Discussion:
Brexit is a golden opportunity for businesses like Tate & Lyle Sugars
Add Reply
Bod
2017-11-08 10:23:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.

But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.

Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.

http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
pamela
2017-11-08 11:26:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.

Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
Bod
2017-11-08 11:29:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
What's wrong with that?
--
Bod
pamela
2017-11-08 12:00:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
What's wrong with that?
Major industry, huh? I think we could live without it.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-08 16:06:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Bod
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
What's wrong with that?
Major industry, huh? I think we could live without it.
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
--
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Ian Jackson
2017-11-08 17:34:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar. Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat - and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
--
Ian
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-08 18:55:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,

Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
--
Ian
Ian Jackson
2017-11-08 19:46:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
--
Ian
Christie
2017-11-08 20:27:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard on LBC,
though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Ian Jackson
2017-11-08 21:25:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard on LBC,
though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
--
Ian
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 01:12:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard on LBC,
though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
Don't believe anything you hear. Food goes into your mouth. If too much food, you get fat. Fat used later when you're starving.
--
When you own Llamas... spit happens
The Peeler
2017-11-09 11:11:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 01:12:19 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Ian Jackson
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
Don't believe anything you hear.
No one should definitely believe any of the sick shit you keep spouting here
around the clock, attention whore!
--
More of wanker Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) twisted
sexuality:
"Facial hair is the same as pubic hair, therefore disgusting."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Christie
2017-11-09 09:51:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard on LBC,
though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through clearly (the
English language is a wonderful thing).

I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon, there is
going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation bias of
confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride we are on
remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at this point of time,
from a democratic point of view at least, I would have thought the
decent thing for us all to accept is that we are all Brexiteers.
pamela
2017-11-09 10:47:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
.......
Post by Ian Jackson
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard
on LBC, though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through clearly
:(the English language is a wonderful thing).
I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon, there
is going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation bias of
confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride we are on
remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at this point of
time, from a democratic point of view at least, I would have
thought the decent thing for us all to accept is that we are all
Brexiteers.
Has there been anything to provide confirmation bias for Brexiteers?

Not a single thing has emerged to Brexiteer's advantage which they
might turn into confirmation that they were right.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:13:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
.......
Post by Ian Jackson
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard
on LBC, though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through clearly
:(the English language is a wonderful thing).
I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon, there
is going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation bias of
confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride we are on
remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at this point of
time, from a democratic point of view at least, I would have
thought the decent thing for us all to accept is that we are all
Brexiteers.
Has there been anything to provide confirmation bias for Brexiteers?
Not a single thing has emerged to Brexiteer's advantage which they
might turn into confirmation that they were right.
I don't care if the UK is better or worse off, as long as I know it's OUR government in charge of us, not 27 others.
--
Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason -- Mark Twain
pamela
2017-11-09 17:30:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
.......
Post by Ian Jackson
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've
heard on LBC, though? I bet you're still going to trust in
that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through
:clearly (the English language is a wonderful thing).
I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon,
there is going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation
bias of confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride
we are on remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at
this point of time, from a democratic point of view at least,
I would have thought the decent thing for us all to accept is
that we are all Brexiteers.
Has there been anything to provide confirmation bias for
Brexiteers?
Not a single thing has emerged to Brexiteer's advantage which
they might turn into confirmation that they were right.
I don't care if the UK is better or worse off, as long as I know
it's OUR government in charge of us, not 27 others.
No other government is in charge of the UK.

MEPs are elected by ballot in the country they represent, EU
commissioners are nominated by their democratically elected
government, EU Council members are heads of government of their
own countries.

The UK has an exemption from any attempt at "ever closer union".

Sit back and relax. All's well.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:35:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
.......
Post by Ian Jackson
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've
heard on LBC, though? I bet you're still going to trust in
that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through
:clearly (the English language is a wonderful thing).
I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon,
there is going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation
bias of confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride
we are on remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at
this point of time, from a democratic point of view at least,
I would have thought the decent thing for us all to accept is
that we are all Brexiteers.
Has there been anything to provide confirmation bias for
Brexiteers?
Not a single thing has emerged to Brexiteer's advantage which
they might turn into confirmation that they were right.
I don't care if the UK is better or worse off, as long as I know
it's OUR government in charge of us, not 27 others.
No other government is in charge of the UK.
MEPs are elected by ballot in the country they represent, EU
commissioners are nominated by their democratically elected
government, EU Council members are heads of government of their
own countries.
The UK has an exemption from any attempt at "ever closer union".
Sit back and relax. All's well.
There are EU regulations which the UK adheres to. So other EU countries are telling us what to do. It's as simple as that. It's why we want to leave!!!
--
Went to the pub with my girlfriend last night.
Locals were shouting "paedophile!" and other names at me, just because my girlfriend is 21 and I'm 50.
It completely spoilt our 10th anniversary.
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:41:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:35:29 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
No other government is in charge of the UK.
MEPs are elected by ballot in the country they represent, EU
commissioners are nominated by their democratically elected
government, EU Council members are heads of government of their
own countries.
The UK has an exemption from any attempt at "ever closer union".
Sit back and relax. All's well.
There are EU regulations which the UK adheres to. So other EU countries
are telling us what to do. It's as simple as that. It's why we want to
leave!!!
Birdbrain just doesn't understand it! LOL
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic
"life":
"I have seriously considered poisoning my father"
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:39:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:13:48 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
I don't care if the UK is better or worse off, as long as I know it's OUR
government in charge of us, not 27 others.
"Our", you deluded sociopathic idiot? Even "your" government thinks you are
a total asshole, Birdbrain! <BG>
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic
"life":
"When I were a lad, I was a vegetarian and my friend wasn't. But I broke
the necks of the rabbits we caught and he couldn't bring himself to. Yet he
would eat the result and I wouldn't. Very odd."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Christie
2017-11-09 18:42:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Christie
Post by Ian Jackson
.......
Post by Ian Jackson
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
What about all the previous anti-brexiteer stuff you've heard
on LBC, though? I bet you're still going to trust in that!
Certainly. My faith in LBC is totally shattered.
:) Somewhat strangely, your message is coming through clearly
:(the English language is a wonderful thing).
I guess, unless something seismic happens relatively soon, there
is going to be enough happening to feed the confirmation bias of
confirmed 'leavers' and 'remainers' such that the ride we are on
remains bumpy for ages to come. But, anyway, at this point of
time, from a democratic point of view at least, I would have
thought the decent thing for us all to accept is that we are all
Brexiteers.
Has there been anything to provide confirmation bias for Brexiteers?
Not a single thing has emerged to Brexiteer's advantage which they
might turn into confirmation that they were right.
All the pro-Brexit points have been mentioned on this newsgroup
several times already, and repeatedly continue to be so.

First let us leave the EU as we have democratically decided to do, for
only then - over time - can we truly get confirmation that leaving the
EU was the right thing to do, anyway.
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 10:26:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
A reasonable simplification.
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
That bit is true - fat represents an energy reserve, even if you starve it only gets used up slowly.
Post by Ian Jackson
--
Ian
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:19:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into sugar.
Amino acids - er no,
Fats - er no,
Post by Ian Jackson
Some
things take longer to convert than others. Sugar that is surplus to
immediate requirements gets stored as fat
Glycogen initially, only later into fat.
I'm only parroting what a doctor (answering callers' questions) said on
one of last night's LBC phone-ins.
A reasonable simplification.
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Ian Jackson
- and sugar surpluses (even if
only temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume substantial
quantities of stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to
get re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin again.
That's the last time I trust what I hear on LBC!
That bit is true - fat represents an energy reserve, even if you starve it only gets used up slowly.
It's a bloody crap energy reserve. It should be able to provide energy at the same rate as we need to consume it. What's the point if we lack the energy to hunt an animal because we haven't eaten in a few days? That's precisely when we need energy!
--
Researchers have recently unearthed the text of the first transcontinental telegraph message. Reportedly, it reads
ENLARGE YOUR MALE MEMBER STOP GUARANTEED RESULTS STOP ...
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:42:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:19:26 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:

<FLUSH all the unbelievably idiotic bullshit>
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic
"mind":
"If I wanted you to stab me with a knife and kill me, you should not
get into trouble for it".
"I would kill my sister if I thought I'd get away with it".
"I'm not what most people think of as human".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
pamela
2017-11-08 20:51:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much
food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-08 21:33:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
--
The problem with today's society is adults are treated like children, children are treated like retards, and retards are exempt from the law.
The Peeler
2017-11-08 21:55:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:33:31 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar,
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat
too much it will get stored.
Who taught you that BULLSHIT, Birdbrain? Did you perhaps just read it on
Usenet? LOL
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) retarded "mind":
"A cyclist is more similar in power, weight, and speed, to a pedestrian, so
fits in better on the pavement."
MID: <***@red.lan>
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 10:28:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar. Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed directly.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
--
The problem with today's society is adults are treated like children, children are treated like retards, and retards are exempt from the law.
pamela
2017-11-09 10:52:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:33:34 UTC, James Wilkinson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too
much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat
- and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most
likely to occur when we consume substantial quantities of
stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take
some time to get re-converted into sugar - but when they do,
we become thin again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what
you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar.
Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed
directly.
Protein ends up with nitrogen stripped away and then follows carbs
into the citric acid cycle.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 12:49:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:33:34 UTC, James Wilkinson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat
- and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most
likely to occur when we consume substantial quantities of
stuff with a high sugar content. We then become physically
fat. Even if we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take
some time to get re-converted into sugar - but when they do,
we become thin again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what
you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar.
Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed
directly.
Protein ends up with nitrogen stripped away and then follows carbs
into the citric acid cycle.
And makes your farts smell of oranges?
--
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
The Peeler
2017-11-09 17:11:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:49:23 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Protein ends up with nitrogen stripped away and then follows carbs
into the citric acid cycle.
And makes your farts smell of oranges?
What an idiot!
--
Wanker Birdbrain giving advice on Usenet on how to procreate:
"I will also admit I would never have kids as only those with perfect genes
should ever pass them on. Don't have kids just because you feel like it, if
you do, you are a selfish cunt polluting the world with more inferior
people."
Message-ID: <***@red.lan>
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 12:49:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar. Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed directly.
Yeah right. So you're telling me I can eat 15 million tonnes of carbs without getting fat. Pull the other one.

Anyway, why bother working out what each food contains? Eat the foods you enjoy eating, but only eat as much as you need! You don't put 100 litres of petrol in your car when it only needs 50 do you?
--
US PGA Commentator - "One of the reasons Arnie is playing so well is that, before each tee shot, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them."
And Johnny Carson famously commented "That must make his little putter stand up"
The Peeler
2017-11-09 17:11:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:49:02 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again:

<FLUSH more sociopathic drivel by the resident sociopath>
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the village idiot's,
sick drivel:
"99% of people are thick, ignorant, or just plain stupid."
MID: <***@red.lan>
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 18:14:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar. Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed directly.
Yeah right. So you're telling me I can eat 15 million tonnes of carbs without getting fat. Pull the other one.
Please try and read the posts - carbohydrates (e.g. starch) is converted into sugars, sugars are absorbed directly and make be used directly for energy.

Surplus sugar is converted into glycogen and stored in the liver and will [eventually] be turned into fat.

Fat is absorbed directly. It may be converted into energy, or if surplus stored in fatty tissue.

Amino acids (protein broken down by digestion) are also absorbed, these are used for bodily processes - making protein within you - e.g. renewing cells, blood etc.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, why bother working out what each food contains? Eat the foods you enjoy eating, but only eat as much as you need! You don't put 100 litres of petrol in your car when it only needs 50 do you?
It depends how far away the petrol station is and how far you want to drive tomorrow.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 18:25:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into sugar, then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
You are underthinking - carbohydrates get converted into sugar. Amino acids (protein) and fat do not - they are absorbed directly.
Yeah right. So you're telling me I can eat 15 million tonnes of carbs without getting fat. Pull the other one.
Please try and read the posts - carbohydrates (e.g. starch) is converted into sugars, sugars are absorbed directly and make be used directly for energy.
Whatever, I meant protein and fat. I wasn't paying close attention to your waffle. I eat food, if I eat more than I use, it goes to fat. End of story.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, why bother working out what each food contains? Eat the foods you enjoy eating, but only eat as much as you need! You don't put 100 litres of petrol in your car when it only needs 50 do you?
It depends how far away the petrol station is and how far you want to drive tomorrow.
Assuming you could fit a second tank into your car to hold the other 50 litres, if it was designed like the human body, it would have a microscopic hose so the engine would have to run in limp home mode when you used the 2nd tank.
--
O'Hare Approach Control to a 747: "United 329 heavy, your traffic is a Fokker, one o'clock, three miles, Eastbound."
United 239: "Approach, I've always wanted to say this... I've got the little Fokker in sight."
pamela
2017-11-09 10:56:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too
much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you
eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 12:33:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too
much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you
eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
--
Never play leapfrog with a unicorn!
Yellow
2017-11-09 14:04:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
At the risk of piling in..... you actually need to eat less calories,
not less food. And no, it is not the same thing at all.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you
eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
Again - too many calories, not too much food.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 16:37:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
At the risk of piling in..... you actually need to eat less calories,
not less food. And no, it is not the same thing at all.
But why change what you eat instead of how much? I'd much rather eat half as much food than change to tasteless diet shit.
Post by Yellow
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you
eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
Again - too many calories, not too much food.
Stop repeating yourself.
--
You wag your tail like your mother, you repugnant, hairball engorging, cat buggering, pseudo-human android spawn of a foul-smelling telephone solicitor!
Yellow
2017-11-09 17:31:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:37:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
At the risk of piling in..... you actually need to eat less calories,
not less food. And no, it is not the same thing at all.
But why change what you eat instead of how much? I'd much rather eat half as much food than change to tasteless diet shit.
That is your choice.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
then either burnt off or stored. Doesn't matter what you
eat, if you eat too much it will get stored.
Again - too many calories, not too much food.
Stop repeating yourself.
OK.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:38:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:37:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
At the risk of piling in..... you actually need to eat less calories,
not less food. And no, it is not the same thing at all.
But why change what you eat instead of how much? I'd much rather eat half as much food than change to tasteless diet shit.
That is your choice.
It's the only sensible choice. Why torture yourself with tasteless food?
--
The wife said to me last night "If you turn the bedside lamp off I'll take it up the arse."
Maybe I should have waited for the bulb to cool down first.
Yellow
2017-11-09 18:24:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:38:34 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:37:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too
much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
You're overthinking it. You eat anything, it gets changed into
sugar,
That's a confusing way to put it. Ribose may be a sugar but table
sugar is not ribose.
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form. Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
At the risk of piling in..... you actually need to eat less calories,
not less food. And no, it is not the same thing at all.
But why change what you eat instead of how much? I'd much rather eat half as much food than change to tasteless diet shit.
That is your choice.
It's the only sensible choice. Why torture yourself with tasteless food?
We all have our own tastes, but for me food does not need to be sweet to
be delicious.
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:45:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:38:34 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
That is your choice.
It's the only sensible choice. Why torture yourself with tasteless food?
What an idiot! <tsk>
--
Wanker Birdbrain giving advice on Usenet on how to procreate:
"I will also admit I would never have kids as only those with perfect genes
should ever pass them on. Don't have kids just because you feel like it, if
you do, you are a selfish cunt polluting the world with more inferior
people."
Message-ID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:44:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:37:49 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Stop repeating yourself.
It's the ONLY way to educate idiots like you, Birdbrain!
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange
sociopathic world:
"I like driving fast and scaring people".
"If the guy behind me has his lights on too bright. I let him past
then tailgate him with my full beam on until he switches his off".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
The Peeler
2017-11-09 17:11:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:33:49 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
What's confusing about what I said? I made it into the simplest form.
Your body converts whatever you eat into energy. If you eat more than
you burn off, it goes into fat. EAT LESS FOOD.
Humans CANNOT convert sugar into fat, you prize idiot!
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) pathological "mind"
revealed:
"I am actually considering crashing deliberately into one of my neighbours.
Three times he's stopped on the wrong side of the road, directly in front of
me, then reversed into his drive. I had to brake hard to avoid a head on
collision. Next time I'll glance at the camera to make sure it's rolling
and carry on."
Message-ID: <***@red.lan>
tim...
2017-11-09 15:19:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,

"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "

why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?

tim
pamela
2017-11-09 15:54:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
You idiot. You can't even use Google properly. It is not angina.
The context should have told you. Just read the post I was
replying to.

We were discussing refined carbs and I was talking about the
syndrome which arises from damaged carbohydrate metabolism. This
is popularly referred to as "Syndrome X". It can lead to diabetes
and cardio problems which may have nothing to do with angina.

Try this:
https://theconsciouslife.com/do-you-have-syndrome-x.htm

You have now been educated. There is no fee for this service.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 16:13:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely
to occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with
a high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if
we then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
You idiot. You can't even use Google properly. It is not angina.
The context should have told you. Just read the post I was
replying to.
We were discussing refined carbs and I was talking about the
syndrome which arises from damaged carbohydrate metabolism. This
is popularly referred to as "Syndrome X". It can lead to diabetes
and cardio problems which may have nothing to do with angina.
https://theconsciouslife.com/do-you-have-syndrome-x.htm
You have now been educated. There is no fee for this service.
No sensible doctor would ever name something X. X is the unknown.
--
Is it just a coincidence that Christianity and insanity end with the same letters?
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:46:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:13:33 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
No sensible doctor would ever name something X. X is the unknown.
ALMOST quoteworthy, poor idiot! Try harder! <BG>
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"I go hillwalking barefoot for hours in the snow, my feet just go red.
Extra blood, they can't freeze."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Ophelia
2017-11-09 16:55:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,

"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "

why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?

tim

==

He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:11:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
--
"I'll have the rump steak, rare, please."
He said, "Aren't you worried about the mad cow?"
"Nah, she can order for herself."
And that's when the fight started....
Yellow
2017-11-09 17:32:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 17:37:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
--
Gardening Rule:
When weeding, the best way to make sure you are removing a weed and not a valuable plant is to pull on it.
If it comes out of theground easily, it is a valuable plant.
pamela
2017-11-09 17:42:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:32:09 -0000, Yellow
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:55:44 -0000, Ophelia
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others.
Sugar that is surplus to immediate requirements gets
stored as fat - and sugar surpluses (even if only
temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume
substantial quantities of stuff with a high sugar content.
We then become physically fat. Even if we then starve
ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of
its metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
They're just kidding you and trying to needle me.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 18:00:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:32:09 -0000, Yellow
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:55:44 -0000, Ophelia
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others.
Sugar that is surplus to immediate requirements gets
stored as fat - and sugar surpluses (even if only
temporary) are most likely to occur when we consume
substantial quantities of stuff with a high sugar content.
We then become physically fat. Even if we then starve
ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of
its metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
They're just kidding you and trying to needle me.
Is that a euphamism?
--
Space is an illusion, disk space doubly so.
Yellow
2017-11-09 18:22:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:37:59 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
We can all call ourselves what we want, obviously, and I would therefore
want to suggest it is with the intent to deceive.
Yellow
2017-11-09 18:25:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:37:59 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
We can all call ourselves what we want, obviously, and I would therefore
want to suggest it is with the intent to deceive.
Whoops - I'll try that again.....

We can all call ourselves what we want, obviously, and I would therefore
NOT want to suggest it is with the intent to deceive.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 18:35:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:37:59 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
We can all call ourselves what we want, obviously, and I would therefore
want to suggest it is with the intent to deceive.
Whoops - I'll try that again.....
We can all call ourselves what we want, obviously, and I would therefore
NOT want to suggest it is with the intent to deceive.
So he's a crossdresser/tranny/poofter then?
--
Peter is listening to "The club can't handle me - Flo Rida feat. David Guetta"
Mr Pounder Esquire
2017-11-09 18:42:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Yellow
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by tim...
Post by pamela
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
The body first tries to convert everything we take in into
sugar. Some things take longer to convert than others. Sugar
that is surplus to immediate requirements gets stored as fat -
and sugar surpluses (even if only temporary) are most likely to
occur when we consume substantial quantities of stuff with a
high sugar content. We then become physically fat. Even if we
then starve ourselves, our fat stores take some time to get
re-converted into sugar - but when they do, we become thin
again.
Refined carbs such as sugar causes syndrome X because of its
metabolic path. That's not true for unprocessed foods.
Hm,
"Cardiac syndrome X is angina "
why the fuck do you not use the name everyone knows?
tim
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
No - he is just a bloke.
Blokes don't call themselves Pamela unless they have some weird fetish.
What a fool you are Hucker and what a fool you always will be.
Well done on your latest troll.
Wanker.
The Peeler
2017-11-09 18:51:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:11:52 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Ophelia
==
He didn't expect you to know what it meant:))))
Pamela is a transgender?
Mentally challenged Brexiters having a tete-a-tete! LOL
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"The alleged timing is, fall into ice water and die of cold in 15 minutes.
Do what I do, go swimming in winter in a partially frozen lake, and do so
for a lot more than 15 minutes. Jesus Christ your teeth don't even start
chattering until about 30 minutes."
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-11-08 18:12:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:06:14 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by pamela
Post by Bod
Post by pamela
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
What's wrong with that?
Major industry, huh? I think we could live without it.
You don't get fat from sugar, you get fat from eating too much food.
Who mentioned fat, attention whore?
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the village idiot's,
sick drivel:
"99% of people are thick, ignorant, or just plain stupid."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Handsome Jack
2017-11-08 17:29:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
You cretinous oaf.
--
Jack
Fredxxx
2017-11-09 00:28:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive UK
market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Why do you think this? There is a weak correlation with sugar intake and
obesity and many peer reviewed studies even indicate an inverse
relationship between sugar intake and obesity.
Post by pamela
Fancy clutching onto the profits made by a sugar manufacturer as a
way of justifying Brexit!
Yes, Bod is the Brexit equivalent of MM.
pamela
2017-11-09 10:49:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Fredxxx
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive
UK market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Why do you think this? There is a weak correlation with sugar
intake and obesity and many peer reviewed studies even indicate
an inverse relationship between sugar intake and obesity.
It's not only to do with obesity but Syndrome X in which the types of
food which provide calories are significant.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 16:36:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by pamela
Post by Fredxxx
Post by pamela
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs
and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate
against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar
producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive
UK market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
The less sugar we eat, the better for our health.
Why do you think this? There is a weak correlation with sugar
intake and obesity and many peer reviewed studies even indicate
an inverse relationship between sugar intake and obesity.
It's not only to do with obesity but Syndrome X in which the types of
food which provide calories are significant.
Don't you know which syndrome it is?
--
You wag your tail like your mother, you repugnant, hairball engorging, cat buggering, pseudo-human android spawn of a foul-smelling telephone solicitor!
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-08 12:26:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
pensive hamster
2017-11-08 15:55:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Bod
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
Bod's sentence:

"These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers."

is potentially a bit misleading. We are also beet sugar producers,
and 2/3rds of sugar used in the UK is produced in this way:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Sugar
'British Sugar processes all sugar beet grown in the United Kingdom,
and produces about two-thirds of the United Kingdom's quota of
sugar, with the remainder covered by Tate & Lyle and imports.'

Also

'... Tate & Lyle ... is still allowed to import zero-tariff sugar from a
handful of designated markets such as Fiji, Belize and Guyana and
that are seen as supporting international development goals. [But
it has to add in shipping costs].
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/mar/27/brexit-sugar-beet-cane-tate-lyle-british-sugar

So it is a bit more complex than Bod makes out. It is not exactly
brave British Tate & Lyle battling against the evil EU and their
dastardly beet sugar producers ...
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-08 16:06:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard =E2=80=93 and cost Br=
itish jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist su=
gar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners li=
ke
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger cho=
ice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also bo=
ost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might =
be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufac=
tured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it=
underselling similar EU foods.

Could we nuke the EU?

-- =

Bill Clinton thinks "harass" is two words.
The Peeler
2017-11-08 18:12:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:06:40 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by R. Mark Clayton
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be
cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK
manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to
prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
Could we nuke the EU?
Somebody needs to nuke your stupid gob, Birdbrain!
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) life as a wanker:
"When I was 14, there were places in forests where people would leave
magazines for anyone to use."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Yellow
2017-11-08 20:41:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to just as
long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you continually whine
about rising prices.
pamela
2017-11-08 21:02:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost
British jobs. The EU imposes prohibitively high import
tariffs and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These
discriminate against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of
EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a
bigger choice of more innovative products. A more competitive
UK market can also boost our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar
might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose
tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar
(e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU
foods.
So you are HAPPY to see consumers pay more than they need to
just as long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you
continually whine about rising prices.
Can you show where Mark says he's HAPPY about it?
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 10:32:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to just as
long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you continually whine
about rising prices.
Not really, but Brexiteers are.

I doubt that the UK government would reduce the tariff on sugar seeing how in the 2016 budget it imposed a direct tax on it: -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugary_drink_tax#United_Kingdom
Yellow
2017-11-09 14:01:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 02:32:11 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to just as
long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you continually whine
about rising prices.
Not really,
So why are you arguing that it is OK for consumers to have to pay more
for goods if it means businesses can make more profit?
Post by R. Mark Clayton
but Brexiteers are.
Er.... no. You are the one making this argument.
Post by R. Mark Clayton
I doubt that the UK government would reduce the tariff on sugar seeing how in the 2016 budget it imposed a direct tax on it: -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugary_drink_tax#United_Kingdom
And that has nothing whatsoever to do with Brexit.
tim...
2017-11-09 15:17:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might
be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK
manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to
prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to just as
long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you continually whine
about rising prices.
Not really, but Brexiteers are.
I doubt that the UK government would reduce the tariff on sugar seeing how
in the 2016 budget it imposed a direct tax on it: -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugary_drink_tax#United_Kingdom
um, no he didn't

(you need to look up the meaning of the word "direct")

tim
pamela
2017-11-09 16:51:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by tim...
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and
protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the
UK sugar market. This will be a real success story for a
UK industry and a much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then
sugar might be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU
impose tariffs on UK manufactured foods containing a lot of
sugar (e.g. confectionery) to prevent it underselling
similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to
just as long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you
continually whine about rising prices.
Not really, but Brexiteers are.
I doubt that the UK government would reduce the tariff on sugar
seeing how in the 2016 budget it imposed a direct tax on it: -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugary_drink_tax#United_Kingdom
um, no he didn't
(you need to look up the meaning of the word "direct")
tim
I hope you've looked up the correct meaning of syndrome X. :)
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 18:22:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by tim...
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Yellow
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:26:34 -0800 (PST), R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard ? and cost British jobs.
The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
Consumers will also win because competition will deliver a bigger choice
of more innovative products. A more competitive UK market can also boost
our exports.
http://www.brexitgoldenopportunity.com
--
Bod
If the UK tariff on sugar is decoupled from the EU's then sugar might
be cheaper in the UK. Expect to see the EU impose tariffs on UK
manufactured foods containing a lot of sugar (e.g. confectionery) to
prevent it underselling similar EU foods.
So you are happy to see consumers pay more than they need to just as
long as businesses can make bigger profits yet you continually whine
about rising prices.
Not really, but Brexiteers are.
I doubt that the UK government would reduce the tariff on sugar seeing how
in the 2016 budget it imposed a direct tax on it: -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugary_drink_tax#United_Kingdom
um, no he didn't
(you need to look up the meaning of the word "direct")
tim
"
The tax will be imposed at the point of production or importation, in two bands. Drinks with total sugar content above 5g per 100 millilitres will be taxed at 18p per litre
"
Nick
2017-11-08 16:58:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost British jobs. > The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
I'm confused, Tate & Lyle -sugar Refining business appears to be fully
owned by a US company. AIUI Sugar cane doesn't grow in the UK.
pamela
2017-11-09 17:31:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Nick
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost
British jobs. > The EU imposes prohibitively high import
tariffs and protectionist sugar and trade policies. These
discriminate against cane sugar refiners like us in favour of
EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK
sugar market. This will be a real success story for a UK
industry and a much-loved British brand.
I'm confused, Tate & Lyle -sugar Refining business appears to be
fully owned by a US company. AIUI Sugar cane doesn't grow in the
UK.
lol!
R. Mark Clayton
2017-11-09 18:27:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Nick
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard – and cost British jobs. > The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and protectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
I'm confused, Tate & Lyle -sugar Refining business appears to be fully
owned by a US company. AIUI Sugar cane doesn't grow in the UK.
Bod's argument is that the UK could have cheaper sugar if the [EU] duty on imported cane sugar (usually by Tate & Lyle) were abolished.

The UK does grow quite a lot of sugar beet.

The main counter argument really is that whilst there would be some minor areas of benefit for UK consumers, the overall result of Brexit will be relative economic decline relative to the EU and poorer UK consumers in real terms. It is already happening.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-11-09 18:35:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard =E2=80=93 and cost =
British jobs. > The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and pro=
tectionist sugar
and trade policies. These discriminate against cane sugar refiners =
like
us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar=
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
I'm confused, Tate & Lyle -sugar Refining business appears to be full=
y
owned by a US company. AIUI Sugar cane doesn't grow in the UK.
Bod's argument is that the UK could have cheaper sugar if the [EU] dut=
y on imported cane sugar (usually by Tate & Lyle) were abolished.
The UK does grow quite a lot of sugar beet.
The main counter argument really is that whilst there would be some mi=
nor areas of benefit for UK consumers, the overall result of Brexit will=
be relative economic decline relative to the EU and poorer UK consumers=
in real terms. It is already happening.

Is it really? All the food I buy is the same price.

-- =

Uncle Larry was smoking in a restaurant the other day when a guy came up=
to him and said, "That smoke's bothering me."
Larry said, "Well, it's killing me. If I don't care about what it's doi=
ng to me, why would I give a shit what it's doing to you?"
Mr Pounder Esquire
2017-11-09 18:45:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:27:23 -0000, R. Mark Clayton
Post by R. Mark Clayton
Post by Nick
Being in the EU has hit Tate & Lyle Sugars hard - and cost British
jobs. > The EU imposes prohibitively high import tariffs and
protectionist sugar and trade policies. These discriminate against
cane sugar refiners like us in favour of EU beet sugar producers.
But after Brexit, we can have a level playing field in the UK sugar
market. This will be a real success story for a UK industry and a
much-loved British brand.
I'm confused, Tate & Lyle -sugar Refining business appears to be
fully owned by a US company. AIUI Sugar cane doesn't grow in the UK.
Bod's argument is that the UK could have cheaper sugar if the [EU]
duty on imported cane sugar (usually by Tate & Lyle) were abolished. The
UK does grow quite a lot of sugar beet.
The main counter argument really is that whilst there would be some
minor areas of benefit for UK consumers, the overall result of
Brexit will be relative economic decline relative to the EU and
poorer UK consumers in real terms. It is already happening.
Is it really? "All the food I buy is the same price".
Prick
Loading...