Discussion:
US federal judge rules that AR-15s and large capacity magazines are not protected by Second Amendment
Add Reply
BurfordTJustice
2018-04-09 11:48:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
"Bod" <***@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:***@mid.individual.net...
:A federal judge has ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect a
: citizen's right to own an AR-15 rifle and other, similar semi-automatic
: "military style" rifles and high capacity magazines.
:
: "AR-15s and [large capacity magazines] are most useful in military
: service, they are beyond the scope of the Second Amendment ... and may
: be banned," Massachusetts District Court Judge William Young wrote in
: his ruling.
:
:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/gun-control-second-amendment-ar-15-not-protected-assault-rifles-massachusetts-a8294186.html
: --
: Bod
BurfordTJustice
2018-04-09 11:49:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Like yourself ?

Like you he promotes the agenda not worried about being over turned.
Post by BurfordTJustice
A federal judge has ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect a
citizen's right to own an AR-15 rifle and other, similar semi-automatic
"military style" rifles and high capacity magazines.
"AR-15s and [large capacity magazines] are most useful in military
service, they are beyond the scope of the Second Amendment ... and may
be banned," Massachusetts District Court Judge William Young wrote in
his ruling.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/gun-control-second-amendment-ar-15-not-protected-assault-rifles-massachusetts-a8294186.html
--
Bod
The US military doesn't use the AR-15 and AFAIK neither does any other
military. They might have a few for some special purpose, but it's not the
weapon carried by US soldiers, they use the M16/M4 which is full auto. The
judge made a decision using the wrong facts, must be a lib.

Loading...