Discussion:
UK Proposes Prison Time For Offensive Online Posts
Add Reply
BurfordTJustice
2018-05-12 10:48:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Racing Germany to the finish line..

UK Proposes Prison Time For Offensive Online Posts
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted new guidelines
proposing prison sentences of between 26 weeks and six years for social
media posts deemed hostile toward a race, religion or sexual identity.

The proposals have been made in relation to the Public Order Act, which
prohibits all activities "intended or likely to stir up hatred" against
minority groups, including transgender people. Many of the examples in the
document reference social media use.

Those "in a position of trust, authority or influence" abusing their
position to stir up hatred are facing the harshest sentences. The suggested
punishment will also be more severe if the offender has a particularly large
online following or if he or she is associated with any groups promoting
hatred based on race or religion.

Three types of offences are considered the most serious. The first of these,
understandably, are "cases where activity is encouraged which threatens or
endangers life." However, more surprisingly, the other two categories are
"cases involving widespread dissemination of material and/or a strong
likelihood that many would be influenced."

"Volumes of these offences are extremely low and there have been no
offenders sentenced for some offences," the document says. However, the
Council still believes that the use of social media channels as vehicles for
hate crimes is a growing problem, "given the recent social climate and an
enhanced focus on this type of offending." Their proposals are the start of
a three-month consultation process.

In August last year, the UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that
it intended to punish online hate crime as seriously as personal,
face-to-face abuse. They threatened to treat offences via major social media
platforms the most strictly. In October 2016, CPS notably determined that a
hate crime needs only to be so perceived by a victim, without the need for
objective evidence.

In January this year, Germany began enforcing a law demanding social media
companies to remove hate speech and fake news from their platforms. This
legislation is currently being revised, following criticism that press
freedom was negatively impacted, after more content was blocked than
necessary and a satirical magazine's account was suspended.
BurfordTJustice
2018-05-12 20:25:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
bod and poo will get life....LOL



"BurfordTJustice" <burford/***@uk.MI15> wrote in message news:pd6gqk$rc7$***@dont-email.me...
: Racing Germany to the finish line..
:
: UK Proposes Prison Time For Offensive Online Posts
: The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted new guidelines
: proposing prison sentences of between 26 weeks and six years for social
: media posts deemed hostile toward a race, religion or sexual identity.
:
: The proposals have been made in relation to the Public Order Act, which
: prohibits all activities "intended or likely to stir up hatred" against
: minority groups, including transgender people. Many of the examples in the
: document reference social media use.
:
: Those "in a position of trust, authority or influence" abusing their
: position to stir up hatred are facing the harshest sentences. The
suggested
: punishment will also be more severe if the offender has a particularly
large
: online following or if he or she is associated with any groups promoting
: hatred based on race or religion.
:
: Three types of offences are considered the most serious. The first of
these,
: understandably, are "cases where activity is encouraged which threatens or
: endangers life." However, more surprisingly, the other two categories are
: "cases involving widespread dissemination of material and/or a strong
: likelihood that many would be influenced."
:
: "Volumes of these offences are extremely low and there have been no
: offenders sentenced for some offences," the document says. However, the
: Council still believes that the use of social media channels as vehicles
for
: hate crimes is a growing problem, "given the recent social climate and an
: enhanced focus on this type of offending." Their proposals are the start
of
: a three-month consultation process.
:
: In August last year, the UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that
: it intended to punish online hate crime as seriously as personal,
: face-to-face abuse. They threatened to treat offences via major social
media
: platforms the most strictly. In October 2016, CPS notably determined that
a
: hate crime needs only to be so perceived by a victim, without the need for
: objective evidence.
:
: In January this year, Germany began enforcing a law demanding social media
: companies to remove hate speech and fake news from their platforms. This
: legislation is currently being revised, following criticism that press
: freedom was negatively impacted, after more content was blocked than
: necessary and a satirical magazine's account was suspended.
:
:
:
BurfordTJustice
2018-05-13 11:28:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
"BurfordTJustice" <burford/***@uk.MI15> wrote in message news:pd6gqk$rc7$***@dont-email.me...
: Racing Germany to the finish line..
:
: UK Proposes Prison Time For Offensive Online Posts
: The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted new guidelines
: proposing prison sentences of between 26 weeks and six years for social
: media posts deemed hostile toward a race, religion or sexual identity.
:
: The proposals have been made in relation to the Public Order Act, which
: prohibits all activities "intended or likely to stir up hatred" against
: minority groups, including transgender people. Many of the examples in the
: document reference social media use.
:
: Those "in a position of trust, authority or influence" abusing their
: position to stir up hatred are facing the harshest sentences. The
suggested
: punishment will also be more severe if the offender has a particularly
large
: online following or if he or she is associated with any groups promoting
: hatred based on race or religion.
:
: Three types of offences are considered the most serious. The first of
these,
: understandably, are "cases where activity is encouraged which threatens or
: endangers life." However, more surprisingly, the other two categories are
: "cases involving widespread dissemination of material and/or a strong
: likelihood that many would be influenced."
:
: "Volumes of these offences are extremely low and there have been no
: offenders sentenced for some offences," the document says. However, the
: Council still believes that the use of social media channels as vehicles
for
: hate crimes is a growing problem, "given the recent social climate and an
: enhanced focus on this type of offending." Their proposals are the start
of
: a three-month consultation process.
:
: In August last year, the UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that
: it intended to punish online hate crime as seriously as personal,
: face-to-face abuse. They threatened to treat offences via major social
media
: platforms the most strictly. In October 2016, CPS notably determined that
a
: hate crime needs only to be so perceived by a victim, without the need for
: objective evidence.
:
: In January this year, Germany began enforcing a law demanding social media
: companies to remove hate speech and fake news from their platforms. This
: legislation is currently being revised, following criticism that press
: freedom was negatively impacted, after more content was blocked than
: necessary and a satirical magazine's account was suspended.
:
:
:
BurfordTJustice
2018-05-13 15:10:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
"Rev. Wright" <***@wrong.guv> wrote in message news:fQWJC.90791$***@fx19.iad...
: On 05/12/2018 06:48 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
: > The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted new guidelines
: > proposing prison sentences of between 26 weeks and six years for social
: > media posts deemed hostile toward a race, religion or sexual identity.
:
: WTF?
:
: Why do gay mulatto Trinity United Church of Christmembers get all the
government protection?
:

Loading...