Discussion:
Sweden...Svenne.
(too old to reply)
harry
2018-04-08 16:02:36 UTC
Permalink
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-terror-threat-new-normal/
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Vidcapper
2018-04-09 06:17:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-terror-threat-new-normal/
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
harry
2018-04-09 07:20:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-terror-threat-new-normal/
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
Why would that be?
Vidcapper
2018-04-09 13:51:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by harry
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-terror-threat-new-normal/
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
Why would that be?
because most people don't like reading a website whose opinions make
Donald Trump seem like a Lefty! :p
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Svenne
2018-04-09 08:12:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-
terror-threat-new-normal/
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
Bad reputation or not, the Breibart article is factually correct. Below
are links from the Swedish national broadcasters SVT and SR which fully
support the veracity of the Breibart report.

It is unfortunate that people should be put off reading Breibart and
other alternative sources since reading alternative sources is the only
way of gaining a balanced understanding of events. Always keep a critical
mindset and bear in mind the the BBC and other mainstream media do have
their own perspective which compromises their objectivity and perspective
from other sources is necessary to balance this.

Anyway, the truth of the matter is that Breibart is objective, truthful
and factual in this article.

http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=6731295

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/allt-svarare-att-forutse-terrorresor
harry
2018-04-09 14:14:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by harry
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-
terror-threat-new-normal/
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
Bad reputation or not, the Breibart article is factually correct. Below
are links from the Swedish national broadcasters SVT and SR which fully
support the veracity of the Breibart report.
It is unfortunate that people should be put off reading Breibart and
other alternative sources since reading alternative sources is the only
way of gaining a balanced understanding of events. Always keep a critical
mindset and bear in mind the the BBC and other mainstream media do have
their own perspective which compromises their objectivity and perspective
from other sources is necessary to balance this.
Anyway, the truth of the matter is that Breibart is objective, truthful
and factual in this article.
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=6731295
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/allt-svarare-att-forutse-terrorresor
It usually is factual.
Stuff is easily verified these days.
Except by brain dead leftys that bury their heads in the sand.

The biggest liar these days is the BBC.
Mainly by what it leaves out.
Vidcapper
2018-04-09 15:35:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by harry
The biggest liar these days is the BBC.
Mainly by what it leaves out.
Well, I can't disagree with that, but OTOH that doesn't prove Breitbart
is any more accurate.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Ophelia
2018-04-09 16:08:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by harry
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/06/sweden-security-chief-
terror-threat-new-normal/
Post by Vidcapper
Post by harry
Is this what Labour wants for the UK?
Has it occurred to you that the name Breitbart is likely to put people
*off* clicking on that article?
Bad reputation or not, the Breibart article is factually correct. Below
are links from the Swedish national broadcasters SVT and SR which fully
support the veracity of the Breibart report.
It is unfortunate that people should be put off reading Breibart and
other alternative sources since reading alternative sources is the only
way of gaining a balanced understanding of events. Always keep a critical
mindset and bear in mind the the BBC and other mainstream media do have
their own perspective which compromises their objectivity and perspective
from other sources is necessary to balance this.
Anyway, the truth of the matter is that Breibart is objective, truthful
and factual in this article.
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=6731295
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/allt-svarare-att-forutse-terrorresor
It usually is factual.
Stuff is easily verified these days.
Except by brain dead leftys that bury their heads in the sand.

The biggest liar these days is the BBC.
Mainly by what it leaves out.

==

+1

Loading...