Discussion:
OT Lib Dems to back a 'regulated cannabis market' in UK
(too old to reply)
Bod
2017-05-12 14:43:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 16:02:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
About bloody time. It's a naturally growing plant. The law dictating what goes in your own body is wrong.
--
People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs
The Peeler
2017-05-12 16:21:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 17:02:34 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
About bloody time. It's a naturally growing plant. The law dictating
what goes in your own body is wrong.
It's actually only because of idiots like you that such laws are needed,
Birdbrain!
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"I don't use doors much."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-12 16:10:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.

Trafalgar square 2020:



YES!!!
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 16:23:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.

Nor will voting LibDem.
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-12 16:52:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Vidcapper
2017-05-13 07:02:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Bod
2017-05-13 07:08:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 16:07:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
--
Risk more than others think is safe.
Care more than others think is wise.
Dream more than others think is practical.
Expect more than others think is possible.
-- Claude Bissell
The Peeler
2017-05-13 16:32:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 17:07:59 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
ONLY to a druggie, Birdbrain!
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) about himself:
" I have no plans to make children. The world is already too full, and I
admit I'm not the healthiest best looking person Only healthy fit good
looking people should reproduce."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Vidcapper
2017-05-14 06:08:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 13:35:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
--
Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one?
Norman Wells
2017-05-14 13:39:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's
sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 13:45:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's
sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some other policy.
--
Hockey is a sport for white men.
Basketball is a sport for black men.
Golf is a sport for white men dressed like black pimps. -- Tiger Woods
Norman Wells
2017-05-14 13:59:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's
sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.

But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.

If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 14:20:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's
sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
--
I learnt so much from my mistakes I think I'll make another.
The Peeler
2017-05-14 15:17:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 15:20:25 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke it,
but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending on
how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
Based on WHAT or WHOSE statistic? The very kind of statistic that your
sociopathic birdbrain keeps making up on the go? LOL
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) deep "thinking":
"The answer is 9. The 0.5 chicken is dead, so basically it's 1 chicken
laying 1 egg per day. The half egg was one halfway out, the only egg for
that day."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-14 16:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 18:40:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't). Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You ought to try it before you dismiss it.
--
In 1999 the creators of KY Jelly created a new product. It was called "Y2K Jelly." It allowed you to get four digits in your date instead of two.
The Peeler
2017-05-14 18:43:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 19:40:03 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard.
From WHOM, you hallucinating psycho?
--
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) about women:
"I don't want one. Easy enough to get one if I wanted one."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-14 21:12:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
the miniscule blue bits on the map at:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country

Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-25 17:59:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages. I suppose if you lived in the days of prohibition you'd say "most people clearly do not think alcohol should be legal".
--
For men, the conversation happens in addition to driving
whereas for women the driving is something that happens in addition to the conversation.
The Peeler
2017-05-25 18:10:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 25 May 2017 18:59:53 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Yet more wishful thinking by the resident sociopathi! <tsk>
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
...says the drug-addled idiot! <tsk>
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) "wisdom":
"Look at a donkey with a 2 foot penis. Does it require underwear? No."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-25 19:33:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-25 19:51:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
I haven't asked everybody in the country.
--
Up until 1948 there was a gold medal for town planning in the Olympics.
The Peeler
2017-05-25 20:28:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 25 May 2017 20:51:47 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
I haven't asked everybody in the country.
<tsk> Blithering idiot!
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic
"life":
"I have seriously considered poisoning my father"
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
Norman Wells
2017-05-25 21:00:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general
election
as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
I haven't asked everybody in the country.
It was you who said it. If you don't know what you're talking about,
why say it?
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-25 21:01:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general
election
as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over half the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
I haven't asked everybody in the country.
It was you who said it. If you don't know what you're talking about,
why say it?
Clearly I meant people with half a brain. There are always dimwits like you who for some reason are entitled to vote.
--
Auctioneer, n. The man who proclaims with a hammer that he has picked a pocket with his tongue.
Norman Wells
2017-05-25 21:20:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
On Sun, 14 May 2017 14:59:57 +0100, Norman Wells
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general
election
as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the
LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to
consider
when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
More like I understand statistics.
Post by Norman Wells
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it. That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
As I said, it's not a fair test. There are many folk who don't smoke
it, but think it should be legal. They could vote either way depending
on how much they like their other policies. I never said over
half
the
population smoked it, just that over half agreed with it.
That's a good job, because the figures I've seen are that only about 6%
of the UK population smoke it at all. Moreover, your assertion that
'over half agreed with it' is just wishful thinking on your part based
on nothing at all. It's entirely made up.
It's from what I've heard. Most people agree it should be legal (on the
grounds it's a lot better for you than alcohol - pretty damn stupid to
ban something that's good for you and legalise something that isn't)
That's no more than wishful thinking on your part supported by specious
reasoning.
Bollocks. There are plenty studies that prove you wrong.
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Anyway, several US states have already legalised it, it's coming. You
ought to try it before you dismiss it.
If you want to see where in the world it's actually legal, try to find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_country
Most people clearly do not think it should be legal.
Most people are still in the dark ages.
Then don't say 'most people agree it should be legal'. They clearly don't.
I haven't asked everybody in the country.
It was you who said it. If you don't know what you're talking about,
why say it?
Clearly I meant people with half a brain.
And you've asked all of those, have you?
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
There are always dimwits like
you who for some reason are entitled to vote.
My vote in my constituency counts for nothing.

So does yours in all probability.
The Peeler
2017-05-25 21:34:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 25 May 2017 22:01:58 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
It was you who said it. If you don't know what you're talking about,
why say it?
Clearly I meant people with half a brain. There are always dimwits like
you who for some reason are entitled to vote.
Bullshitting idiot! <tsk>
--
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson") about himself:
"I can sleep outside in a temperature of -20C wearing only shorts".
"I once took a dump behind some bushes and slid down a hill to wipe my
arse".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 14:52:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to. The half of the population that's
sensible enough to know that alcohol is more dangerous.
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it.
Not necessarily. Not if the taxes make the legal stuff more expensive.
Post by Norman Wells
That's why I think it would be
fair to say it's a sort of referendum on the matter.
If you don't want the matter tested, don't ask the question.
--
I learnt so much from my mistakes I think I'll make another.
The Peeler
2017-05-14 15:49:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 15:52:26 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Sounds to me like you're scared to put it to the test.
But the LibDems *are* putting it to the test by putting it in their
manifesto. Potheads would be mad to ignore the possibility of their
habit becoming legal, and it's so important to them it's clear they'd
all vote for any party that proposes it.
Not necessarily. Not if the taxes make the legal stuff more expensive.
What a great "explanation" by a sociopath of the fact that NOT over half of
the population want it legalized! LOL
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange world:
"Why is the soup talking to itself?"
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-05-14 15:16:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 14:45:11 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I think it might be fair to regard the forthcoming general election as a
referendum on the matter. Let's see how many MPs and votes the LibDems
get to see how popular their newly-announced policy is.
It won't prove anything, as there are too many things to consider when
voting. Mr Smith might like a joint but hates the Liberals for some
other policy.
Your drug-addled "mind" keeps clutching at straws, Birdbrain! <BG>
--
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson") about himself:
"I can sleep outside in a temperature of -20C wearing only shorts".
"I once took a dump behind some bushes and slid down a hill to wipe my
arse".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
The Peeler
2017-05-14 15:16:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 14:35:40 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
I don't believe you. I'd bet over half the population either smokes it
or thinks others should be able to.
ONLY in your drug-addled "mind", Birdbrain! LOL
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) about himself:
" I have no plans to make children. The world is already too full, and I
admit I'm not the healthiest best looking person Only healthy fit good
looking people should reproduce."
MID: <***@red.lan>
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 15:03:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It will make more sense than voting for anyone else.
Only if you've already jumped the gun on their suggested policy...
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and let's say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop voting for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to 3.75%. But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change their mind due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of 25%, well up from 15%.

That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They will have 25% as 25% smoke.
--
"There are more planes in the ocean than submarines in the sky."
- From an old carrier sailor
The Peeler
2017-05-14 15:50:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:03:16 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and let's
say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop voting
for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to 3.75%.
But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change their mind
due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of 25%, well up
from 15%.
That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They
will have 25% as 25% smoke.
*ROTFLOL*!!!!!!!!!!!!! The resident idiot is at it again!
Bruahahahahahahahahaaaa!!! Saved for keeps!
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) deep "thinking":
"The answer is 9. The 0.5 chicken is dead, so basically it's 1 chicken
laying 1 egg per day. The half egg was one halfway out, the only egg for
that day."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-14 16:41:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and
let's say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop
voting for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to
3.75%. But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change
their mind due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of
25%, well up from 15%.
That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They
will have 25% as 25% smoke.
Well, it will shortly be put to the test, won't it? Let's see if the
LibDems do actually increase their share of the vote.

As I said, we might well regard the election as a referendum on it.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-14 16:44:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Whilst I agree with the Lib-Dems Cannabis policy, there's no way that I
would vote for them on just a single issue.
It's quite a big issue.
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and
let's say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop
voting for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to
3.75%. But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change
their mind due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of
25%, well up from 15%.
That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They
will have 25% as 25% smoke.
Well, it will shortly be put to the test, won't it? Let's see if the
LibDems do actually increase their share of the vote.
As I said, we might well regard the election as a referendum on it.
No, as there will most likely be people who don't care about weed and continue to vote for the party which has the policies they want.
--
What happens when you stick your hand in a jar of jelly beans?
The black ones steal your watch and rings.
The Peeler
2017-05-14 17:45:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:44:45 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Well, it will shortly be put to the test, won't it? Let's see if the
LibDems do actually increase their share of the vote.
As I said, we might well regard the election as a referendum on it.
No, as there will most likely be people who don't care about weed and
continue to vote for the party which has the policies they want.
That's because the MAJORITY do NOT approve of it, idiot ...contrary to your
made up claim!
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) scientific "mind" at work
again:
"Try this - have some sort of inflated thing with no
hole, and lie on the floor with it on your chest. Have a friend drop a
large rock onto it. Now try dropping the same rock directly onto you.
Even without doing it, it's obvious which would hurt more."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Vidcapper
2017-05-15 07:14:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and
let's say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop
voting for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to
3.75%. But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change
their mind due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of
25%, well up from 15%.
That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They
will have 25% as 25% smoke.
They'd *have* to be stoned to make their voting choice on that sole basis!
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-25 18:03:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Vidcapper
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
It seems like it'd lose them more votes than they would gain though.
Not necessarily. Even if only 25% of people want it legalised, and
let's say LibDems already have 15% of the vote. If 75% of that 15% stop
voting for them because they don't want it legalised, they're down to
3.75%. But 25% of the 85% who didn't previously vote for them, change
their mind due to this policy, they gain 21.25%, giving them a total of
25%, well up from 15%.
That was rather longwinded! They currently have 15% of the vote. They
will have 25% as 25% smoke.
They'd *have* to be stoned to make their voting choice on that sole basis!
Or just someone who realise the LibDems have some common sense. Would you support the banning of alcohol?
--
When the Viagra virus comes to your PC, all your software becomes hardware.
The Peeler
2017-05-25 18:12:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 25 May 2017 19:03:58 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Vidcapper
They'd *have* to be stoned to make their voting choice on that sole basis!
Or just someone who realise the LibDems have some common sense. Would
you support the banning of alcohol?
Fucked up sociopathic idiot Hucker is so attention-starve he needs to revive
10-day-old threads! <tsk>
--
More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic
"life":
"I have seriously considered poisoning my father"
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 19:35:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
--
Federal Expresso: When you absolutely, positively have to stay up all night.
The Peeler
2017-05-12 19:52:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 20:35:53 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
It OBVIOUSLY did not do you any good, Birdbrain! Or are you a congenital
idiot?

<FLUSH the rest of your psychotic BULLSHIT>
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"I don't use doors much."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 20:07:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 20:21:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
--
Uncle Larry was smoking in a restaurant the other day when a guy came up to him and said, "That smoke's bothering me."
Larry said, "Well, it's killing me. If I don't care about what it's doing to me, why would I give a shit what it's doing to you?"
The Peeler
2017-05-12 20:52:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 21:21:08 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
Blithering idiot! LOL
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"Most animals don't attack me, even though their owners tell me they're
dangerous. I had to laugh at one woman who ran out to tell me her dog was
going to bite my hand off, then saw me petting it. I once bought a parrot
that was extremely vicious. I walked into his house and picked it up, then
cuddled it. He said he'd never seen it do that in 10 years."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 21:13:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?

Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 21:17:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else, and the world never changes.
--
How do you confuse a blonde?
You don't. They're born that way.
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 21:23:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 21:37:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
It's exactly what it is. From Wikipedia:
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an undesirable outcome."
--
Proceed to your next incarnation. Use any means available.
The Peeler
2017-05-12 21:44:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:37:23 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
It's exactly what it is. From Wikipedia: "In voting methods, tactical
voting (or strategic voting or sophisticated voting or insincere voting)
occurs, in elections with more than two candidates, when a voter supports
another candidate more strongly than his or her sincere preference in
order to prevent an undesirable outcome."
You obviously can't make sense of the very last statement in your quote,
"Birdbrain"! <G>
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"...men are superior, so a woman dressed as a man looks better, not worse."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 21:54:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s,
let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted
tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or
sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more
than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more
strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an
undesirable outcome."
So, what's the 'undesirable outcome' they're all trying to prevent?
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 21:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s,
let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted
tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or
sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more
than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more
strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an
undesirable outcome."
So, what's the 'undesirable outcome' they're all trying to prevent?
Tactical voters refuse to vote for their own small party (e.g. Green) because they think the Tories have more votes in their seat and vote Labour instead to try to keep them out.
--
If the English language made any sense, lackadaisical would have something to do with a shortage of flowers.
The Peeler
2017-05-12 22:59:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:58:12 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or
sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more
than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more
strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an
undesirable outcome."
So, what's the 'undesirable outcome' they're all trying to prevent?
Tactical voters refuse to vote for their own small party (e.g. Green)
because they think the Tories have more votes in their seat and vote
Labour instead to try to keep them out.
They most likely just vote for another party because that party is their
second desirable option when they see that their first desirable option has
no chance of winning, oh birdbrained one!
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"Most animals don't attack me, even though their owners tell me they're
dangerous. I had to laugh at one woman who ran out to tell me her dog was
going to bite my hand off, then saw me petting it. I once bought a parrot
that was extremely vicious. I walked into his house and picked it up, then
cuddled it. He said he'd never seen it do that in 10 years."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-13 07:56:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
On Fri, 12 May 2017 17:23:56 +0100, Norman Wells
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s,
let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted
tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or
sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more
than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more
strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an
undesirable outcome."
So, what's the 'undesirable outcome' they're all trying to prevent?
Tactical voters refuse to vote for their own small party (e.g. Green)
because they think the Tories have more votes in their seat and vote
Labour instead to try to keep them out.
All voting is tactical in that you vote to get the candidate you want
elected. I don't think there's any evidence to show that the LibDems
are kept out of power because of it though.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 11:12:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
On Fri, 12 May 2017 17:23:56 +0100, Norman Wells
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing
cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s,
let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted
tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
That's not 'tactical voting'. Back to school with you.
"In voting methods, tactical voting (or strategic voting or
sophisticated voting or insincere voting) occurs, in elections with more
than two candidates, when a voter supports another candidate more
strongly than his or her sincere preference in order to prevent an
undesirable outcome."
So, what's the 'undesirable outcome' they're all trying to prevent?
Tactical voters refuse to vote for their own small party (e.g. Green)
because they think the Tories have more votes in their seat and vote
Labour instead to try to keep them out.
All voting is tactical in that you vote to get the candidate you want
elected. I don't think there's any evidence to show that the LibDems
are kept out of power because of it though.
FFS look up "tactical voting" you moron.
--
The sensible in the world are doomed to be frustrated by petty, officious idiots.
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 12:12:36 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
All voting is tactical in that you vote to get the candidate you want
elected. I don't think there's any evidence to show that the LibDems
are kept out of power because of it though.
FFS look up "tactical voting" you moron.
Look up "sociopathy" and learn about yourself, Birdbrain!
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"I don't use doors much."
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Todal
2017-05-12 21:27:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
Not until the Labour Party or the Tory Party choose a radical new policy
that could make a big difference to the wellbeing of the British people.
Labour did so when creating the NHS. The Tories did it when closing down
the coal mines to put all the miners on the dole, and selling off our
publicly owned services so that middle class people could become minor
shareholders and pretend to be toffs.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 21:36:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
If you're referring to the cannabis, then you're a misinformed idiot.
Post by Norman Wells
Nor will voting LibDem.
Are you saying they're lying? Or are you one of those dimwitted tactical voters?
Those who have no chance of being elected can promise the earth with no
consequnces, can't they?
They only have no chance of being elected because of stupid tactical voters.
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean people like you only vote Labour or Tory because they think
nobody votes for anyone else. Therefore nobody votes for anyone else,
and the world never changes.
Not until the Labour Party or the Tory Party choose a radical new policy
that could make a big difference to the wellbeing of the British people.
Labour did so when creating the NHS. The Tories did it when closing down
the coal mines to put all the miners on the dole, and selling off our
publicly owned services so that middle class people could become minor
shareholders and pretend to be toffs.
You can vote for a radical smaller party.
--
We used to mock the Americans' litigiousness, political correctness, health & safety obsessions and the like.
Now Britain is full of lazy lard buckets who'll sue for everything they can get if they even stub their toe on something.
I need to find a new country to live in.
The Peeler
2017-05-12 21:50:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:36:36 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by The Todal
Not until the Labour Party or the Tory Party choose a radical new policy
that could make a big difference to the wellbeing of the British people.
Labour did so when creating the NHS. The Tories did it when closing down
the coal mines to put all the miners on the dole, and selling off our
publicly owned services so that middle class people could become minor
shareholders and pretend to be toffs.
You can vote for a radical smaller party.
I suggest, you vote for whoever you want to vote, and he votes for whoever
he wants to vote! Agreed, Birdbrain? But then, of course, you would have no
reason to keep blathering endlessly! LOL
--
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson") about himself:
"I can sleep outside in a temperature of -20C wearing only shorts".
"I once took a dump behind some bushes and slid down a hill to wipe my
arse".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
The Peeler
2017-05-12 21:40:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:17:50 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
You mean Labour and the Tories have conspired to vote for one another
just to keep the LibDems out?
Shocking! But thanks for telling us. You learn something every day.
No, I mean
Who gives a shit, Birdbrain? <G>
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"I can drive according to the rules if I have to, but as soon as I'm not in
a driving test I go double the speed limit, ignore red lights, let the
pedestrians get out of my way, and don't wear a poofy seatbelt."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Brian Reay
2017-05-13 05:19:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
It won't do you any good.
Nor will voting LibDem.
It is a cheap shot to grab votes, I hope it backfires.

I've no axe to grind with the idea but they are just a nasty little
party trying to muddy the water. Look at the problems they caused last time.
--
Suspect someone is claiming a benefit under false pretences? Incapacity
Benefit or Personal Independence Payment when they don't need it? They
are depriving those in real need!

https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud
The Todal
2017-05-12 21:36:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.

I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.

Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows. It will happen regardless of which
party is in power. It has nothing to do with conservatism, socialism or
liberalism or green politics. It has everything to do with satisfying
consumer demand, improving public health (through stricter regulation of
quality and strength of the product) and finding something new to tax.
Norman Wells
2017-05-12 21:56:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.
Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows.
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.

Any idea when?
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-12 21:59:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.
Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows.
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.
Any idea when?
Being able to kill many people is not the same as being able to put a substance into your own body.
--
More people in the world are bitten by New Yorkers than by sharks.
The Peeler
2017-05-12 22:58:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 22:59:08 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.
Any idea when?
Being able to kill many people is not the same as being able to put a
substance into your own body.
ROTFLOL! Idiot!
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic "mind" at work:
"Satan is god's wife. Woman are evil."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-13 07:58:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.
Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows.
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.
Any idea when?
Being able to kill many people is not the same as being able to put a
substance into your own body.
Where the USA leads, the UK eventually follows. That's what you said.
Now it seems it's not.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 11:12:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.
Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows.
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.
Any idea when?
Being able to kill many people is not the same as being able to put a
substance into your own body.
Where the USA leads, the UK eventually follows. That's what you said.
Now it seems it's not.
No I didn't. Learn to operate your newsreader correctly.
--
Acupuncture is a jab well done.
The Todal
2017-05-13 12:51:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
I suppose they couldn't promise to abolish student loans again, because
it would draw attention to the fact that the LibDems broke their promise
on that pledge in 2010 and cannot therefore be trusted to keep any
promises. Maybe they should promise to hand out free bars of chocolate
to everyone celebrating their 18th birthday.
Various states in the USA have legalised cannabis shops. Where the USA
leads, the UK eventually follows.
I suppose you think we'll all have the right to bear arms shortly then.
Any idea when?
Being able to kill many people is not the same as being able to put a
substance into your own body.
Where the USA leads, the UK eventually follows. That's what you said.
Now it seems it's not.
No I didn't. Learn to operate your newsreader correctly.
And I would agree of course that "where the USA leads, the UK eventually
follows" does not apply to absolutely everything.

Admittedly our Cadbury's chocolate now tastes horrible after Kraft took
over Cadbury's. And we now see horrible Hershey bars on our shelves.
And our industries are now infected with American jargon like service
level agreements, key performance indicators and employee appraisals.
Solicitors are now called law firms and they now employ paralegals
instead of clerks. And increasingly we use the hideous word "coworker"
instead of "colleague".

But we aren't likely to legalise the widespread use of firearms. Our
toilets aren't likely to become bathrooms and our gardens aren't likely
to become backyards. Our police officers aren't likely to shoot us for
being black.
Roger Hayter
2017-05-25 21:18:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The Todal <***@icloud.com> wrote:

snip
Post by The Todal
Our police officers aren't likely to shoot us for
being black.
Well, only a very few of us, anyway.
--
Roger Hayter
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-25 21:31:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Roger Hayter
snip
Post by The Todal
Our police officers aren't likely to shoot us for
being black.
Well, only a very few of us, anyway.
Don't get caught Driving While Black and you'll be fine.
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 12:12:10 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
Where the USA leads, the UK eventually follows. That's what you said.
Now it seems it's not.
No I didn't. Learn to operate your newsreader correctly.
"Operate"??? LOL YOU first learn how to adjust the line breaks in your
fucked up newsreader, Birdbrain!
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange world:
"Why is the soup talking to itself?"
MID: <***@red.lan>
Brian Reay
2017-05-13 05:25:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
They could promise anything, their chances of forming a Gov. are about
the same as my being PM. I doubt the election will even be close enough
for them to hold any influence- they just want bums on seats.

They are a joke of a party, the Greens in suits or the Monster Raving
Loonies without the fancy dress.
--
Suspect someone is claiming a benefit under false pretences? Incapacity
Benefit or Personal Independence Payment when they don't need it? They
are depriving those in real need!

https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud
Bod
2017-05-13 06:18:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Brian Reay
Post by The Todal
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
Bloody great news. About time. This will have me voting Lib Dem.
http://youtu.be/KBnAKH6Rd00
YES!!!
Although I'm in favour of legalising cannabis shops, to make it a LibDem
manifesto pledge smacks of desperation.
They could promise anything, their chances of forming a Gov. are about
the same as my being PM. I doubt the election will even be close enough
for them to hold any influence- they just want bums on seats.
They are a joke of a party, the Greens in suits or the Monster Raving
Loonies without the fancy dress.
Agreed.
burfordTjustice
2017-05-12 19:38:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:43:36 +0100
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s,
let people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
As if they are not kooky enough now
Vidcapper
2017-05-13 07:02:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Norman Wells
2017-05-13 08:00:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Bod
2017-05-13 10:35:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.

It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.

Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 11:11:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis i=
f
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.=
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, =
let
Post by Bod
Post by Vidcapper
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spa=
ced
Post by Bod
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness=
,
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher c=
an
Post by Bod
be heard.
You're talking to Norman Wells. He has the same rule-based mentality as=
Steve. It's illegal, therefore it's wrong.

-- =

A statistician took a standard deviation from his normal way home becaus=
e the mean of the population was after him.
Bod
2017-05-13 11:31:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
You're talking to Norman Wells. He has the same rule-based mentality as
Steve. It's illegal, therefore it's wrong.
He certainly thinks he knows better than the government appointed expert
*Prof David Nutt*.

The government didn't like what the expert said so they sacked him.

Drugs Live cannabis trial: Hash is less harmful than any other drug ...
www.independent.co.uk/.../drugs-live-cannabis-tral-hash-is-less-harmful-than-any-oth...

4 Mar 2015 - Professor David Nutt says a distinction must be made
between traditional ... that ranked cannabis as more dangerous than
alcohol or tobacco.

Alcohol worse than ecstasy on shock new drug list | Politics | The ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Politics › Constitutional reform
23 Mar 2007 - Cannabis was 11th, while LSD and ecstasy were 14th and
18th ... Prof Nutt said young people already know ecstasy is relatively
safe, ...

Government drug adviser David Nutt sacked | Politics | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › Politics › Drugs policy
30 Oct 2009 - Professor David Nutt was asked to resign after his claims
ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol. ... that alcohol and
tobacco were more harmful than many illegal drugs, including LSD,
ecstasy and cannabis.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 11:40:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis=
if
Post by Bod
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifest=
o.
Post by Bod
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s=
, let
Post by Bod
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social=
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic..=
.
Post by Bod
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by s=
paced
Post by Bod
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fr=
i
Post by Bod
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenne=
ss,
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher=
can
Post by Bod
be heard.
You're talking to Norman Wells. He has the same rule-based mentality=
as
Steve. It's illegal, therefore it's wrong.
He certainly thinks he knows better than the government appointed expe=
rt
*Prof David Nutt*.
The government didn't like what the expert said so they sacked him.
Drugs Live cannabis trial: Hash is less harmful than any other drug ..=
.
www.independent.co.uk/.../drugs-live-cannabis-tral-hash-is-less-harmfu=
l-than-any-oth...
4 Mar 2015 - Professor David Nutt says a distinction must be made
between traditional ... that ranked cannabis as more dangerous than
alcohol or tobacco.
Alcohol worse than ecstasy on shock new drug list | Politics | The ...=
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Politics =E2=80=BA Constitutiona=
l reform
23 Mar 2007 - Cannabis was 11th, while LSD and ecstasy were 14th and
18th ... Prof Nutt said young people already know ecstasy is relativel=
y
safe, ...
Government drug adviser David Nutt sacked | Politics | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Politics =E2=80=BA Drugs policy
30 Oct 2009 - Professor David Nutt was asked to resign after his claim=
s
ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol. ... that alcohol and=
tobacco were more harmful than many illegal drugs, including LSD,
ecstasy and cannabis.
The only conclusion I can come to is 90% of the world are stupid. And m=
ost of those are in politics. Seriously, doesn't anybody have any commo=
n sense anymore?

-- =

A patient complained to his doctor, "I've been to three other doctors an=
d none of them agreed with your diagnosis."
The doctor calmly replied, "Just wait until the autopsy, then they'll se=
e that I was right."
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 12:40:04 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
30 Oct 2009 - Professor David Nutt was asked to resign after his claims
ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol. ... that alcohol and
tobacco were more harmful than many illegal drugs, including LSD,
ecstasy and cannabis.
The only conclusion I can come to is 90% of the world are stupid. And
most of those are in politics. Seriously, doesn't anybody have any
common sense anymore?
ROTFLOL! You ARE aware that FAR MORE than 90% of all the people who get to
know you think that it's YOU who is abysmally stupid, Birdbrain? And don't
try to tell me that you don't know it! <BG>
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic "mind" at work:
"Doesn't all meat taste pretty much like chicken?"
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Government drug adviser David Nutt sacked | Politics | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › Politics › Drugs policy
30 Oct 2009 - Professor David Nutt was asked to resign after his claims
ecstasy and LSD were less dangerous than alcohol. ... that alcohol and
tobacco were more harmful than many illegal drugs, including LSD,
ecstasy and cannabis.
And rightfully he was sacked. LSD is one of the most dangerous hallucinatory
drugs if you are not under supervision and people had all kinds of accidents
or died because they believed they could "fly". ISTR that the Mansion gang
committed their murders under the influence of LSD.
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 12:11:29 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
You're talking to Norman Wells. He has the same rule-based mentality as
Steve. It's illegal, therefore it's wrong.
In other words, they are SANE, whereas you aren't, Birdbrain!
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"The most comfortable underwear is no underwear. And that's quite normal
for both sexes."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Norman Wells
2017-05-13 11:37:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 11:40:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis =
if
Post by Bod
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto=
.
Post by Bod
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s,=
let
Post by Bod
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...=
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by sp=
aced
Post by Bod
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri=
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkennes=
s,
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher =
can
Post by Bod
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic=
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Except neither is the case, what makes you think it is? Someone who smo=
kes pot occasionally is no different to someone who drinks occasionally.=


-- =

Snap-off parts, because it's French.
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 12:40:58 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Norman Wells
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Except neither is the case, what makes you think it is? Someone who
smokes pot occasionally is no different to someone who drinks
occasionally.
Ah, well, your case proves the opposite to be true, Birdbrain!
--
Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson") about himself:
"I can sleep outside in a temperature of -20C wearing only shorts".
"I once took a dump behind some bushes and slid down a hill to wipe my
arse".
(Courtesy of Mr Pounder)
Bod
2017-05-13 12:06:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 12:11:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis=
if
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifest=
o.
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s=
, let
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social=
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic..=
.
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by s=
paced
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fr=
i
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenne=
ss,
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher=
can
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographi=
c
Post by Bod
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target=
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do people s=
moke for profit?

-- =

Why did the Blonde put ice in her boyfriend's condom?
To keep the swelling down.
Bod
2017-05-13 12:46:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do people
smoke for profit?
It's the difference between the few who smoke it all day long and the
ones who do it socially just to relax and chill out.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 12:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannab=
is if
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manife=
sto.
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis soci=
al
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic=
...
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by=
spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every =
fri
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunken=
ness,
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretch=
er
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demograp=
hic
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a targ=
et
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do=
.
Post by Bod
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do peopl=
e
Post by Bod
smoke for profit?
It's the difference between the few who smoke it all day long and the
ones who do it socially just to relax and chill out.
Doing it all day long would probably increase their brain power so they =
could vote more accurately.

-- =

The German for nipple is "Brustwarze" - or "breast wart".
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:53:28 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
It's the difference between the few who smoke it all day long and the
ones who do it socially just to relax and chill out.
Doing it all day long would probably increase their brain power so they
could vote more accurately.
That's what you REALLY believe, eh, retard? <G>
--
More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"Most animals don't attack me, even though their owners tell me they're
dangerous. I had to laugh at one woman who ran out to tell me her dog was
going to bite my hand off, then saw me petting it. I once bought a parrot
that was extremely vicious. I walked into his house and picked it up, then
cuddled it. He said he'd never seen it do that in 10 years."
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Todal
2017-05-13 12:53:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to
over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do people
smoke for profit?
There are self-medicating cannabis smokers, you know. Who use the drug
to combat chronic pain or to alleviate nausea from prescription drugs.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 13:02:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannab=
is if
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manife=
sto.
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis soci=
al
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic=
...
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by=
spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every =
fri
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunken=
ness,
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretch=
er
Post by Bod
Post by Bod
can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demograp=
hic
Post by Bod
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a targ=
et
Post by Bod
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do=
.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do peopl=
e
smoke for profit?
There are self-medicating cannabis smokers, you know. Who use the drug=
to combat chronic pain or to alleviate nausea from prescription drugs.=
Oh so you're fine with that but not smoking it to just feel good?

-- =

"The best things in life actually cost a lot of money" - The Beatles
The Todal
2017-05-13 13:08:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Bod
Post by Norman Wells
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis social clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demographic...
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected by spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E every fri
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...
https://www.theguardian.com › Society › Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stretcher can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demographic
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a target
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do people
smoke for profit?
There are self-medicating cannabis smokers, you know. Who use the drug
to combat chronic pain or to alleviate nausea from prescription drugs.
Oh so you're fine with that but not smoking it to just feel good?
That's not what I said.
James Wilkinson Sword
2017-05-13 13:17:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
The Liberal Democrats would legalise selling and growing cannabis if
elected, the party has confirmed ahead of publishing its manifesto.
The party would allow licensed shops to sell the drug to over-18s, let
people grow cannabis at home and introduce small "cannabis so=
cial
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by Bod
clubs".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39897999
It certainly gives a good indication of their target demograph=
ic...
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
It's what we all need, though, isn't it? A government elected =
by
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
spaced
out potheads?
Ha! by your own logic, pissed voters can drink alcohol legally.=
It's alcohol that causes all of the fights and fills up A&E ever=
y fri
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
and saturdays.
Alcohol and A&E: should drunk people be kept out of hospital ...=
https://www.theguardian.com =E2=80=BA Society =E2=80=BA Alcohol
2 Jan 2015 - Fed up with the pressure placed on the NHS by drunkenness,
... the slurred and expletive-filled demands of a man on a stret=
cher
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
can
be heard.
All that is true of course. And a party that had a target demogr=
aphic
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
of drunks would be as distatsteful to me as a party that has a ta=
rget
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
demographic of potheads.
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the=
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers =
do.
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do peo=
ple
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
smoke for profit?
There are self-medicating cannabis smokers, you know. Who use the dr=
ug
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
to combat chronic pain or to alleviate nausea from prescription drug=
s.
Post by The Todal
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Oh so you're fine with that but not smoking it to just feel good?
That's not what I said.
What percentage of people do you think use it medically?

And how do you know the recreational ones aren't also doing it to allevi=
ate an unknown illness?

-- =

"It was reported last week that a citizen's group is trying to remove po=
rn channels from hotels across the country."
"The group is called the Coalition of People Who Want to Ruin Everything=
."
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:17:06 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by The Todal
That's not what I said.
What percentage of people do you think use it medically?
And how do you know the recreational ones aren't also doing it to
alleviate an unknown illness?
So, what "pain" are you trying to alleviate, you drug-addict? The pain of
your abnormal existence as a despised sociopath?
--
Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) about himself:
" I have no plans to make children. The world is already too full, and I
admit I'm not the healthiest best looking person Only healthy fit good
looking people should reproduce."
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:02:45 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by James Wilkinson Sword
Post by The Todal
There are self-medicating cannabis smokers, you know. Who use the drug
to combat chronic pain or to alleviate nausea from prescription drugs.
Oh so you're fine with that but not smoking it to just feel good?
Sicko, every idiotic drunkard drinks because it makes him "feel good"!
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange sociopathic
world:
"...men are superior, so a woman dressed as a man looks better, not worse."
MID: <***@red.lan>
The Peeler
2017-05-13 15:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:11:01 +0100, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
Post by Bod
Most recreational Cannabis smokers just have a joint or two in the
evenings to relax. The same as most recreational alcohol drinkers do.
"recreational Cannabis smokers"? What other kind is there? Do people smoke for profit?
LOL! Idiot!
--
More from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) sociopathic world:
"I can drive according to the rules if I have to, but as soon as I'm not in
a driving test I go double the speed limit, ignore red lights, let the
pedestrians get out of my way, and don't wear a poofy seatbelt."
MID: <***@red.lan>
Loading...