THE HUMAN COGNITION ITSELF BEING A #902 - LIVING SOUL / #902 - RULE OF
>> LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41}.
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82
>> - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
>>
>>      84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
>>      86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
>>      102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
>>      104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
>>      115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
>>
>> #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature
>> [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
>>
>>      130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
>>      139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
>>      146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
>>      148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
>>      156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
>>      157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
>> DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
>>      158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
>>      161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
>> NATURE [#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
>>
>>      166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
>>      168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
>>      169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
>>      171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
>>      173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
>>      175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
>>      177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
>>      180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
>>      181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS,
>> 35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
>>      182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
>>      184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
>>      185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
>>      186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
>>      191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
>>      192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
>>      196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
>>      197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
>>      200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
>>
>> #175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature
>> [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
>>
>>      210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
>>      215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
>>      220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
>>      228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #49 [IDEA: @336]: "Therefore the persistence of the soul can
>> be proven only during the life of a human being (which proof will
>> doubtless be granted us), but not after death (which is actually our
>> concern) – and indeed then only from the *UNIVERSAL* *GROUND* *THAT*
>> *THE* *CONCEPT* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*, insofar as it is to be considered as
>> connected necessarily with the concept of persistence, can be so
>> connected only in accordance with a principle of possible experience,
>> and hence only for the purpose of the latter. It is in fact quite
>> remarkable that metaphysicians have always slid so blithely over the
>> *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES*, without ever
>> attempting to prove it; doubtless because they found themselves
>> completely forsaken by all grounds of proof as soon as they commenced
>> with the concept of substance. Common sense, being well aware that
>> without this *ASSUMPTION* *NO* *UNIFICATION* *OF* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN*
>> *AN* *EXPERIENCE* *WOULD* *BE* *POSSIBLE*, made up for this defect
>> with a postulate; for it could never extract this principle from
>> experience itself, partly because experience cannot follow the
>> materials (substances) through all their alterations and dissolutions
>> far enough to be able to find matter always undiminished, partly
>> because the *PRINCIPLE* *CONTAINS* [#41 - *ONTIC*] *NECESSITY*,
>> *WHICH* *IS* *ALWAYS* *THE* *SIGN* *OF* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*. But the
>> metaphysicians applied this principle confidently to the concept of
>> the soul as a substance and inferred its necessary continuation after
>> the death of a human {ie .#99 / #297 {#ONE: CRUCIFIXION UPON  FRIDAY,
>> 3 APRIL, 33 A.D)} being (*PRINCIPALLY* *BECAUSE* *THE* *SIMPLICITY*
>> *OF* *THIS* *SUBSTANCE*, *WHICH* *HAD* *BEEN* *INFERRED* *FROM* *THE*
>> *INDIVISIBILITY* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *SAVED* *IT* *FROM*
>> *DESTRUCTION* *THROUGH* *DISSOLUTION*). Had they found the true source
>> of this principle, which however would have required far deeper
>> investigations than they ever wanted to start, then they would have
>> seen: that this *LAW* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCES* *IS*
>> *GRANTED* *ONLY* *FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* and therefore
>> can hold good only for things insofar as they are to be cognized in
>> experience and connected with other things, but never for things
>> irrespective of all possible experience, hence not for the soul after
>> death.
>>
>> That our outer perceptions not only do correspond to something real
>> outside us, but must so correspond, also can never be proven as a
>> connection of things in themselves, but can well be proven for the
>> purpose of experience. This is as much as to say: it can very well be
>> proven that there is something outside us of an empirical kind, and
>> hence as appearance in space; for we are not concerned with other
>> objects than those that belong to a possible experience, just because
>> such objects cannot be given to us in any experience and therefore are
>> nothing for us. Outside me empirically is that which is intuited in
>> space; and because this space, together with all the appearances it
>> contains, belongs to those *REPRESENTATIONS* *WHOSE* *CONNECTION*
>> *ACCORDING* *TO* *LAWS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *PROVES* *THEIR* *OBJECTIVE*
>> *TRUTH* {
>>
>> G2309@{
>>     @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>>     @2: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 5 (#14),
>>     @3: Sup: 44 (#67); Ego: 30 (#44),
>>     @4: Sup: 33 (#100); Ego: 70 (#114),
>>     @5: Sup: 2 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 50 (#164),
>>     @6: Sup: 59 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 57 (#221),
>>     @7: Sup: 69 (#230); Ego: 10 (#231),
>>     Male: #230; Feme: #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #844 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
>> Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
>> Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in
>> Annu; *I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF*
>> *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>      #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>      #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>      #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>      #CANON: #181
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>     @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>     @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>     @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>     @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
>> WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>     Male: #98; Feme: #181
>> } // #181
>>
>> #474 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #50, #300, #10] = thelo (G2309): {UMBRA:
>> #11 as #844 % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*;
>> 1a) to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish;
>> 1c) to love; 1c1) to like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take
>> delight in, have pleasure;
>>
>> }, just as the connection of the appearances of the inner sense proves
>> the reality of my soul (as an object of inner sense), it follows that
>> I am, by means of outer appearances, just as conscious of the reality
>> of bodies as outer appearances in space, as I am, by means of inner
>> experience, conscious of the existence of my soul in time – which soul
>> I cognize only as an object of inner sense through the appearances
>> constituting an inner state, and whose being as it is in itself, which
>> underlies these appearances, is unknown to me. Cartesian idealism
>> therefore distinguishes only outer experience from dream, and
>> lawfulness as a criterion of the truth of the former from the disorder
>> and false illusion of the latter. In both cases [IDEA: @337] it
>> presupposes space and time as conditions for the existence of objects
>> and merely asks whether the objects of the outer senses are actually
>> to be found in the space in which we put them while awake, in the way
>> that the object of inner sense, the soul, actually is in time, that
>> is, whether experience carries with itself sure criteria to
>> distinguish it from imagination.
>>
>> Here the doubt can be easily removed, and we always remove it in
>> ordinary life by investigating the connection of appearances in both
>> space and time according to universal laws of experience, and if the
>> representation of outer things consistently agrees therewith, we
>> cannot doubt that those things should not constitute truthful
>> experience. Because appearances are considered as appearances only in
>> accordance with their connection within experience, material idealism
>> can therefore be very easily removed; and it is just as secure an
>> experience that bodies exist outside us (in space) as that I myself
>> exist in accordance with the representation of inner sense (in time) –
>> for the concept: outside us, signifies only existence in space. Since,
>> however, the I in the proposition I am does not signify merely the
>> *OBJECT* *OF* *INNER* *INTUITION* (*IN* *TIME*) *BUT* *ALSO* *THE*
>> *SUBJECT* *OF* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, just as body does not signifiy merely
>> outer intuition (in space) but also the thing in itself that underlies
>> this appearance, accordingly the question of whether bodies (as
>> appearances of outer sense) exist outside my thought as bodies in
>> nature can without hesitation be answered negatively; but here matters
>> do not stand otherwise for the question of whether I myself as an
>> appearance of inner sense (the soul according to empirical psychology)
>> exist in time outside my power of representation, for this question
>> must also be answered negatively.
>>
>> In this way everything is, when reduced to its true signification,
>> conclusive and certain. Formal idealism (elsewhere called
>> transcendental idealism by me) actually destroys material or Cartesian
>> idealism. For if space is nothing but a form of my sensibility, then
>> it is, as a representation in me, just as real as I am myself, and the
>> only question remaining concerns the empirical truth of the
>> appearances in this space. If this is not the case, but rather space
>> and the *APPEARANCES* *IN* *IT* *ARE* *SOMETHING* *EXISTING* *OUTSIDE*
>> *US*, *THEN* *ALL* *THE* *CRITERIA* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *CAN* *NEVER*,
>> *OUTSIDE* *OUR* *PERCEPTION*, *PROVE* *THE* *REALITY* *OF* *THESE*
>> *OBJECTS* *OUTSIDE* *US*.
>>
>> "NOW WHEN THIS WAS NOISED ABROAD, THE MULTITUDE CAME TOGETHER, AND
>> *WERE* *CONFOUNDED*, *BECAUSE* *THAT* *EVERY* *MAN* *HEARD* *THEM*
>> *SPEAK* *IN* *HIS* *OWN* *LANGUAGE*.
>>
>> G1097@{
>>     @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
>>     @2: Sup: 53 (#56); Ego: 50 (#53),
>>     @3: Sup: 42 (#98); Ego: 70 (#123),
>>     @4: Sup: 11 (#109); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>>     @5: Sup: 68 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 57 (#230),
>>     @6: Sup: 69 (#246); Ego: 1 (#231),
>>     Male: #246; Feme: #231
>> } // #474
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #1883 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
>> makest thine appearance at Sais; *I* *CURSE* *NOT* *A* *GOD*.
>>
>>      #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
>>      #TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
>>      #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even
>> distant relatives.
>>      #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and
>> blood.
>>      #CANON: #220
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
>>     @1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
>>     @2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
>>     @3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>>     @4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
>> Ego: 70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
>>     Male: #200; Feme: #220
>> } // #220
>>
>> #474 as [#3, #50, #70, #50, #300, #1] = ginosko (G1097): {UMBRA: #9 as
>> #1883 % #41 = #38} 1) to learn to know, come to know, get a knowledge
>> of perceive, feel; 2) to know, understand, perceive, have knowledge
>> of; 3) Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman;
>> 4) to become acquainted with, to know; 1a) to become known; 2a) to
>> understand; 2b) to know;
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED AND MARVELLED, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER, BEHOLD,
>> ARE NOT ALL THESE WHICH SPEAK GALILAEANS {WHEEL; REVOLUTION: #492 -
>> VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41)}? AND HOW
>> HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN?
>>
>> Parthians, and Medes {MEASURE; HABIT; COVERING}, and Elamites {A YOUNG
>> MAN; A VIRGIN; A SECRET}, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia {BETWEEN TWO
>> RIVERS}, and in Judaea {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION}, and
>> Cappadocia {A SPHERE, BUCKLE, OR HAND}, in Pontus {THE SEA}, and Asia
>> {MUDDY; BOGGY}, Phrygia {DRY; BARREN}, and Pamphylia {A NATION MADE UP
>> OF EVERY TRIBE}, in Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}, and
>> in the parts of Libya {THE HEART OF THE SEA; FAT} about Cyrene {A
>> WALL; COLDNESS; THE FLOOR}, and strangers of Rome {STRENGTH; POWER},
>> Jews and proselytes, Cretes {CARNAL; FLESHLY} and Arabians {EVENING;
>> DESERT; RAVENS}, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful
>> works of God.
>>
>> AND THEY WERE ALL AMAZED, AND WERE IN DOUBT, SAYING ONE TO ANOTHER,
>> WHAT MEANETH THIS?  OTHERS MOCKING SAID, THESE MEN ARE FULL OF NEW
>> WINE." [Acts 2:1-13 (KJV)]
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature.
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS AS
>> SECTION #50 - COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS (CRITIQUE, PP. 405 FF.) [IDEA: @338]:
>>
>> "This *PRODUCT* *OF* *PURE* *REASON* *IN* *ITS* *TRANSCENDENT* *USE*
>> *IS* *ITS* *MOST* *REMARKABLE* *PHENOMENON*, *AND* *IT* *WORKS* *THE*
>> *MOST* *STRONGLY* *OF* *ALL* *TO* *AWAKEN* *PHILOSOPHY* *FROM* *ITS*
>> *DOGMATIC* *SLUMBER*, and to prompt it toward the difficult business
>> of the critique of reason itself.
>>
>> #2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
>> #273 - *MOMENT*
>>
>> As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
>> *CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
>> *DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the PRINCIPLE OF #312 -
>> *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE AS
>> PYTHAGOREAN IMPIETY} BEING THE MISNOMERED FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN
>> CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS LITURGICAL STUPEFACTION, SEDITION AND TREASON:
>>
>> #364 - ADMITTANCE +
>> #312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN
>> CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
>> #728 - REACTANCE +
>> #390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
>> MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
>> #390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
>> PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE
>> 1:5]}
>>
>> I call this idea cosmological because it always finds its object only
>> in the sensible world and needs no other world than that whose object
>> is an object for the senses, and so, thus far, is immanent and not
>> transcendent, and therefore, up to this point, is not yet an idea; by
>> contrast, to think of the soul as a simple substance already amounts
>> to thinking of it as an object (the simple) the likes of which cannot
>> be represented at all to the senses. Notwithstanding all that, the
>> cosmological idea expands the connection of the conditioned with its
>> condition (be it mathematical or dynamic) so greatly that experience
>> can never match it, and therefore it is, with respect to this point,
>> always an idea whose object can never be adequately given in any
>> experience whatever." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
>> Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @336 to @338]
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> That AMERICAN justice for the death penalty takes 25 years is truly an
>> immoral obscenity.
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Arise, Shine, for Thy Light Has Come"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxXxER9RVKs>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfRvV_L58eY>
>>
>> On 5/12/18 11:49 am, dolf wrote:
>>> Sorry for the multiple revisions
>>>
>>>
>>> — PARIS IS BURNING: JUXTAPOSITION / CONTINUITY / COHESION / MATERIALITY
>>>
>>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 5 December, 2018
>>>
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#321 / #365} / HETEROS {#309 / #359} / TORAH
>> {#395 / #321}
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:5,nous:31&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,47}&idea:{m,321}&idea:{f,365}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>>
>> ***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 31 [Date: 2018.12.4, Super:
>> #321 / #47 - Ignorant Guides, Viewing the Distant; I-Ching: H43 -
>> Resolution, Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 30 - Bold
>> Resolution, Ego: #365 / #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War;
>> I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51
>> - Constancy]
>>
>> As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
>> very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
>> metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so
>> we need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking
>> about thinking) reality which we seek to convey (eg: something from
>> nothing or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
>> nothingness into being (ie. in theological terms the equivalence of
>> the resurrection from the #260 - DEAD}.
>>
>> Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24
>> UN Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
>> travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "The Terminator" so
>> he could stop fossil fuels from being used.
>>
>> "If we would've never started in that direction and used other
>> technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
>> governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.
>>
>> And since we have the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines all
>> instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
>> cognitive conception of reality together with the #41 - ONTIC
>> necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism
>> is assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by
>> which to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to
>> fecund action:
>>
>> 1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900}
>> 3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54
>> - MARRYING MAIDEN}
>> 4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
>> NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
>> MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED)}
>>
>> At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
>> provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than
>> only focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely
>> fixated pontificated tokenism.
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>
>>
>> And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
>> NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
>> associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
>> was not impugned by either Mr MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech
>> nor my INTERVENTION ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content
>> before he actually made it--THAT IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.
>>
>> SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>
>>
>> Where I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
>> IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS that was
>> published in 1785 and by such action you may observe, I am
>> spontaneously capable of writing a POEM which is then redacted to a
>> GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary
>> works of 1781 to 1787 for comparative cognition and authentication by
>> such narrative.
>>
>> So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
>> circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
>> Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
>> is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
>> speaking to the NATION from 1785 as being prior to the French
>> Revolution of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal
>> made against the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps
>> having only an hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and
>> no longer possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.
>>
>> Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
>> whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
>> alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
>> as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?
>>
>> Such a technological innovation in our prudent opinion will in being a
>> progressive development associated to "META-SCHEMA ACQUIESCE AS A
>> PROCESS OF DETERMINISTIC PROBABILITY FUNCTION" by intrinsically having
>> COHESION with the PERENNIALIST historical ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE
>> AND HUMAN RELATIONS IS SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF BEING AN INERT OBJECT (ie.
>> A BOOK WITHIN A LIBRARY) AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and thereby
>> ABSENT OF ANY SECTARIAN IMPOST AS CAUSE FOR IMPEDING THE HUMAN
>> COGNITIVE PROCESS AND SUBJUGATING EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY WILL in
>> additionally conveying a MORAL IMPERATIVE by the providence of the
>> ONTIC necessity as TRINOMIAL reality which is prerequisite for the
>> facilitation of ideas by the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (vis a
>> vis: WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE).
>>
>> THE THEORETICAL ADOPTION OF SUCH A G20 RESOLUTION AS THIS PARADIGMATIC
>> TECHNOLOGY STUB:
>>
>> "THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL
>> IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 /
>> #175} IS FACILITATED"
>>
>> DIMINISHES THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THE #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL IS
>> THE IMPETUS AND GOAL FOR QUIXOTIC QUESTS OF SECTARIAN TUMULT TO BEING
>> @1 - REGULATED BY LEGISLATIVE PREROGATIVES, @2 - A MATTER OF
>> PERSPECTIVE, @3 - FORMULATION OF ENQUIRY, @4 - THE INTRINSIC
>> AUTONOMOUS PERSONA CHARACTERISTIC OR @5 - NEGOTIATION OF ACTIONABLE
>> AGREEMENT.
>>
>> #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES OF THE
>> PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
>>      @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>>      @2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159),
>>      @3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
>> *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234),
>>      @4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
>>      @5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM*
>> *WITH* #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
>> ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12
>> X #41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER
>> 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
>> AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
>>      @6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
>>      @7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
>>      @8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
>>      @9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
>>      Male: #585; Feme: #693
>> }
>>
>> KNOWLEDGE SPHERES OF INDIVIDUAL SAPIENT EXPERTISE {eg: NEWS PAPERS AND
>> OTHER SYNCRETIC MULTI-MEDIA SOURCES} MAY THEN BE ASSIMILATED AS
>> ELECTRONIC BOEKS TO PROVIDE AN ECONOMY FOR QUANTUM INFORMATION
>> PROCESSES ON ANY SUBJECT WHICH ARE CO-JOINED BY THE KERNEL AS #41 -
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> PROVIDING A MORALITY SPECTRUM.apply universally apply to OUR DEFENCE
>> OF INCURSIONS AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL within all these LEGAL MATTERS
>>
>> THUS I ENVISION THAT IT IS THE TASK OF A COMPUTER SCIENTIST /
>> KNOWLEDGE ENGINEER TO DEVISE A PROBABILITY METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE
>> FROM THE #5 / #7 AS ACT / TEMPORAL COHESION WHERE WITHIN THE SPECTRUM
>> THAT IT HAS A PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING as an issue of PAIRING
>> {DODECAHEDRON: ACT OF NATURE TWINING} which occurs with the ANTHROPIC
>> PROTOTYPE {ICOSAHEDRON: ENGENDERING NATURE TWINING} by validating
>> meta-descriptor prototypes as that which is conjoined within the
>> TEMPORAL LIMIT {TETRACTYS: INSTANTIATION}.
>>
>>> Resistance is futile as you will be assimilated...
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>> Initial Post: 5 December 2018
>>
>>
>
>


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-12-07 20:03:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
THE SUGGESTED NEW TITLE FOR IMMANUEL KANT'S EXEMPLAR SEMINAL
INTELLECTUAL WORK GIVEN ITS HISTORICAL CRITIQUE IS:

"PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS THAT WILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT
ITSELF AS A SCIENCE" FOR FACILITATING #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE WILL / #390
- SOVEREIGNTY DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902 - RULE OF
LAW BY SUSTAINABILITY OF THE IDEA @329 APPLICABLE TO #390 - BRITISH
CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY 1751) /
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776)}

As we begin our INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL we must first sketch a
very difficult metempirical methodology {@1 / @5, #65 / #175} or
metaphysical dynamic existential virtualisation process and to do so we
need a provisional hypothesis of the conceptional (ie. thinking about
thinking) *REALITY* which we seek to convey (eg: something from nothing
or somewhere to someplace etc) as being akin to traversal from
nothingness into being and with in theological terms the equivalence of
the resurrection from the #260 - *THE* *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *MERCILESS*
*MACHINATIONS* *AS* *ONLY* *A* *COVENANT* *OF* *DEATH* {

#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc

} by the prudent exercise of PURE REASON WHICH IN ITS TRANSCENDENT USE
OF A #237 - DETERMINED FORCEFUL WILL HAS ITS MOST REMARKABLE PHENOMENON,
ENABLING IT TO WORK THE MOST STRONGLY OF ALL TO AWAKEN PHILOSOPHY FROM
ITS DOGMATIC SLUMBER {ie.

AS THE IDEA: @B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL* BEING A *METHOD*
AGAINST THE DEPRAVITY BY THE PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x
4 + #371 = #1827 - #FIVE YEARS OF SILENCE} BY THE MISNOMERED
FOUNDATIONAL BASIS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC BLASPHEMOUS PYTHAGOREAN PIETY AS
VAIN #OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 BY THE COLLEGIUM OF PONTIFFS DERIVING FROM
510 BCE PONTIFICATED AS DEIFIED IGNORANCE AND NARCISSISM:

#Aleph (1 - #1), #He (5 - #5) = #6 - ROYAL ARCH FREEMASONS

WHOM BY SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS BEING AN IMPETUS OF
SEDITION / TREASON ARE IN BREACH {#197 / #139} OF MY #371 - INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS ENTITLEMENT UNDER THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (USA)

*TO* *ENFORCE* *AN* *OBMUTESCENCE* WHICH IS THE ACT OF BECOMING MUTE OR
SILENT—USUALLY A STUBBORN, WILFUL ACT; IF YOU ARE INCLINED TO SILENCE,
YOU ARE OBMUTESCENT

}, AND TO PROMPT IT TOWARD THE DIFFICULT BUSINESS OF THE CRITIQUE OF
REASON ITSELF." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) TO ANY FUTURE
METAPHYSICS IDEA: @338]

Arnold Schwarzenegger on 4 DECEMBER 2018 during the opening of COP24 UN
Climate Change Conference 2018 in Katowice said he wishes he could
travel back in time like the cyborg he played in "THE TERMINATOR" so he
could stop fossil fuels from being used.

"If we would've never started in that direction and used other
technology, we'd be much better off," the actor and former California
governor said Monday at the start of a UN climate conference in Poland.

But since we knowing better and are not given to unreasoned anarchist
notions of STATE in having the meta-descriptor prototypes which defines
all instantiations of temporality and a faculty as capacity to convey a
cognitive conception of *REALITY* together with the #41 - ONTIC
necessity morality proscriptions by which integrity of the syncretism is
assured, to do that we need an APRIORITY categorical imperative by which
to provisionally frame our transcendent intention as impetus to fecund
action:

1) JUXTAPOSITION {@1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81}

2) CONTINUITY {@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27}

3) COHESION {@65 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 -
MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 + #6 = #9}

4) MATERIALITY {@175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR (%22 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS
NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE PROVIDES A
MORALITY SPECTRUM BY WHICH COHESION {ie. #65 / #175} IS FACILITATED) —
RATIONAL PI AS TIME DIVISIONS BY JUBILEES: #2184 x 49 = 107016 / 293
TROPICAL YEARS: 365.242321; WEEKS; DAYS: #2184: #1 + #2 + #3 = #6}

At this stage of our conceptual thinking @ 0649 hours it is only
provisional and needs to convey an immaterially sublime rather than only
focused upon symbolic intuition by contrived gesturing as merely fixated
pontificated tokenism.

YOUTUBE: “Eat The Biscuit Son (Arnott’s Shapes)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwdTyXZ89C8>

And the beginning scenario is an instance of my INTERVENTION upon 11
NOVEMBER 2018 and the AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN DANNY O'BRIEN whom is
associated to the NATIONAL PARTY whereupon his re-election opportunity
was not impugned by either the FRENCH PRESIDENT, THE HONOURABLE MR
EMMANUEL MACRON'S NATIONALISM / PATRIOTISM speech nor my INTERVENTION
ACTIONs which mapped to Mr MACRON'S SPEECH content before he actually
made it--THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH IS HARD TO EXPLAIN.

SEE FURTHER: "FRENCH CONCRETE ALLIANCE OF 12 NOVEMBER 2018"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Danny%20OBRIEN%2020181112.pdf>

Whereupon I provided some neural linguistic programming associated with
IMMANUEL KANT'S "PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS THAT WILL BE ABLE
TO PRESENT ITSELF AS A SCIENCE" FOR FACILITATING #492 - AUTONOMOUS FREE
WILL / #390 - SOVEREIGNTY DYNAMIC BY #391 - HOMOGENEOUS REGARD FOR #902
- RULE OF LAW BY SUSTAINABILITY OF THE IDEA @329 APPLICABLE TO #390 -
BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776)} ... that was published in
1783 and by such action you may observe, I am spontaneously capable of
writing a POEM which is then redacted to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET and has recourse to KANT'S literary works of 1781 to 1787 for
comparative cognition and authentication by such narrative.

So the semantical conundrum as cognitive dissonance is in the
circumstance of the recent SOYLENT GREEN anarchist riots in France and
Paris burning after #288 - REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE DAY CENTENNIAL 2018
is the confrontation to all reason and sensibility, in that if I am
speaking to the NATION from 1783 as being prior to the French Revolution
of 1789 what is then the magnitude of monstrous betrayal made against
the past and its vital exuberance by an esprit de corps having only an
hysteria entitlement, mantras of self-justification and no longer
possessing a prerequisite integrity for an authentic identity.

Have I as a foreigner (with our ANZAC troops buried in France’s soil)
whom have never so much as set a right foot within that country, let
alone walked it’s streets, upon this day got more entitlement to claim
as veracity: JE SUIS PARIS or VIVA LA FRANCE than they ever will?

— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —

“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW {#260 - RAVEN}.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.

TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.

VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”

YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aVKQZaSmY>

NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
accomplishment.

Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.

RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
of Friday:

Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.

ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.

THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.

TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
STRENGTH:

FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]

DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"

JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
"MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:

MACRON’S POPALARITY

Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"

— HOMO ERECTUS —

"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."

GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:

French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
Buenos Aires, Argentina.

A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.

In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
while the crown prince nods and smiles.

Salman is heard