Discussion:
— TRUTH TO KNOW
Add Reply
dolf
2019-09-07 21:55:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
CATHERINE CLIFFORD (CNBC) @ 0930 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2019: “RAY DALIO:
BE CAREFUL OF ‘FAST TALKERS’ AS THEY’RE TRYING TO BULLDOZE YOU:

Billionaire Ray Dalio, who founded Bridgewater Associates, the largest
hedge fund in the world with $160 billion in assets under management, is
known for his belief in “radical transparency” in communications and
decision-making.

As part of his trademark communication style, Dalio advises to beware
fast talkers.

“Fast talkers are people who articulately and assertively say things
faster than they can be assessed as a way of pushing their agenda past
other people’s examination or objections,” Dalio tweeted in August.

It’s an idea Dalio discusses in his book, “Principles: Life and Work.”

“Fast talking can be especially effective when it is used against people
worried about appearing stupid,” Dalio writes.

Don’t let yourself be manipulated by the tactic, he says.

“Recognize that it is your responsibility to make sense of things and
don’t move on until you do. If you’re feeling pressured, say something
like, ‘Sorry for being stupid, but I’m going to need to slow you down so
I can make sense of what you’re saying,’” Dalio recommends.”
[<https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/02/bridgewater-associates-ray-dalio-be-careful-of-fast-talkers.html>]

— TRUTH TO KNOW —

“A LIE IS A LIE,
N’ER FAST TELL.
TRUTH BE CRY.
I CAN COMPEL.

YOU CAN SEE.
FROM THIS SAY.
WHETHER IT BE.
AS I DO CONVEY." {@9: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#413); Ego: 15 - REACH:
TA (#363: SEE KANT’S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

@68 + @146 = #214 as [#10, #8, #30, #10, #100, #6, #700] = châlaq
(H2505): {UMBRA: #31 as #138 % #41 = #15} 1) to divide, share, plunder,
allot, apportion, assign; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to divide, apportion; 1a2) to
assign, distribute; 1a3) to assign, impart; 1a4) to share; 1a5) to
divide up, plunder; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to divide oneself; 1b2) to be
divided; 1b3) to assign, distribute; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to divide,
apportion; 1c2) to assign, distribute; 1c3) to scatter; 1d) (Pual) to be
divided; 1e) (Hiphil) to receive a portion or part; 1f) (Hithpael) to
divide among themselves; 2) to be smooth, slippery, *DECEITFUL*; 2a)
(Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be smooth; 2b2) to
*FLATTER*;

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @363: “If I consider all the
transcendental ideas, which together constitute the real problem for
natural pure reason – a problem that compels reason to forsake the mere
contemplation of nature and go beyond all possible experience, and, in
this endeavour, to bring into existence the thing called metaphysics (be
it knowledge or sophistry) – then I believe I perceive that this natural
predisposition is aimed at making our concept sufficiently free from the
fetters of experience and the limits of the mere contemplation of nature
that it at the least sees a field opening before it that contains only
objects for the *PURE* *UNDERSTANDING* *WHICH* *NO* *SENSIBILITY* *CAN*
*REACH*: not with the aim that we concern ourselves speculatively with
these objects (for we find no ground on which we can gain footing), but
rather with practical principles, which, without finding such a space
before them for their necessary expectations and hopes, could not extend
themselves to the universality that reason ineluctably requires with
respect to morals.

Here I now find that the psychological idea, however little insight I
may gain through it into the pure nature of the human soul elevated
beyond all concepts of experience, at least reveals clearly enough the
inadequacy of those concepts of experience, and thereby leads me away
from materialism, as a psychological concept unsuited to any explanation
of nature and one, moreover, constricts reason with respect to the
practical. Similarly, the cosmological ideas, through the manifest
inadequacy of all possible cognition of nature to satisfy reason in its
rightful demands, serve to deter us from naturalism, which would have it
that nature is sufficient unto itself.

Finally, since all natural necessity in the sensible world is always
conditioned, in that it always presupposes the dependence of one thing
on another, and since unconditioned necessity must be sought only in the
unity of a cause distinct from the sensible world, although the
causality of that cause, in turn, if it were merely nature, could never
make comprehensible the existence of the contingent as its consequence;
reason, therefore, by means of the theological idea, frees itself from
fatalism – from blind natural necessity both in the connection of nature
itself, without a first principle, and in the causality of this
principle itself – and leads the way to the concept of a cause through
freedom, and so to that of a highest intelligence.

The transcendental ideas therefore serve, if not to instruct us
positively, at least to negates the impudent assertions of materialism,
naturalism, and fatalism which constrict the field of reason, and *IN*
*THIS* *WAY* *THEY* *SERVE* *TO* *PROVIDE* *MORAL* *IDEAS* *WITH*
*SPACE* *OUTSIDE* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *SPECULATION*; and this would, I
should think, to some extent explain the aforementioned natural
predisposition.” [pages 113 to 114]

A PROPOSITION AS PROVISIONAL FORMULA FOR ASSAYING TRUTH:

CUSHIONING:

62 20 64
1 34 48
53 51 80

REALITY:

68 37 69
60 15 59
18 9 28

— TRUTH TO KNOW — {@1: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#62); Ego: 68 - DIMMING:
MENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})},

"A LIE IS A LIE, {@2: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#82); Ego: 37 - PURITY:
TS'UI (#105)},

N'ER FAST TELL. {@3: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#146 - I AM NOT A
LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#174)},

TRUTH BE CRY. {@4: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#194); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#233)},

I CAN COMPEL. {@5: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#274); Ego: 28 - CHANGE:
KENG (#261)},

YOU CAN SEE. {@6: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#325); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING
OUT: SHU (#270)},

FROM THIS SAY. {@7: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#378); Ego: 18 - WAITING:
HSI (#288)},

WHETHER IT BE. {@8: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#379); Ego: 60 -
ACCUMULATION: CHI (#348)},

AS I DO CONVEY {@9: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#413); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA
(#363)},

It will still need to be peer reviewed for technical proficiency but
both the ONTIC NECESSITY MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS:

@68 + @146 = #214 as [#10, #8, #30, #10, #100, #6, #700] = châlaq
(H2505): {UMBRA: #31 as #138 % #41 = #15} 2) to be smooth, slippery,
*DECEITFUL*; 2a) (Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be
smooth; 2b2) to *FLATTER*;

AND METAPHYSICAL APRIORITY are concordant.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-09-08 01:20:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Since we are involved within informal research as noumenon faculty of
metaphysics it is necessary to deploy nuances of semantical terms to
convey the process and I am here using the word *REDACT* as a neural
linguistic concept given our earlier modelling comment on @180 + @156 +
@157 = #493 - HYPOTEÍNOUSA (#1586 as [#400, #80, #70, #300, #5, #10,
#50, #70, #400, #200, #1]) {TO HYPOTHESISE BY RATIOCINATION WITHIN
MEASURED BOUNDS OF DIVISION WITHOUT AN INCOMMENSURATE BIAS}.

Where we suggested that there was in all probability a DIALECTIC process
of #73 - EXTRUSION {#492 + #41 = #533 / #41 = #13} by vocalisation
according to its nuance of metrication which is RHYTHMIC and within good
/ evil bounds of SENSIBILITIES: #15 —> #34 —> #65 —> #111 —> #175 —>
#260 —> #369 as the opine of TRUTH {% #41} or NOT BEING TRUTH {% #81} is
then capable of being ASSAYED {ie. If #72 is THE FORMA CORPIS AS
ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE COULD NOT THE SERIES: #73 to #81 BE CONSIDERED THE
JUXTAPOSITION BY WHICH CRITERIA OF PURE REASON IS MEASURED}

Thus the term *REDACT* is a #123 - SYNCRETIC process where there is
"removal of the narrative content, replacing it typically with it's
corresponding REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR nous entry" to then derive
the AUTONOMOUS prototype as GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:

For instance the dialectic sequence 'TRUTH TO KNOW' is then redacted to

MALE: #62, FEME: #68

But we note as an exceptional class that the vocalisation has occurred
according to its nuance of metrication which is RHYTHMIC and within
bounds of SENSIBILITIES:

#15 —> #34 —> {? PRINCIPLE OF COHESION}
@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE)
@18 - FORM OF NATURE
@21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE {LIABILITY}

CUSHIONING:

@6 --> #146
@21 --> #83
@18 --> #184 = #413

#146 as [#6, #10, #4, #70, #50, #6] = yâdaʻ (H3045): {UMBRA: #16 as #84
% #41 = #2} 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to know; i) to know, learn to
know; ii) to perceive; iii) to perceive and see, find out and discern;
iv) to discriminate, distinguish; v) to know by experience; vi) to
recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; vii) to consider; 1a2) to know,
be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person carnally); 1a4) to know how,
be skilful in; 1a5) to have knowledge, be wise; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
made known, be or become known, be revealed; 1b2) to make oneself known;
1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to
know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know; 1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2)
known, one known, acquaintance (participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known,
declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be made known; 1h) (Hithpael) to make oneself
known, reveal oneself;

#83 as [#8, #20, #40, #10, #5] = châkâm (H2450): {UMBRA: #38 as #68 %
#41 = #27} 1) wise, wise (man); 1a) skilful (in technical work); 1b)
wise (in administration); 1c) shrewd, crafty, cunning, wily, subtle; 1d)
learned, shrewd (class of men); 1e) prudent; 1f) wise (ethically and
religiously);

#184 as [#3, #10, #50, #70, #40, #1, #10] = gínomai (G1096): {UMBRA: #37
as #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to
be, receive being; 2) to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen; 2a) of
events; 3) to arise, appear in history, come upon the stage; 3a) of men
appearing in public; 4) to be made, finished; 4a) of miracles, to be
performed, wrought; 5) to become, be made;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{146}&idea:{83}&idea:{184}>

REALITY:

@6 --> #174
@21 --> #134
@18 --> #55 = #363

#174 as [#40, #50, #4, #70, #10] = mandaʻ (H4486): {UMBRA: #7 as #164 %
#41 = #41} 1) knowledge, power of knowing;

#134 as [#10, #8, #6, #50, #50, #10] = chăvâʼ (H2324): {UMBRA: #7 as #19
% #41 = #19} 1) to show, interpret, explain, inform, tell, declare; 1a)
(Pael) to show, interpret; 1b) (Aphel) to show;

#55 as [#6, #30, #2, #3, #4, #10] = beged (H899): {UMBRA: #11 as #9 %
#41 = #9} 1) treachery, deceit; 2) (CLBL) garment, clothing (used
indiscriminately); 3) a covering, i.e. clothing; also treachery or
pillage; apparel, cloth(-es, ing), garment, lap, rag, raiment, robe,
[idiom] very (treacherously), vesture, wardrobe;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{174}&idea:{134}&idea:{55}>

We also note within our AUTONOMOUS pairings that we have present the two
extents of the sequence #1 ... #9, so in my informal view since we have
a viable phonetic / dialetic sequence even given the conventional
linguistic aberrations: N'ER instead of NE'ER and BE CRY instead of
BECRY, this ASSAYING TRUTH prototype is worthy of further investigation...

MUSTARD WEASEL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0839 HOURS ON 8 SEPTEMBER
2019: "TRUTH TO KNOW : DOLF HAS NO IDEA WHAT "REDACT" MEANS, PROVING
EVEN 6-LETTER WORDS ARE BEYOND HIM

*Every* day you show how to redact neural linguistic concepts and
replace them with gibberish."

WE NOTE THAT YOU ARE UTILISING CARDINAL GEORGE PELL'S DEFENCE: #439 as
[#2, #3, #4, #400, #10, #500] = beged (H899): {UMBRA: #11 as #9 % #41 =
#9} 1) treachery, deceit; 2) (CLBL) garment, clothing (used
indiscriminately); 3) a covering, i.e. clothing; also treachery or
pillage; apparel, cloth(-es, ing), garment, lap, rag, raiment, robe,
[idiom] very (treacherously), vesture, wardrobe;

For want of a @180 + @156 + @157 = #493 - HYPOTEÍNOUSA (#1586 as [#400,
#80, #70, #300, #5, #10, #50, #70, #400, #200, #1]) {TO HYPOTHESISE BY
RATIOCINATION WITHIN MEASURED BOUNDS OF DIVISION WITHOUT AN
INCOMMENSURATE BIAS} model let’s consider the hypothetical postulation
that #123 - SENSIBILITY by #41 - *ONTIC* necessity might be similarly
considered within terms of #9 - LIMIT / #72 - UNLIMITED whereby there is
then a virtual process of #65 - DELIMITATION (ie. it’s 0409 hours)
within the temporality by which noumena grounding then occurs as
determinant of the relativity as DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR which is a
virtual #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL providing the intrinsic and
prerequisite GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET that is then a mechanism
for an IDEA to be circumscribed {#12 x #41 = #492} as ratiocination
before the DIALECTIC process of #73 - EXTRUSION {#492 + #41 = #533 / #41
= #13} by vocalisation according to its nuance of metrication which is
RHYTHMIC and within good / evil bounds of SENSIBILITIES: #15 —> #34 —>
#65 —> #111 —> #175 —> #260 —> #369 as the opine of TRUTH {% #41} or NOT
BEING TRUTH {% #81} is then capable of being ASSAYED {ie. If #72 is THE
FORMA CORPIS AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE COULD NOT THE SERIES: #73 to #81 BE
CONSIDERED THE JUXTAPOSITION BY WHICH CRITERIA OF PURE REASON IS MEASURED}.

HYPOTEÍNOUSA (ὑποτείνουσα)@[υ, {@1: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#76);
Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#76)},
π, {@2: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#151); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#156
- I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21})},
ο, {@3: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#226)},
τ, {@4: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#255); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
(#283: SEE KANT'S SECTION #10)},
ε, {@5: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#300); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#288: *MEMORIAL* *COMMEMORATIONS* *DUE* *TO* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* *A*
*FOREIGN* *POWER*)},
ι, {@6: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#355); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#298)},
ν, {@7: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#379); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#348: STATEMENT AND SOLUTION OF THE WHOLE *ANTINOMY* IN WHICH REASON
FINDS ITSELF ENTANGLED IN THE APPLICATION OF ITS PRINCIPLES TO THE
SENSIBLE WORLD)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#392); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#418)},
υ, {@9: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#400); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#494)},
ς, {@10: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#446); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
(#532)},
α] {@11: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#493: @180 + @156 + @157 = #493 -
HYPOTEÍNOUSA; 3 APRIL 33 AD / 3 APRIL 2019); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
(#533: 13 x #41)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{493}&idea:{533}&idea:{1586}>

HYPOTEÍNOUSA (verb):
- to hypothesise by ratiocination within measured bounds of division
without an incommensurate bias.

(noun):
- [GEOMETRY]: the side of a right triangle opposite the right angle.
- Also: hypothenuse.

ETYMOLOGY:
The word hypotenuse comes from Late Latin hypotēnūsa, a transliteration
of Ancient Greek ὑποτείνουσα [πλευρά] (hypoteínousa “sustaining”),
meaning "[side] subtending [the right angle]". The word was used for
the hypotenuse of a triangle c. 360 BCE by Plato in the Timaeus
(dialogue) 54d and by many other ancient authors.

That if the GREEK term HYPOTEÍNOUSA (ὑποτείνουσα) (sustaining) redacts
to a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET: #493 / #533 (13 x #41) it may
then be provisionally considered to be a logical formulation and
mathematical premise for assaying the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
to then determining TRUTH given that the *ONTIC* necessity premise
conveyed by such word is @156 + @215 = #371 - SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
CÉLÈBRE (#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - EUCHARIST / ROMAN CATHOLIC
ECCLESIASTICAL CALENDAR) which is not then TRUTH but *BLASPHEMY*:

G268@{
   @1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
   @2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#42); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#41),
   @3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE
{%2}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#42),
   @4: Sup: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#145); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING:
TS'UNG (#61),
   @5: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#118),
   @6: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#209); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#189),
   @7: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#266); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#219),
   @8: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#312); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#289),
   @9: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#368); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#299),
   Male: #368; Feme: #299
} // #1352

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1542 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the
Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small
Exceeding, Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 -
Defectiveness, Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.

    #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
    #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
    #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
    #CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
   @1: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#25); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG
(#25),
   @2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#34); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#90),
   @3: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#85); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
(#132),
   @4: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#108); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#185 - I AM
NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#2082 as [#1, #40, #1, #100, #300, #800, #30, #800, #10] / #1352 as [#1,
#40, #1, #100, #300, #800, #30, #70, #10] = hamartōlós (G268): {UMBRA:
#0 as #1542 % #41 = #25} 1) devoted to sin, a sinner; 1a) not free from
sin; 1b) pre-eminently sinful, especially wicked; 1b1) all wicked men;
1b2) *SPECIFICALLY* *OF* *MEN* *STAINED* *WITH* *CERTAIN* *DEFINITE*
*VICES* *OR* *CRIMES*; i) *TAX* *COLLECTORS*, heathen;
Post by dolf
Billionaire Ray Dalio, who founded Bridgewater Associates, the largest
hedge fund in the world with $160 billion in assets under management, is
known for his belief in “radical transparency” in communications and
decision-making.
As part of his trademark communication style, Dalio advises to beware
fast talkers.
“Fast talkers are people who articulately and assertively say things
faster than they can be assessed as a way of pushing their agenda past
other people’s examination or objections,” Dalio tweeted in August.
It’s an idea Dalio discusses in his book, “Principles: Life and Work.”
“Fast talking can be especially effective when it is used against people
worried about appearing stupid,” Dalio writes.
Don’t let yourself be manipulated by the tactic, he says.
“Recognize that it is your responsibility to make sense of things and
don’t move on until you do. If you’re feeling pressured, say something
like, ‘Sorry for being stupid, but I’m going to need to slow you down so
I can make sense of what you’re saying,’” Dalio recommends.”
[<https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/02/bridgewater-associates-ray-dalio-be-careful-of-fast-talkers.html>]
— TRUTH TO KNOW —
“A LIE IS A LIE,
N’ER FAST TELL.
TRUTH BE CRY.
I CAN COMPEL.
YOU CAN SEE.
FROM THIS SAY.
WHETHER IT BE.
TA (#363: SEE KANT’S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}
@68 + @146 = #214 as [#10, #8, #30, #10, #100, #6, #700] = châlaq
(H2505): {UMBRA: #31 as #138 % #41 = #15} 1) to divide, share, plunder,
allot, apportion, assign; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to divide, apportion; 1a2) to
assign, distribute; 1a3) to assign, impart; 1a4) to share; 1a5) to
divide up, plunder; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to divide oneself; 1b2) to be
divided; 1b3) to assign, distribute; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to divide,
apportion; 1c2) to assign, distribute; 1c3) to scatter; 1d) (Pual) to be
divided; 1e) (Hiphil) to receive a portion or part; 1f) (Hithpael) to
divide among themselves; 2) to be smooth, slippery, *DECEITFUL*; 2a)
(Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be smooth; 2b2) to
*FLATTER*;
transcendental ideas, which together constitute the real problem for
natural pure reason – a problem that compels reason to forsake the mere
contemplation of nature and go beyond all possible experience, and, in
this endeavour, to bring into existence the thing called metaphysics (be
it knowledge or sophistry) – then I believe I perceive that this natural
predisposition is aimed at making our concept sufficiently free from the
fetters of experience and the limits of the mere contemplation of nature
that it at the least sees a field opening before it that contains only
objects for the *PURE* *UNDERSTANDING* *WHICH* *NO* *SENSIBILITY* *CAN*
*REACH*: not with the aim that we concern ourselves speculatively with
these objects (for we find no ground on which we can gain footing), but
rather with practical principles, which, without finding such a space
before them for their necessary expectations and hopes, could not extend
themselves to the universality that reason ineluctably requires with
respect to morals.
Here I now find that the psychological idea, however little insight I
may gain through it into the pure nature of the human soul elevated
beyond all concepts of experience, at least reveals clearly enough the
inadequacy of those concepts of experience, and thereby leads me away
from materialism, as a psychological concept unsuited to any explanation
of nature and one, moreover, constricts reason with respect to the
practical. Similarly, the cosmological ideas, through the manifest
inadequacy of all possible cognition of nature to satisfy reason in its
rightful demands, serve to deter us from naturalism, which would have it
that nature is sufficient unto itself.
Finally, since all natural necessity in the sensible world is always
conditioned, in that it always presupposes the dependence of one thing
on another, and since unconditioned necessity must be sought only in the
unity of a cause distinct from the sensible world, although the
causality of that cause, in turn, if it were merely nature, could never
make comprehensible the existence of the contingent as its consequence;
reason, therefore, by means of the theological idea, frees itself from
fatalism – from blind natural necessity both in the connection of nature
itself, without a first principle, and in the causality of this
principle itself – and leads the way to the concept of a cause through
freedom, and so to that of a highest intelligence.
The transcendental ideas therefore serve, if not to instruct us
positively, at least to negates the impudent assertions of materialism,
naturalism, and fatalism which constrict the field of reason, and *IN*
*THIS* *WAY* *THEY* *SERVE* *TO* *PROVIDE* *MORAL* *IDEAS* *WITH*
*SPACE* *OUTSIDE* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *SPECULATION*; and this would, I
should think, to some extent explain the aforementioned natural
predisposition.” [pages 113 to 114]
62 20 64
1 34 48
53 51 80
68 37 69
60 15 59
18  9 28
MENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})},
TS'UI (#105)},
LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#174)},
(#233)},
KENG (#261)},
OUT: SHU (#270)},
HSI (#288)},
ACCUMULATION: CHI (#348)},
(#363)},
It will still need to be peer reviewed for technical proficiency but
@68 + @146 = #214 as [#10, #8, #30, #10, #100, #6, #700] = châlaq
(H2505): {UMBRA: #31 as #138 % #41 = #15} 2) to be smooth, slippery,
*DECEITFUL*; 2a) (Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be
smooth; 2b2) to *FLATTER*;
AND METAPHYSICAL APRIORITY are concordant.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...