Post by The Peeler
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:19:07 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by The Jews
No WONDER you have to have a Jew run prison Aryan gangs in prison! You
glue-huffing idiots are just too damn incompetent!
Prison authorities describe him as a brutal killer and a former leader
of the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang.
What kind of jew is that, jew master?
It's too funny, you nazitards wouldn't even have any leaders without the
Jews, just like you wouldn't even have any proper names without them.
"Think" of "David" Duke or "David" Irving! LMAO
No wonder the mangina and his fellow dreckvolk are so jealous of the
Here is an article of interest.
Your Tuesday Evening Brett Kavanaugh Nomination Ethics Train Wreck Report
I. Let’s give a whole car to USC.
Nearly 100 students attended a rally at noon on Monday demanding a tenured
professor be fired after he sent a reply-all email last Thursday to the
student body noting that “accusers sometimes lie.”
Professor James Moore, a tenured professor at the University of Southern
California, replied to a campus wide email fatuously demanding that students
“Believe Survivors” on the day of Christine Ford’s testimony with a
reply-all message that…
“If the day comes you are accused of some crime or tort of which you are not
guilty, and you find your peers automatically believing your accuser, I
expect you find yourself a stronger proponent of due process than you are
For a teacher, this was a responsible and important point to make. It is
also undeniable, except in dishonesty, ignorance and hysteria. So what was
the campus response? Hundreds of emails from “concerned” students and
alumni condemning the engineering professor. USC students Audrey Mechling
and Joelle Montier organized a Facebook rally against him, entitled “Times
Up for James Moore.” Nearly 100 students gathered to shout, “Times Up, No
Moore!” The crowd then paraded its bias and ignorance, and marched to the
office of Dean Jack Knott. He, of course…
...sided with the protesters...
“What [Professor Moore] sent was extremely inappropriate, hurtful,
insensitive. We are going to try to do everything we can to try to create a
better school, to educate the faculty,” said Dean Knott to the crowd. “This
is going to be a multi-pronged effort. We are going to have a faculty
meeting later this week around implicit bias, sensitivity towards [sexual
That’s academia today! At Georgetown, a professor tweets that white males
should be killed and castrated, and the administrators shrug and say she has
a right to her opinion. AT USC, a professor corrects indefensible cant that
rejects basic ethical and judicial principles, and a dean says that he must
People actually pay to send their children to be warped by these places.
II. Let’s always believe survivors who know how to beat lie detectors.
The fact that Dr. Ford had been declared “truthful” in her polygraph test
was always one of the worst reasons to believe her, but now that test throws
legitimate suspicion on her account. The machines are notoriously
unreliable, but the argument was that the fact that Ford was eager to take
the test indicated her confidence in her account. Today, Fox News received
this letter from a man who claims to be Ford’s ex-boyfriend:
Of course, it could be completely innocent that a woman who suddenly dredged
up a forgotten alleged incident just in time to use it to derail the
confirmation of a SCOTUS nominee her party opposes and submitted to a lie
detector test as evidence of her veracity considered herself an expert on
beating lie detector tests.
III. Ethics Hero meets Ethics Dunce
Seldom do we see so many people so passionately and angrily advocating a
position that is indefensible in law, logic, fact, common sense, history or
fairness. That’s the mob mentality that Democrats and the mainstream media
has created, however. They begin with the assumption that the judge must be
guilty. They state that he is a “serial rapist” though there is no evidence
of any rape. They talk as if it is normal for high school incidents to be
considered relevant to assessing the character and trustworthiness of a
public servant with an unblemished career, when in fact it is unheard-of.
Their arguments, like their logic, is disjointed, and they will change
subjects to avoid dealing with their gaping flaws.
A typical anti-Kavanaugh protester confronted Republican Senator Bill
Cassidy of Louisiana on his way through a Senate building walkway. Monday.
She demanded , “Why are you supporting Kavanaugh?” So he stopped and asked
her the Golden Rule question that the Democrats and “the resistance” have
ignored from the beginning of this disgusting example of the politics of
personal destruction. Would she want her loved one to be destroyed by
uncorroborated, unproven accusations of a horrific act? The protester either
took this as a rhetorical question, or just doesn’t understand the ethical
principle of reciprocity. I’m guessing the latter. The other key ethics
question would also presumably be beyond her, Kant’s test of whether this
would be a standard she would be willing to have applied universally, in all
cases. Democrats answer this one by saying “Of course! Unsubstantiated
accusations of decades old high school incidents should be universally
applied to and disqualify all conservative judges appointed by a President
we hate when he will shift the ideological balance of the court.”
Deciding to ask an easier question, Cassidy resorted to, “Why wouldn’t I
Protester: “Because rapists are bad.”
Never mind that nobody, even Ford, has claimed that Kavanaugh is a rapist.
This is such a spectacular straw man that it will start singing “I I only
had a brain” any minute now.
Cassidy: “Wait a second — everybody there said that it did not happen. So
why am I going to–”
Protester: “So you’re going to believe Mark Judge over a woman?”
Conveniently ignoring the other two witnesses who also deny seeing what Ford
Cassidy: “No, I’m going to believe her best friend.”
Protester: “Her best friend didn’t say it didn’t happen. Her best friend
said she wasn’t told about it.”
The issue is the lack of anyone other than Ford who says that “it” did
happen. The protester is resorting to nit-picking to avoid the issue.
Cassidy: “She said she didn’t remember.”
Protester: “So you’re OK as a doctor to harm a woman?”
Now, as the protester resorts to gibberish and deliberate misrepresentation,
the Senator tries the Golden Rule again, and Kant.
Cassidy: “Wait a second – are you OK as a person to go ahead and to accept a
non-corroborated charge to destroy someone’s life? If it destroyed your
life, your son’s life, or your husband’s? Wait a second, answer my question.
If it was your husband, your son, your father, whose life has been destroyed
by uncorroborated, would you like that?”
Protester: “I would support a full FBI investigation.”
Cassidy: “No, no. Would you like that? An uncorroborated charge,
Protester: “I wouldn’t marry somebody that was a drunk.”
Translation: “How dare you expect me to defend my position? By the way, I’m
Cassidy: “Oh no, wait a second. Uncorroborated. Answer the question. I don’t
think you’re able to. Because you know it’s unfair.”
Protester: “I would stand up.”
Cassidy: “You know it’s unfair.”
Protester: “I would fight. And I would make sure women are heard. Clearly
you’re OK if a rapist goes on the Supreme Court.”
This sounds like a Facebook exchange. When out of arguments, resort to
bumper stickers, non sequiturs, and deliberate misrepresentations.
Cassidy: “No, I’m not. But then on the other hand, clearly you’re OK, the
absence of evidence obviously means nothing to you.”
Protester: “No, there is evidence. Look at the standard. How many people are
in jail for less?”
How many? None, that’s how many, because there is, in fact, no evidence, and
nobody, ever, has been convicted on uncorroborated 35-tear old accusations.
Obviously the protester has no idea what the standard is.
This makes her a bit better than most Democrats trying to smear Kavanaugh, I
suppose. They know what the standard is, know the standard they are
establishing will be disastrous, and they are trying to establish it anyway.
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.