Discussion:
Woman, 64, Filmed Having Sex With Dogs in Vile 'Bestiality Party' Claims She Didn’t Know it was Illegal
(too old to reply)
James Harris
2017-05-15 12:16:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been
spared a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that
bestiality was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a
police investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which
dog owners watched their dogs have sex with women, before having
sex with the women themselves. The investigation, which centered
on an Internet forum specializing in bestiality, led the police
to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with
vile images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various
dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with
various bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme
images. Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative
sexual acts with dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying
out sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs
Bowditch engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog
named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had
penetrative sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was
unaware it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal
sex once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had
already suffered great public humiliation, having been
ostracized by friends and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not
sentenced to prison. Rather she sentenced to community service
with 12 months’ supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result
of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not
surprise me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was-
illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
--
James Harris
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-15 13:04:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:16:46 +0100, James Harris
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been
spared a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that
bestiality was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a
police investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which
dog owners watched their dogs have sex with women, before having
sex with the women themselves. The investigation, which centered
on an Internet forum specializing in bestiality, led the police
to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with
vile images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various
dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with
various bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme
images. Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative
sexual acts with dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying
out sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs
Bowditch engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog
named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had
penetrative sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was
unaware it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal
sex once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had
already suffered great public humiliation, having been
ostracized by friends and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not
sentenced to prison. Rather she sentenced to community service
with 12 months’ supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result
of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not
surprise me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was-
illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Which raises a different question: on what basis is bestiality
treated differently than inter-racial sex?
The Peeler
2017-05-15 14:34:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 06:04:19 -0700, jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by James Harris
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Which raises a different question: on what basis is bestiality
treated differently than inter-racial sex?
Which raises the most important question: why can you housebound sexually
crippled wanker not have sex with ANYONE ...other than with yourself?
--
The top 5 truths about poor dumb Razovic, our colostomy bag wearing resident
psychopath, aka "The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
she can't get out of the house anymore,
she got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
she can't FUCK anymore,
she got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
j***@gmail.com
2017-05-15 15:22:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
How low can you go?

A Chihuahua
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Exorcist Missile")
2017-05-16 12:50:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
a shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Which raises a different question: on what basis is bestiality
treated differently than inter-racial sex?
The pedo speaks... LOL!
abelard
2017-05-15 15:25:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:16:46 +0100, James Harris
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been
spared a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that
bestiality was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a
police investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which
dog owners watched their dogs have sex with women, before having
sex with the women themselves. The investigation, which centered
on an Internet forum specializing in bestiality, led the police
to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with
vile images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various
dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with
various bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme
images. Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative
sexual acts with dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying
out sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs
Bowditch engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog
named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had
penetrative sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was
unaware it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal
sex once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had
already suffered great public humiliation, having been
ostracized by friends and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not
sentenced to prison. Rather she sentenced to community service
with 12 months’ supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result
of the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not
surprise me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was-
illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
i'm pretty well convinced that it's about fashion

though i'm for franchise by examination
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-15 16:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been spared
a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that bestiality
was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a police
investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which dog owners
watched their dogs have sex with women, before having sex with the
women themselves. The investigation, which centered on an Internet
forum specializing in bestiality, led the police to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with vile
images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with various
bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme images.
Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with
dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out
sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch
engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative
sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware
it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex
once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had already
suffered great public humiliation, having been ostracized by friends
and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not sentenced to
prison. Rather she sentenced to community service with 12 months’
supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of
the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise
me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was- illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Interestingly the judge said “What you engaged in was first of all
unlawful and secondly disgusting" the second part of which was a moral
judgment and not a legal one. It is the sort of thing which could have
been said, and probably was said, to thousands of gay men who were
convicted at a time when their sexual orientation was just as illegal and
disgusting as bestiality is today.

Now homosexual acts are no longer illegal and homosexuality is no longer
considered disgusting.

Why some sexual orientations such as bestiality, necrophilia and others
too weird to mention are illegal while others such as homosexuality are
legal seems to hinge on what society considers to be disgusting for the
moment and is subject to change. In fact whether they are considered
sexual orientations at all depends on social fashion rather than science.

The claim that it is only paraphilias which are illegal and homosexuality
is not a paraphilia but a sexual orientation seems to be pure fiction
since the medical classification is apparently determined by the legal
status, i.e social convention, rather than the other way round.

Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry and
have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers is
pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
Nick
2017-05-15 16:14:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by James Harris
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Interestingly the judge said “What you engaged in was first of all
unlawful and secondly disgusting" the second part of which was a moral
judgment and not a legal one.
Tough job being a Judge.

I don't know how they sleep at night...,

You know, what with them spending all day asleep and only having to wake
up to say a few words of twaddle at the end of a trial.
Incubus
2017-05-15 16:22:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been spared
a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that bestiality
was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a police
investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which dog owners
watched their dogs have sex with women, before having sex with the
women themselves. The investigation, which centered on an Internet
forum specializing in bestiality, led the police to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with vile
images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with various
bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme images.
Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with
dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out
sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch
engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative
sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware
it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex
once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had already
suffered great public humiliation, having been ostracized by friends
and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not sentenced to
prison. Rather she sentenced to community service with 12 months’
supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of
the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise
me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was- illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Interestingly the judge said “What you engaged in was first of all
unlawful and secondly disgusting" the second part of which was a moral
judgment and not a legal one. It is the sort of thing which could have
been said, and probably was said, to thousands of gay men who were
convicted at a time when their sexual orientation was just as illegal and
disgusting as bestiality is today.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1573187/Moral-judgments-have-no-place-in-court.html
James Harris
2017-05-15 16:33:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been spared
a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that bestiality
was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a police
investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which dog owners
watched their dogs have sex with women, before having sex with the
women themselves. The investigation, which centered on an Internet
forum specializing in bestiality, led the police to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with vile
images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with various
bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme images.
Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with
dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out
sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch
engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative
sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware
it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex
once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had already
suffered great public humiliation, having been ostracized by friends
and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not sentenced to
prison. Rather she sentenced to community service with 12 months’
supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of
the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise
me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was- illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Interestingly the judge said “What you engaged in was first of all
unlawful and secondly disgusting" the second part of which was a moral
judgment and not a legal one. It is the sort of thing which could have
been said, and probably was said, to thousands of gay men who were
convicted at a time when their sexual orientation was just as illegal and
disgusting as bestiality is today.
Now homosexual acts are no longer illegal and homosexuality is no longer
considered disgusting.
Why some sexual orientations such as bestiality, necrophilia and others
too weird to mention are illegal while others such as homosexuality are
legal seems to hinge on what society considers to be disgusting for the
moment and is subject to change. In fact whether they are considered
sexual orientations at all depends on social fashion rather than science.
That's what I thought. It leads to moral questions. For example, we know
that it is now illegal for guesthouse owners to refuse to let gay men
share a bed, even if in their beliefs homosexual activity is
"disgusting". But if they owned a stables they might object - on very
similar moral grounds - to letting a guest to have sex with an animal on
their premises. The difference between the two cases is probably down to
law as influenced by societal opinion.
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
The claim that it is only paraphilias which are illegal and homosexuality
is not a paraphilia but a sexual orientation seems to be pure fiction
since the medical classification is apparently determined by the legal
status, i.e social convention, rather than the other way round.
Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry and
have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers is
pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
There is surely a _medical_ case for state intervention against incest
where it can result in deformities in children.
--
James Harris
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-15 16:48:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by James Harris
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry
and have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and
mothers is pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
There is surely a _medical_ case for state intervention against incest
where it can result in deformities in children.
This means the state should prohibit persons with genetically
transmissable conditions such as Down syndrome, Cystic fibrosis,
Haemophilia and others from marrying and having sex. This isn't the case
so why should siblings marrying and having sex, or even mothers and sons,
fathers and daughters marrying and having sex be treated differently?

The genetic disease argument cannot be used where fathers and sons are
concerned, so why shouldn't fathers and sons be permitted to marry and
have a happy sex life together?
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-15 17:02:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 16:48:37 -0000 (UTC), Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by James Harris
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry
and have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and
mothers is pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
There is surely a _medical_ case for state intervention against incest
where it can result in deformities in children.
This means the state should prohibit persons with genetically
transmissable conditions such as Down syndrome, Cystic fibrosis,
Haemophilia and others from marrying and having sex. This isn't the case
so why should siblings marrying and having sex, or even mothers and sons,
fathers and daughters marrying and having sex be treated differently?
The genetic disease argument cannot be used where fathers and sons are
concerned, so why shouldn't fathers and sons be permitted to marry and
have a happy sex life together?
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-15 17:21:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:02:26 -0700, jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
Give 'em time.

Already the youth wing of the Swedish Liberal party are calling for
incest and necrophilia to be legalised.
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-15 19:02:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 17:21:03 -0000 (UTC), Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:02:26 -0700, jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
Give 'em time.
Already the youth wing of the Swedish Liberal party are calling for
incest and necrophilia to be legalised.
Since sexual 'consent' is the only relevant factor to the loonie left,
there's no reason why either should be illegal.
The Peeler
2017-05-15 19:50:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 12:02:49 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Already the youth wing of the Swedish Liberal party are calling for
incest and necrophilia to be legalised.
Since sexual 'consent' is the only relevant factor to the loonie left,
there's no reason why either should be illegal.
Did you FINALLY find an idiot who swings like you, dumb anal sexually
crippled Razovic? LOL
--
The top 5 truths about poor dumb Razovic, our colostomy bag wearing resident
psychopath, aka "The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
she can't get out of the house anymore,
she got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
she can't FUCK anymore,
she got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Exorcist Missile")
2017-05-16 12:56:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
a shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Since sexual 'consent' is the only relevant factor to the loonie left,
there's no reason why either should be illegal.
What gall on you, old pedo. Your day will come.

The Peeler
2017-05-15 17:56:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:02:26 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
The genetic disease argument cannot be used where fathers and sons are
concerned, so why shouldn't fathers and sons be permitted to marry and
have a happy sex life together?
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
You two sick idiots OBVIOUSLY did! <VBG>
--
Anal Razovic's motto:
"An enema for every constipated anus."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Svenne Tvaerskaegg
2017-05-15 18:15:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Peeler
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:02:26 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an
ass of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
The genetic disease argument cannot be used where fathers and sons are
concerned, so why shouldn't fathers and sons be permitted to marry and
have a happy sex life together?
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
You two sick idiots OBVIOUSLY did! <VBG>
All rational people should consider it because it is the way society is
heading.
The Peeler
2017-05-15 18:20:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by The Peeler
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
You two sick idiots OBVIOUSLY did! <VBG>
All rational people should consider it because it is the way society is
heading.
Idiot!
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-15 19:00:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 18:15:23 -0000 (UTC), Svenne Tvaerskaegg
[FLUHS Grik skata]
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
All rational people should consider it because it is the way society is
heading.
Griks such as the Foreskin Peeler have, been doing it for MILLENNIA!
The Peeler
2017-05-15 19:53:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 12:00:52 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by The Peeler
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
You two sick idiots OBVIOUSLY did! <VBG>
All rational people should consider it because it is the way society is
heading.
Griks such as the Foreskin Peeler have, been doing it for MILLENNIA!
I'm curious to see how long it will still take him to realize to what kind
of an idiot he keeps talking! Seems to take him longer than most other
people! LOL
--
Anal Razovic's motto:
"An enema for every constipated anus."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Loose Cannon
2017-05-16 12:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
a shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Griks
We know ALL about your problem with "Griks", old pedo!

YES! limey ARYAN babes COMPETE to suck Greek Dick... yet, they shit and
piss all over the nazoid sub-louse Andrew "Andrzej" Baron... he could
never get ANYWHERE near them! Why?? Anyone?

Compare, folks:

"Nine British women arrested after oral sex competition on Greek island"
Source: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nine-british-women-arrested-after-318205

vs.

"You may have something there. This touchy-feely 'New Man' attitude
isn't getting me anywhere. Perhaps I should go for the more basic
Neanderthal approach." --Posted by the nazoid sub-louse PEDO Andrew "Andrzej"
Baron, Message-ID: <***@news.ukgateway.net>#1/1.

LOL oh LOL!
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Exorcist Missile")
2017-05-16 12:51:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
a shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Same sex incestual unions are something even the most liberal loonies
haven't considered yet.
You got some gall, old pedo...
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-05-15 17:01:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 16:01:45 -0000 (UTC), Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Post by James Harris
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:40:07 +0200 (CEST), UK Skanks
A British retiree who was caught on camera having sex with a St.
Bernard named Oscar, a black Labrador and an Alsatian has been spared
a prison sentence after claiming she did not realize that bestiality
was illegal.
Carol Bowditch, 64, of Lincolnshire in England was exposed in a police
investigation of an alleged “bestiality party” in which dog owners
watched their dogs have sex with women, before having sex with the
women themselves. The investigation, which centered on an Internet
forum specializing in bestiality, led the police to Bowditch.
Police who searched her home found computer files filled with vile
images of Bowditch engaged in sexual congress with various dogs.
Bowditch and 65 year old Daniel Galloway were charged with various
bestiality-related crimes.
Speaking at Lincoln Crown Court, prosecutor Victoria Rose said,
“When the DVD was analysed it was found to contain extreme images.
Those images portrayed persons committing penetrative sexual acts with
dogs.
“Also included were images of this defendant herself carrying out
sexual activity.
“Included was an eight minute and 59 seconds video of Mrs Bowditch
engaging in vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard dog named Oscar.
“When the defendant was interviewed she admitted she had penetrative
sex with dogs.
“She accepted it had taken place over several years. She was unaware
it was illegal.
“She identified the dogs. She said she had penetrative vaginal sex
once with a Labrador and twice with an Alsatian.
“She recalled she had vaginal and oral sex with a St Bernard.”
Bowditch admitted to one charge of sex with an animal and also
admitted to possessing extreme pornographic images. Her attorney
argued, however, that she had no prior convictions and had already
suffered great public humiliation, having been ostracized by friends
and family.
As a result of these mitigating factors, Bowditch was not sentenced to
prison. Rather she sentenced to community service with 12 months’
supervision, and a 16-week nighttime curfew.
In sentencing Bowditch, Judge Michael Heath told her: “What you
engaged in was first of all unlawful and secondly disgusting.
“I am told that you have received public humiliation as a result of
the publicity that this case has attracted. That does not surprise
me.”
https://heatst.com/uncategorized/woman-64-filmed-having-sex-with-
dogs-in-vile-bestiality-party-claims-she-didnt-know-it-was- illegal/
were the dogs consenting adults?
That raises a serious question: On what basis are bestiality and
homosexuality treated as different by UK law? Or are laws concerning
them nothing more than subject to current opinions of what is and what
is not acceptable?
Interestingly the judge said “What you engaged in was first of all
unlawful and secondly disgusting" the second part of which was a moral
judgment and not a legal one. It is the sort of thing which could have
been said, and probably was said, to thousands of gay men who were
convicted at a time when their sexual orientation was just as illegal and
disgusting as bestiality is today.
Now homosexual acts are no longer illegal and homosexuality is no longer
considered disgusting.
Why some sexual orientations such as bestiality, necrophilia and others
too weird to mention are illegal while others such as homosexuality are
legal seems to hinge on what society considers to be disgusting for the
moment and is subject to change. In fact whether they are considered
sexual orientations at all depends on social fashion rather than science.
The claim that it is only paraphilias which are illegal and homosexuality
is not a paraphilia but a sexual orientation seems to be pure fiction
since the medical classification is apparently determined by the legal
status, i.e social convention, rather than the other way round.
Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry and
have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers is
pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
Today's sexual disorientation is tomorrow's alternative lifestyle.

I predict there will be Paedo Pride parades along Whitehall within the
next 100 years.
The Peeler
2017-05-15 17:59:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 10:01:08 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Svenne Tvaerskaegg
Why men can marry other men and women marry other women but not marry and
have sex with their dogs, cats, brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers is
pure social convention and can, and probably will, change.
Today's sexual disorientation is tomorrow's alternative lifestyle.
I predict there will be Paedo Pride parades along Whitehall within the
next 100 years.
You'd better see to it that you get your OWN "sex"-life in order instead of
ranting constantly about OTHER people's sex lives and their genitals for
YEARS, virtually around the clock, you housebound abnormal sexual cripple!
--
The top 5 truths about poor dumb Razovic, our colostomy bag wearing resident
psychopath, aka "The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
she can't get out of the house anymore,
she got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
she can't FUCK anymore,
she got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Exorcist Missile")
2017-05-16 12:51:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
a shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Today's sexual disorientation is tomorrow's alternative lifestyle.
Tell it to da judge, sick old child-rapist.
Loading...